SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 form a desktop pairing that lands at the 73rd combined percentile, with the CPU far outperforming the GPU. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the fact pack, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct testing.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon RX 7600 is built on the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors and a die size of 204 mm². It carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), while the base GPU clock is 1720 MHz, the game clock is 2250 MHz, and the boost clock reaches 2655 MHz. The chip contains 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray-tracing cores. Pixel fill rate is 169.9 GPixel/s, texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 21.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

Benchmark results place this GPU at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 15171. The closest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM with an average score of 15199 (0.2% slower), the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270 (0.7% slower), the AMD Radeon Pro 560X at 15082 (0.6% faster), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti at 15063 (0.7% faster). In effect, the RX 7600 sits in a tight cluster of mid-range cards; it is marginally behind the RTX 3050 OEM and the Radeon 680M, and slightly ahead of the older Radeon Pro 560X and GTX 660 Ti. The 8 GB VRAM and 288 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p texture-heavy workloads but will become a constraint at higher resolutions or with demanding RT effects. The 32 RT cores support ray tracing, but the modest FP32 throughput (21.75 TFLOPS) suggests that ray-traced scenes will not run at high frame rates without significant upscaling. For rendering workloads, the Passmark G3D score of 16634 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051 indicate a GPU that handles common 3D tasks adequately but is not a compute powerhouse. The Vulkan score of 34401 points to decent low-level API performance, which is useful for modern game engines.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU side of this pairing is substantially stronger. The Intel Core i5-14600 achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 and a single-core score of 4300, while Geekbench reports 14680 multi-core and 2424 single-core. Passmark multi-thread score is 35848 and single-thread is 4167. The CPU's average benchmark score is 44889, placing it at the 89th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i9-12900KS with an average score of 45094 (0.5% faster), the AMD EPYC 4344P at 45122 (0.5% faster), the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D at 44573 (0.7% slower), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at 44466 (1.0% slower). This is a top-tier CPU that edges out or matches high-end previous-generation parts.

The GPU, by contrast, is at the 57th percentile. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2310, Geekbench OpenCL is 88051, Vulkan is 34401, and Passmark G3D is 16634. The combined picture is of a CPU that can feed any modern game at high frame rates, but a GPU that will cap frame rates at lower resolutions or lower detail settings. The CPU is clearly the more capable component in this pair, and the GPU is the bottleneck in most graphics-bound scenarios. The combined percentile of 73 reflects the GPU dragging the CPU down from the 89th to the 73rd overall tier.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows an extreme imbalance: the CPU sits at the 89th percentile while the GPU sits at the 57th. That gap of 32 percentile points means the CPU can handle far more work than the GPU can keep up with in graphics tasks. In gaming, the CPU's high single-thread score (Cinebench R23 single 4300, Passmark single 4167) ensures that frame pacing and draw-call processing are never CPU-limited, even at high refresh rates. The GPU, with a Passmark G3D score of 16634, becomes the limiting factor in most 3D scenes, especially at 1440p or 4K where 8 GB VRAM and 288 GB/s bandwidth will saturate.

For non-graphics workloads, the bottleneck flips. The CPU's multi-thread score of 30464 in Cinebench R23 and Passmark multi-thread of 35848 make it the primary driver for video encoding, compilation, and 3D scene simulation. The GPU, meanwhile, has a Passmark GPU compute score of 8790, which is strong for a mid-range card but not in the same league as the CPU's compute capabilities. In a mixed workload like live streaming while gaming, the CPU's 20 threads can handle both game logic and encoding (via UHD Graphics 770 as a fallback), but the GPU still limits the gaming output. The absence of measured FPS rows for this exact combination forces us to estimate frame rates from these scores, and the estimate is clear: at 1080p high settings, the GPU will be the ceiling; at 720p or with reduced settings, the CPU can push extremely high frame rates.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a high-performance CPU for multi-threaded work but only require a mid-range GPU for graphics. Gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rates will find the CPU far ahead of the GPU, meaning the GPU will hold back the system in many titles, but the CPU will never be the cause of stutter. Content creators who edit video, compile code, or run simulations will benefit from the CPU's 89th-percentile performance, and the GPU can handle moderate graphics tasks such as timeline preview and light effects. Software developers working on multi-threaded builds will see the CPU's 20 threads and high Passmark integer math score of 117078, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM is enough for GUI and basic GPU compute. Students and small-business workstations that run office suites, spreadsheets, and web apps will have a CPU that is far beyond their needs, and the GPU is a fine addition for occasional photo or video work. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 165 W TDP of the GPU mean this build can fit in a standard desktop case with a modest power supply.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 4300 in Cinebench R23 and 4167 in Passmark single-thread ensure it can drive frame rates far above 144 Hz at 1080p, but the GPU's 57th percentile and 8 GB VRAM will limit frame rates in demanding titles. Expect the GPU to be the primary limiter, with CPU headroom to spare.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 make it capable of software encoding while gaming, and the GPU's 32 RT cores and 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 can handle the rendering. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is enough for 1080p streaming with a single screen.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-thread performance is strong, with Passmark multi-thread at 35848 and Geekbench multi-core at 14680, so timeline preview and export will be CPU-bound. The GPU's OpenCL score of 88051 can accelerate effects, but it will not be the primary driver for large projects.

3D rendering: The CPU's high core count and 24 MB L3 cache (shared) make it a good choice for CPU-based renderers. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 GB VRAM limit GPU-accelerated rendering to smaller scenes. The Passmark G3D score of 16634 indicates it can handle medium complexity assets.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 117078 and data encryption score of 25082 show strong performance for compilation and code execution. The GPU is adequate for running multiple monitors and hardware acceleration.

Student and office work: The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a baseline display output, while the discrete GPU is overkill for document editing. The CPU's low 65 W TDP keeps power consumption modest, and the 20 threads handle multitasking with ease.

FAQ

Q: Does this CPU support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-12900KS?

A: The i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44889, which is 0.5% lower than the i9-12900KS at 45094.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the CPU?

A: The i5-14600 boosts to 5.20 GHz.

Q: Is there integrated graphics on the CPU?

A: Yes, the CPU includes Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. It also supports ECC memory and has a 65 W TDP. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The suggested PSU is 450 W for the GPU, and the CPU's 65 W TDP means the total system load is modest. The GPU has a 165 W TDP and uses a single 8-pin power connector. The 8 GB VRAM and 288 GB/s bandwidth are the first upgrade candidates if higher-resolution gaming is needed, but the CPU is already at the 89th percentile and would not need an upgrade for a long time. The socket 1700 supports a range of 12th and 13th generation CPUs, but the fact pack only lists this specific CPU, so no further upgrade options are detailed here. The motherboard must have PCIe 4.0 support for the GPU to reach full bandwidth, though the CPU's PCIe 5.0 lanes are backward compatible.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a 14-core, 20-thread Intel Core i5-14600 with an 8 GB AMD Radeon RX 7600. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 57th percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 73. The CPU is a high-end desktop processor with a 5.20 GHz boost clock and 24 MB of L3 cache, while the GPU is a mid-range card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The pairing is heavily CPU-skewed, meaning the CPU is capable of far more than the GPU can deliver in graphics scenarios. The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that all frame-rate statements are estimates from the benchmark scores, but the percentile gap indicates that the GPU will be the primary limiting factor in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a desktop processor in the Core 14th Gen series, manufactured by Intel on a 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. It has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The TDP is 65 W. The architecture is Raptor Lake, with the codename Raptor Lake-R. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and has ECC memory support. It includes integrated UHD Graphics 770 and uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The CPU is unlocked (multiplierUnlocked: false) and has a part number SRN44. Its release date is 2024-01-07, and its launch MSRP is $255.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performer: Cinebench R23 multi-core is 30464 and single-core is 4300. Geekbench multi-core is 14680 and single-core is 2424. Passmark multi-thread is 35848 and single-thread is 4167. In specialized tests, Passmark integer math reaches 117078, floating point math 85759, and extended instructions 25674. The CPU's average benchmark score is 44889, placing it at the 89th percentile. The nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-12900KS with an average score of 45094 (0.5% faster), while the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573 (0.7% slower). This puts the i5-14600 in the top tier of desktop CPUs, just below the flagship i9-12900KS but above the Ryzen 5 7500X3D. The high single-thread and multi-thread scores indicate a CPU that can handle both high-refresh gaming and demanding multi-threaded workloads such as video encoding, compilation, and 3D rendering.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600

AMD Radeon RX 7600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds