SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a 14th Generation desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that combines performance and efficiency cores to handle both heavily threaded workloads and single-thread responsiveness. The processor operates with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and boosts up to 5.20 GHz, giving it strong peak performance when demand spikes. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache, alongside 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 cache per core, provides substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data, which benefits gaming and productivity applications alike.

Benchmark results place the i5-14600 in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors currently tracked. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 demonstrates serious rendering and computational muscle, while the single-core score of 4300 shows excellent per-thread performance that matters for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The Geekbench multi-core score of 14680 further corroborates strong all-core throughput, and the single-core score of 2424 confirms the processor's ability to execute single-threaded tasks efficiently. In PassMark tests, the processor shows specialized strengths: data compression score of 434620, integer math at 117078, and floating-point math at 85759. Extended instruction score of 25674 and data encryption at 25082 indicate solid cryptographic and SIMD performance, while the find prime numbers score of 155 is notably lower, reflecting a weaker showing in that specific algorithmic workload.

Comparing against nearest rivals, the i5-14600 sits remarkably close to higher-tier processors. It trails the Intel Core i9-12900KS by a marginal -0.5% in average benchmark score, and the AMD EPYC 4344P by the same -0.5%. Against the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, the i5-14600 leads by 0.7%, and it is 1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H. These delta values are tiny, meaning the i5-14600 delivers performance statistically equivalent to those competitors despite often being positioned differently in the market. The average benchmark score of 44889, with an overall CPU average that puts it just 205 points below the i9-12900KS, confirms that this is a high-end mid-range part that punches well above its nominal tier.

FAQ

Q: What is the socket type for the Intel Core i5-14600?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Does the i5-14600 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the processor supports ECC memory, and it also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What integrated graphics does the i5-14600 include?

A: The processor includes Intel UHD Graphics 770 as its integrated GPU.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i5-14600?

A: The launch MSRP is $255.

Q: How does the i5-14600 compare to the Intel Core i9-12900KS in average benchmark score?

A: The i5-14600 trails the i9-12900KS by only -0.5% in average benchmark score, making them effectively performance peers.

Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Core i5-14600?

A: The TDP is 65 watts.

Q: Is the multiplier on the i5-14600 unlocked?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking via multiplier adjustment is not supported.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a stark contrast between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The Intel Core i5-14600 achieves an average benchmark score of 44889, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result that puts it in the upper echelon of desktop processors. The AMD Radeon RX 7400, by contrast, posts an average benchmark score of 2467 and sits in only the 17th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 53, reflecting the fact that the graphics card drags down what would otherwise be an exceptionally high-performing system.

In Cinebench R23, the i5-14600 scores 30464 multi-core and 4300 single-core, numbers that suggest excellent performance in both fully threaded rendering tasks and responsive single-threaded applications. The Cinebench R20 scores of 12794 multi-core and 1806 single-core follow the same pattern, as do the R15 scores of 3070 multi-core and 433 single-core. Geekbench results show 14680 multi-core and 2424 single-core, reinforcing the processor's balanced capabilities.

On the GPU side, the Radeon RX 7400's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1103, which is modest. PassMark DirectX 11 score of 97 and DirectX 12 score of 44 indicate limited graphics throughput, while the DirectX 10 score of 59 and DirectX 9 score of 176 show that legacy APIs perform relatively better. The PassMark G3D score of 11897 and G2D score of 1209 provide additional context, with the GPU compute score of 5152 suggesting that compute workloads are handled with moderate efficiency. The RX 7400's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8040S (1.1% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce 710M (1.4% ahead), Intel HD Graphics 610 (1.8% ahead), and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M (1.9% ahead) — all of which are integrated or low-end discrete solutions, confirming the RX 7400's entry-level positioning.

The combined picture is one of significant imbalance. The CPU is operating at near-flagship levels, while the GPU is performing at the bottom tier. This means the system is capable of extremely fast CPU-bound work like compilation, rendering, and data processing, but graphics-intensive applications will be limited by the GPU's throughput.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600 is built for the Intel Socket 1700 platform, a mature socket that supports a wide range of 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen processors. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility to use either older, more affordable DDR4 modules or newer, faster DDR5 kits. ECC memory support is also present, which is unusual for a consumer-oriented chip and valuable for workstation-style builds that require data integrity. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast connectivity for modern SSDs and graphics cards, although the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The TDP of 65 watts for the CPU is modest, and the GPU's TDP is even lower at 43 watts. The suggested PSU for the entire system is 200 watts, which indicates that this build does not require a high-capacity power supply. This is a low-power pairing that can be cooled by a capable air cooler without exotic solutions. The CPU's 65-watt TDP means thermals are manageable, and the GPU's 43-watt TDP is exceptionally low for a discrete graphics card.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Radeon RX 7400 with a higher-performing GPU. The CPU has enough headroom to drive a significantly more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck, given its 89th percentile standing. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU ensures that future high-bandwidth devices will be accommodated, and the dual memory support means the platform can be configured flexibly. For users who require more multi-core performance, the socket 1700 platform also offers higher-core-count options, though the i5-14600's 14 cores and 20 threads already provide substantial throughput.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i5-14600 combined with the AMD Radeon RX 7400. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this exact pairing, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking and low 3DMark and PassMark DirectX scores indicate that this graphics card is not designed for high-end gaming at demanding settings. The CPU, on the other hand, is more than capable of feeding frames, with a 89th percentile ranking and strong single-core performance.

Estimated gaming performance for this pairing would be modest at best. At 1080p with ultra settings, the RX 7400 would likely struggle to maintain high frame rates in modern AAA titles, given its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 and PassMark G3D score of 11897. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p textures but may be limiting at higher resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs. The 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 257.6 GTexel/s texture rate provide some indication of the card's raw capabilities, but these are modest figures compared to mid-range and high-end cards.

At 1080p with lower settings, the RX 7400 could deliver playable frame rates for esports titles and older games, but users should not expect high-refresh-rate experiences in demanding games. The CPU's strength in single-core performance, as shown by the R23 single-core score of 4300, means that CPU-bound scenarios in games would not be a limiting factor. The bottleneck in gaming would be almost entirely the GPU. For users prioritizing gaming, this pairing is only suitable for light or legacy gaming, and the GPU should be considered a placeholder for a more capable card.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for users who need exceptional CPU performance but have minimal graphics requirements. The Intel Core i5-14600 is a high-end processor at the 89th percentile, making it an excellent choice for software developers who compile code, data analysts who process large datasets, and content creators who work with CPU-intensive applications like video encoding or 3D rendering. The PassMark integer math score of 117078 and floating-point math score of 85759 indicate strong computational throughput for these workloads.

Students and small business workstations that run office productivity suites, web applications, and database tasks would benefit from the CPU's responsiveness, as the single-core performance is top-tier. The processor's low TDP of 65 watts and the GPU's 43-watt TDP mean this system can be built in a compact chassis with a modest power supply, making it suitable for environments where space and power efficiency are priorities.

However, gamers should not choose this build for serious gaming. The RX 7400 sits at the 17th percentile, and its performance rivals are integrated graphics solutions like the Intel HD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA GeForce 710M. For gaming at 1080p with high settings, a more powerful GPU would be necessary. The target audience is therefore CPU-centric users: developers, researchers, and professionals who require fast processing for multi-threaded tasks and do not rely on discrete graphics performance for their daily work.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not well served by this pairing. The RX 7400's 17th percentile ranking and low DirectX 12 score of 44 mean that high frame rates at high settings are not achievable in modern titles. The CPU's strong single-core score of 4300 in R23 would support high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU would be the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 89th percentile ranking, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark data encryption score of 25082 indicates the processor can handle encoding workloads efficiently. However, the GPU's limited graphics performance means that streaming games at high quality would be difficult, as the game itself would run poorly.

Video editing: The i5-14600 excels here with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 and PassMark multithread score of 35848. Video editing software that leverages multi-core CPUs will see strong performance. The GPU's compute score of 5152 may provide some acceleration for effects, but the CPU is the primary workhorse.

3D rendering: Rendering is CPU-bound, and this processor delivers with R20 multi-core score of 12794 and R15 multi-core score of 3070. The RX 7400's limited compute performance means GPU-accelerated rendering would be slow, but CPU rendering would be fast, making this a viable option for CPU-based renderers.

Software development: The i5-14600 is ideal for compilation tasks. The PassMark integer math score of 117078 and data compression score of 434620 indicate rapid code compilation and data processing. The 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-core performance keeps interactive development tools responsive.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for typical office tasks, but the CPU's responsiveness makes it pleasant for multitasking. The low power draw of both components (65 W CPU, 43 W GPU) means the system runs cool and quiet, which is beneficial in shared spaces. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could even handle basic display output if the discrete GPU is not needed.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-14600, a 14th Gen Raptor Lake processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 7400, an entry-level RDNA 3.0 graphics card from the RX 7000 series. The CPU is a high-end mid-range part that performs at the 89th percentile across all CPUs, while the GPU is an entry-level solution at the 17th percentile. The combined percentile of 53 reflects this imbalance, placing the overall system squarely in the middle of all tracked configurations.

The build class is desktop, and the components are physically compatible: the CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is supported by the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The system's overall tier is mid-range due to the GPU's low standing, despite the CPU's high performance. This is a system that prioritizes processing power over graphics capability, making it a workstation-class CPU paired with a basic display adapter.

The RX 7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores, with a boost clock of 2300 MHz and a game clock of 2200 MHz. The GPU's 43-watt TDP and 200-watt suggested PSU make it an extremely power-efficient addition, but its performance is constrained, as evidenced by its nearest rivals being integrated graphics.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance in this pairing is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The i5-14600 operates at the 89th percentile, while the RX 7400 sits at the 17th percentile — a gap of 72 percentile points. In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data processing, and 3D rendering, the system performs exceptionally well, with the CPU delivering near-flagship results. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 and Geekbench multi-core score of 14680 confirm that the processor is not a limiting factor in any compute-heavy scenario.

In GPU-bound workloads, the RX 7400 is the clear bottleneck. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 and PassMark G3D score of 11897 are low, and the GPU's performance rivals are integrated graphics solutions. Any task that relies on the GPU — gaming, GPU-accelerated rendering, video encoding with hardware encoders — will be severely constrained. The CPU will frequently sit idle waiting for the GPU to catch up in graphics-intensive scenarios, meaning the system's overall responsiveness in such tasks will feel entry-level despite the powerful processor.

The FPS scaling, where no measured data exists, would be entirely dictated by the GPU. Even if the CPU could push hundreds of frames per second, the RX 7400 would cap the output at much lower levels. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like integer math (PassMark score of 117078) or data compression (434620), the GPU has no role, and the system performs at a high level. Users should therefore match this CPU with a far more capable GPU if they intend to run graphics-intensive applications; otherwise, the RX 7400 will remain the permanent performance ceiling.