SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + AMD Radeon RX 6800

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800

30,095 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14600 + AMD Radeon RX 6800 — Desktop Build Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 14th-generation mid-range desktop processor with AMD's RDNA 2 flagship-tier graphics card from the RX 6000 series. The CPU sits in the 89th percentile of all processors tested, while the GPU lands in the 75th percentile of all graphics cards, placing the overall combination in the 82nd percentile. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores rather than observed in-game results.

Gaming Performance

Because there is no measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU pairing, the frame-rate expectations must be derived from the underlying benchmark performance of each component. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 22067 places it at the 75th percentile among all graphics cards, a position that historically supports smooth 1440p gaming and reasonable 4K performance in less demanding titles. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4300 and Geekbench single-core score of 2424 indicate strong per-thread performance, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates in games that rely heavily on a single primary thread.

The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample memory capacity and throughput for modern game assets at high resolutions, including high-resolution texture packs that frequently exceed 8 GB of VRAM. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3188 reflects the GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate capabilities, and the architecture supports hardware ray tracing through 60 dedicated RT cores, though the RDNA 2 implementation is typically less performant in ray-traced workloads than the rasterized rendering that this card excels at.

For esports and competitive titles played at 1080p, the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with its 5.20 GHz boost clock, should keep frame rates high even when the GPU is not fully saturated. The single-thread performance, evidenced by the PassMark single-thread score of 4167, ensures that CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions do not become a limiting factor. At 1440p, the GPU's 16.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 505.2 GTexel/s texture rate suggest the pairing is well matched for high-refresh-rate monitors in most titles, with the GPU becoming the primary determinant of frame rates as resolution increases.

At 4K, the GPU's 202.1 GPixel/s pixel rate and 16 GB memory capacity will handle the workload, but the 75th percentile position indicates that ultra settings with maximum details will likely require adjustments in the most demanding AAA releases. The combined 82nd percentile for the pairing suggests a system that delivers a consistently playable experience at high settings across 1080p and 1440p, with 4K being viable in less demanding or well-optimized games.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 44889 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core i9-12900KS at 45094, a mere 0.5 percent difference. This proximity is remarkable because the i5-14600 is a mid-range part outperforming a previous-generation flagship by a negligible margin. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D trails by 0.7 percent with a score of 44573, while the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is 1 percent behind at 44466. The AMD EPYC 4344P matches closely at 45122, also within 0.5 percent.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 30095 places it in the 75th percentile, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti scoring 29945, just 0.5 percent behind. The RTX 5070 Mobile sits at 29928, 0.6 percent lower, and the RTX 2080 Ti is 1 percent behind at 29783. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 leads this group by 1.1 percent at 30433. This clustering indicates that the RX 6800 competes directly with NVIDIA's upper-mid-range cards from multiple generations, offering performance that has remained competitive over time.

The combined picture shows a CPU that punches above its class and a GPU that sits solidly in the upper-middle tier. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking against all processors is a stronger position than the GPU's 75th percentile ranking against all graphics cards, suggesting that the processor has more headroom relative to its peers than the graphics card does. The combined percentile of 82 reflects a system where the CPU is slightly overqualified relative to the GPU, but not so mismatched that it creates obvious imbalance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals an interesting balance dynamic. The CPU's 89th percentile position versus the GPU's 75th percentile indicates that in most gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput becomes the dominant constraint. The GPU's 202.1 GPixel/s pixel rate and 505.2 GTexel/s texture rate define the ceiling for rasterization-heavy tasks, and the CPU's strong single-thread performance means it can feed the GPU without becoming a bottleneck in typical game scenarios.

However, the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities — a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 14680 — are substantial, and in CPU-intensive workloads such as physics simulation, the PassMark physics score of 2330 indicates robust performance. The FPS scaling between resolutions would likely show the GPU's influence growing as resolution increases, with the CPU becoming less relevant at 4K where the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth dominate.

The CPU's 65 W TDP compared to the GPU's 250 W TDP highlights the power distribution, with the graphics card drawing substantially more power and therefore having more thermal and power headroom to sustain its performance. The PassMark data compression score of 434620 and encryption score of 25082 suggest that the CPU handles compute-heavy tasks efficiently, while the GPU's compute score of 10864 indicates strong parallel processing for graphics-adjacent workloads. In mixed workloads such as gaming with streaming, the CPU's 20 threads provide enough capacity for both game logic and encoding tasks without significant contention.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize 1440p high-refresh-rate gaming, where the GPU's 16 GB memory and the CPU's strong single-thread performance combine to deliver smooth frame rates in most titles. The 75th percentile GPU position and 89th percentile CPU position indicate a system that handles modern game requirements without requiring frequent upgrades. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-core strength, evidenced by the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12794 and PassMark multi-thread score of 35848, while the GPU's compute capabilities accelerate rendering tasks.

Software developers compiling large codebases will find the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads valuable, with the PassMark integer math score of 117078 and extended instructions score of 25674 indicating strong performance for computation-heavy workloads. Students and small business users building workstations will appreciate the CPU's ECC memory support, a feature typically reserved for server platforms, combined with the GPU's capability to handle both professional applications and occasional gaming. The system's desktop class and 82nd combined percentile make it a versatile choice for users who need one machine capable of handling diverse workloads without compromising on gaming performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It features a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps power requirements modest. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample fast memory for both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a CPU that excels in both single-thread and multi-thread performance. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4300 and multi-core score of 30464 demonstrate strong performance across the board, with the multi-core result being particularly impressive given the 65 W TDP. The Geekbench scores of 2424 single-core and 14680 multi-core corroborate this, and the PassMark single-thread score of 4167 confirms that the architecture's high boost clock translates into real-world performance gains.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support adding reliability for workstation use. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes for the CPU provides high bandwidth for storage and GPU connectivity. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers basic display output capabilities, though the discrete GPU in this pairing makes it largely redundant for gaming. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking, with an average benchmark score of 44889, places it competitively against processors from higher tiers, as evidenced by its near-identical score to the i9-12900KS.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 82, based on the CPU's 89th percentile ranking and the GPU's 75th percentile ranking.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900KS?

A: The i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44889, while the i9-12900KS scores 45094, making the difference only 0.5 percent in favor of the i9.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600 supports ECC memory, a feature often associated with server or workstation platforms.

Q: What is the GPU's score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The GPU scores 3188 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark test.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RX 6800 has an average benchmark score of 30095, while the RTX 3070 Ti scores 29945, putting the AMD card 0.5 percent ahead.

Q: What process node is the CPU built on?

A: The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm².

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on budget and performance priorities. The dual-channel memory bus allows for adequate bandwidth for most workloads, though users seeking maximum memory performance would opt for DDR5 modules. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, enabling high-speed connectivity for next-generation GPUs and NVMe storage devices.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and has a 250 W TDP, with the suggested PSU rated at 600 W, leaving headroom for additional components. The 2x 8-pin power connectors provide a stable power delivery mechanism, and the dual-slot design with dimensions of 267 mm length, 120 mm height, and 40 mm width ensures compatibility with most mid-tower cases. A sensible next upgrade would involve the GPU, as the CPU's 89th percentile position indicates it has more headroom for future graphics cards. The CPU's 65 W TDP means the platform has substantial power budget for a more powerful GPU without requiring a PSU upgrade.

The socket 1700 platform supports the 14th generation Core series, and users could potentially upgrade to a higher-tier processor within the same generation for additional multi-threaded performance. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that builders can choose to carry over existing DDR4 modules or invest in newer DDR5 for improved bandwidth. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU provides future-proofing for storage devices, though the GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface is sufficient for current graphics workloads.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-14600 with the AMD Radeon RX 6800, creating a system that ranks in the 82nd percentile overall. The CPU's 89th percentile position among all processors makes it a standout component, while the GPU's 75th percentile position places it solidly in the upper-middle tier of graphics cards. The combination is well-suited for a mainstream desktop that prioritizes gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with capabilities extending into content creation and productivity workloads.

The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample parallelism for multi-threaded applications, while the 5.20 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded performance. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth offer substantial memory resources for high-resolution gaming and compute tasks. The system's 65 W CPU TDP and 250 W GPU TDP together suggest a power requirement that is manageable for most ATX power supplies, with the suggested 600 W PSU providing comfortable headroom.

The build class is desktop, confirming this is a traditional tower or similar form factor system rather than a laptop or compact format. The overall tier, based on the 82nd combined percentile, places this system above the majority of configurations, with the CPU being the stronger component relative to its peers. This pairing represents a balanced mid-to-high-end desktop that delivers strong performance across gaming and productivity without reaching the extreme high end where costs escalate significantly.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is built on the Navi 21 chip using TSMC's 7 nm process, with 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die. The RDNA 2.0 architecture provides 3840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, delivering a pixel rate of 202.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 505.2 GTexel/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 1815 MHz, and a boost clock of 2105 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for 1440p and 4K gaming, especially with high-resolution texture packs. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. The 60 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the RDNA 2 implementation is generally considered less efficient than NVIDIA's equivalent offerings.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 22067 in PassMark G3D, 10864 in PassMark GPU Compute, and 3188 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Geekbench scores of 24508 in OpenCL, 115107 in Vulkan, and 153635 in Metal show strong compute performance across different APIs. The 75th percentile ranking, with an average score of 30095, places it just 0.5 percent ahead of the RTX 3070 Ti and 1.1 percent behind the RX 6700, indicating that this GPU remains competitive despite being from the previous generation. The 16.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 32.33 TFLOPS of FP16 compute (2:1 ratio) make it capable for both gaming and compute workloads, while the 96 ROPs ensure efficient pixel processing at high resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 89th percentile single-thread performance, evidenced by the 4300 Cinebench R23 single-core score, ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, while the GPU's 75th percentile position supports 1440p gaming at high refresh rates in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads provide sufficient capacity for encoding while gaming, with the PassMark multi-thread score of 35848 indicating that simultaneous game and stream workloads are handled without significant performance degradation.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core strength (Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12794) accelerates rendering and export tasks, while the GPU's 16 GB memory and compute capabilities (10864 PassMark GPU Compute) assist with effects and color grading.

3D rendering: The GPU's 16.17 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 60 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for both rasterized and ray-traced rendering, while the CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and high multi-thread scores handle scene complexity and geometry processing.

Software development: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, along with the PassMark integer math score of 117078 and extended instructions score of 25674, indicate strong compilation performance and capability for running virtual machines or containers.

Student and office work: The system's 82nd combined percentile represents a powerful desktop that handles document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing with ease, while the CPU's ECC memory support provides reliability for important academic or business data.