SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

27,425 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600 and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT form a desktop pairing that sits at the 81st percentile among all combined builds. The CPU achieves an 89th percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU holds a 72nd percentile position among all graphics cards. This configuration represents a high-midrange desktop platform where the processor significantly outpaces the graphics card in relative standing, a dynamic that shapes performance across every workload.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 22 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process with 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2321 MHz, a boost clock of 2581 MHz, and a game clock of 2424 MHz. Memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed across a 192-bit bus, yielding 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer.

The rendering pipeline includes 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. Pixel throughput is rated at 165.2 GPixel/s, while texture fill hits 413.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance reaches 13.21 TFLOPS for FP32 and 26.43 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU includes 40 ray accelerators for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though it has no dedicated tensor cores — a distinction from NVIDIA alternatives that rely on such hardware for AI-accelerated workloads.

Benchmark results place this GPU in a specific performance band. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test returns a score of 2435. Geekbench results show 130896 for Metal, 44152 for OpenCL, and 93500 for Vulkan. Passmark scores include 19786 for G3D, 9336 for GPU compute, and API-specific results of 242 for DirectX 9, 173 for DirectX 11, and 77 for DirectX 12. The average benchmark score is 27425.

Comparing against nearest rivals, the RX 6700 XT sits within a narrow margin of several notable cards. It matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile with a delta of 0%, trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 by 0.5%, leads the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell by 1.1%, and lags the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 by 1.5%. The data suggests the 6700 XT delivers performance nearly indistinguishable from an RTX 3090 in these aggregate benchmarks, which is notable given the generational and architectural differences — the RDNA 2.0 design achieves this parity through raw throughput rather than tensor-assisted features.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 figure of 13.21 TFLOPS indicates strong raw compute for rasterization, while the 40 ray accelerators provide entry-level RT capability. The 12 GB VRAM with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for high-resolution textures but may constrain heavy 4K rendering scenes. The lack of tensor cores means no dedicated hardware for DLSS-style AI upscaling, relying instead on FSR or other spatial-temporal techniques.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The data is not measured but estimated from benchmark scores, so all frame rate discussions below are qualitative projections based on the relative performance of the components, not observed gameplay results.

The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking and its near-parity with the RTX 3090 in aggregate benchmarks suggest strong 1080p and 1440p capability. The CPU's 89th percentile position ensures the processor will not typically bottleneck the GPU at these resolutions. The 12 GB VRAM frame buffer is ample for modern game textures at 1440p, and the 384.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution asset streaming.

At 1080p, the combination of the i5-14600's high single-thread performance and the RX 6700 XT's raw rasterization power should deliver high frame rates in esports titles and demanding AAA games alike. The CPU's 4300 Cinebench R23 single-core score indicates excellent per-thread performance, which drives high minimum frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's 165.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 413.0 GTexel/s texture rate suggest efficient handling of fill-rate-heavy effects at this resolution.

At 1440p, the workload shifts toward the GPU, and the RX 6700 XT's 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 throughput should maintain solid performance. The 192-bit memory bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth may become a limiting factor in bandwidth-sensitive titles, but the 12 GB capacity prevents capacity-related stuttering. The GPU's performance parity with the RTX 3090 in benchmarks implies that where the RTX 3090 delivers high frame rates, the 6700 XT should be in a similar range, though the 3090's larger memory bus gives it an edge in extreme bandwidth scenarios.

At 4K, the RX 6700 XT will likely require reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates. The 72nd percentile GPU ranking places it below the top tier, and the memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s is modest for 4K workloads. Ray tracing at any resolution will be limited by the 40 RT cores, so games with heavy RT effects will see significant performance drops compared to rasterized rendering.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44889, placing it 0.5% behind the Intel Core i9-12900KS (45094) and 0.5% behind the AMD EPYC 4344P (45122). It leads the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573) by 0.7% and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466) by 1%.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT?

A: The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does the RX 6700 XT have tensor cores?

A: No, the RX 6700 XT has no tensor cores. It includes 40 ray accelerators for ray tracing but relies on standard shading units (2560) for compute, with no dedicated AI acceleration hardware.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and die size?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090?

A: The RX 6700 XT has an average benchmark score of 27425, which is 0.5% below the RTX 3090's score of 27565. This places the two within a negligible performance margin in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The build holds an 81st percentile ranking among all combined CPU+GPU pairs. The CPU alone ranks at the 89th percentile, while the GPU ranks at the 72nd percentile.

Q: What memory types does the i5-14600 support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer desktop processors.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The i5-14600 ranks at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 6700 XT sits at the 72nd percentile among GPUs. This 17-percentage-point gap indicates the processor has significantly more headroom than the graphics card can utilize.

In CPU-bound workloads, the processor will be the limiting factor only in highly multithreaded scenarios that exceed 14 cores and 20 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30464 demonstrates strong parallel throughput, but the GPU's lower relative standing means most gaming workloads will be GPU-limited once resolution increases past 1080p. At 1080p with lower graphical settings, the CPU's single-thread performance (4300 in Cinebench R23 single-core) can drive very high frame rates, potentially outpacing what the GPU can render.

The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking versus the CPU's 89th percentile means the graphics card is the bottleneck in graphically intensive tasks. The 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth are midrange figures, while the CPU's floating-point math score of 85759 in Passmark indicates substantial compute capability. In rendering or compute workloads that use both components, the GPU will finish its portion of the work slower than the CPU processes its tasks.

For gaming at 1440p and above, the RX 6700 XT becomes the clear performance limiter. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU without stalling, but the GPU's raw throughput caps the achievable frame rates. The FPS scaling between resolutions will follow the GPU's performance curve rather than the CPU's, meaning that users upgrading from a weaker CPU will see minimal gains unless they also upgrade the GPU.

The 65W TDP of the CPU versus the 230W TDP of the GPU further illustrates this dynamic. The GPU consumes over three times the power of the CPU, indicating where the system's thermal and power budget is concentrated. This is typical for gaming builds, but the performance percentile gap suggests a more balanced pairing would pair the i5-14600 with a higher-tier GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows strong all-around performance. Cinebench R15 multicore scores 3070 with single-core at 433. Cinebench R20 multicore reaches 12794 with single-core at 1806. Cinebench R23 multicore hits 30464 with single-core at 4300. Geekbench multicore scores 14680 with single-core at 2424. Passmark results include multithread at 35848, single-thread at 4167, integer math at 117078, floating-point math at 85759, and data compression at 434620.

The GPU's benchmark results are more varied. 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 2435. Geekbench scores are 130896 for Metal, 44152 for OpenCL, and 93500 for Vulkan. Passmark G3D scores 19786, GPU compute scores 9336, and DirectX API tests show 124 for DX10, 173 for DX11, 77 for DX12, and 242 for DX9.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU operates near the top tier of desktop processors — its 89th percentile ranking places it among the best available — while the GPU operates in the upper-midrange. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-12900KS, which it trails by only 0.5%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, which it leads by 0.7%. The GPU's nearest rivals include the RTX 3090, which it trails by 0.5%, and the RTX 4070 Mobile, which it exactly matches.

The average benchmark score of 44889 for the CPU and 27425 for the GPU reflects this disparity. The CPU's score is approximately 64% higher than the GPU's, though these are different types of benchmarks and not directly comparable. What matters is the percentile positions: the CPU is 17 points higher than the GPU, indicating the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread performance (4300 in Cinebench R23 single-core) and the GPU's 165.2 GPixel/s pixel rate support high frame rates at 1080p. The 89th percentile CPU ranking ensures minimal bottleneck in esports titles, though the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking may cap maximum FPS in demanding games.

Streaming: The 14-core, 20-thread CPU provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30464 indicates the processor can handle simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding without significant frame drops. The GPU lacks dedicated tensor cores for AI-based encoding, so CPU-based x264 encoding is the primary option.

Video editing: The CPU's multithreaded performance (35848 in Passmark multithread) and the GPU's 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 throughput accelerate timeline rendering and effects. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K video preview, though the lack of tensor cores limits AI-assisted editing features.

3D rendering: The CPU's 30464 Cinebench R23 multicore score handles CPU-based rendering efficiently. The GPU's 26.43 TFLOPS FP16 performance supports GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 12 GB VRAM may constrain very large scenes. The 40 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced renders in supported applications.

Software development: The CPU's 20 threads and high single-core performance (2424 Geekbench single-core) handle compilation and code analysis efficiently. The 434620 Passmark data compression score aids in build artifact handling. The GPU is less relevant for development workloads unless running CUDA-accelerated tests, which this AMD card does not support.

Student and office work: The CPU's 89th percentile ranking ensures responsive multitasking across office applications, web browsing, and document processing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU handles any graphics-accelerated tasks. The 65W CPU TDP keeps power consumption moderate for daily use.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers at 1080p and 1440p who prioritize high frame rates in rasterized games. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking and near-parity with the RTX 3090 in benchmarks indicate strong performance for these resolutions, while the CPU's 89th percentile ranking ensures no processor bottleneck. Gamers who play esports titles at 1080p with competitive settings will benefit most from the CPU's single-thread performance.

Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads valuable for multithreaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30464 supports efficient rendering, while the GPU's FP32 throughput of 13.21 TFLOPS accelerates GPU-accelerated effects. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most editing projects but may limit extreme 4K or 8K timelines.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's high Passmark multithread score of 35848 and data compression score of 434620. The 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the CPU's 89th percentile ranking means it outperforms most processors in compilation tasks. The GPU is less critical for development but provides acceleration for GPU compute experiments.

Students and small business workstations will find this build over-specified for typical office tasks but capable of handling any graphics or compute workloads they encounter. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking ensures longevity for several years of software evolution, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM future-proofs against increasing texture sizes. The desktop form factor from the build class allows for future upgrades.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-14600 with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture with Raptor Lake-R codename. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with a 65W TDP. The GPU is an AMD Radeon RX 6000 series card with the Navi 22 chip, featuring 12 GB GDDR6 memory and a 230W TDP.

The combined percentile ranking of 81 places this build above most CPU+GPU pairs, indicating strong overall performance. The CPU's 89th percentile is notably higher than the GPU's 72nd percentile, making this a CPU-heavy build where the processor outpaces the graphics card. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $255, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 479 USD.

The build's tier is upper-midrange, driven primarily by the CPU's high standing. The GPU, while not top-tier, delivers performance competitive with much more expensive cards like the RTX 3090 in aggregate benchmarks. This makes the pairing well-suited for users who need strong CPU performance for productivity tasks while maintaining solid gaming capability.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The 65W CPU TDP and 230W GPU TDP suggest a suggested PSU of 550 W, which provides adequate headroom for the base configuration.

The first sensible upgrade for this build is the GPU. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking has significant headroom above the GPU's 72nd percentile, meaning a higher-tier graphics card would be immediately utilized without CPU bottleneck. Upgrading to a GPU in the 90th percentile or above would better balance the system, leveraging the CPU's strong single-thread and multithread performance.

Memory upgrades are also viable. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so users on DDR4 can transition to DDR5 for higher bandwidth, though the practical gains depend on the workload. The 24 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache benefit from faster memory access.

The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide future-proofing for next-generation storage and peripherals. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is fully compatible but does not utilize the Gen 5 bandwidth. A future GPU upgrade to a PCIe 5.0 card would take advantage of the CPU's lanes, though current GPUs do not saturate PCIe 4.0 x16 bandwidth.

The power delivery system, with a 550 W suggested PSU, has limited headroom for significant component upgrades. A higher-TDP GPU (above 230W) or a more power-hungry CPU would require a PSU upgrade. The 65W CPU TDP leaves room for overclocking headroom, though the multiplier is locked, preventing manual overclocking.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. It operates with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The processor is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3.

Benchmark results show strong performance across all tests. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 30464, with single-core at 4300. Geekbench multicore scores 14680 with single-core at 2424. Passmark multithread scores 35848, single-thread scores 4167, integer math scores 117078, floating-point math scores 85759, and data compression scores 434620. The average benchmark score is 44889.

The CPU's 89th percentile ranking places it among the top processors available. It trails the Intel Core i9-12900KS by only 0.5% in average score, indicating performance parity with a previous-generation flagship. It leads the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D by 0.7%, showing competitive performance against AMD's gaming-focused X3D parts. The data encryption score of 25082 and extended instructions score of 25674 in Passmark demonstrate strong cryptography and SIMD performance.

The 14 cores and 20 threads provide excellent multithreaded performance for productivity workloads, while the high boost clock of 5.20 GHz delivers strong single-thread performance for gaming and lightly threaded applications. The 24 MB shared L3 cache aids in data-heavy workloads, and the ECC memory support is unusual for consumer processors, appealing to entry-level workstation users. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output and hardware acceleration when the discrete GPU is not in use, though the Raptor Lake architecture does not include the AI accelerators found in newer Intel Core Ultra parts.

The real-world implication is that this CPU punches above its i5 designation, delivering performance competitive with previous-generation i9 parts. The 30464 Cinebench R23 multicore score indicates it can handle demanding productivity tasks, while the 4300 single-core score ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday use. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking means it outperforms 89% of all processors, making it a strong foundation for any desktop build.