SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14500T

28,065 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14500T paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a highly specialized desktop configuration that prioritizes compute density and professional-grade graphics over raw gaming frame rates. The data shows a stark contrast between a power-sipping 35 W CPU and a workstation-class GPU with a 250 W TDP, resulting in a system that excels in content creation, AI, and scientific workloads but requires careful consideration for gaming and general use. The combined percentile of 89 places this build firmly in the top tier of all systems, but the absence of measured gaming data means its real-world gaming performance is an estimate based solely on the synthetic benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the dominant component in this build, and the benchmark data confirms its position as a top-tier compute monster. It sits at the 98th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 184,664. This places it in direct competition with data-center accelerators: it is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, only 1.3% behind the A100 SXM4 40 GB, and 1.4% ahead of the newer RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. The most telling comparison is against the consumer flagship GeForce RTX 4090 D, which this card outperforms by 3.7% in the aggregate benchmark.

The raw specifications underline why this is a rendering powerhouse. The GPU is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm TSMC process, housing 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. It features 12,800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. The memory subsystem is particularly strong: 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is essential for large datasets and high-resolution textures. Clock speeds are a base of 1155 MHz with a boost of 2550 MHz, and the memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The compute rates are staggering: 65.28 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), a pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s.

For ray tracing and AI acceleration, the hardware is fully featured. It includes 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, making it highly capable for real-time ray tracing and denoising tasks. The API support is current, with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The benchmark scores support the hardware claims: it scores 175,286 in Geekbench OpenCL and 194,041 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Vulkan score being higher than OpenCL suggests strong driver optimization for cross-platform rendering workloads. For 3D rendering specifically, the combination of high FP32 throughput and massive memory bandwidth means that both GPU-accelerated rasterization and compute-based ray tracing (like those in Blender or Octane) will see substantial performance, likely outpacing the consumer-oriented RTX 4090 D in professional scenes that utilize more than 24 GB of memory.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: This is the weakest scenario for this build. While the GPU is extremely fast, the CPU's low TDP of 35 W and base clock of 1.70 GHz suggest potential bottlenecking in CPU-bound titles. The GPU's 3.7% lead over the RTX 4090 D in synthetic benchmarks does not guarantee high-refresh 1080p or 1440p gaming, as frame rates at those resolutions often depend more on the processor. The lack of measured FPS data means this is an estimate, but the CPU's single-core Passmark score of 3736 is not top-tier, which may limit 240 Hz or 360 Hz gaming scenarios.

Streaming: The hardware is well-equipped for streaming. The GPU's 400 tensor cores can handle NVENC encoding offload, freeing CPU resources. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads with a Passmark multithread score of 22,910 provide enough headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming software. The RTX 5000 Ada's 32 GB VRAM is overkill for streaming, but the high compute power ensures that any encoding filters or overlays will have minimal performance impact.

Video Editing: This is a strong use case. The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects, color grading, and timeline rendering in applications like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Premiere Pro. The 32 GB VRAM is particularly beneficial for 4K and 8K timelines with heavy color correction, as large preview buffers will not spill over into system memory. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11,790 helps with video encoding tasks, but the GPU will handle most of the heavy lifting.

3D Rendering: This is the primary use case. The combination of the CPU's 14 cores and the GPU's 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores provides a balanced platform for both CPU-based and GPU-based render engines. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 indicates massive compute throughput for cycles-based rendering. The 576 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures that texture-heavy scenes with high polygon counts are processed efficiently.

Software Development: The CPU's Passmark data encryption score of 15,410 and extended instructions score of 16,043 indicate strong performance for compilation and cryptographic workloads. The 20 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 24 MB of shared L3 cache speeds up data access patterns typical in large codebases. This is a capable development workstation, especially for tasks involving AI model training or simulation, which can leverage the GPU's 400 tensor cores.

Student and Office Work: The system is grossly overqualified for this scenario. The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 2229 is more than sufficient for web browsing and document editing, but the GPU's power draw of 250 W and dual-slot size make this an impractical and inefficient choice for a standard office environment. The 35 W CPU TDP is efficient, but the overall system power requirements are dominated by the GPU.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14500T is a low-power member of the Raptor Lake Refresh family, designed for efficiency rather than raw speed. It has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The architecture is Raptor Lake on a 10 nm process, with a die size of 215 mm². The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration is critical for performance in workloads where data reuse is high, such as database operations and certain scientific simulations.

The benchmark data shows a processor that is competent but not exceptional. It achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11,790 and a single-core score of 1,838. Its Geekbench scores are 11,894 multicore and 2,229 single-core. The average benchmark score is 28,065, placing it at the 80th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE, which scores 28,054, a delta of 0%. The Intel Core i9-12900H is only 0.2% behind, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is 0.2% ahead. These tight deltas indicate that the 14500T is in a highly competitive mid-range segment, offering performance nearly identical to several other solid options.

For real workloads, the CPU's performance is defined by its boost clock of 4.80 GHz and its multi-threading capabilities. The Passmark multithread score of 22,910 supports strong performance in video encoding and 3D scene simulation, but the single-thread score of 3,736 may lag behind higher-clocked desktop parts in lightly-threaded applications. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support, which is a boon for workstation stability. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present but largely irrelevant when a discrete GPU is installed. The 35 W TDP is the defining characteristic; it limits sustained all-core boost clocks but allows for very efficient operation in power-constrained environments.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance here is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The GPU is at the 98th percentile, while the CPU is at the 80th percentile. This 18-point gap suggests that in most GPU-accelerated tasks, the CPU will not be the limiting factor, but in tasks that are highly dependent on single-threaded CPU performance, the processor will hold back the system. For example, in gaming at lower resolutions where frame rates are high, the CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1,838 and Passmark single-thread score of 3,736 are moderate, which may cap the FPS that the powerful GPU can deliver.

In contrast, for GPU-compute workloads like 3D rendering, the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide adequate data feeding, but the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the clear driver of results. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11,790 is respectable, but the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 dwarfs it in terms of raw compute output. The bottleneck shifts depending on the task: in CPU physics simulations, the Passmark physics score of 1,288 is a limiting factor; in texture streaming, the GPU's 576 GB/s bandwidth is the key resource.

The lack of measured FPS data prevents a direct assessment of gaming bottlenecks. However, the pair rank by FPS is null, and the data is not measured, so we must rely on the percentile difference. The GPU's 3.7% lead over the RTX 4090 D suggests it can produce very high frame rates, but the CPU's 80th percentile ranking implies it will not support the absolute highest frame rates in esports titles. The system is best balanced for 4K gaming or high-detail 1440p, where the GPU is the bottleneck, rather than 1080p high-refresh, where the CPU may struggle.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is based on Intel Socket 1700, which is a mature socket with a clear upgrade path. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but the specific motherboard chosen will determine which type is used. The memory bus is dual-channel, and with ECC support, it is a solid foundation for a workstation. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the GPU has sufficient bandwidth, but the CPU's Gen 5 lanes are available for future high-speed NVMe storage.

The power requirements are clear from the data. The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 250 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU alone is 600 W, which provides ample headroom for the entire system. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector. A sensible next upgrade would be to a higher-core-count Raptor Lake CPU on the same socket, such as an i7 or i9 model, which would improve CPU-bound scenarios like gaming and physics simulations. The motherboard's support for DDR5 would also allow for a memory upgrade, which could improve performance in memory-bandwidth-sensitive tasks. However, given that the CPU is already at the 80th percentile, the most impactful upgrade for this system would be adding more storage or a second GPU for NVLink-style compute scaling, though the PCIe lanes might not support that configuration optimally.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination of CPU and GPU. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores, not actual game tests.

Based on the GPU's 98th percentile rank and its 3.7% lead over the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D, the RTX 5000 Ada is expected to deliver extremely high frame rates in most modern titles. The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 100 RT cores suggest it will excel in both rasterized and ray-traced games. At 1440p ultra settings, this GPU should easily surpass 144 FPS in most competitive shooters and maintain above 60 FPS in demanding single-player titles with ray tracing enabled. At 4K ultra, the 32 GB of VRAM ensures that even the most texture-heavy games will not hit memory limits, and the 576 GB/s bandwidth allows for smooth streaming of high-resolution assets.

However, the CPU's 35 W TDP and base clock of 1.70 GHz are a concern for frame pacing. The boost clock of 4.80 GHz is adequate, but the low base clock suggests that sustained all-core loads will cause the processor to throttle to lower frequencies. In CPU-intensive games like strategy titles or simulation games, the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,838 may become the limiting factor, potentially holding frame rates below what the GPU can deliver. The estimated FPS figures are therefore optimistic for GPU-bound scenarios but may be pessimistic for CPU-bound ones. The lack of measured data means these are speculative, but the hardware specifications point to a system that is a 4K gaming beast with potential 1080p weaknesses.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU and GPU present two very different performance profiles. The CPU, Intel Core i5-14500T, has an average benchmark score of 28,065 and is at the 80th percentile of all CPUs. Its key scores include a Cinebench R23 multicore result of 11,790 and a single-core result of 1,838. In Geekbench, it scores 11,894 multicore and 2,229 single-core. The Passmark suite shows a multithread score of 22,910 and a single-thread score of 3,736. The CPU is closely matched with the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (0% delta) and the Intel Core i9-12900H (0.2% delta), indicating it is a solid mid-range performer.

The GPU, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, is a different beast entirely. It has an average benchmark score of 184,664 and is at the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 175,286, and its Vulkan score is 194,041. It is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB and 3.7% ahead of the GeForce RTX 4090 D, making it one of the fastest workstation GPUs available.

The combined picture is one of extreme asymmetry. The system's combined percentile is 89, which is high, but this is driven almost entirely by the GPU. The CPU's 80th percentile is merely average for a modern desktop processor. For compute-heavy workloads, the GPU will dominate the results, making the CPU a secondary component. For general productivity and gaming, the CPU will provide a competent but unremarkable experience. The data shows a system built for one specific purpose: maximum GPU compute power in a workstation form factor, with the CPU serving as a sufficient support component rather than a performance leader.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this system?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 89, indicating it outperforms 89% of all systems in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has an average benchmark score of 28,065, which is essentially identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE's score of 28,054, resulting in a 0% delta.

Q: What is the GPU's advantage over the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation has an average benchmark score of 184,664, which is 3.7% higher than the GeForce RTX 4090 D's score of 178,050.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14500T supports ECC memory, and it can use both DDR4 and DDR5 modules in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 250 W. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 600 W.

Q: Are there measured FPS data for this system?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This system is for professionals who prioritize GPU compute above all else. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation, with its 98th percentile ranking and 32 GB VRAM, is the primary selling point. It is designed for 3D artists and animators working with complex scenes that exceed 16 GB of VRAM, as the 576 GB/s bandwidth will handle large textures and high-polygon models without swapping to system memory. The 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance is ideal for GPU-accelerated render engines like Octane or Redshift, where the 3.7% lead over the RTX 4090 D in synthetic benchmarks translates to faster iteration times.

Data scientists and AI researchers will benefit from the 400 tensor cores, which accelerate model training and inference. The CPU's support for ECC memory ensures data integrity during long-running calculations, and its 14 cores provide adequate throughput for data preprocessing. The 35 W TDP of the CPU is a boon for multi-GPU or dense server environments where power and heat are constraints.

The system is also suitable for video editors working in 8K, as the 32 GB VRAM allows for full-resolution previews without proxy files. However, it is not recommended for gamers seeking high-refresh 1080p performance, as the CPU's 80th percentile ranking may bottleneck the GPU at low resolutions. Similarly, it is overkill for office work or students, where the cost of the GPU is not justified by the required performance. The target user is a professional in a GPU-compute-heavy field who needs the absolute best in workstation graphics and treats the CPU as a supporting component, not a primary driver.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14500T

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

FAQ

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds