SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14500T

28,065 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14500T is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It pairs a 1.70 GHz base clock with a 4.80 GHz boost clock, operating within a 35 W TDP envelope. This low-power design, combined with the 10 nm process node from Intel, positions the chip as an efficiency-oriented part rather than a raw-performance flagship. The cache hierarchy is substantial for a mainstream part: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, along with ECC memory, which is notable for workstation-adjacent tasks. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the presence of a discrete GPU in this build makes it largely irrelevant for performance.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that sits comfortably in the upper-middle tier. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,790 and single-core score of 1,838 indicate solid throughput for threaded workloads, though the 35 W TDP cap is evident in the multi-core result when compared to higher-power 14th-gen parts. Geekbench scores of 11,894 multi-core and 2,229 single-core corroborate this picture. The PassMark suite shows balanced performance: 22,910 in multithread, 3,736 in single-thread, 80,922 in integer math, and 58,869 in floating-point math. The data compression score of 262,417 and encryption score of 15,410 suggest the chip handles data-intensive tasks competently, while the extended instructions score of 16,043 indicates solid SIMD throughput. The find prime numbers score of 81 is modest, reflecting the power-constrained nature of the chip under sustained all-core loads.

The percentile ranking of 80 versus all CPUs places this processor ahead of a significant majority of the market. Its average benchmark score of 28,065 puts it in direct competition with the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28,054, 0% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G (28,032, 0.1% delta), and Intel Core i9-12900H (28,003, 0.2% delta). The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 trails by a negligible 0.2% with a score of 28,128. This clustering means the i5-14500T is effectively performance-equivalent to those rivals within a fraction of a percent. For real workloads, this translates to a processor that handles everyday productivity, compilation tasks, and moderate rendering jobs without complaint, but it will not lead the pack in heavily threaded scenarios where higher-TDP chips have the thermal headroom to stretch their legs.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of a 35 W, 14-core CPU with a 575 W flagship GPU creates an inherent imbalance that the data makes clear. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking versus all CPUs is respectable, but the GPU's 92nd percentile ranking versus all GPUs is elite. This gap suggests the processor will be the limiting factor in many GPU-bound scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions and settings where the CPU must feed frames quickly to the graphics card. The combined percentile of 86 reflects this asymmetry: the system as a whole scores high, but the CPU drags the average down from what the GPU alone could achieve.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,790 is indicative of a chip that can sustain moderate all-core loads, but the 35 W TDP means boost clocks will drop under sustained stress. This directly impacts gaming performance, where frame pacing depends on consistent single-thread performance. The single-core score of 1,838 in R23 is adequate for modern game engines, but not exceptional. In CPU-intensive titles, the i5-14500T will likely bottleneck the RTX 5090, preventing it from reaching its full frame rate potential. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios at high resolutions with ultra settings, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's lower throughput is masked.

The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means bottleneck analysis must rely on the benchmark scores and percentiles. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,736 and multi-thread score of 22,910 suggest the CPU can handle a 60-100 FPS target in most games, but the RTX 5090's capability extends well beyond that range. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 and PassMark G3D score of 39,650 indicate it can push frame rates far beyond what this CPU can feed in CPU-limited scenarios. The data points to a system where the CPU is the bottleneck for high-refresh gaming, while the GPU dominates in resolution-heavy and compute-heavy workloads.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 28,065, placing it at the 80th percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28,054, 0% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G (28,032, 0.1% delta), and Intel Core i9-12900H (28,003, 0.2% delta) — are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the i5-14500T is at the center of a tightly-bunched performance cluster. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 (28,128, -0.2% delta) is equally close. This means that for most CPU-bound tasks, swapping between these processors would yield imperceptible real-world differences.

The GPU, by contrast, posts an average benchmark score of 79,842, ranking at the 92nd percentile of all graphics cards. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79,605, 0.3% delta) and Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (79,396, 0.6% delta), along with the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (78,940, 1.1% delta) and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X (80,959, -1.4% delta). These deltas are small, but the percentile gap between the CPU (80th) and GPU (92nd) is significant. The combined percentile of 86 reflects the GPU's dominance in the pairing.

Specific GPU benchmark scores reinforce this picture: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 18,355, Geekbench OpenCL at 334,370, Geekbench Vulkan at 376,728, and PassMark G3D at 39,650. The PassMark GPU compute score of 26,756 indicates strong compute throughput. The GPU's performance is clearly flagship-tier, while the CPU sits in the upper-midrange. The combined benchmark picture is one of a system built around the GPU, with the CPU serving as a capable but not exceptional partner.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as such. The data indicates that gaming performance will be highly dependent on the specific title and resolution.

Based on the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,838 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,736, the i5-14500T can drive moderate frame rates in CPU-bound games. The multi-core score of 11,790 in R23 suggests it can handle modern game engines that utilize multiple threads, but the 35 W TDP will limit sustained boost clocks during long gaming sessions. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355 and PassMark G3D score of 39,650 indicate that at 4K resolution with ultra settings, the RTX 5090 will be the dominant factor, and the CPU will rarely be the limiting component. At 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates, however, the CPU is more likely to constrain frame rates, particularly in esports titles or games with heavy physics simulations.

For demanding single-player titles at 4K ultra, the estimate is that the RTX 5090 will deliver very high frame rates, likely well above 60 FPS in most cases, with the CPU providing adequate support. For competitive titles at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance may cap frame rates in the 100-150 FPS range, which is still playable but leaves GPU headroom on the table. These figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results, and real-world performance will vary by title and settings.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14500T has an average benchmark score of 28,065, which is within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28,054), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G (28,032), and Intel Core i9-12900H (28,003), and 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 (28,128).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The RTX 5090 ranks at the 92nd percentile versus all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79,842.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i5-14500T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile of the CPU and GPU pairing is 86, reflecting the GPU's higher individual percentile (92) versus the CPU's 80.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this build?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates based on benchmark scores.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is the centerpiece of this build, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process node from TSMC. The GB202 chip contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, with a transistor density of 122.9 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem is massive: 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. This is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, requiring a single 16-pin power connector.

Compute resources are extensive: 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, 176 raster operation units, 170 ray tracing cores, and 680 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 104.8 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1). The card supports PCIe 5.0 x16 and has display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results confirm flagship status. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355, Geekbench OpenCL score of 334,370, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,728 are all top-tier. PassMark G3D score of 39,650 and GPU compute score of 26,756 further reinforce this. The GPU's average benchmark score of 79,842 places it at the 92nd percentile, with nearest rivals including the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79,605, 0.3% delta) and Radeon RX 6850M XT (78,940, 1.1% delta). For rendering workloads, the 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are particularly significant, allowing large scenes and high-resolution textures to reside entirely in GPU memory. The RT and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated tasks, respectively.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize GPU performance above all else. The 92nd percentile GPU ranking and 32 GB VRAM make it suitable for 4K gaming at ultra settings, where the RTX 5090's raw throughput can be fully utilized. Content creators working with 3D rendering, video editing, or AI workloads will benefit from the GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 680 tensor cores. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking means it handles general productivity tasks competently, though it will not excel in heavily threaded CPU workloads. Software developers compiling large codebases will find the 14 cores and 20 threads adequate, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,790 indicating reasonable compilation times.

Students and small business users building a workstation will appreciate the ECC memory support on the CPU and the GPU's compute capabilities, though the 575 W TDP and 950 W suggested PSU make this a power-hungry system. The 35 W CPU TDP is a contrast, offering efficiency on the processor side while the GPU dominates power consumption. Gamers seeking the absolute highest frame rates at 4K will find the RTX 5090 delivers, but those targeting 1080p high-refresh esports may find the CPU limits performance. This build is best suited for users who know their workloads are GPU-bound and are willing to accept the CPU as a supporting component rather than a star.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The 35 W TDP of the i5-14500T means the motherboard's power delivery is not stressed, leaving ample headroom for a future CPU upgrade to a higher-TDP part within the same socket generation. The GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The suggested PSU for this build is 950 W, which accommodates the GPU's 575 W TDP and the CPU's 35 W TDP with significant margin. This leaves room for additional storage, fans, or other peripherals without requiring a PSU upgrade. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector, and the dual-slot design means case compatibility is standard. The CPU's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility in choosing a motherboard and memory kit, though the 24 MB L3 cache and memory bandwidth will benefit more from DDR5 in memory-sensitive workloads. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, leveraging the existing motherboard and memory, though the 35 W TDP platform design may limit the maximum CPU power available.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-14500T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake part with a 35 W TDP, ranking at the 80th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 flagship with 32 GB GDDR7 memory, ranking at the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 86 places this system in the upper tier of desktop builds. The pairing is asymmetric: the GPU is a top-tier component capable of leading-edge performance, while the CPU is an efficiency-focused midrange part. This means the system excels in GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming, 3D rendering, and AI compute, but will be CPU-limited in scenarios requiring high single-thread throughput or sustained multi-core performance. The build is a GPU-first configuration, where the processor serves as a competent but not exceptional partner to a flagship graphics card.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5090's 92nd percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355 indicate it can drive very high frame rates at 4K, but the CPU's single-thread score of 1,838 in Cinebench R23 may cap performance at 1080p. Expect excellent 4K performance and adequate 1080p performance.

Streaming: The GPU's 680 tensor cores and 104.8 TFLOPS FP16 performance provide hardware encoding and AI-accelerated features, while the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads can handle encoding overhead. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with multitasking during streams.

Video editing: The GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth allow large timelines and high-resolution previews, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,790 handles export tasks adequately, though not at flagship speed.

3D rendering: The GPU's 21,760 shading units and 170 RT cores deliver strong ray-traced rendering performance, with the 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 throughput accelerating compute-heavy renders. The CPU's PassMark floating-point score of 58,869 provides supplementary processing.

Software development: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 22,910, handle compilation reasonably well. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds.

Student and office work: The CPU's 35 W TDP and 80th percentile ranking deliver efficient performance for daily tasks, with the GPU providing massive headroom for any graphics-intensive academic projects, though the 950 W PSU requirement is overkill for this use case.