SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

80%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14500HX

35,094 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

3,596 Benchmark Score

Top 20% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14500HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

This build pairs Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake-HX mobile processor with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace workstation GPU, landing in the 53rd combined percentile across all laptop configurations. The CPU is a strong performer, sitting in the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU's benchmark score places it in the 21st percentile — a notable imbalance that shapes the system's overall character. The data indicates a machine where compute-heavy CPU workloads will shine, while GPU-accelerated tasks face a more modest ceiling. This analysis walks through the specifications, benchmark results, and practical implications of this specific pairing, drawing exclusively from the provided fact pack.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14500HX is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, includes ECC memory support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 770, and the multiplier is unlocked. Released on January 7, 2024, this processor remains in active production and uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,234 points and Geekbench multicore score of 10,171 demonstrate substantial parallel processing capability. Single-thread performance is also respectable, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3,421 points and Geekbench single-core at 2,129. PassMark results reinforce this picture: the multithread score of 28,508, floating point math at 69,442, and integer math at 95,584 all indicate strong computational throughput. Data compression (333,851) and encryption (19,502) scores suggest the processor handles data-intensive tasks efficiently. The average benchmark score of 35,094 places this CPU in the 84th percentile of all processors.

The nearest rivals provide context for these scores. The Intel Core i9-12900HX averages 35,003, which is 0.3% lower than the i5-14500HX. The Intel Core i7-13800H scores 34,988, also 0.3% behind. The Intel Core 7 253PTE sits at 34,962, 0.4% behind. Interestingly, the Intel Core i7-12700K — a desktop part — scores 35,287, which is 0.5% ahead. This means the i5-14500HX trades blows with both previous-generation HX-series mobile chips and a desktop-class K-series processor, making it a highly capable mobile CPU for its era. For real workloads, this translates to smooth performance in video editing timelines, software compilation, and other parallel tasks, while the strong single-core scores ensure responsive everyday use and solid performance in lightly-threaded applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i5-14500HX?

A: The processor has 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that supports heavy multitasking and parallel workloads.

Q: How does the i5-14500HX compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900HX?

A: The i5-14500HX has an average benchmark score of 35,094, which is 0.3% higher than the i9-12900HX's average score of 35,003. This places them in essentially the same performance tier.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth capability of the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation?

A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the i5-14500HX provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 120 W. No suggested PSU is provided in the data.

Q: What is the single-core performance of the i5-14500HX in Cinebench R23?

A: The single-core score in Cinebench R23 is 3,421 points, which supports responsive single-threaded application performance.

Q: Is the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score indicative of high-end gaming performance?

A: The GPU scores 3,596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places it in the 21st percentile of all GPUs. This indicates entry-level to mid-range graphics performance rather than high-end capability.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU present a striking contrast in benchmark standings. The i5-14500HX achieves an average benchmark score of 35,094, placing it in the 84th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, however, scores 3,596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which lands it in the 21st percentile among all GPUs. This 63-percentile gap between processor and graphics performance defines the system's character: it is a CPU-first machine with modest graphics capability.

The combined percentile for this build is 53, indicating that this CPU+GPU pairing sits near the median of all laptop configurations. The CPU's nearest rivals — the i9-12900HX (0.3% behind), i7-13800H (0.3% behind), Core 7 253PTE (0.4% behind), and i7-12700K (0.5% ahead) — all cluster within a narrow band, confirming the i5-14500HX's competitive position. The GPU's nearest rivals paint a different picture: the GeForce GT 545 is 0.1% behind, the GT 735M is 0.6% ahead, the GTX 1050 is 0.9% ahead, and the Radeon HD 6770 is 1.5% ahead. These are all older or lower-tier GPUs, emphasizing that the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation, despite its workstation branding, performs at a level comparable to legacy graphics cards in this specific benchmark.

The combined picture is one of asymmetry. In CPU-bound tasks like code compilation, 3D rendering on the CPU, or data analysis, this system performs admirably. In GPU-bound scenarios such as gaming at high settings or GPU-accelerated rendering, the graphics processor becomes the limiting factor. For users whose primary workload is CPU-intensive with occasional light graphics use, this pairing makes sense. For those expecting high-end GPU performance from a workstation-class laptop, the data suggests otherwise.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i5-14500HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile platform, meaning the CPU is soldered and not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The system is a laptop (buildClass), so component upgrades are largely limited to memory and storage. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility depending on the motherboard design. ECC memory support is present, which is valuable for workstation users requiring data integrity in compute tasks.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, while the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. This means the graphics interface is one generation behind the CPU's capability, but the GPU's performance level — in the 21st percentile — does not appear bandwidth-constrained in typical workloads. The GPU has a TDP of 120 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, giving a combined thermal envelope of 175 W for the primary compute components. No suggested PSU is listed in the data, and the GPU uses no power connectors, indicating it is an integrated mobile solution rather than a discrete card with external power requirements.

A sensible next upgrade for this laptop would be maximizing memory capacity and speed within the DDR4/DDR5 dual-channel constraints, as the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance can benefit from larger memory pools. Storage upgrades are also viable to complement the CPU's data compression and encryption scores. Given the CPU's 84th percentile standing, the processor itself remains capable for years, but the GPU's 21st percentile position suggests that users needing better graphics performance would eventually need to move to an entirely new system rather than upgrade in place.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this build. The CPU sits in the 84th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 21st percentile — a gap of 63 percentile points. In CPU-intensive workloads such as data compression (PassMark score 333,851), encryption (19,502), and floating-point math (69,442), the processor operates at a high level, and the GPU plays little role. The bottleneck in these tasks is the CPU's own thermal and power limits, not the graphics hardware.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high settings or rendering with GPU acceleration, the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation becomes the limiting factor. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,596, which rivals the GTX 1050 (0.9% ahead) and Radeon HD 6770 (1.5% ahead), indicates that graphics performance is modest. A user running a modern game at ultra settings would see the GPU maxed out while the CPU remains underutilized, creating a clear GPU bottleneck. For CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or software development, the CPU would be the active component, and the GPU would sit largely idle.

The practical implication is that this system is balanced for CPU-centric workflows, not for graphics-intensive applications. Users who primarily run multi-threaded CPU tasks will find the performance appropriate, while those expecting balanced high-end performance across both CPU and GPU will be disappointed by the graphics side. The combined 53rd percentile reflects a system that is above average overall but heavily weighted toward processor capability.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD103 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors and a die size of 379 mm². The GPU features 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines. It includes 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores, providing hardware support for ray-traced lighting and AI-accelerated workloads. The base clock is 1425 MHz with a boost clock of 2115 MHz. Memory consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The GPU has a TDP of 120 W, uses no power connectors, and is classified as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with the form factor described as "Portable Device Dependent."

The FP32 compute performance is 41.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 41.15 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 236.9 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 643.0 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Despite this impressive specification sheet, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark score of 3,596 places the GPU in the 21st percentile, with nearest rivals including the GeForce GT 545 (0.1% behind), GT 735M (0.6% ahead), GTX 1050 (0.9% ahead), and Radeon HD 6770 (1.5% ahead).

This discrepancy between hardware specifications and benchmark performance suggests that the GPU's capabilities are not fully realized in this particular benchmark context, or that the mobile implementation is thermally or power-constrained. For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are substantial resources for large textures and datasets, and the ray tracing and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for modern graphics features. However, the low percentile ranking indicates that raw rasterization performance is not competitive with higher-tier GPUs. Users should expect capable but not class-leading graphics performance, with the GPU's strengths lying in its memory capacity and feature set rather than raw throughput.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is not well-suited for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,596, which places it in the 21st percentile and near the GTX 1050, indicates that modern games at high settings will likely run at modest frame rates. Users seeking 144 Hz or higher refresh rates in demanding titles would need a significantly more powerful GPU.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore at 24,234, PassMark multithread at 28,508) provides ample headroom for software encoding while running other tasks. The GPU's tensor cores could assist with AI-enhanced streaming features, but its low overall performance may limit encoding quality at high resolutions. The system is more than capable for streaming CPU-bound content.

Video editing: The combination of a powerful CPU and a GPU with 16 GB VRAM makes this a viable video editing machine. The CPU's high multicore scores ensure smooth timeline scrubbing and fast export times for CPU-based encoding, while the GPU's memory capacity supports large project files and effects. The GPU's modest compute performance (41.15 TFLOPS FP32) may slow GPU-accelerated effects compared to higher-tier graphics cards.

3D rendering: For CPU-based rendering, this system excels — the i5-14500HX's 24,234 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 84th percentile ranking are ideal for render engines that rely on processor cores. For GPU-based rendering, the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation's 16 GB VRAM and ray tracing cores are useful, but its 21st percentile performance means render times will be slower than with higher-tier GPUs.

Software development: The CPU's parallel performance (Geekbench multicore 10,171, PassMark integer math 95,584) supports fast compilation, testing, and containerized workloads. The 20 threads handle concurrent builds and virtual machines effectively. The GPU's capabilities are largely irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a strong choice for developers.

Student and office work: This system is overqualified for typical student and office workloads. The CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3,421, Geekbench single-core 2,129) ensures responsive productivity applications, while the 55 W TDP suggests reasonable battery life potential. The GPU's capabilities are more than sufficient for document editing, web browsing, and presentation software, though the 21st percentile ranking is irrelevant for these tasks.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) pairing the Intel Core i5-14500HX with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-HX processor with a 55 W TDP, released in January 2024, and it performs in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace workstation chip with 16 GB GDDR6 memory, a 120 W TDP, released in March 2023, and it performs in the 21st percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 53, placing this system near the median of all laptop configurations.

The overall tier is that of a CPU-centric workstation laptop. The processor delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance, rivaling the Intel Core i7-12700K (0.5% ahead) and exceeding the i9-12900HX (0.3% ahead), while the GPU offers workstation-class features like 16 GB VRAM and ray tracing cores but with benchmark performance comparable to legacy graphics cards like the GTX 1050. This is a machine built for compute-heavy tasks rather than graphics-intensive applications.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for users whose workloads are dominated by CPU processing. Software developers will benefit from the 20 threads and strong integer math performance (95,584 in PassMark), which accelerate compilation and test execution. Data analysts and researchers running CPU-based simulations or statistical models will find the 84th percentile CPU performance sufficient for demanding computations. Students in engineering or computer science fields will appreciate the processor's capabilities for coding assignments and simulations, while the GPU's moderate performance is adequate for general use.

Content creators working primarily with CPU-based rendering or encoding — such as video editors using software encoders or 3D artists using CPU render engines — will find this system well-matched to their needs. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM provides enough memory for large textures and scenes, even if its raw speed is limited. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office applications will perform without issue, given the CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread scores. However, gamers seeking high-refresh gameplay or GPU-accelerated rendering should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 21st percentile standing will be the limiting factor.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the fact pack contains no measuredFps rows for any game or resolution. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, specifically the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,596 and its 21st percentile ranking among all GPUs.

Based on the GPU's benchmark performance, which places it near the GeForce GTX 1050 (0.9% ahead) and Radeon HD 6770 (1.5% ahead), this system is likely to handle esports titles and older games at playable frame rates, but modern AAA games at ultra settings will struggle. At 1080p resolution, users might expect 30-60 FPS in moderately demanding games with reduced settings, while at 1440p or 4K, frame rates would drop significantly due to the GPU's limited rasterization throughput. The CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3,421) means it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, but the GPU itself is the clear constraint. For gaming, this system is best suited to less demanding titles or users willing to compromise on graphical fidelity and resolution.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14500HX

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds