SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14500HX

35,094 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is an Ada Lovelace architecture part built on TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 18,900 million transistors into a 159 mm² die. The chip, designated AD107, operates at a base clock of 1455 MHz and boosts to 1755 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). This is a 6 GB GDDR6 implementation on a 96-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s. The GPU's 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines produce a pixel rate of 84.24 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 140.4 GTexel/s. Raw FP32 throughput sits at 8.986 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1).

The RTX 4050 Mobile includes 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, positioning it for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern graphics APIs. The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface is worth noting — half the lanes of a typical desktop GPU, which could matter for bandwidth-sensitive tasks, though the 192.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is the more binding constraint in most rendering scenarios.

Benchmark data places this GPU in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19049. In Geekbench compute tests, it scores 74748 in OpenCL and 75235 in Vulkan. PassMark results show a G3D score of 14423, a G2D score of 633, and a GPU compute score of 5947. DirectX-specific PassMark scores are 184 for DX9, 130 for DX11, 79 for DX10, and 61 for DX12 — the low DX12 number relative to DX11 is curious and may reflect driver maturity or test methodology rather than raw capability.

The nearest rivals bracket this GPU tightly. The AMD Radeon RX 6600 scores 19036, a delta of 0.1% — essentially identical. The NVIDIA Quadro K6000 scores 19030 (0.1% delta), the NVIDIA Tesla K20m scores 19089 (-0.2% delta), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 18954 (0.5% delta). The RTX 4050 Mobile sits between the Tesla K20m and the RX 6600, meaning desktop GPUs from previous generations offer comparable raw compute. However, the RTX 4050 Mobile's advantage lies in its architecture — Ada Lovelace brings dedicated RT and tensor cores that these older rivals lack, which matters for ray-traced rendering and DLSS workloads.

For rendering, the 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is adequate for 1080p content creation, while the 20 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing acceleration. The 6 GB VRAM capacity is a limiting factor for large scenes or high-resolution textures; 192.0 GB/s bandwidth supports 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads but will bottleneck at higher resolutions or with heavy texture streaming. The tensor cores enable DLSS, which can offset the bandwidth limitation by rendering at lower internal resolutions and upscaling.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU sits at the 84th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. This 21-percentile gap indicates a CPU-heavy pairing — the processor is substantially stronger relative to its field than the graphics card is relative to its field. In gaming scenarios, the GPU will typically be the limiting factor, particularly at higher resolutions where pixel throughput dominates. The CPU's headroom means it can feed frames without becoming a bottleneck in most titles.

The combined percentile is 74, which sits between the two individual scores, suggesting the pairing is balanced overall but leans toward CPU capability. The pair rank by FPS is null in the data, and no measured FPS rows exist, so frame scaling cannot be derived from direct measurements. However, the benchmark scores imply that CPU-bound scenarios — physics calculations, AI, data compression — will perform strongly, while GPU-bound scenarios — rasterization at high resolutions, ray tracing — will see the RTX 4050 Mobile as the constraint.

The CPU's PassMark physics score of 1911 and multithread score of 28508 indicate strong computational throughput, which benefits simulation and strategy games that rely heavily on CPU logic. Meanwhile, the GPU's 14423 G3D score is modest by comparison, meaning frame rates in graphically intensive titles will be governed by the GPU's 8.986 TFLOPS and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s is a potential bottleneck for the GPU in texture-heavy workloads, while the CPU's dual-channel memory support (DDR4 or DDR5) provides ample bandwidth for its 14 cores. The 55 W TDP of the CPU combined with the 50 W TDP of the GPU suggests a thermal envelope that prioritizes CPU performance, reinforcing the CPU-forward balance of this pairing.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14500HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-HX refresh) using Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 55 W TDP. The die size is 257 mm², and it supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support as a notable feature for workstation use. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, though the discrete RTX 4050 Mobile handles graphics duties.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3 cache. The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), providing high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and peripherals. The processor is unlocked (multiplier unlocked), and its production status is Active, with a release date of 2024-01-07.

Cinebench scores are strong: R15 multicore hits 2442, R20 multicore reaches 10178, and R23 multicore achieves 24234. Single-core scores are 344 (R15), 1436 (R20), and 3421 (R23). Geekbench shows 10171 multicore and 2129 single-core. These numbers place the i5-14500HX at the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35094.

The nearest rivals show how tight the competition is. The Intel Core i9-12900HX scores 35003 (0.3% delta), the Intel Core i7-13800H scores 34988 (0.3% delta), the Intel Core 7 253PTE scores 34962 (0.4% delta), and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287 (-0.5% delta). The i5-14500HX is effectively neck-and-neck with these parts — the 0.3-0.5% deltas are within noise. This means a 14th-gen i5 mobile chip matches or slightly edges a 12th-gen i9 HX, a 13th-gen i7 H-series, and a desktop i7-12700K. The performance per watt is impressive given the 55 W TDP.

PassMark results paint a detailed picture: multithread score of 28508, single-thread of 3629, integer math at 95584, floating point math at 69442, extended instructions (SIMD) at 20019, data compression at 333851, data encryption at 19502, physics at 1911, prime number finding at 130, and random string sorting at 36219. The encryption and compression scores indicate strong throughput for data-heavy workloads, while the physics score supports simulation tasks.

For real workloads, the 14 cores and 20 threads handle multithreaded compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering efficiently. The 4.90 GHz boost clock delivers responsive single-threaded performance for legacy applications and gaming. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency, and the dual-channel memory support (DDR4 or DDR5) provides adequate bandwidth for most tasks.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This laptop pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance with moderate GPU capability. Gamers at 1080p will find the RTX 4050 Mobile sufficient for most titles, given its 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 14423 G3D score, though the 6 GB VRAM limits texture quality at 1440p. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking ensures smooth frame delivery in CPU-bound scenarios, while the GPU's 63rd percentile positions it as a mid-tier graphics solution.

Content creators — video editors, 3D artists, and graphic designers — benefit from the CPU's 24234 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 28508 PassMark multithread score. The 20 threads accelerate rendering and encoding, while the GPU's tensor cores enable AI-accelerated workflows. The 6 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p projects but will struggle with 4K textures or complex scenes.

Software developers gain from the CPU's 95584 integer math score and 333851 data compression score, which speed up compilation and build processes. The 20 threads handle parallel builds, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running tasks. Students and small business users benefit from the balanced performance — the CPU handles productivity suites and data analysis, while the GPU accelerates presentation graphics and light video editing.

The 74th combined percentile indicates a system that outperforms most laptops on the market. The CPU-heavy balance favors users who prioritize processing power over graphics, making this ideal for engineering simulations, scientific computing, and data analysis workloads that leverage the CPU's 20 threads and high boost clock.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i5-14500HX achieves an average benchmark score of 35094, placing it at the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Key scores include Cinebench R23 multicore at 24234 and single-core at 3421, Geekbench multicore at 10171 and single-core at 2129, and PassMark multithread at 28508 with single-thread at 3629. The nearest rival comparison shows the i5-14500HX at 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900HX (35003), 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13800H (34988), 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core 7 253PTE (34962), and 0.5% behind the Intel Core i7-12700K (35287). This is a remarkable result — a mobile i5 essentially ties or beats desktop and higher-tier mobile parts from previous generations.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile achieves an average benchmark score of 19049, placing it at the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Key scores include Geekbench OpenCL at 74748 and Vulkan at 75235, PassMark G3D at 14423, G2D at 633, and GPU compute at 5947. The nearest rival comparison shows the RTX 4050 Mobile at 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (19036), 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19030), 0.2% behind the NVIDIA Tesla K20m (19089), and 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (18954). The GPU performance is respectable but not class-leading — it matches desktop GPUs from previous generations while offering newer features.

The combined percentile is 74, reflecting a system that is stronger on the CPU side than the GPU side. The CPU's 84th percentile versus the GPU's 63rd percentile creates a 21-point gap, meaning the processor is significantly further ahead of its peers than the graphics card. This suggests the system is CPU-limited in balanced workloads, which is favorable for productivity but means gaming frame rates will be GPU-bound. The average benchmark score of 35094 for the CPU versus 19049 for the GPU further illustrates this disparity — the CPU has roughly 84% higher average benchmark score than the GPU.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14500HX compare to the Intel Core i9-12900HX?

A: The i5-14500HX scores 35094 on average, which is 0.3% higher than the i9-12900HX's 35003. The two are effectively identical in performance, despite the i5 being a lower-tier part.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has 192.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth from its 6 GB GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus. This is adequate for 1080p gaming but may limit texture streaming at higher resolutions.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14500HX supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer mobile processor and beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and how many cores does it have?

A: The i5-14500HX has 14 cores and 20 threads with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz and a base clock of 2.60 GHz.

Q: How does the RTX 4050 Mobile compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6600?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile scores 19049 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the RX 6600's 19036. The performance is essentially identical, though the RTX 4050 Mobile offers newer features like DLSS.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and die size?

A: The i5-14500HX is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The GPU uses TSMC's 5 nm process with a smaller 159 mm² die.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 74, which sits between the CPU's 84th percentile and the GPU's 63rd percentile, indicating a system that outperforms most laptops.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i5-14500HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a ball-grid array design — this means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and is not user-upgradable. The socket is specific to the Raptor Lake-HX mobile platform, so any CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard or entire laptop. The memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory as an option — this provides flexibility for users who want to maximize memory bandwidth or prioritize error correction.

The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which provides high-bandwidth connectivity for NVMe storage and external GPUs. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is half the lane width of a typical desktop GPU but sufficient for the RTX 4050 Mobile's bandwidth requirements. The CPU TDP is 55 W, and the GPU TDP is 50 W, totaling 105 W of power draw for the core components — a modest figure that leaves headroom in most laptop power budgets.

The suggested PSU field is null for the GPU, and the power connectors are listed as "None," indicating this is an integrated mobile solution where power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal power supply and motherboard. The slot width is "IGP" (integrated graphics processor), confirming this is a laptop component. For upgrades, the most sensible path is to increase memory to the maximum supported capacity and speed, as the dual-channel DDR5 support can improve CPU-bound workloads. Storage upgrades via the Gen 5 PCIe lanes offer the next performance gain, while GPU upgrades are not feasible in a laptop form factor.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This pairing consists of the Intel Core i5-14500HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, configured in a laptop (buildClass: "laptop"). The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-HX refresh part that launched on 2024-01-07, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace mobile part that launched on 2023-01-02. The system occupies a mid-to-high tier in the laptop market, with a combined percentile of 74 — meaning it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all laptop configurations.

The CPU's 84th percentile places it in the top tier of mobile processors, rivaling desktop parts like the Intel Core i7-12700K (which it trails by only 0.5%). The GPU's 63rd percentile places it in the upper-mid tier of all GPUs, matching desktop parts like the AMD Radeon RX 6600. The combination creates a system that is CPU-forward — users get exceptional processing power with adequate graphics capability. This is a workstation-leaning laptop configuration, suited for tasks that benefit from high multithreaded performance, with gaming as a secondary consideration.

The average benchmark scores — 35094 for the CPU and 19049 for the GPU — reinforce this assessment. The CPU outperforms the GPU by a wider margin than typical laptop pairings, which often balance the two more evenly. This asymmetry is the defining characteristic of the build, making it a compelling choice for CPU-bound workloads.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RTX 4050 Mobile's 8.986 TFLOPS and 14423 G3D score can drive modern titles at high settings, though the 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth may require texture quality reductions. The CPU's 4.90 GHz boost clock and 84th percentile ranking ensure frame pacing stays consistent, preventing CPU-bound stutters in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and 28508 PassMark multithread score handle encoding and game logic simultaneously, while the GPU's tensor cores could accelerate broadcast effects. The 24234 Cinebench R23 multicore score indicates the system can manage simultaneous gaming and encoding without significant frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU's 95584 integer math score and 333851 data compression score accelerate codec operations and timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 74748 OpenCL score assists with effects and color grading, though 6 GB VRAM limits 4K multi-layer timelines. The 20 threads handle export tasks efficiently, with the 24 MB L3 cache reducing latency.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24234 Cinebench R23 multicore score excels at CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 20 RT cores and 8.986 TFLOPS provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The 6 GB VRAM constrains scene complexity, but the 80 tensor cores enable AI denoising and upscaling, speeding up iterative renders.

Software development: The CPU's 20 threads and 95584 integer math score accelerate compilation, while the 19502 data encryption score supports secure development workflows. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds, and the 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for code hotspots. The GPU's compute capabilities enable local testing of GPU-accelerated applications.

Student and office work: The CPU's 84th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking across productivity suites, browsers, and communication tools. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for the discrete GPU, and the 55 W CPU TDP contributes to reasonable battery life. The 20 threads handle virtualization and data analysis without strain, making this a capable all-rounder.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so all FPS figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The system's combined percentile of 74 and the individual CPU (84th) and GPU (63rd) percentiles provide the basis for these estimates.

At 1080p ultra settings, the RTX 4050 Mobile's 14423 G3D score and 8.986 TFLOPS suggest playable frame rates (30-60 FPS) in demanding AAA titles, with lighter esports titles exceeding 60 FPS. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p ultra textures in most games, though titles with high-resolution texture packs may require adjustments. The CPU's 84th percentile ensures that frame rates are GPU-limited, meaning the 4.90 GHz boost clock keeps up with the GPU's output.

At 1440p, the 192.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 6 GB VRAM become limiting factors. Frame rates are expected to drop by 30-40% compared to 1080p, with ultra settings likely requiring DLSS to maintain playable performance. The 80 tensor cores enable DLSS, which can recover frame rates by rendering at a lower internal resolution. The CPU remains a non-issue at this resolution, as the GPU is firmly the bottleneck.

At 4K, the RTX 4050 Mobile is not viable for ultra settings — the 8.986 TFLOPS and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient, and 6 GB VRAM will cause texture thrashing. DLSS at performance mode may make some titles playable, but this resolution is beyond the GPU's intended scope. These estimates assume a well-cooled laptop chassis; thermal throttling could reduce performance in thin-and-light designs.