SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14500HX

35,094 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

23,628 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14500HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile represents a high-performance laptop configuration that balances a modern 14-core processor with a previous-generation flagship mobile GPU. The data shows this pairing lands in the 77th percentile overall among all builds, indicating a system that sits comfortably above the median but is not at the absolute top of the performance spectrum. The CPU, a Raptor Lake-HX Refresh part, delivers strong multi-threaded throughput, while the Ampere-based GPU provides substantial rasterization and ray-tracing capabilities. This analysis walks through the benchmark data step by step, comparing the components to their nearest rivals and interpreting what the scores mean for real-world workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is built on the GA104 chip using Samsung’s 8 nm process, with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The GPU features 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines. Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Clock speeds are listed at a base of 1110 MHz and a boost of 1545 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz or 14 Gbps effective. The GPU includes 48 ray-tracing cores and 192 tensor cores, which support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Pixel rate is rated at 148.3 GPixel/s, texture rate at 296.6 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance at 18.98 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1).

Benchmark results for the GPU show a Passmark G3D score of 16321, which places it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs. The average benchmark score across all GPU tests is 23628. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 2644. Compute performance is represented by Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 104831 and 104066, respectively, while Passmark GPU Compute returns 7276. The nearest rivals provide context: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 23736 on average, which is 0.5% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 scores 23877, 1% higher. Conversely, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile scores 23518, 0.5% lower, and the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 scores 23315, 1.3% lower. This places the RTX 3080 Mobile in a tight cluster where performance differences are within roughly 1% of its closest competitors.

For rendering workloads, the 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores are directly relevant to ray-traced scenes and AI-accelerated features like DLSS. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is substantial for a mobile GPU, ensuring that texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution rendering do not stall on memory throughput. The FP32 output of 18.98 TFLOPS indicates solid raw compute for 3D rendering tasks that rely on shader math. However, the 8 GB VRAM capacity could become a limiting factor in very large scenes or at extreme resolutions, though for most laptop workloads it remains adequate. The GPU’s 69th percentile ranking suggests it outperforms a majority of GPUs but is not in the top tier, with the data showing it trades blows with the GTX TITAN Z and RX 9070 within a 1% margin.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 77, indicating it outperforms 77% of all tracked configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14500HX compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900HX?

A: The Core i5-14500HX has an average benchmark score of 35094, while the Core i9-12900HX scores 35003, a delta of 0.3% in favor of the i5. The i5 also edges out the Core i7-13800H by 0.3% (34988) and the Intel Core 7 253PTE by 0.4% (34962).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth, and how does it compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile?

A: The RTX 3080 Mobile has a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus. Its average benchmark score is 23628, which is 0.5% higher than the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile’s score of 23518.

Q: What are the CPU’s core and thread counts, and what is its boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. It has a TDP of 55 W and uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing, and what API level does it achieve?

A: Yes, the RTX 3080 Mobile includes 48 RT cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern ray-traced titles.

Q: Is the CPU’s integrated graphics present, and what is the memory support?

A: The CPU includes UHD Graphics 770 as integrated graphics. The memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory capability enabled.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU, and when was it released?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is marked as end-of-life in production status. It was released on 2021-01-11.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14500HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX refresh. It operates on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.60 GHz, boosting up to 4.90 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 55 W. Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with ECC capability, and it provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The socket is Intel BGA 1964, and the multiplier is unlocked. The release date is 2024-01-07, with production status active.

Benchmark scores for the CPU are robust across the board. Cinebench R23 multicore returns 24234, while single-core scores 3421. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 10178 and single-core is 1436, while Cinebench R15 shows 2442 multicore and 344 single-core. Geekbench multicore scores 10171 and single-core 2129. Passmark tests show a multithread score of 28508, single-thread of 3629, and an average benchmark score of 35094. The CPU’s percentile ranking against all CPUs is 84, meaning it outperforms 84% of processors in the database. The nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-12900HX, which has an average score of 35003, a delta of 0.3% — essentially a statistical tie. The Core i7-13800H scores 34988 (0.3% lower), the Intel Core 7 253PTE scores 34962 (0.4% lower), and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287 (0.5% higher).

For real workloads, the 14-core configuration with 20 threads is well-suited for multi-threaded applications like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24234 indicates strong sustained performance under heavy loads, while the single-core score of 3421 ensures responsive day-to-day tasks and gaming performance that relies on single-thread speed. The Passmark integer math score of 95584 and floating-point math score of 69442 further underscore its capability in computational tasks. The data shows the i5-14500HX holds its own against higher-tier laptop CPUs from the previous generation, matching the i9-12900HX within 0.3%. This makes it a compelling choice for users who need high core counts without stepping up to the most expensive mobile processors.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Intel Core i5-14500HX and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is characterized by their respective percentile positions: the CPU sits at the 84th percentile, while the GPU is at the 69th percentile. This 15-point gap suggests the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in this pairing. In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulations or heavy multi-threaded productivity tasks, the i5-14500HX will not be the limiting factor — its Passmark physics score of 1911 and multithread score of 28508 are high enough to feed the GPU efficiently. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming at ultra settings, the RTX 3080 Mobile’s 69th percentile ranking will constrain overall performance more than the CPU.

The GPU’s nearest rival data shows it is nearly identical in performance to the GTX TITAN Z (0.5% faster) and the RX 9070 (1% faster), which means the GPU is the ceiling for graphics-heavy tasks. The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of each other, indicating that the i5-14500HX is not a bottleneck in most scenarios — it has headroom. For gaming, the balance leans toward the GPU being the primary determinant of frame rates, especially at 1440p or 4K where the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become more critical. In contrast, CPU-bound tasks like data compression (Passmark score 333851) or encryption (19502) will scale with the i5’s core count and clock speed, where the GPU remains idle.

The data indicates no severe imbalance. The CPU’s 84th percentile provides ample headroom for the GPU’s 69th percentile, meaning the system is well-matched for a laptop class where thermal and power constraints often limit both components. The GPU’s TDP of 115 W and the CPU’s 55 W TDP suggest a power envelope that allows the GPU to reach its boost clock of 1545 MHz under load, while the CPU can sustain its 4.90 GHz boost. In mixed workloads, such as gaming while streaming, the CPU has enough threads to handle encoding while the GPU focuses on rendering, with the 14-core/20-thread configuration proving sufficient.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This laptop configuration targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance and competent GPU acceleration without requiring the absolute top-tier mobile hardware. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will benefit from the GPU’s 69th percentile ranking, which puts it ahead of the majority of mobile GPUs but below the very best. The CPU’s 84th percentile ensures high frame rates in CPU-limited esports titles, while the GPU handles demanding AAA games at high settings. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24234 and the GPU’s 18.98 TFLOPS FP32 useful for accelerating renders and exports.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 14 cores and 20 threads, evidenced by the Passmark multithread score of 28508, which shortens build times. Students in engineering or computer science programs can leverage the CPU’s ECC memory support and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 compatibility for stability in long-running computations. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or data analysis tools will see strong performance in the Passmark integer math score of 95584 and floating-point math score of 69442. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for CAD or moderate machine learning tasks, though not for massive datasets. Overall, the build is suited for users who want a balance of CPU and GPU power, with neither component severely bottlenecking the other.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i5-14500HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the CPU is soldered and not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC capability, giving users flexibility in choosing memory that balances cost and performance. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, allowing for high-speed NVMe storage or external GPU enclosures. The GPU is connected via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is sufficient for the RTX 3080 Mobile’s bandwidth needs.

The GPU has no power connectors listed, and the suggested PSU is not specified, but the GPU’s TDP is 115 W, while the CPU’s TDP is 55 W, resulting in a combined thermal design power of 170 W. This is a moderate power envelope for a laptop, and most high-performance laptops with this class of hardware will include a power supply in the 200-300 W range, though no specific figure is provided in the data. For upgrades, the most sensible path is increasing memory capacity or speed, as the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, and adding more RAM will benefit multi-threaded workloads. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 5 lanes offer a future-proofing option, though the laptop form factor may limit physical drive bays.

The GPU is end-of-life, so the next logical upgrade would be to a newer mobile GPU with a higher percentile ranking, though this would require a new laptop entirely due to the soldered nature of mobile components. Similarly, the CPU’s BGA socket means no socket-level upgrades are possible. The platform’s Active production status for the CPU suggests it will remain supported for a while, but the overall upgrade path is limited to memory and storage. Users should consider this a fixed-configuration system with headroom for RAM and SSD improvements rather than component swaps.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35094, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23628, placing it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the build is 77. The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is notably stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. In Cinebench R23, the CPU achieves 24234 multicore and 3421 single-core, while the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2644. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 104831 and Vulkan score of 104066 for the GPU are high, indicating strong compute performance.

The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900HX, has an average score of 35003, a 0.3% deficit, meaning the i5-14500HX outperforms a previous-generation i9 in aggregate benchmarks. The GPU’s nearest rival, the GTX TITAN Z, scores 23736, 0.5% higher, showing the RTX 3080 Mobile is just slightly behind a desktop card from several years ago. The data reveals that this pairing is CPU-forward: the i5-14500HX is a top-16% processor, while the RTX 3080 Mobile is a top-31% GPU. For users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks like rendering or compilation, this is a favorable balance. For pure gaming at the highest settings, the GPU will be the limiting factor, but it remains competitive with the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile and other GPUs in its class.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This build is a laptop configuration, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs the Intel Core i5-14500HX, a 14-core mobile processor from the Core 14th Gen series, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile, an Ampere-based mobile GPU. The overall tier is defined by the combined percentile of 77, which places it in the upper-middle tier of all tracked builds. The CPU’s 84th percentile is well above the GPU’s 69th percentile, making this a CPU-leaning system. The GPU is end-of-life, but the CPU is active, suggesting the platform is recent while the GPU is from the previous generation.

In the context of laptop builds, this pairing represents a high-performance configuration that can handle demanding workloads. The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with the GPU’s 6144 shading units and 8 GB VRAM, make it suitable for a range of tasks from gaming to content creation. The build is not at the flagship level — the GPU’s 69th percentile means there are faster mobile GPUs available — but it is significantly above the median. The combined 77th percentile indicates that in a typical workload mix, this system outperforms three-quarters of all configurations in the database. This is a solid mid-to-high-tier laptop build for users who need strong CPU performance and competent GPU acceleration.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS discussion is framed as estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 16321 and its 69th percentile ranking suggest it can handle modern games at 1080p with high settings, achieving playable frame rates above 60 FPS in most titles. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will support high settings, but frame rates may dip below 60 FPS in the most demanding games. For 4K gaming, the GPU’s performance is likely insufficient for ultra settings, with estimates suggesting lower frame rates around 30-40 FPS in AAA titles.

The CPU’s single-core score of 3421 in Cinebench R23 ensures that CPU-bound games, such as esports shooters, will not be limited by the processor, allowing the GPU to reach its maximum output. The RTX 3080 Mobile’s ray-tracing cores enable features like DLSS, which can boost frame rates in supported titles by rendering at a lower resolution and upscaling. The direct comparison to the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile (0.5% lower average score) implies the 3080 Mobile will perform nearly identically to that GPU in gaming. Compared to the GTX TITAN Z (0.5% higher score), the 3080 Mobile should deliver similar or slightly lower frame rates in rasterized games. These estimates are based on benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate, with actual performance varying by game optimization and laptop cooling.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is well-supported by this build. The CPU’s 84th percentile and single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3421 ensure high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 16321 and 69th percentile provide enough graphics power for 144Hz displays in many games. Streaming while gaming is feasible due to the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, which can handle encoding concurrently with game rendering — the Passmark multithread score of 28508 indicates ample headroom for OBS or similar software.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24234 for timeline rendering, while the GPU’s 18.98 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates effects and exports. 3D rendering in Blender or Maya leverages both the CPU’s 24 MB L3 cache and the GPU’s 48 RT cores for ray-traced previews and final renders. Software development sees strong performance in the Passmark integer math score of 95584, which speeds up code compilation, and the 20 threads allow parallel build processes. Student and office work is handled easily, with the CPU’s Geekbench single-core score of 2129 providing snappy responsiveness for productivity applications, and the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM supporting multiple monitors or light CAD work.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14500HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds