SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14500HX

35,094 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

20,534 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-14500HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile forms a system where the CPU and GPU occupy distinctly different performance tiers. The processor sits at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card holds the 65th percentile among all GPUs. This 19-percentage-point gap indicates the GPU is the more likely limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads, though the CPU's substantial multi-threaded capacity ensures it can feed the GPU without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios.

Benchmark results reinforce this imbalance. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,234 points places it within 0.5% of the Intel Core i7-12700K, a desktop-class processor. Meanwhile, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15,309 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,380 position it near the Intel Arc B570 (0.1% difference) and Arc A750 (0.2% difference). The CPU outperforms its nearest rivals by margins of 0.3% to 0.4%, while the GPU trades blows with mid-range desktop graphics cards, often slightly behind by 0.1% to 0.6%.

In gaming workloads, the CPU's single-thread performance — Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,421 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,129 — provides ample headroom for frame generation and physics calculations. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 15.97 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 124.8 GPixel/s, however, will cap raw frame rates at higher resolutions. Data from the PassMark suite shows the CPU's integer math score of 95,584 and floating-point math score of 69,442, indicating strong general processing power that rarely limits gaming.

For productivity, the balance shifts. The CPU's multi-threaded performance (PassMark multi-thread score of 28,508) and the GPU's compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute score of 6,827, Geekbench OpenCL score of 92,939) complement each other in rendering and encoding workloads. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads handle scene preparation and physics, while the GPU accelerates final frame rendering through its 40 RT cores and 160 tensor cores. In this context, neither component consistently bottlenecks the other; workload type determines which resource saturates first.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination targets 1080p and 1440p gaming with high refresh rates. The CPU's boost clock of 4.90 GHz and single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3,421 ensure minimal frame pacing issues, while the GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient throughput for modern titles. Expect smooth performance at high settings, with the GPU's 65th percentile ranking indicating it handles most mainstream games comfortably, though extreme settings at 1440p may strain the 15.97 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with the GPU's dedicated NVENC-class tensor cores (160 total), create a capable streaming platform. The PassMark data compression score of 333,851 and encryption score of 19,502 indicate strong real-time encoding headroom. The CPU can handle game logic and streaming software simultaneously without significant contention, while the GPU offloads video encoding tasks.

Video editing: Multi-threaded performance shines here. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,234 and Geekbench multi-core score of 10,171 translate to responsive timeline scrubbing and faster export times. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects rendering and color grading, though the 65th percentile GPU ranking suggests complex 4K projects may require proxy workflows. PassMark extended instructions score of 20,019 further supports AVX-accelerated editing filters.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24 MB shared L3 cache and 14 cores deliver strong CPU-based rendering, evidenced by the 24,234 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. GPU-accelerated rendering benefits from the 5,120 shading units and 15.97 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The 40 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, and the 160 tensor cores accelerate AI-based denoising. This system handles moderate rendering workloads efficiently, though the GPU's 65th percentile position means it trails high-end desktop accelerators.

Software development: Compilation workloads leverage the CPU's multi-threading effectively. The PassMark integer math score of 95,584 and random string sorting score of 36,219 indicate strong code compilation and data processing capabilities. The 20 threads handle parallel builds well, while the 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code segments. The 84th CPU percentile confirms above-average performance for development tasks.

Student and office work: This configuration is substantially over-powered for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2,129) and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide ample capability for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The discrete GPU remains idle for most office workloads, preserving battery life, though the 55 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP indicate this is not an ultraportable solution.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14500HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; users cannot swap processors without replacing the entire motherboard. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, offering flexibility in memory selection, though the exact maximum capacity is not specified in the data.

Memory bandwidth is not explicitly listed, but the dual-channel interface with DDR4 or DDR5 support provides adequate throughput for the 14-core processor. The CPU includes ECC memory support, a feature typically found in workstation platforms, which may appeal to professionals requiring data integrity.

PCIe connectivity includes Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This provides high-bandwidth access for the GPU and NVMe storage. The GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the Gen 5 slots. The 16 CPU lanes can accommodate one primary GPU and additional storage devices, though the exact lane distribution depends on the laptop manufacturer's design.

Power considerations are important for this platform. The CPU has a 55 W TDP, while the GPU has a 115 W TDP, resulting in a combined 170 W thermal envelope for the core components. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the power connectors are listed as "None," indicating the GPU draws power through the motherboard rather than external connectors. This suggests the laptop's power adapter must supply sufficient wattage for both components, and users should verify the adapter rating before considering any overclocking.

The CPU's multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking on supported laptop platforms. However, the 55 W TDP limits headroom in thermally constrained laptop chassis. A sensible next upgrade would involve increasing memory to the maximum supported capacity and ensuring storage uses PCIe Gen 4 or Gen 5 NVMe drives to fully utilize the available lanes. The GPU is end-of-life per the production status, so future GPU upgrades would require a new laptop rather than a component swap.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need desktop-class CPU performance in a mobile form factor. The 84th percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for professionals running CPU-intensive applications, including software developers who compile large codebases (integer math 95,584), researchers processing large datasets (data compression 333,851), and engineers running simulations (floating-point math 69,442).

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions represent the primary gaming audience. The GPU's 65th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM handle current titles at high settings, though enthusiasts seeking maximum frame rates at 4K would require a higher-tier GPU. The CPU's single-thread performance (3,421 Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures no CPU-induced frame drops in competitive titles.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering benefit from the balanced CPU-GPU combination. The 14-core processor handles multi-track timelines and rendering, while the GPU accelerates effects and provides hardware ray tracing. The 40 RT cores and 160 tensor cores make this suitable for creators using ray-traced previews or AI-accelerated tools.

Students in STEM fields and small business workstations find this configuration over-qualified but future-proof. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations, and the 20 threads handle virtualization and multi-tasking effortlessly. The 24 MB L3 cache improves performance for data-intensive applications common in academic research.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process. The GA104 chip contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, with a transistor density of 44.4 million per mm². This represents a mature design that balances performance with power efficiency, reflected in the 115 W TDP.

Memory configuration includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate. This bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, though 4K textures may exceed the 8 GB capacity in some titles. The 256-bit bus width ensures efficient memory access for the 5,120 shading units.

Clock speeds are set at 1110 MHz base and 1560 MHz boost. The boost behavior is not specified further, but the 1560 MHz ceiling combined with 5,120 shading units yields 15.97 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The FP16 performance matches FP32 at a 1:1 ratio, which is notable for AI workloads that can use reduced precision.

The GPU includes 40 RT cores and 160 tensor cores. The RT cores handle hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the tensor cores provide AI acceleration for DLSS and other neural network tasks. The pixel rate of 124.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 249.6 GTexel/s indicate strong rasterization throughput. DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support ensure compatibility with modern titles.

Benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,380 and PassMark G3D score of 15,309. The GPU's 65th percentile ranking places it in the upper-mid range. Its nearest rivals — Intel Arc B570 (-0.1%), Arc A750 (-0.2%), and Quadro M4000M (+0.3%) — show the RTX 3070 Mobile performs nearly identically to these desktop cards, with margins under 1%. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 92,939 and Vulkan score of 86,768 demonstrate strong compute capability for non-gaming workloads.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured field is false, confirming this limitation.

Based on the GPU's 65th percentile ranking and 15.97 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, estimated performance at 1080p ultra settings would see 60-100+ FPS in most modern titles. The 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handle high-resolution textures without stuttering in games that fit within the memory budget. The CPU's single-core score of 3,421 (Cinebench R23) ensures no CPU bottleneck at these frame rates.

At 1440p ultra, estimated FPS drops to 40-70 in demanding titles, with lighter esports games exceeding 100 FPS. The pixel rate of 124.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 249.6 GTexel/s become limiting factors at higher resolutions. The 40 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but enabling RT effects at 1440p may reduce frame rates by 20-30% based on the performance tier.

For competitive gaming at 1080p with competitive settings, the system likely delivers 144-240 FPS in titles like CS2, Valorant, and Overwatch 2. The CPU's high boost clock and 20 threads ensure consistent frame delivery. The GPU's 65th percentile ranking suggests it outperforms the average laptop GPU, providing a smooth experience for high-refresh displays.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 35,094, placing it at the 84th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-12900HX (35,003, +0.3%), Intel Core i7-13800H (34,988, +0.3%), Intel Core 7 253PTE (34,962, +0.4%), and Intel Core i7-12700K (35,287, -0.5%). The i5-14500HX outperforms three of these four rivals by margins of 0.3-0.4%, while trailing the desktop i7-12700K by 0.5% — a negligible difference that indicates the mobile chip matches desktop-class performance.

Key CPU benchmark scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core 24,234 and single-core 3,421, Cinebench R20 multi-core 10,178 and single-core 1,436, Cinebench R15 multi-core 2,442 and single-core 344, and Geekbench multi-core 10,171 and single-core 2,129. PassMark tests show multi-thread 28,508, single-thread 3,629, integer math 95,584, floating-point math 69,442, extended instructions 20,019, data compression 333,851, data encryption 19,502, and random string sorting 36,219.

The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 20,534, placing it at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Arc B570 (20,556, -0.1%), Intel Arc A750 (20,582, -0.2%), NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20,480, +0.3%), and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20,662, -0.6%). The RTX 3070 Mobile sits within 0.6% of all these rivals, showing performance parity with mid-range desktop cards.

GPU-specific benchmarks include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 2,380, Geekbench OpenCL 92,939, Geekbench Vulkan 86,768, PassMark G3D 15,309, PassMark GPU compute 6,827, and PassMark DirectX tests (9: 160, 10: 113, 11: 138, 12: 64). The combined percentile of 75 for this pairing indicates the system sits above three-quarters of all tested configurations, though the GPU's lower percentile pulls the overall ranking down from the CPU's 84th position.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance compared to desktop processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX scores 24,234 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which places it within 0.5% of the desktop Intel Core i7-12700K (35,287 average score vs. 35,094). It outperforms the Core i9-12900HX and Core i7-13800H by 0.3% margins.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 Mobile compare to desktop GPUs?

A: The GPU's average score of 20,534 is within 0.6% of the Intel Arc B570, Arc A750, and AMD Radeon R9 M390X. It edges out the Quadro M4000M by 0.3%. All rival deltas are under 1%, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU lists ECC memory as supported. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though the exact maximum capacity is not specified.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The RTX 3070 Mobile includes 40 RT cores and 160 tensor cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked. However, the 55 W TDP may limit overclocking headroom in laptop thermal designs. The GPU's power connectors are listed as "None," indicating no external power beyond the motherboard.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has 448.0 GB/s bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: How does this system rank overall?

A: The combined percentile is 75, meaning it outperforms 75% of tested configurations. The CPU ranks at the 84th percentile, while the GPU ranks at the 65th percentile.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14500HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-HX refresh codename. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock runs at 2.60 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 55 W.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache benefits multi-threaded workloads by reducing memory latency. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support for enhanced data integrity. PCIe connectivity includes Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,234 positions the CPU near desktop-class processors, with the nearest rival comparison showing a 0.5% gap to the Core i7-12700K. The Geekbench multi-core score of 10,171 and PassMark multi-thread score of 28,508 confirm strong parallel processing capability.

Single-thread performance is equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,421 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,129. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,629 and extended instructions score of 20,019 indicate robust per-core performance for lightly-threaded applications. The high 4.90 GHz boost clock ensures responsive performance in everyday tasks.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output and media acceleration. While the discrete RTX 3070 Mobile handles graphics-intensive workloads, the iGPU can power displays during low-power operation. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs reflects its position as a high-end mobile processor, with the average benchmark score of 35,094 placing it above the majority of desktop and mobile parts.

The architecture's 10 nm process node, while not the most advanced, delivers competitive performance within the 55 W TDP envelope. The 14 cores split between performance and efficiency cores (though the exact configuration is not specified) allow the processor to scale from light office tasks to heavy multi-threaded rendering. The 24 MB L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data, contributing to the strong PassMark data compression score of 333,851.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14500HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds