SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500HX + AMD Radeon 890M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14500HX

35,094 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 890M

9,210 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14500HX paired with the AMD Radeon 890M represents a distinct laptop configuration where a high-performance 14th-generation processor is matched with an integrated graphics solution based on RDNA 3.5. This combination is not a typical gaming laptop build; it is a platform where CPU compute capability significantly outweighs graphics horsepower. The benchmark data confirms this, with the CPU achieving an 84th percentile ranking among all processors while the GPU sits at the 45th percentile. Consequently, the system is built for processor-intensive tasks, with graphics performance that is adequate for light gaming and general use but will struggle with demanding modern titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is anchored by the Intel Core i5-14500HX, which uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket. This is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and not user-replaceable in the traditional sense. The upgrade path for this configuration is therefore limited to components that are not physically integrated. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing for a flexible memory configuration. A sensible upgrade would be to ensure the system is populated with fast DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, as the performance of the integrated Radeon 890M graphics is highly dependent on memory bandwidth. The GPU's memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which underscores that the speed and configuration of the system RAM will directly dictate the graphics performance.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the processor, which is a forward-looking interface for potential future devices, though the integrated GPU communicates over a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus. The power delivery is a key consideration. The CPU has a TDP of 55 watts, which is a base power draw, and the GPU has a TDP of 15 watts, indicating a combined base power draw of 70 watts. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the system's total power envelope is manageable. The upgrade path is not about swapping the processor or adding a discrete GPU, as this is an integrated graphics platform. Instead, upgrades should focus on maximizing the existing hardware, primarily by installing the fastest supported dual-channel memory to feed both the 20-thread CPU and the shared-memory GPU. The platform's design is a closed one, with the primary performance lever being memory configuration.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance tier of the Intel Core i5-14500HX processor?

A: The CPU has a percentile ranking of 84 among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 35094, which places it in a close competitive group with processors like the Intel Core i9-12900HX (35003), the Intel Core i7-13800H (34988), and the Intel Core 7 253PTE (34962), all within a 0.4% delta.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 890M integrated GPU compare to other graphics solutions?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 9210, placing it in the 45th percentile of all GPUs. It performs nearly identically to the AMD Radeon Vega 8, which has a score of 9221 and a delta of -0.1%, and is slightly behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960, which has a score of 9273 and a delta of -0.7%.

Q: What kind of memory does this platform support?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The memory bandwidth for the GPU is listed as "System Dependent," meaning the speed and configuration of the installed system memory will directly impact the performance of the Radeon 890M.

Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the stronger component in this build?

A: The benchmark data clearly shows the CPU is the dominant component. It scores in the 84th percentile for all CPUs, while the GPU scores in the 45th percentile for all GPUs. This significant discrepancy indicates a processor-heavy system.

Q: What is the architecture and process node of the processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX is based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with the codename Raptor Lake-HX. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node and has a die size of 257 mm².

Q: What are the key architectural features of the AMD Radeon 890M?

A: The GPU is based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture and is manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process. It utilizes the Strix Point chip and features 16 ray tracing cores and 1024 shading units.

Q: Are there any measured frames-per-second (FPS) results for this specific CPU and GPU combination?

A: No. The benchmark data does not contain any measured FPS results for this exact pairing. All FPS figures for this configuration are estimates based on the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Benchmark Performance

The performance profile of this system is defined by a stark contrast between its components. The Intel Core i5-14500HX is a high-end mobile processor, as evidenced by its 84th percentile ranking. Its average benchmark score of 35094 places it in a dead heat with the Intel Core i9-12900HX, which scores 35003, a delta of just 0.3%. This indicates that for multi-threaded tasks, the i5-14500HX offers performance on par with a previous-generation flagship. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24234 and Geekbench multicore score of 10171 reinforce its strong multi-threaded capabilities. Single-thread performance is also robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3421 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3629.

In contrast, the AMD Radeon 890M is a mid-range integrated GPU. Its 45th percentile ranking puts it in the lower half of all GPUs. With an average benchmark score of 9210, it is statistically indistinguishable from the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (score 9221, delta -0.1%) and is slightly behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (score 9273, delta -0.7%). Its best performance comes in the Geekbench Vulkan test with a score of 40808, suggesting some strength in compute workloads. When looking at the combined picture, the system's overall percentile is 65, which is dragged down by the GPU's lower standing. The data suggests a platform where CPU-intensive workloads will perform exceptionally well, while the GPU will be the limiting factor in any graphics-heavy application.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is targeted at users whose primary workloads are processor-bound and who do not require dedicated graphics performance. The 84th percentile CPU performance makes it an excellent choice for software developers who need to compile large codebases, as the high multithreaded scores (e.g., 28508 in Passmark multithread) will significantly reduce build times. It is also well-suited for students and professionals in fields like data science or financial modeling who run complex simulations or work with large datasets in spreadsheets and analysis tools. For small business workstations, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core score of 2129) ensures responsive application usage, while the multi-core power handles background tasks efficiently.

For content creators, this build is a mixed bag. Video editors working with 4K footage will find the CPU's encoding and processing capabilities (Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24234) to be very strong, but the render and preview performance in GPU-accelerated timelines will be hampered by the integrated GPU. For 3D renderers using CPU-based engines, this would be a highly capable machine, but for GPU-based rendering, it is not suitable. Gamers should look elsewhere, as the 45th percentile GPU will not deliver high-refresh-rate experiences at high resolutions. The ideal user is one who prioritizes computational power for productivity and development over graphics fidelity.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Radeon 890M, with a Passmark G3D score of 8076 and a 45th percentile ranking, is an entry-level graphics solution. It is not designed for high-refresh-rate gaming. In practical terms, this GPU is capable of running less demanding esports titles at 1080p with medium to low settings, potentially achieving playable frame rates. However, for modern AAA games, the performance will be a significant bottleneck.

The CPU's substantial power does not translate into higher frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios. The system's performance in games will be dictated by the GPU. At 1080p with high or ultra settings, most modern games will likely see frame rates in the low to mid-20s, or even lower. The 890M's theoretical FP32 performance of 5.939 TFLOPS provides a baseline for its computational ceiling. The combined CPU and GPU configuration is not intended for gaming, and the data suggests that any gaming experience will be limited to older or less demanding titles at lower resolutions and graphical presets. The lack of measured FPS data reinforces that this is not a gaming-focused platform.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 890M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. It is a relatively small chip with a die size of 233 mm² and a transistor count of 34,000 million. The GPU is equipped with 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. It also includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, which provide hardware support for DirectX Raytracing, although the overall compute power is limited. The GPU runs at a base clock of 400 MHz and can boost up to 2900 MHz, enabling a pixel rate of 92.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 185.6 GTexel/s. Its FP32 performance is rated at 5.939 TFLOPS.

A critical limitation of this GPU is its memory. It uses "System Shared" memory, meaning it relies on the system's main RAM for its frame buffer. The bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which means the GPU's performance is directly tied to the speed and configuration of the host system's memory. This architecture is common for integrated graphics but is a major bottleneck compared to dedicated GPUs with their own high-speed VRAM. The benchmark scores reflect this. Its Passmark G3D score of 8076 is on par with older discrete graphics cards like the GTX 960 (9273) and GTX 465 (9294), but its DirectX 12 score of 37 is notably weak. For rendering tasks, the 890M can handle basic 2D acceleration and light 3D workloads, but it is not a viable solution for serious 3D rendering or modern game development.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance of this configuration is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor's 84th percentile ranking and the GPU's 45th percentile ranking create a clear imbalance. In any workload that involves graphics, the AMD Radeon 890M will be the primary bottleneck. This is evident in the GPU's low DirectX 11 score of 73 and DirectX 12 score of 37, which suggest a severe limitation in modern graphics APIs. For gaming, the CPU will almost always be waiting for the GPU to finish rendering frames, meaning the powerful i5-14500HX will be underutilized.

Conversely, in CPU-intensive workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, or 3D rendering using a CPU-based engine, the GPU becomes largely irrelevant, and the i5-14500HX will operate at its full potential. The CPU's Passmark data encryption score of 19502 and data compression score of 333851 show its strength in these specific tasks. The bottleneck is situational. For general productivity and compute tasks, the CPU is the star, with the GPU handling basic display output. For any 3D application, the GPU becomes a hard limit, capping performance at levels far below what the CPU could otherwise support. The 65th combined percentile for the system accurately reflects this compromise.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build that pairs a top-tier mobile processor with a mid-range integrated GPU. The Intel Core i5-14500HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture. Its performance is exceptional, ranking in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Radeon 890M is a modern integrated graphics solution based on RDNA 3.5. Its performance is modest, ranking in the 45th percentile of all GPUs. The system's overall combined percentile is 65.

This pairing creates a machine that is a compute powerhouse but a graphics lightweight. It is not a balanced system for general-purpose computing or gaming. It is a specialized tool for users who need maximum processing power for tasks like code compilation, data analysis, and CPU-based rendering, all within a mobile form factor. The i5-14500HX's performance, which is within 0.5% of the Intel Core i7-12700K, means it can handle almost any productivity task thrown at it. However, the GPU's performance limits the system's versatility, making it a poor choice for gamers or digital artists who rely on GPU acceleration. It is a workstation-class CPU trapped in a system with an entry-level display adapter.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14500HX is a member of the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture and codenamed Raptor Lake-HX. It is a mobile processor manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. The chip features 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration typical of high-end mobile CPUs. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a large 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The processor also integrates UHD Graphics 770, providing a basic display output capability.

Benchmark results show the CPU is a formidable performer. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24234 is a strong indicator of its multi-threaded prowess. The Geekbench multicore score of 10171 and Passmark multithread score of 28508 corroborate this. Single-thread performance is also excellent, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3421. The CPU's average benchmark score of 35094 places it in a virtual tie with the Intel Core i9-12900HX (35003, delta 0.3%), a previous-generation flagship. This means that for real-world workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, and heavy multitasking, the i5-14500HX delivers performance comparable to a top-tier desktop processor from a recent generation. The Passmark integer math score of 95584 and floating point math score of 69442 highlight its arithmetic capabilities. This is a CPU that can power through demanding productivity tasks without breaking a sweat.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh Gaming: This scenario is not recommended. The Radeon 890M's 45th percentile ranking and low DirectX 12 score of 37 indicate an inability to drive demanding games at high frame rates. Any gaming would be limited to esports titles at 1080p with reduced settings, and even then, high refresh rates are unlikely to be achievable.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped for the encoding side of streaming. Its strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24234) can handle x264 encoding. However, the integrated GPU cannot handle the game rendering side of a modern AAA title, making this a poor choice for a streaming setup.

Video Editing: The CPU will excel in the processing and encoding stages of video editing, with high scores in multithreaded tests. However, the GPU-accelerated effects and real-time preview in modern editing software will suffer due to the 890M's limited compute power (5.939 TFLOPS). This is a system for CPU-centric editing workflows, not GPU-accelerated ones.

3D Rendering: For CPU-based rendering engines, this is an excellent machine. The i5-14500HX's 20 threads and high Cinebench scores will render scenes efficiently. For GPU-based renderers, the system is inadequate, as the Radeon 890M's performance is in the lower half of all GPUs.

Software Development: This is a primary use case. The CPU's powerful multi-core performance (Passmark multithread score of 28508) will significantly speed up code compilation. The robust single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core score of 2129) ensures a responsive IDE. The integrated GPU is sufficient for standard 2D UI rendering.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for standard office tasks like word processing and spreadsheets. The CPU's power is wasted, but the system will be extremely responsive. The 890M is perfectly adequate for 2D desktop acceleration, making this a fast but expensive machine for basic productivity.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500HX + AMD Radeon 890M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14500HX

AMD Radeon 890M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds