SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14500HX

35,094 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14500HX + AMD Radeon 8050S: A Mobile Workstation-Class Pairing

This laptop configuration pairs Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake-HX processor with AMD's RDNA 3.5-based integrated graphics solution, achieving a combined performance percentile of 87 across all tested systems. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 89th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a well-matched pair where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The following analysis draws exclusively from benchmark data, with all gaming performance figures presented as estimates since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU's 89th percentile ranking suggests strong 1080p and 1440p capability, though exact frame rates remain estimates. The Radeon 8050S delivers 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which positions it for smooth gameplay at high settings in most titles, but the system-shared memory architecture means performance will scale with available system RAM. The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 2129 provides adequate per-thread performance for game logic and physics, while the 84th percentile CPU ranking ensures minimal bottlenecking in most gaming workloads.

Streaming: The combination of 14 cores and 20 threads on the CPU provides ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads. The Passmark data compression score of 333851 and data encryption score of 19502 indicate strong throughput for encoding video streams, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 58398 suggests capable hardware acceleration for modern streaming APIs. The 55W TDP on both components keeps thermal output manageable during extended streaming sessions.

Video Editing: Multi-core performance is exceptional, with Cinebench R23 multi-core scoring 24234 and Geekbench multi-core reaching 10171. These scores indicate the CPU can handle 4K timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks efficiently. The GPU's OpenCL score of 65818 provides substantial acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects and color grading, while the 2048 shading units and 128 texture mapping units deliver solid compute throughput for video processing pipelines.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10178 and R15 multi-core score of 2442 demonstrate strong ray tracing and path tracing performance in CPU-based renderers. For GPU rendering, the Radeon 8050S's 32 RT cores and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide capable hardware acceleration, though the system-shared memory may limit extremely large scene handling. The 64 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s, ensuring efficient final frame composition.

Software Development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 14-core, 20-thread configuration, with Passmark integer math scoring 95584 and floating point math scoring 69442. The Passmark extended instructions score of 20019 indicates strong SIMD performance for modern code compilation and analysis tools. The CPU's 24 MB shared L3 cache helps maintain high throughput when building large codebases, and the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support allows for flexible system configuration.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread performance is more than adequate for daily productivity, with Geekbench single-core scoring 2129 and Cinebench R23 single-core reaching 3421. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display solution, while the main Radeon 8050S handles any GPU-accelerated tasks in productivity suites. The 84th percentile CPU ranking ensures smooth multitasking across office applications, web browsing, and communication tools without perceptible lag.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 35094, placing it at the 84th percentile among all processors. This score is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900HX, which scores 35003 — a mere 0.3% difference. The Intel Core i7-13800H scores 34988 (0.3% behind), and the Intel Core 7 253PTE scores 34962 (0.4% behind). Interestingly, the desktop Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, which is 0.5% ahead, demonstrating that this mobile chip trades blows with a previous-generation desktop processor.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 62108 places it at the 89th percentile among all graphics cards. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, scores 61896 (0.3% behind), while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693 (2.5% ahead). The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775 (2.6% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63830 (2.7% ahead). This places the Radeon 8050S in a competitive mid-range mobile GPU tier, with the 89th percentile ranking indicating strong overall performance.

In GPU-specific benchmarks, the Radeon 8050S scores 65818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58398 in Geekbench Vulkan. The gap between these scores suggests the RDNA 3.5 architecture performs better in compute-oriented OpenCL workloads than in Vulkan-optimized scenarios. Combined with the CPU's 84th percentile ranking, the system achieves an overall 87th percentile combined score, indicating that both components contribute meaningfully to the complete package.

Balance and Bottleneck

The 3-percentage-point gap between CPU (84th percentile) and GPU (89th percentile) rankings indicates a slight GPU bias in this configuration. The GPU outperforms the CPU relatively, meaning in GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions, the graphics card will be the limiting factor. Conversely, in CPU-heavy tasks such as video encoding or 3D rendering, the processor becomes the constraint, though both components remain within a close performance band.

The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 28508 and single-thread score of 3629 reveal a system that is approximately 7.9 times faster in multi-threaded workloads than single-threaded ones, reflecting the 14-core/20-thread configuration. This scaling pattern means productivity applications that leverage multiple cores will see substantial benefits, while lightly-threaded games may not fully utilize the CPU's capacity. The GPU's FP32 compute of 11.47 TFLOPS combined with a texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s indicates the graphics card can feed data to the shaders efficiently, but the system-shared memory bandwidth, listed as "System Dependent," introduces a variable that could bottleneck certain workloads.

The pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and ROP count of 64 suggest the GPU can handle high-resolution rendering without becoming pixel-bound, but the shared memory architecture means that system RAM speed and capacity directly influence GPU performance. In gaming scenarios, the estimated FPS scaling would show diminishing returns at higher resolutions as memory bandwidth becomes the constraint, while at 1080p, the GPU's compute capabilities would be the primary limiter.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p: The GPU's 89th percentile ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicate strong capability for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and solid 1440p performance. The CPU's single-core score of 2129 in Geekbench ensures that game logic and physics calculations keep pace with the GPU's rendering output. Enthusiasts seeking a laptop that handles esports titles at high frame rates and AAA games at high settings will find this configuration suitable, though the system-shared memory means performance depends on having sufficient fast system RAM.

Content Creators: The combination of 14 CPU cores and the GPU's compute capabilities makes this suitable for video editors working with 4K footage and motion graphics artists using GPU-accelerated effects. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24234 and OpenCL score of 65818 provide a balanced platform for both CPU and GPU rendering pipelines. Photographers using GPU-accelerated editing software will benefit from the 2048 shading units and 128 TMUs.

Software Developers: The 20-thread configuration and 24 MB L3 cache provide solid compilation performance, while the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes. The Passmark data compression score of 333851 indicates efficient handling of large code repositories and build artifacts. Developers working with virtual machines or containers will appreciate the 14 physical cores for isolation and resource allocation.

Students and Small Business Workstations: The 84th percentile CPU ranking ensures smooth multitasking for research, document creation, and communication tools. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a redundant display output, and the GPU's compute capabilities can accelerate spreadsheet calculations, data visualization, and light 3D modeling tasks. The 55W TDP on both components suggests reasonable battery life for mobile productivity use.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture using TSMC's 4 nm process, with a die size of 308 mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1295 MHz and boosts to 2800 MHz, delivering 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and an equivalent 11.47 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio. The 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs provide a balanced compute-to-output ratio, with a pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s.

Memory is entirely system-shared, with the memory type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as "System Dependent." This architecture means the GPU relies on the host system's RAM for all graphics memory requirements, making system memory configuration critical to GPU performance. The 32 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support ensures compatibility with modern graphics features.

The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, trails by just 0.3% in average benchmark score, suggesting the 8050S sits at the upper edge of mid-range mobile GPUs. The 89th percentile ranking places it ahead of the majority of graphics cards, with only the Radeon Pro Vega 56 (2.5% ahead), RX 7600M (2.6% ahead), and RX 9060 XT LP (2.7% ahead) exceeding its performance among listed rivals. In OpenCL workloads, the score of 65818 indicates strong compute performance for rendering and scientific applications, while the Vulkan score of 58398 shows capable gaming performance under modern graphics APIs.

Gaming Performance

Important note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than definitive measurements.

Estimated 1080p Ultra Performance: Based on the GPU's 89th percentile ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 compute, this configuration should deliver smooth frame rates in most titles at 1080p with ultra settings. The CPU's single-core performance, scoring 2129 in Geekbench, is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking in most games. Expect 60+ FPS in esports titles and 40-60 FPS in demanding AAA games, with the system-shared memory potentially affecting performance in memory-intensive titles.

Estimated 1440p Ultra Performance: At 1440p, the GPU's 179.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate become more significant factors. The 89th percentile ranking suggests playable frame rates in most titles at high settings, though ultra settings may push the GPU to its limits in the most demanding games. The 32 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but enabling RT features may significantly reduce frame rates.

Estimated 4K Performance: The system-shared memory architecture limits 4K gaming potential, as the GPU must share memory bandwidth with the CPU. While the pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s is adequate for 4K output, the texture rate and compute capabilities may struggle with ultra settings at this resolution. Expect lower frame rates at 4K, with performance depending heavily on system memory speed and capacity.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 87, with the CPU at the 84th percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 89th percentile among all graphics cards.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX scores 35094 on average, which is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900HX (35003) and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13800H (34988). It trails the desktop Intel Core i7-12700K (35287) by 0.5%.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU uses system-shared memory, with the memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as "System Dependent." This means GPU performance is directly tied to the host system's RAM configuration.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14500HX supports ECC memory, making it suitable for reliability-critical workloads. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S features 32 RT cores dedicated to hardware-accelerated ray tracing. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the Radeon RX 7600M?

A: The Radeon 8050S scores 62108 on average, which is 2.6% behind the Radeon RX 7600M's score of 63775. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is 2.5% ahead, and the RX 9060 XT LP is 2.7% ahead.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz. It features 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache per core.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining Intel's Core 14th Gen mobile processor with AMD's Radeon 8050S integrated graphics solution. The CPU, part of the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm² and features 14 cores and 20 threads. The GPU, based on RDNA 3.5 architecture and fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process, integrates directly onto the platform with a 308 mm² die.

The system achieves an overall performance tier at the 87th combined percentile, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of tested configurations. The CPU's 84th percentile and GPU's 89th percentile rankings place this as a high-mid-range mobile platform suitable for demanding workloads. Both components carry a 55W TDP, suggesting a balanced thermal profile for a laptop form factor. The GPU is classified as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors and a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14500HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-HX codename. It operates at a base frequency of 2.60 GHz and boosts to 4.90 GHz, with a 55W TDP. The processor features an 80 KB L1 cache per core, 2 MB L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory with ECC capability, making it suitable for workstation applications.

The CPU's benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 24234, R20 multi-core scores 10178, and R15 multi-core scores 2442. Single-core scores are 3421 in R23, 1436 in R20, and 344 in R15. Geekbench scores are 10171 multi-core and 2129 single-core. The Passmark suite reveals specific workload characteristics: integer math scores 95584, floating point math scores 69442, data compression scores 333851, and data encryption scores 19502. The extended instructions score of 20019 indicates strong SIMD performance, while the find prime numbers score of 130 and physics score of 1911 represent more specialized workloads.

The 84th percentile ranking places this CPU slightly above the Intel Core i9-12900HX and Intel Core i7-13800H, with delta percentages of 0.3% and 0.3% respectively. It trails the desktop Core i7-12700K by 0.5%, demonstrating that this mobile chip provides desktop-class performance in specific scenarios. The CPU's memory bus is dual-channel, and it supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for CPU-attached devices.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14500HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning CPU upgrades are not feasible in a traditional sense. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory as an option. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU connects via PCIe 5.0 x16, ensuring high-bandwidth communication between components.

The GPU is an integrated part of the platform (classified as IGP) with no power connectors and a 55W TDP. Since both CPU and GPU share the same 55W TDP, the overall thermal budget for the platform is approximately 110W under full load, excluding other system components. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the low TDP of both components indicates a modest power supply requirement for the integrated platform, typical for laptop-class systems.

Given that the GPU uses system-shared memory, the most impactful upgrade path involves increasing system RAM capacity and speed, as this directly improves GPU performance. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures that any future external GPU connectivity would have ample bandwidth. Since the CPU is soldered and the GPU is integrated, the primary upgrade options are memory capacity, storage via PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and potentially an external GPU enclosure if the laptop supports it. The CPU's production status is active, and it was released on January 7, 2024, while the GPU was released on January 5, 2025, indicating a current-generation platform with ongoing software and driver support.