SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-14490F and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pairing presents an unusual balance profile. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 67th percentile among all graphics cards. This 19-percentage-point gap indicates the processor is substantially stronger relative to its own competitive field than the graphics card is relative to its field. In most workloads, the Quadro RTX 5000 will be the limiting factor.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 38,149 is within 0.3% of its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T at 38,194 (delta -0.1%), the Intel Core i5-13600KF at 38,103 (delta 0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38,221 (delta -0.2%), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX at 38,261 (delta -0.3%). This clustering shows the i5-14490F is precisely positioned in a highly competitive mid-range tier, delivering performance essentially indistinguishable from several alternative processors.

The GPU, by contrast, is closer to older or lower-tier hardware. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which scores 21,856 versus the Quadro's 21,629, a delta of -1%. The RTX A4000 Mobile trails by just 1.2% at 21,379. The AMD Radeon HD 8970M sits 1.8% behind at 21,237, and the Radeon RX Vega M GL is 2.3% behind at 21,153. These tight margins mean the Quadro RTX 5000 is not significantly faster than several much older or mobile-class products in aggregate benchmarks.

Because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, frame expectations from the benchmark scores. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,873 and multi-thread score of 28,662 indicate it can feed frames quickly. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15,616 and DirectX 12 score of 59 suggest it will constrain high-refresh gaming at demanding settings. The CPU is capable of pushing far more frames than the GPU can render in most scenarios, making the GPU the definitive bottleneck in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The i5-14490F delivers strong Cinebench results. The R23 multi-core score of 23,000 and single-core score of 3,247 demonstrate balanced throughput. The R20 scores of 9,660 multi-core and 1,363 single-core reinforce this pattern. The R15 scores of 2,318 multi-core and 327 single-core show consistent scaling across benchmark generations. These numbers place the CPU at the 86th percentile, meaning it outperforms 86% of all tested processors.

PassMark testing reveals workload-specific strengths. The multi-thread score of 28,662 and single-thread score of 3,873 are both solid. Integer math scores 87,844, while floating-point math scores 66,558. Data compression reaches 340,026, and data encryption scores 18,225. Extended instructions score 21,731, which matters for AVX-512-style workloads. Physics simulation scores 2,093, and random string sorting reaches 35,608. Prime number finding is the outlier at 122, indicating a specific weakness in that particular integer workload.

The Quadro RTX 5000's benchmark picture is more mixed. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 78,999 and Vulkan score of 92,309 are respectable. PassMark G3D scores 15,616, placing the GPU at the 67th percentile. However, the DirectX 12 score of 59 is surprisingly low, while DirectX 11 scores 140 and DirectX 10 scores 113. DirectX 9 scores 195. The G2D score of 709 is modest. Compute performance via PassMark GPU Compute is 6,525.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 77, reflecting the average of the CPU's 86th and GPU's 67th percentile positions. This means the system overall outperforms 77% of tested desktop combinations, but the GPU drags the combined score below what the CPU alone would suggest. Users upgrading from a weaker processor will notice immediate CPU-bound improvements, while those coming from a stronger GPU will see the Quadro as the ceiling.

CPU Analysis

The i5-14490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates on a 10 nm process node from Intel with a die size of 215 mm². Base clock is 2.50 GHz, boosting to 5.00 GHz. The thermal design power is 65 W, which is modest for a 10-core part and indicates efficient power management.

Cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides substantial fast memory for active workloads. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in platform memory selection. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity includes Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth peripherals.

The processor has no integrated graphics, so the discrete Quadro RTX 5000 is mandatory for display output. The multiplier is not unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited to BCLK adjustments rather than direct multiplier changes. The part number is SRN35, and production status is active with a release date of December 31, 2023.

Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,247 indicates strong per-thread performance, suitable for lightly threaded applications like web browsing, office productivity, and legacy software. The multi-core score of 23,000 shows excellent scaling across all 16 threads for rendering, compilation, and scientific computing. PassMark data compression at 340,026 is particularly high, suggesting the CPU handles archival and database workloads efficiently. The extended instructions score of 21,731 confirms robust SIMD capability for modern optimized software.

The nearest rival comparison shows the i5-14490F is effectively tied with the i5-13600KF at 38,103 (delta 0.1%) and the Core Ultra 5 245T at 38,194 (delta -0.1%). This means users choosing between these processors will see negligible aggregate performance differences. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38,221 is also within 0.2%. The i5-13600HX, a laptop part, scores 38,261, just 0.3% higher. The desktop i5-14490F essentially matches mobile flagship silicon, which speaks to its efficiency.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i5-14490F uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This gives users a choice between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The dual-channel memory bus means two DIMMs are optimal for bandwidth. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes from the CPU means modern GPUs and NVMe drives can run at full bandwidth, though the Quadro RTX 5000 itself uses PCIe 3.0 x16.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, while the CPU's TDP is 65 W. This leaves substantial headroom for a 550 W power supply to handle the combined load. The GPU has a TDP of 230 W, so the total system draw under full load is well within the suggested PSU rating. The GPU requires a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector configuration, which older power supplies may not have readily available.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Quadro RTX 5000 with a more modern GPU. The CPU's 86th percentile performance and PCIe Gen 5 support mean it can handle significantly faster graphics cards without becoming the bottleneck. The 65 W TDP and 10-core configuration make this a balanced platform for a mid-range to upper-mid-range GPU upgrade. The CPU's active production status ensures ongoing availability and driver support.

Memory upgrades are straightforward given dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 support. The 24 MB L3 cache benefits from faster memory, so DDR5 would maximize performance. However, the integrated memory controller's efficiency with both memory types means either choice works. The lack of ECC support limits use in error-sensitive scientific or financial computing, but for most workloads, non-ECC memory is sufficient.

The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs storage and accelerator connectivity. The 16 CPU lanes can be split for multiple devices, though the Quadro RTX 5000's PCIe 3.0 interface means it will not benefit from the newer standard. Users planning to add high-speed NVMe storage or AI accelerators will find the platform ready. The 230 W GPU TDP and 550 W suggested PSU leave room for a more powerful GPU upgrade without changing the power supply.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 3,873 PassMark single-thread score and 3,247 Cinebench R23 single-core score can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. However, the Quadro RTX 5000's 67th percentile GPU standing and modest DirectX 12 score of 59 will limit frame rates at 1080p or 1440p with high settings. Expect the GPU to cap performance below what the CPU can deliver.

Streaming: The 10-core, 16-thread configuration with a 23,000 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU's lack of modern NVENC (given its Turing architecture with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores) means software encoding on the CPU is viable. The 16 GB VRAM helps with multiple display outputs and encoding buffers.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 23,000 accelerates timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB GDDR6 VRAM handle large project files. Geekbench OpenCL score of 78,999 indicates reasonable GPU acceleration for effects, though the DirectX 12 score of 59 suggests older API workloads may be slow.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-thread score of 28,662 in PassMark and 23,000 in Cinebench R23 will handle CPU-based renderers effectively. The GPU's 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 16 GB VRAM support GPU rendering, though the 67th percentile GPU standing means render times will be slower than modern workstation cards.

Software development: Compilation benefits from the 10 cores and 16 threads, with PassMark integer math at 87,844. The 24 MB L3 cache speeds up iterative builds. Data compression at 340,026 helps with package management and version control operations. Single-thread performance of 3,873 ensures responsive IDE interaction.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65 W TDP keeps power costs low. PassMark single-thread of 3,873 handles document processing and spreadsheets smoothly. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is overkill for office tasks but supports multiple 4K displays via the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs. The 709 PassMark G2D score indicates adequate 2D performance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a Turing-architecture workstation GPU built on TSMC's 12 nm process. The die spans 545 mm² with 13,600 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². The chip is TU104, and the card is dual-slot with a length of 267 mm (10.5 inches) and height of 111 mm (4.4 inches).

Memory configuration includes 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed. This large VRAM capacity is a key strength for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and multiple simultaneous workloads. The 256-bit bus width ensures adequate bandwidth for most compute tasks, though modern GPUs offer more.

Compute resources include 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The card has 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI inference. FP32 performance is 11.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s.

The GPU's benchmark scores show it sits at the 67th percentile, with an average score of 21,629. Its nearest rival, the GTX 1060 6 GB, is only 1% faster at 21,856. The RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.2% slower at 21,379, and the Radeon HD 8970M is 1.8% behind at 21,237. This clustering indicates the Quadro RTX 5000 performs at a level comparable to entry-level gaming GPUs from several generations ago, despite its workstation pedigree.

The DirectX 12 score of 59 is particularly low, suggesting poor optimization for modern gaming APIs. DirectX 11 scores 140, DirectX 10 scores 113, and DirectX 9 scores 195. This pattern indicates the card is better suited to legacy DirectX workloads than current games. The Vulkan score of 92,309 in Geekbench is much stronger, implying better performance in Vulkan-based applications. The OpenCL score of 78,999 shows reasonable compute capability.

The 230 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU rating mean the card requires a moderately powerful power supply. The 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin connectors are standard for this class. The card is end-of-life, with production status marked as such, and its successor is Workstation Ampere. The launch MSRP was 2,299 USD. Display outputs include 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 77, meaning the system outperforms 77% of tested desktop combinations.

Q: How does the i5-14490F compare to the Core i5-13600KF?

A: The i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38,149, while the i5-13600KF scores 38,103, a delta of 0.1% in favor of the i5-14490F, making them effectively tied.

Q: What is the Quadro RTX 5000's nearest rival in benchmark performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB scores 21,856 versus the Quadro's 21,629, a delta of -1%, meaning the GTX 1060 is marginally faster in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: Does the i5-14490F support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked, so overclocking is limited to BCLK adjustments.

Q: What is the suggested power supply rating for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, and the GPU's TDP is 230 W, while the CPU's TDP is 65 W.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-14490F with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is a Turing-architecture workstation card at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 77, indicating an upper-mid-range system overall.

The pairing is unusual in that the CPU is significantly stronger relative to its field than the GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 38,149 places it in a tight cluster with several rivals within 0.3%, including the Core Ultra 5 245T, i5-13600KF, Ryzen 7 250, and i5-13600HX. The GPU's average score of 21,629 places it near the GTX 1060 6 GB and RTX A4000 Mobile, which are considerably older or lower-tier products.

The build class is desktop, with a 65 W CPU TDP and 230 W GPU TDP, totaling a manageable power footprint. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is its standout feature, providing ample capacity for professional workloads despite modest compute throughput. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures the platform is not the limiting factor for future upgrades.

This system sits at the 77th combined percentile, which means it outperforms most desktop PCs but falls short of high-end configurations. The CPU is the stronger component, capable of handling demanding multi-threaded tasks, while the GPU is adequate for professional visualization but not for high-end gaming or compute. The platform offers a solid foundation with the CPU, but the GPU is the clear upgrade target.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p with medium settings will find the Quadro RTX 5000 sufficient, though the low DirectX 12 score of 59 means modern games may underperform. Competitive esports titles that rely on CPU performance will benefit from the i5-14490F's 3,873 single-thread score. Enthusiasts seeking high-refresh gaming should consider a different GPU.

Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,000 and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM for large timelines. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with 4K video scrubbing and effects. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78,999 indicates reasonable GPU acceleration in supported applications.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 10 cores and 16 threads, with PassMark integer math at 87,844. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces recompilation times. Data compression at 340,026 speeds up build artifact handling. The CPU's 65 W TDP keeps power costs low during long compile sessions.

Students and office workers will find this system overqualified for document processing and web browsing, but the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups. The CPU's 3,873 single-thread score ensures responsive everyday use. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is unnecessary for office tasks but provides headroom for future needs.

Small business workstations handling CAD, financial modeling, or data analysis will benefit from the CPU's multi-thread throughput and the GPU's workstation drivers and 16 GB VRAM. The RT cores and tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI inference in supported professional applications. The end-of-life GPU status means availability may be limited, but the platform remains viable.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,873 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,247 indicate strong per-core performance that can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound games. The multi-thread score of 28,662 ensures background tasks do not interfere with gaming. The 65 W TDP means thermal throttling is unlikely in most chassis.

The GPU's benchmark scores suggest modest gaming performance. The PassMark G3D score of 15,616 at the 67th percentile places it near the GTX 1060 6 GB, which is a capable 1080p gaming card. However, the DirectX 12 score of 59 is concerning, as modern games rely heavily on DX12. The DirectX 11 score of 140 is better, suggesting older DX11 titles may run more smoothly.

At 1080p with high settings, the Quadro RTX 5000 likely delivers playable frame rates in most titles, though esports games will far exceed 60 FPS while AAA games may dip below. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle with demanding titles, particularly those using DX12. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the compute throughput limits overall frame rendering.

The CPU will rarely bottleneck the GPU in gaming. The i5-14490F's single-thread performance is strong enough to feed the Quadro RTX 5000 in nearly all scenarios. Users upgrading from an older GPU will notice the CPU's responsiveness, while those expecting high-refresh 1440p gaming will be disappointed. For competitive gaming at 1080p with low settings, the system could exceed 144 FPS in lighter titles, but this is an estimate based on the CPU's strength rather than measured data.