SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

40,377 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14490F is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh variant. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, backed by a 65 W TDP that keeps it within a modest power envelope for a mainstream desktop chip. The CPU is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 215 mm², and it fits the Intel Socket 1700 platform, indicating compatibility with a mature motherboard ecosystem.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. This arrangement supports rapid data access for latency-sensitive workloads, which is reflected in the single-threaded benchmark results. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3247 places the processor in a strong position for lightly threaded tasks, while the multi-core score of 23000 demonstrates substantial parallel throughput from the 10 cores and 16 threads. The Cinebench R20 results echo this pattern, with a single-core score of 1363 and a multi-core score of 9660, while Cinebench R15 shows 327 and 2318 respectively.

The processor's PassMark single-thread score of 3873 and multi-thread score of 28662 reinforce the balanced profile. The multi-thread score is particularly telling for productivity scenarios, as it indicates that the CPU can handle simultaneous compilation, rendering subtasks, or virtual machine loads without severe degradation. The PassMark integer math score of 87844 and floating point math score of 66558 show strength in general arithmetic, while the extended instructions score of 21731 suggests solid AVX and related workload performance. Data compression at 340026 and encryption at 18225 further characterize the CPU's versatility, though the encryption figure is modest compared to the compression throughput, hinting that cryptographic workloads may not be the primary strength.

The CPU holds an 86th percentile ranking among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 38149. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, scores 38194, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the i5-14490F trails by a negligible margin. The Intel Core i5-13600KF sits at 38103, which is 0.1% behind the 14490F, showing near-identical performance to its predecessor. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 posts 38221, putting it 0.2% ahead, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX at 38261 leads by 0.3%. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the 14490F is exactly in the middle of a tightly clustered competitive set, offering no dramatic advantage or deficit.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this CPU and GPU pairing yields a combined percentile of 84, placing the system in the upper tier of desktop configurations. The CPU's average benchmark score of 38149 and the GPU's average benchmark score of 40377 contribute to this overall ranking, though the raw scores alone do not tell the full story of workload-specific behavior.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test returns a score of 5077, which serves as a modern DirectX 12 rasterization benchmark. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172660 and Vulkan score of 178923 indicate strong general-purpose compute and graphics API performance, respectively. The PassMark G3D score of 29137 places the GPU well within the upper portion of the database, while the PassMark GPU compute score of 15787 shows capable compute offload. Notably, the DirectX 11 score of 277 and DirectX 10 score of 180 are far lower than the DirectX 12 score of 108, which is an anomaly in the raw data—this likely reflects the test methodology rather than actual hardware limitations, as modern drivers optimize for DX12 and Vulkan. The DirectX 9 score of 320 and G2D score of 1305 round out the legacy and 2D performance metrics.

The GPU holds an 82nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40377. Its nearest rivals are a mixed set: the AMD Radeon Pro 580 scores 40318 (0.1% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 40063 (0.8% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870 (1.2% ahead), and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568 (2.0% behind). These deltas show that the RTX 5070 outperforms the Radeon Pro 580 and WX 7100 by narrow margins, trails the Radeon Pro 5300 by a slightly larger gap, and has a more comfortable lead over the RTX A500 Mobile. In practical terms, the RTX 5070 sits at a competitive midpoint among workstation-oriented GPUs, which is notable given its consumer gaming focus.

The combined CPU and GPU percentiles (86th and 82nd, respectively) produce an 84th percentile system overall, indicating that neither component drags the other down significantly. The CPU's slight edge over the GPU in percentile terms suggests that the processor has a marginal headroom advantage in balanced workloads, but the difference is small enough that the system should be viewed as evenly matched.

# Balance and Bottleneck

Examining the percentile positions and performance scaling, the CPU at the 86th percentile and GPU at the 82nd percentile are closely aligned, which minimizes the risk of a severe bottleneck in either direction. The CPU's average benchmark score of 38149 versus the GPU's 40377 shows a slight numerical advantage for the GPU in raw average terms, but the percentile rankings account for the broader population, making the CPU marginally stronger relative to its peers.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulation or data compression, the PassMark physics score of 2093 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 indicate that the processor can feed the GPU without stalling in most scenarios. The single-thread performance, exemplified by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3247, ensures that even lightly threaded game engines will not leave the GPU idle waiting for draw calls. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios, the RTX 5070's PassMark G3D score of 29137 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5077 show that the graphics card can push high frame rates at resolutions where the CPU's 10 cores are not the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the measured data—there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination—so any bottleneck analysis must rely on the benchmark scores as proxies. The close percentile alignment suggests that at 1080p with high refresh rates, the CPU may occasionally become the limiting factor in very lightly threaded titles, as the single-core score of 3247 is good but not class-leading. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's workload increases, and the balance shifts toward the GPU being the primary constraint, which is typical for a mid-high-end pairing. The data indicates that neither component is disproportionately weak, making the system well-suited for balanced gaming and productivity use.

# Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the combination of the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and the GPU's strong 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5077 suggests the system can drive 1440p displays at high frame rates in most titles, though the lack of measured FPS data means this is an estimate based on benchmark scores rather than a direct measurement.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, which can handle encoding overhead while maintaining game performance; the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 provides ample headroom for simultaneous game and stream processing.

Video editing relies on both components, and the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 28662, combined with the GPU's OpenCL score of 172660, indicates smooth timeline scrubbing and accelerated effects rendering, with the 12 GB VRAM of the GPU accommodating large project files.

3D rendering tasks are well-served by the GPU's compute capabilities, as evidenced by the PassMark GPU compute score of 15787 and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 178923, while the CPU's floating point math score of 66558 handles geometry processing and scene preparation.

Software development benefits from the CPU's integer math score of 87844 and data compression score of 340026, which speed up code compilation and package management, while the 16 threads allow for parallel build processes.

Student and office work is comfortably handled, with the CPU's single-core score of 3873 ensuring responsive application use and the GPU's 2D score of 1305 providing smooth desktop compositing, though this pairing is far more capable than such tasks require.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB205 chip fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. The chip contains 31,100 million transistors across a 263 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.3 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz, effectively 28 Gbps.

Memory configuration consists of 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. This bandwidth is substantial for the memory bus width, which supports high-resolution textures and compute workloads without excessive latency. The memory subsystem is complemented by 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, which drive the pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 482.3 GTexel/s.

The GPU includes 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features such as DLSS. The FP32 performance is rated at 30.87 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 30.87 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio, indicating that half-precision workloads do not receive a throughput boost. The GPU's power draw is 250 W, with a recommended 600 W power supply, and it connects via PCIe 5.0 x16.

In benchmark terms, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 represents modern rasterization performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 178923 shows strong cross-API capability. The PassMark G3D score of 29137 places the GPU at the 82nd percentile, with the nearest rivals being workstation-oriented cards like the Radeon Pro 580 and WX 7100. The 12 GB VRAM is notable for its capacity at this performance tier, supporting 1440p gaming with high texture settings and moderate ray tracing.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination—the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows—so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3247 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5077 provide the basis for these estimates.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 29137 suggests the system can achieve high frame rates in esports and moderately demanding titles, with the CPU's single-thread performance ensuring minimal bottleneck. At 1440p ultra, the GPU's 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 throughput indicate strong performance, likely sustaining 60+ FPS in most games, though the exact figures depend on title optimization. At 4K ultra, the 12 GB VRAM and 192-bit bus may become limiting in the most demanding scenes, and the GPU's 82nd percentile ranking suggests it will deliver playable but not exceptional frame rates at this resolution.

The absence of measured FPS means these estimates carry inherent uncertainty, but the benchmark scores point to a system that is well-matched for 1440p gaming with high refresh rates, and capable of 4K with reduced settings or upscaling.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize 1440p resolution with high refresh rates, as the CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 82nd percentile provide balanced performance that avoids severe bottlenecks in this resolution class. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's multi-core score of 23000 and the GPU's compute score of 15787 sufficient for moderate workloads, though professionals requiring extreme throughput may look higher.

Software developers benefit from the CPU's integer math score of 87844 and 16 threads, which accelerate compilation tasks, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 178923 supports graphics development and testing. Students and small business users will find the system overqualified for typical office tasks, but the performance headroom ensures longevity for future software demands. The 12 GB VRAM makes the GPU suitable for local AI inference or machine learning experimentation, supported by the 192 tensor cores.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 84, with the CPU at the 86th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14490F compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T?

A: The i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38149, while the Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38194, resulting in a delta of -0.1% meaning the 14490F trails by a negligible margin.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5070 has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's power draw and how does it affect cooling?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is modest for a 10-core processor and allows for a capable air cooler without excessive heat output.

Q: What is the GPU's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is 549 USD.

Q: How does the GPU perform in DirectX 12 compared to its rivals?

A: The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5077, and the GPU holds the 82nd percentile, with the nearest rival AMD Radeon Pro 580 scoring 40318 in average benchmarks, which is 0.1% behind the RTX 5070's 40377.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14490F processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 graphics card. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 12 GB of GDDR7 memory. The combined percentile of 84 places this system in the upper tier of desktop configurations, indicating strong overall performance for gaming and productivity.

The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 82nd percentile are closely aligned, suggesting a balanced pairing where neither component significantly outperforms the other. The average benchmark scores of 38149 for the CPU and 40377 for the GPU reinforce this balance, with the GPU holding a slight raw score advantage while the CPU ranks higher relative to its peers. This is a mid-high-end desktop build suitable for demanding applications, but not at the extreme enthusiast level.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 depending on motherboard selection. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring compatibility with the GPU's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface for maximum bandwidth.

The GPU requires a 250 W power draw and a suggested 600 W power supply, which leaves headroom for additional components such as storage drives or expansion cards. The 1x 16-pin power connector is standard for modern high-end GPUs, and the dual-slot design fits most mid-tower cases, with dimensions of 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU's 86th percentile provides sufficient headroom for a more powerful graphics card without immediate bottleneck concerns. The 65 W TDP of the CPU also leaves thermal and power budget for a higher-tier GPU, though the 600 W PSU suggestion may need revision if the next GPU draws significantly more power. Alternatively, upgrading to a CPU with more cores on the same socket could enhance multi-threaded workloads, but the 14490F's 10 cores already handle most tasks effectively.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14490F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds