SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

44,795 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 10-core Raptor Lake refresh CPU with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace-based RTX 4070 Ti GPU, landing at the 85th combined percentile across all builds in the database. The CPU holds an 86th percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 84th percentile among all graphics cards, making this a high-tier mainstream configuration. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14490F is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size. It packs 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This is a locked multiplier part (SRN35), so overclocking headroom is not available, but boost behavior is strong given the 65 W TDP envelope.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,000 places this chip in a competitive position against its nearest rivals. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T by just 0.1% in average benchmark score (38,149 vs. 38,194), essentially a statistical tie. Against the Intel Core i5-13600KF, the 14490F is 0.1% ahead (38,149 vs. 38,103), showing that the refresh brings parity with the previous generation's K-series part. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 sits 0.2% ahead, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX is 0.3% ahead — all within noise margins. For real workloads, this means the 14490F handles heavily threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation at a level comparable to those alternatives, with no single rival holding a decisive edge.

Single-thread performance is equally strong. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,247 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,873 reflect the 5.00 GHz boost clock doing its job. The PassMark single_thread score of 3,873 (duplicated as singlethread in the data) confirms consistency across test iterations. For everyday responsiveness, browser workloads, and lightly threaded applications, the 14490F behaves like a modern high-clocked desktop part.

The PassMark multi-thread score of 28,662, combined with floating point math at 66,558 and integer math at 87,844, shows a balanced ALU/FPU design. Data compression scores 340,026 in PassMark, which is useful for file archiving and backup tasks. Data encryption at 18,225 and extended instructions at 21,731 indicate solid cryptographic throughput for VPNs or encrypted storage. Prime number finding scores 122, a lower number that reflects the workload's sensitivity to certain instruction paths, but this is not representative of typical productivity. Random string sorting at 35,608 suggests strong memory subsystem performance for database-style operations.

The physics score of 2,093 in PassMark, while not directly a game physics metric, correlates with the CPU's ability to handle simulation workloads in engineering or scientific contexts. The 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs means this processor outperforms the vast majority of installed desktop and mobile parts, though it is not in the top tier occupied by HEDT or flagship server chips.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the i5-14490F + RTX 4070 Ti combination, so all gaming figures here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of both components. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, which means frame rates must be inferred rather than cited as hard numbers.

For 1080p gaming, the CPU's single-core strength (Cinebench R23 single-core 3,247) and the GPU's high shading throughput (40.09 TFLOPS FP32) suggest that most modern titles will run at very high frame rates, likely limited by the CPU in esports scenarios where frame rates exceed typical monitor refresh rates. The 10-core / 16-thread configuration provides enough headroom for streaming or background tasks while gaming, as the multi-thread score of 23,000 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong parallelism for encode workloads.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The RTX 4070 Ti's pixel rate of 208.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 626.4 GTexel/s suggest it can feed high-resolution displays with demanding settings. The 12 GB GDDR6X memory with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity for current game textures at this resolution. Estimated frame rates in AAA titles would typically fall in the 100+ FPS range for optimized titles, with more demanding games settling into the 70-90 FPS range at ultra settings.

For 4K gaming, the 4070 Ti's 84th percentile GPU ranking means it can handle 4K at high settings in most titles, though ultra settings with ray tracing enabled would push it toward 60 FPS or below in the most demanding games. The 60 RT cores in the AD104 chip provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, and the 240 tensor cores handle DLSS workloads, which can substantially boost frame rates when upscaling is enabled. The Vulkan score of 213,808 in Geekbench and OpenCL score of 176,953 indicate strong compute performance that translates well to modern game engines using these APIs.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on the AD104 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 35,800 million transistors packed into a 294 mm² die — a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz, while memory runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed. The 192-bit memory bus carries 12 GB of GDDR6X, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

Compute resources include 7,680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. The 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated features respectively. The FP32 throughput of 40.09 TFLOPS matches the FP16 throughput at a 1:1 ratio, meaning the card does not rely on shader reordering for half-precision work — it is equally fast in both. This is relevant for AI inference workloads and scientific computing where FP16 is common.

In benchmark results, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,024 places the card in a solid mid-high tier. The PassMark G3D score of 31,624 and GPU compute score of 18,396 show strong rasterization and compute performance respectively. The DirectX 12 score of 116 in PassMark, while lower than the DirectX 11 score of 288, reflects the different workload characteristics of the newer API rather than a deficiency — modern DX12 titles depend heavily on driver optimization and multi-threaded CPU interaction.

The nearest rival comparisons are instructive. The RTX 4070 Ti trails the RTX 5090 Mobile by 0.8% in average benchmark score (44,795 vs. 45,152), meaning this desktop card essentially matches a flagship mobile GPU from a newer generation. Against the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT, the 4070 Ti is 1.3% behind (44,795 vs. 45,384), and against the Intel Arc A730M it is 1.7% behind (44,795 vs. 45,592). The NVIDIA RTX A6000 sits 1.6% behind the 4070 Ti (44,075 vs. 44,795), meaning this consumer card outpaces a professional workstation GPU. These deltas are all small, indicating the 4070 Ti sits in a dense performance cluster where component selection matters less than cooling and driver quality.

The card draws 285 W TDP and requires a 600 W power supply recommendation, with a single 16-pin connector. It is a dual-slot design measuring 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 42 mm in width, fitting most mid-tower cases. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multi-monitor setups up to four displays.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14490F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility means builders can choose between reusing existing DDR4 modules or investing in newer DDR5 kits, though the memory bandwidth difference will affect performance in memory-sensitive workloads. ECC memory is not supported, so this platform is not ideal for error-critical scientific computing.

PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU provides high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest NVMe SSDs and future expansion cards. However, the RTX 4070 Ti uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so it does not take advantage of Gen 5 bandwidth — but this is not a bottleneck in practice, as PCIe 4.0 x16 offers ample bandwidth for current GPUs.

The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, meaning most mid-range motherboards with adequate VRM cooling will handle it without issue. The GPU's 285 W TDP, combined with the CPU, suggests a total system draw that a 600 W PSU (as suggested) can handle with headroom for drives and peripherals. The suggested PSU figure of 600 W is the recommended minimum, not a measured requirement, so builders with higher-wattage units have additional margin for overclocking other components or adding expansion cards.

A sensible next upgrade would be moving to a higher-core-count Socket 1700 CPU if more multi-threaded performance is needed, since the platform is shared across the 14th-gen lineup. Alternatively, the GPU could be upgraded to a newer generation when available, as the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface remains compatible with future cards. The platform's DDR4/DDR5 support means the memory upgrade path depends on which type the motherboard uses — DDR4 boards are limited to that standard, while DDR5 boards allow future memory speed improvements.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 38,149, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals show tight clustering: the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38,194 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38,103 (+0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38,221 (-0.2%), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38,261 (-0.3%). This means the 14490F is effectively tied with four other processors from both Intel and AMD, with no more than 0.3% separating any of them. For buyers, this translates to picking based on platform features (socket, memory support, integrated graphics presence) rather than raw performance, since all five CPUs deliver virtually identical throughput.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 44,795, placing it at the 84th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the RTX 5090 Mobile at 45,152 (-0.8%), the Radeon Pro 5500 XT at 45,384 (-1.3%), the RTX A6000 at 44,075 (+1.6%), and the Intel Arc A730M at 45,592 (-1.7%). The 4070 Ti outperforms the RTX A6000 by 1.6% despite the A6000 being a professional workstation card with different driver optimizations. The deltas against mobile and workstation parts are all within 2%, indicating the 4070 Ti occupies a dense competitive segment where generational and market-segment boundaries blur.

The combined percentile of 85 for this CPU+GPU pairing means it outperforms 85% of all recorded build configurations in the database. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 84th percentile are well-matched, with neither component dramatically outperforming the other in relative terms. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2,318 and single-core score of 327, along with the Cinebench R20 scores of 9,660 (multi) and 1,363 (single), provide additional reference points for older benchmark comparisons. The PassMark data compression score of 340,026 and encryption score of 18,225 round out the CPU's productivity profile.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14490F support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false). The CPU relies on its 5.00 GHz boost clock for performance, with a 65 W TDP.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4070 Ti have and what type is it?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 Ti still in production?

A: No, the production status is listed as "End-of-life." The predecessor is GeForce 30 series and the successor is GeForce 50 series.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 600 W, with the GPU drawing 285 W TDP and using a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: How does the i5-14490F compare to the i5-13600KF in benchmarks?

A: The 14490F is 0.1% ahead of the 13600KF in average benchmark score (38,149 vs. 38,103), making them effectively equal in performance.

Q: What PCIe version does the GPU use?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The GPU does not require Gen 5 bandwidth.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions who want high frame rates with quality settings enabled. The RTX 4070 Ti's 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth handle current AAA titles at these resolutions, while the i5-14490F's strong single-thread score of 3,873 in PassMark ensures responsive gameplay and high minimum frame rates. The 86th percentile CPU ranking means this build will not bottleneck in CPU-intensive titles like simulation games or real-time strategy, where the 10 cores and 16 threads provide headroom for AI and physics calculations.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or graphic design will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,000 and the GPU's 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The PassMark floating point math score of 66,558 and integer math score of 87,844 indicate strong performance in number-crunching applications, while the GPU's 240 tensor cores accelerate AI-assisted workflows like denoising in renderers or neural filters in photo editors.

Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16 threads and 24 MB L3 cache, which reduce compile times. The data compression score of 340,026 helps with version control operations and binary asset processing. Students and small business users running productivity suites, virtual machines, or database applications will find the 86th percentile CPU performance more than sufficient, with the 65 W TDP keeping electricity costs manageable in always-on scenarios.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14490F (Raptor Lake, 10 cores, 16 threads) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (Ada Lovelace, 12 GB GDDR6X). The combined percentile of 85 places it in the upper tier of recorded builds, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and GPU at the 84th percentile. Both components are from the same generation era (late 2023/early 2024 release dates), ensuring driver maturity and ecosystem compatibility.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 285 W TDP create a balanced thermal profile that standard mid-tower cooling can handle. The platform supports DDR4 or DDR5 memory, providing flexibility in build cost and performance. The GPU's dual-slot design and 285 mm length fit most ATX and many mATX cases, while the single 16-pin power connector requires a modern PSU with native support or an adapter.

This pairing represents a high-volume sweet spot: the CPU delivers near-flagship single-thread performance (5.00 GHz boost) and solid multi-thread throughput, while the GPU provides ray tracing and tensor core features that enable DLSS and other AI-accelerated rendering techniques. The 85th combined percentile means this build outperforms the majority of configurations in the database, though it does not break into the top tier reserved for flagship CPUs and GPUs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are well-matched in relative performance, with only a 2-percentage-point gap between their percentiles (86 for CPU, 84 for GPU). This suggests balanced behavior across most workloads, but the nature of the bottleneck shifts depending on the task.

In CPU-bound scenarios — esports titles at low resolutions, simulation games with heavy AI, or productivity applications like spreadsheet calculations — the i5-14490F will be the limiting factor. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,873 is strong but not top-tier, so frame rates in high-refresh-rate scenarios may plateau below what the GPU could theoretically deliver. The 65 W TDP also limits sustained all-core boost behavior, so long compile jobs or multi-hour renders may see slight clock throttling depending on cooling.

In GPU-bound scenarios — 4K gaming, ray-traced titles, or machine learning inference — the RTX 4070 Ti becomes the constraint. The 12 GB VRAM is adequate for current games but may limit texture quality in future titles that exceed this capacity. The 84th percentile GPU ranking means some AAA games at ultra settings with ray tracing will push the card to its limits, requiring DLSS or reduced settings to maintain smooth frame rates.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured for this exact pairing, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,000 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,024 suggest that at 1080p the CPU will bottleneck in lighter titles, at 1440p the pairing approaches equilibrium, and at 4K the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. For mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU's 16 threads provide enough parallelism to handle encoding alongside game logic, though the 65 W TDP may limit simultaneous all-core boost.

The overall picture is a balanced mid-high tier build where neither component is egregiously over- or under-powered for the other. Upgrading the GPU would yield gains in 4K and ray-traced scenarios, while upgrading the CPU would help in high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming and heavily threaded compute tasks. For most users, this pairing delivers consistent performance across a wide range of applications without a glaring bottleneck in any common scenario.