SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070: Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 14th-generation Core i5-14490F processor with NVIDIA's Ampere-based GeForce RTX 3070 graphics card in a desktop configuration. The combined system sits at the 74th percentile among all tracked builds, indicating a configuration that outperforms roughly three-quarters of the database population. The CPU alone reaches the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 61st percentile among all graphics cards, revealing a system where the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all frame-by-frame gaming discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay capture.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is built on the GA104 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process, packing 17,400 million transistors into a 392 mm² die. The GPU runs at a base clock of 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 1725 MHz, feeding 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output pipelines. Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The card draws up to 220 W under load and requires a 550 W suggested PSU, connecting via a single 12-pin power connector.

For ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, the RTX 3070 includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores. The tensor core count is particularly notable — it matches the shading unit ratio at 1:32, which is characteristic of the Ampere architecture's design. FP32 compute reaches 20.31 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 20.31 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio, meaning the card does not gain a throughput advantage when switching to half precision. Pixel fill rate is 165.6 GPixel/s and texture fill rate is 317.4 GTexel/s, figures that support smooth high-resolution rasterization.

Benchmark results place this GPU in the 61st percentile overall. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 3162 points, while Geekbench OpenCL yields 112,821 and Vulkan 21,022. Passmark G3D shows 22,214, with GPU compute at 11,195. DirectX 12 performance in Passmark is notably lower at 85, compared to DirectX 11 at 182 and DirectX 10 at 150; DirectX 9 posts 247. The G2D score of 1001 reflects 2D desktop acceleration capability. These scores indicate a GPU that handles modern DirectX 12 titles competently but shows relative weakness in compute-heavy API workloads — the DirectX 12 score being less than half the DirectX 11 figure suggests the architecture's strength lies in traditional rasterization paths.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the RTX 3070 trails the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT by 0.7% in average benchmark score, and leads the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 by 1.0% and the AMD Radeon HD 7970M by 1.1%. It sits 1.5% behind the NVIDIA Tesla K40c. These margins are tight — within 1.5% either direction — meaning the RTX 3070 is effectively performance-peer with this cluster of cards despite their wildly different architectures and generations.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 3070's 61st GPU percentile and the i5-14490F's 86th CPU percentile combine to suggest a system that can drive high refresh rates at 1080p and solid frame rates at 1440p in most titles.

At 1080p ultra settings, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3247 in Cinebench R23 and 3873 in Passmark single-thread indicates the processor can feed the GPU adequately in CPU-bound scenarios. The RTX 3070's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 compute support high polygon counts and complex shader work. Estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra would be in the range where competitive shooters and esports titles exceed 144 Hz, while AAA games would hover in the 80-120 FPS range depending on title optimization.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU becomes the primary limiter. The 8 GB VRAM capacity may prove restrictive in the most demanding modern titles at this resolution, particularly those with high-resolution texture packs. The 317.4 GTexel/s texture rate and 165.6 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest the card can maintain playable frame rates — estimated in the 60-90 FPS range for most AAA games — but not consistently hit 144 Hz outside of lighter titles.

At 4K ultra, the RTX 3070's 8 GB memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become significant constraints. Estimated frame rates would drop to 30-50 FPS in demanding titles, with VRAM capacity potentially causing texture pop-in or reduced detail settings. The card's 61st percentile standing among all GPUs confirms it is not positioned as a 4K ultra-class solution. For 4K gaming, users would need to reduce settings to high or medium to achieve smoother frame rates.

FAQ

Q: How does the RTX 3070 compare to its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT?

A: The RTX 3070's average benchmark score is 17,208, which is 0.7% lower than the RX 7600 XT's 17,083. This places the two cards within performance noise of each other, with the RTX 3070 essentially matching the RX 7600 XT in overall compute capability.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance, and why does it matter for gaming?

A: The i5-14490F scores 3247 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3873 in Passmark single-thread. These figures place the CPU in the 86th percentile among all processors, indicating strong per-core performance that minimizes CPU bottlenecks in gaming workloads that rely on a few heavily-threaded tasks.

Q: Does the RTX 3070 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 3070 includes 46 RT cores dedicated to ray tracing acceleration. The card also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing and mesh shaders, along with Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 API support.

Q: What is the combined system percentile, and what does it signify?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 74, meaning the system outperforms 74% of all tracked desktop configurations in the database. This positions it as a solid mid-to-upper tier build for mainstream gaming and productivity.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the RTX 3070 provide, and how does it affect performance?

A: The RTX 3070 delivers 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus. This bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and complex scenes, but the 8 GB capacity may be a limiting factor in the most VRAM-hungry titles at 1440p and above.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3070 is 550 W. The GPU itself has a TDP of 220 W, and the CPU has a 65 W TDP, so a 550 W supply provides sufficient headroom for the combined system with some margin for other components.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked on the Intel Core i5-14490F. The CPU runs at a base clock of 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and these frequencies are fixed by the processor's default configuration without unlocked multiplier support.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peer group. The i5-14490F holds the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 3070 sits at the 61st percentile among GPUs. This 25-percentile gap indicates the processor has more headroom than the graphics card, making the GPU the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads.

In gaming scenarios, this imbalance manifests as GPU-bound performance in most titles. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,000 and single-core score of 3247 are both strong enough to keep up with the GPU's frame output at 1080p and 1440p. However, when resolution increases or graphical settings are raised, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factors. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 85, relative to DirectX 11's 182, suggests the GPU's driver overhead or architectural efficiency in DX12 workloads could further constrain performance in modern titles.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's multi-threaded performance — 23,000 in Cinebench R23, 28,662 in Passmark multithread, and 87,844 in Passmark integer math — provides substantial compute capability. The GPU's compute score of 11,195 in Passmark GPU compute and 112,821 in Geekbench OpenCL indicate it can accelerate parallel workloads, but the CPU will handle most general-purpose tasks without bottlenecking.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, supports this analysis: at 1080p the CPU can push frame rates high enough that the GPU becomes the ceiling; at 1440p and 4K the GPU's memory and compute limits dominate. This is a well-balanced pairing for 1080p high-refresh gaming, with the CPU having enough reserve for streaming or background tasks while gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The i5-14490F's 5.00 GHz boost clock and 3873 Passmark single-thread score feed frames efficiently at 1080p, while the RTX 3070's 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth sustain high frame rates in competitive titles. Estimated performance supports 144 Hz+ in esports and 100 FPS+ in most AAA games at 1080p ultra.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, evidenced by the 23,000 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, provide enough parallel headroom to encode video while gaming. The RTX 3070's 184 tensor cores can also accelerate NVENC-based encoding, though the data does not specify encoder hardware directly.

Video editing: The CPU's Passmark data compression score of 340,026 and floating-point math score of 66,558 indicate strong number-crunching for video codecs and effects. The GPU's 20.31 TFLOPS compute accelerates rendering previews, and the 8 GB VRAM handles 1080p and 1440p timelines comfortably.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded Cinebench scores — 9,660 in R20 and 23,000 in R23 — show strong render performance for CPU-based renderers. The GPU's 46 RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders in supported applications, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's 87,844 Passmark integer math and 18,225 data encryption scores support fast compilation and cryptographic operations. The 28,662 Passmark multithread score indicates good parallel build performance for multi-core toolchains.

Student and office work: The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and 65 W TDP make it efficient for everyday tasks, while the GPU's 1,001 Passmark G2D score handles 2D desktop acceleration. The system exceeds requirements for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers seeking high-refresh 1080p performance with the option to step up to 1440p at reduced settings. The RTX 3070's 61st GPU percentile and estimated 1080p frame rates make it suitable for competitive and AAA gaming at that resolution, while the CPU's 86th percentile ensures no processor bottleneck in most scenarios.

Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video, photo editing, and moderate 3D rendering workloads will find the CPU's multi-threaded strength and the GPU's compute capability well-matched. The 8 GB VRAM supports these resolutions without excessive memory pressure, though 4K work would require a higher-tier GPU.

Software developers and students benefit from the CPU's strong integer and floating-point performance, with the integrated GPU absent (N/A) meaning a discrete card is mandatory — the RTX 3070 fills this role. Small business workstations running multi-threaded productivity suites, database tasks, or light virtualization will leverage the 10-core/16-thread processor effectively.

The system is less suited for 4K gaming or VR workloads requiring large texture pools, where the 8 GB VRAM becomes a constraint. Users targeting maximum settings at 4K should look at GPUs with more memory and higher compute scores.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 38,149, placing it at the 86th percentile among all processors. Its nearest rivals bracket it tightly: the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38,194 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38,103 (+0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38,221 (-0.2%), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38,261 (-0.3%). These sub-0.5% differences mean the i5-14490F is functionally equivalent to all four rivals in aggregate performance.

The GPU posts an average benchmark score of 17,208, placing it at the 61st percentile. Rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT at 17,083 (+0.7% for the 3070), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 at 17,037 (+1.0%), AMD Radeon HD 7970M at 17,019 (+1.1%), and NVIDIA Tesla K40c at 17,468 (-1.5%). The RTX 3070 sits in a dense performance cluster where 1.5% separates the bottom from the top.

The combined picture shows a system at the 74th percentile, with the CPU contributing significantly more to overall performance than the GPU relative to their respective peer groups. The CPU's multi-thread score of 23,000 in Cinebench R23 and single-thread of 3,247 indicate a balanced processor, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,162 and Passmark G3D of 22,214 show solid but not class-leading graphics performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing Intel's Core i5-14490F with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 3070. The CPU is part of the Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process, featuring 10 cores and 16 threads. The GPU is from the GeForce 30-series, using Ampere architecture on an 8 nm Samsung process, and is now end-of-life in production status.

The combined percentile of 74 places this system in the upper-mid tier of the database's tracked configurations. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 61st percentile indicate a processor-heavy build — the CPU is notably stronger relative to its market segment than the GPU is to its own. This creates a system that excels in CPU-bound workloads like compilation, rendering, and multitasking, while delivering competent but not exceptional GPU performance.

The GPU's launch MSRP was 499 USD, and it uses a dual-slot design measuring 242 mm in length and 112 mm in height. The card connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and outputs to 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. Its predecessor is GeForce 20 and successor is GeForce 40, placing it in the middle of NVIDIA's recent consumer lineup. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R codename) using Intel's 10 nm process. The die measures 215 mm² and features a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, running at a 65 W TDP. The multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking, and there is no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded capability: Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 2,318, R20 multi-core scores 9,660, and R23 multi-core scores 23,000. Single-core scores are equally solid — 327 in R15, 1,363 in R20, and 3,247 in R23. Passmark tests reinforce this: multithread scores 28,662, single-thread scores 3,873, integer math scores 87,844, floating-point math scores 66,558, and extended instructions score 21,731.

The 86th percentile ranking reflects a CPU that outperforms most processors in the database. The 10-core/16-thread configuration provides a balance between single-thread responsiveness and multi-thread throughput, with the 24 MB L3 cache reducing memory latency for frequently accessed data. The 5.00 GHz boost clock is among the highest available, giving the processor excellent per-core performance for lightly-threaded workloads like gaming.

The Passmark data compression score of 340,026 and random string sorting of 35,608 indicate strong memory subsystem performance, while the find prime numbers score of 122 is notably low, suggesting this particular workload — which often depends on specific instruction optimizations — is not a strength. The 18,225 data encryption score shows capable cryptographic throughput.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 with PCIe Gen 5 support providing 16 lanes from the CPU. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in platform cost and performance. ECC memory is not supported. The platform is mature, with the Core 14th Gen being among the final releases for Socket 1700, so upgrade options within the same socket are limited to other 14th Gen or previous-generation parts.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, and the 550 W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom for the 220 W GPU plus 65 W CPU. The power connector is a single 12-pin, which may require an adapter for older power supplies. The GPU's 242 mm length and dual-slot width fit most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, since the CPU has more headroom (86th percentile vs 61st). Moving to a higher-tier GPU with more VRAM would address the 8 GB limitation at high resolutions. Alternatively, adding more system memory or faster DDR5 could improve memory-bound workloads, though the CPU's current performance suggests diminishing returns. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support means a future GPU using PCIe 5.0 would run at full bandwidth, though the RTX 3070's PCIe 4.0 interface is sufficient for current performance levels.

The CPU's 65 W TDP means cooling requirements are modest, and the locked multiplier prevents overclocking, so a capable air cooler suffices. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so existing DDR4 memory could be reused in a new build to save costs, while DDR5 offers higher bandwidth for memory-intensive applications. Given the end-of-life status of both the GPU and the Socket 1700 platform, users should consider whether future upgrades are a priority before committing to this configuration long-term.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14490F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds