SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14490F is a desktop processor from Intel's Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture at Intel's 10 nm process node. The chip packs 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its thermal design power is 65 W, a modest figure that reflects its locked multiplier design — this is not an unlocked overclocking part.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration helps the processor in latency-sensitive workloads, particularly gaming and interactive tasks. The chip supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility for builders on either platform generation. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes ensures modern storage and GPU connectivity, though the GPU itself may use fewer lanes depending on the slot implementation.

Benchmark data places this CPU at the 86th percentile among all processors, indicating strong overall performance. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score reaches 23000, while single-core hits 3247. These are telling numbers: the multicore result suggests heavy multi-threaded workloads — compilation, rendering, video export — will be handled competently, while the single-core figure demonstrates the high boost clock's efficacy in lightly-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R20, scores are 9660 multicore and 1363 single-core; in R15, they are 2318 and 327 respectively.

The PassMark results add another layer of interpretation. The multithread score of 28662 and single-thread score of 3873 are broadly consistent with the Cinebench numbers, pointing to a balanced processor that does not sacrifice single-core responsiveness for multi-core throughput. Integer math scores 87844, floating-point math 66558, and extended instructions 21731 — these indicate strong number-crunching capability across varied instruction types. Data compression scores 340026, while encryption manages 18225, and the physics score is 2093. Prime-number finding scores 122, which is modest, but random string sorting reaches 35608, suggesting solid memory-handling characteristics in sorting workloads.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i5-14490F sits in a tight cluster. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T by 0.1% in average benchmark score, leads the Intel Core i5-13600KF by 0.1%, trails the AMD Ryzen 7 250 by 0.2%, and trails the Intel Core i5-13600HX by 0.3%. These delta percentages are minuscule — the processor is effectively performance-parity with a range of competitive options, both newer-generation and similar-generation parts. The average benchmark score of 38149 underscores this positioning.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The i5-14490F's single-core performance is the key driver here. A Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3247 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3873 indicate that the CPU can feed a discrete GPU adequately in most gaming scenarios. The 86th percentile standing among all CPUs means frame pacing in CPU-bound titles should be smooth, though GPU constraints will often dominate at higher resolutions.

Streaming: The 10-core, 16-thread configuration provides headroom for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay. A Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23000 suggests that x264 encoding at moderate presets is feasible alongside a game, though the GPU's NVENC capabilities (if present) would offload this task. The PassMark multithread score of 28662 reinforces the CPU's ability to handle concurrent workloads.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export are all multi-threaded tasks that benefit from the 16 threads. The multicore scores — 23000 in R23, 9660 in R20 — indicate export times that are respectable for the processor's class. The floating-point math score of 66558 is relevant for color grading and filter applications that rely on FP32 arithmetic.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray will scale with multicore performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23000 places the i5-14490F in a position where it can handle medium-to-large scenes, though it will not match higher-core-count workstation parts. The PassMark extended instructions score of 21731 suggests AVX-512-adjacent workloads are handled reasonably, though this chip does not explicitly list that instruction set.

Software development: Compilation is heavily multi-threaded, and the 16 threads combined with a data compression score of 340026 and integer math score of 87844 indicate that build times for large codebases will be relatively brisk. The L3 cache of 24 MB helps with working-set residency during incremental builds.

Student and office work: For productivity suites, web browsing, and document editing, the single-thread score of 3873 ensures snappy UI responsiveness. The 65 W TDP means the processor is easy to cool in compact desktop systems, and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows cost-effective memory configurations. The PassMark G2D-style integer performance (87844) is more than sufficient for office tasks.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 72, which sits below the CPU's individual 86th percentile but above the GPU's 57th percentile. This gap indicates that the GPU is the performance limiter in graphics-bound workloads. The CPU has significant headroom relative to the GPU — in gaming, the RTX 3050 OEM will be the constraint at most resolutions, with the i5-14490F capable of driving higher frame rates if paired with a stronger graphics card.

In CPU-bound scenarios — such as physics simulation, AI inference, or heavy multitasking — the processor will be the limiting factor, but its 86th percentile standing means it is not a weak link in most real-world applications. The GPU's percentile of 57 is notably lower, so any workload that stresses the graphics pipeline will see the GPU saturate first. This includes gaming at 1080p ultra settings, where the RTX 3050 OEM's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the constraining factors, and to a lesser extent 1440p gaming.

For productivity tasks that are purely CPU-bound — like code compilation or spreadsheet computation — the CPU will dominate the equation, and the GPU will be largely irrelevant. Conversely, for GPU-compute workloads like rendering in Blender's Cycles engine or video encoding, the RTX 3050 OEM's passmark GPU compute score of 5779 will be the bottleneck. The CPU's floating-point math score of 66558 is strong, but the GPU's FP32 throughput of 8.087 TFLOPS is the more relevant metric for graphics-heavy parallel loads.

The FPS scaling picture is simple: there is no measured FPS data for this combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. Given the GPU's 57th percentile and the CPU's 86th percentile, the pairing is GPU-bound in gaming — the CPU will not meaningfully limit frame rates in most titles at standard settings, and upgrading the GPU would yield proportionally larger FPS gains than upgrading the CPU.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity but are willing to accept mid-range GPU capability. Gamers playing at 1080p with moderate settings will find the RTX 3050 OEM sufficient, and the CPU's single-core strength ensures that frame rates are maximized for the GPU's capability. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle more, but the CPU will not be the limiting factor. Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound tasks — video editing, software development, 3D modeling — will benefit from the i5-14490F's multicore throughput, while the GPU provides basic acceleration for preview rendering and effects.

Students building a desktop for coursework, programming, and light gaming will find this a balanced system, with the CPU's 65 W TDP allowing for efficient operation and quiet cooling. Small business workstations that run office productivity suites, spreadsheet analysis, and light database work will see excellent responsiveness from the single-thread score of 3873, and the multithread score of 28662 handles parallel tasks like batch file conversion or report generation. The CPU's 86th percentile standing makes it a strong choice for any workload where the processor is the primary compute engine, while the GPU's 57th percentile limits it to mainstream graphics tasks rather than high-end 3D work.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-14490F achieves an average benchmark score of 38149, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong result, sitting just 0.1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38194) and 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600KF (38103). The AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38221) is 0.2% ahead, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX (38261) is 0.3% ahead. These differences are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the i5-14490F performs essentially identically to these rivals in aggregate.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM achieves an average benchmark score of 15199, placing it at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. It sits 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (15171), 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon 680M (15270), 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (15283), and 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (15290). Notably, the RTX 3050 OEM is effectively tied with the RTX 2060 in aggregate benchmark score, despite being a newer product — this indicates the OEM variant is not a significant performance upgrade over previous-generation mid-range parts.

The combined percentile for the pairing is 72, which reflects the GPU dragging down the CPU's stronger standing. In GPU-specific benchmarks, the RTX 3050 OEM scores 60740 in Geekbench OpenCL and 57103 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark results show G3D at 11857, GPU compute at 5779, DirectX 9 at 137, DirectX 10 at 61, DirectX 11 at 86, DirectX 12 at 58, and G2D at 973. The DirectX 12 score of 58 is notably low, suggesting that modern API-heavy workloads will underperform relative to the card's raw compute capabilities.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14490F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is shared across 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen Core processors. This means a motherboard purchased for this CPU can accept a range of other Socket 1700 parts, though the specific chipset determines feature support. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing builders to choose between the two memory generations based on motherboard selection and budget. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes is available, though the RTX 3050 OEM itself uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so the GPU will not saturate the CPU's PCIe bandwidth.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, and the GPU's TDP is 130 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 300 W. This leaves substantial headroom for additional components, storage drives, and peripherals. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card measuring 242 mm in length and 112 mm in height, which fits most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be a stronger GPU, given that the CPU's 86th percentile standing means it can drive more powerful graphics cards without bottlenecking. The RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile is the weaker link in this pairing, and upgrading to a GPU in the 70th percentile or higher would better match the CPU's capability. The CPU's 65 W TDP means it can be cooled by a capable air cooler, leaving case airflow and GPU thermals as the primary considerations for system cooling.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, specifically the GPU's 57th percentile and the CPU's 86th percentile. The data is not measured, so these figures should be treated as approximations.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11857 and DirectX 12 score of 58, the RTX 3050 OEM is positioned for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings in most titles, with ultra settings achievable in less demanding games. The 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle 1080p textures well, but 1440p will stress the memory bus and capacity. The CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3247) ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, so the GPU's output will not be hampered by CPU stalls in most scenarios.

For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the CPU's single-thread performance will allow the GPU to deliver high frame rates, likely in the hundreds of FPS at 1080p low settings, though the GPU's DirectX 9 score of 137 suggests older API titles are handled well. For AAA games at 1080p ultra, the GPU will likely deliver playable but not high-refresh frame rates, with the DirectX 12 score of 58 indicating that modern APIs are a relative weakness. At 1440p, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and users should expect to reduce settings to maintain playable frame rates.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-14490F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The combined percentile is 72, placing the system in the upper-mid range of overall performance. The CPU is a strong 10-core, 16-thread processor at the 86th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range Ampere-based card at the 57th percentile. The pairing is CPU-heavy, meaning the processor has more headroom than the graphics card in most workloads. This is a system for users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity and accept mainstream GPU capability for gaming and graphics acceleration. The 65 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP with a 300 W suggested PSU indicate a power-efficient build that is suitable for a wide range of desktop cases and cooling solutions.

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-14490F's architecture and process node?

A: The i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R codename) on Intel's 10 nm process node, manufactured by Intel.

Q: How does the i5-14490F compare to the Intel Core i5-13600KF?

A: The i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38149, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-13600KF's 38103, making them effectively performance-equivalent.

Q: What is the RTX 3050 OEM's VRAM and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the i5-14490F support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked = false), so it does not support manual overclocking.

Q: What memory types does the i5-14490F support?

A: It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing flexible motherboard and memory configuration choices.

Q: How does the RTX 3050 OEM's performance compare to the RTX 2060?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has an average benchmark score of 15199, which is 0.6% higher than the RTX 2060's 15290, meaning they perform at a nearly identical level.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 300 W, based on the GPU's 130 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP, with a single 8-pin power connector required for the GPU.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is based on the GA106 chip using the Ampere architecture, fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process node. The die contains 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 43.5 million per mm². The GPU has 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, along with 18 ray tracing cores and 72 tensor cores. The base clock is 1515 MHz with a boost clock of 1755 MHz, while memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This bandwidth is modest by modern standards and will limit the GPU in high-resolution textures and compute workloads that are memory-bandwidth sensitive. The pixel rate is 56.16 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 126.4 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance at 8.087 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same rate (1:1 ratio). The card interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its performance class but means it cannot take full advantage of the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

In benchmark terms, the RTX 3050 OEM scores 60740 in Geekbench OpenCL and 57103 in Geekbench Vulkan, indicating moderate compute capability. The PassMark G3D score of 11857 places it at the 57th percentile among all GPUs, which is mid-range territory. The DirectX 12 score of 58 is low, suggesting the GPU is not particularly well-optimized for modern API workloads — this could impact performance in titles that rely heavily on DX12 features like mesh shaders or ray tracing. The DirectX 11 score of 86 is higher, indicating better relative performance in legacy API titles.

The RTX 3050 OEM's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (0.2% higher average score), AMD Radeon 680M (0.5% lower), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (0.5% lower), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (0.6% lower). The tight clustering around 15199-15290 means the RTX 3050 OEM is positioned in a crowded performance band where no single card has a decisive advantage. The GPU's ray tracing cores (18) and tensor cores (72) provide hardware support for RT and DLSS features, but the modest compute throughput (8.087 TFLOPS FP32) means these features will come with a performance cost in practice.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's compute score of 5779 in PassMark suggests it can handle light-to-moderate GPU-accelerated tasks, but it is not a workstation-class part. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p rendering with reasonable settings, but larger scenes or higher resolutions will exceed its capacity. The GPU is end-of-life per its production status, which means it is no longer in active manufacturing — buyers should consider this when evaluating long-term driver support and availability. The dual-slot form factor and 242 mm length make it compatible with most cases, and the single 8-pin connector simplifies power cabling.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14490F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds