SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

13,543 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14490F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT combine a 10-core, 16-thread CPU with a 16 GB GDDR6 graphics card, both targeting the desktop market. The pair earns a combined percentile of 71, with the CPU at 86th and the GPU at 55th among their respective categories. No measured frame‑rate data exists for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries — so all gaming performance discussed below is estimated from synthetic benchmark scores rather than direct FPS measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5‑14490F is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake‑R, on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The processor carries 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. It supports dual‑channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offers 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU‑only), and has no integrated graphics. The TDP is 65 W, and the socket is Intel Socket 1700.

Benchmark results place the CPU in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38,149. Cinebench R23 multi‑core returns 23,000, while single‑core is 3,247. PassMark results include a multi‑thread score of 28,662 and a single‑thread score of 3,873. Integer math (87,844) and floating‑point math (66,558) indicate strong arithmetic throughput. The CPU’s nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (delta −0.1%), Intel Core i5‑13600KF (delta +0.1%), AMD Ryzen 7 250 (delta −0.2%), and Intel Core i5‑13600HX (delta −0.3%). These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, showing the i5‑14490F sits in a tight performance band among mid‑range desktop and mobile chips. The high single‑core score (3,247 in Cinebench R23) suggests excellent responsiveness for latency‑sensitive tasks, while the multi‑core figure (23,000) points to solid throughput for threaded workloads. The 65 W TDP is modest for the performance level, indicating good efficiency for a desktop part.

Usage Scenarios

High‑refresh gaming — The CPU’s single‑core performance (Cinebench R23 3,247, PassMark 3,873) and the GPU’s boost clock of 2970 MHz work together to feed fast frames. With 16 GB of VRAM and a 644.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, the GPU has ample resources for high‑detail textures and modern API workloads. No exact FPS figures are available, but the combination of a 86th‑percentile CPU and a GPU with 48.66 TFLOPS FP32 suggests the system can push high refresh rates at standard resolutions, provided the game is not CPU‑bounded.

Streaming — The 16 threads handle concurrent encoding and gameplay. The CPU’s multi‑core score of 23,000 in Cinebench R23 indicates headroom for a software encoder while gaming. The GPU’s compute score (15,864 in PassMark) and 64 RT cores can assist with video effects, but the data does not specify dedicated encoder hardware.

Video editing — The CPU’s multi‑threaded performance (PassMark multi‑thread 28,662, Cinebench R23 multi 23,000) accelerates timeline rendering and export. Data compression of 340,026 in PassMark suggests efficient handling of compressed video streams. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and high bandwidth (644.6 GB/s) help with large previews and effects, while the FP32 compute of 48.66 TFLOPS can accelerate GPU‑accelerated effects.

3D rendering — Cinebench R23 multi‑core 23,000 and the GPU’s 48.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance make this a capable pair for both CPU‑based and GPU‑based rendering. The CPU’s 86th percentile ensures it will not lag in ray‑tracing pre‑processing, and the GPU’s 64 RT cores (from the FACT pack) provide dedicated ray‑tracing hardware. The 16 GB VRAM allows large scenes to be held in memory.

Software development — The CPU’s integer math score (87,844) and data compression (340,026) are strong for compilation and code processing. The 5.00 GHz boost clock accelerates single‑threaded build tasks, while the 16 threads handle parallel compilation jobs. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code.

Student and office work — With a TDP of 65 W and single‑thread performance in the 86th percentile, the i5‑14490F handles everyday office tasks with minimal power draw. The integrated graphics are absent, but the discrete GPU is present, which is more than enough for productivity. The CPU’s low power envelope means a quiet, efficient desktop.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38,149, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within a 0.3% delta, with the i5‑13600KF matching it at a +0.1% delta. The GPU’s average score is 13,543, and it sits at the 55th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7770M (delta +0.1%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (delta +0.2%), NVIDIA P106‑090 (delta +0.5%), and AMD Radeon Pro 555 (delta +1.0%). The GPU’s benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7,260, Geekbench OpenCL 17,428, Geekbench Vulkan 65,879, and PassMark G3D 26,795. The GPU’s percentile is notably lower than the CPU’s, suggesting the CPU is the stronger component relative to its respective pool. Combined, the pair ranks at the 71st percentile overall.

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi‑core score of 23,000 and single‑core 3,247 place it in the upper tier for both threaded and single‑threaded tasks. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 7,260 indicates a strong DX12 performance, and its 16 GB VRAM provides capacity for large textures. The GPU’s 55th percentile is surprising given its modern architecture, but the benchmark suite includes legacy DirectX 9/10/11 tests (scores of 353, 154, and 292, respectively) which may drag the average down; the DirectX 12 score is 78. This suggests the GPU’s percentile is understated by legacy workloads, while its modern API performance (Vulkan 65,879) is far higher.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all frame‑rate discussion is estimated from synthetic benchmark scores. The CPU’s single‑core performance (Cinebench R23 3,247) and the GPU’s boost clock (2970 MHz) together suggest the system is capable of high‑refresh gaming at 1080p and likely 1440p, but exact numbers cannot be provided. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern game textures. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 7,260 indicates strong DX12 performance, which correlates with newer titles. Without measured data, we cannot specify FPS at any resolution or game; all such figures would be pure speculation. The CPU’s 86th percentile ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, and the GPU’s high boost clock supports high frame rates when the game is GPU‑bound.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 86th percentile is far above the GPU’s 55th percentile, indicating the CPU is the more capable component relative to its own pool. In gaming, where the GPU typically defines the frame rate, the GPU is the likely bottleneck. However, the CPU’s single‑thread strength (PassMark 3,873) and multi‑thread throughput (28,662) mean it can keep up with the GPU’s demands. The combined percentile of 71 suggests the two are well‑matched, but the CPU has headroom to push a stronger GPU if the user later upgrades. The GPU’s low percentile relative to its modern features (e.g., 64 RT cores, 16 GB VRAM) suggests the benchmark pool may be biased toward older GPUs, so the real‑world bottleneck could be less severe than the percentile gap indicates. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 304 W TDP together require a 700 W PSU (as suggested), which provides sufficient power headroom for both components under load.

Who Should Build It

This build suits gamers who prioritize high refresh rates at 1080p or 1440p, given the CPU’s strong single‑thread performance and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM. Content creators, including video editors and 3D renderers, will benefit from the CPU’s multi‑core 23,000 score and the GPU’s 48.66 TFLOPS FP32 compute. Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s integer math (87,844) and compression (340,026) for compilation tasks. Students and office users can rely on the CPU’s low 65 W TDP and fast single‑thread speed for everyday productivity, though the lack of integrated graphics means the GPU is always active. Small business workstations needing a balance of CPU and GPU power for light rendering or data processing will find the combination adequate. The pair is not intended for extreme 4K gaming where the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM may be limiting, but no measured FPS data exists to confirm.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The dual‑channel memory bus allows for standard memory upgrades. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The suggested PSU is 700 W, which is required for the GPU’s 304 W TDP plus the CPU’s 65 W TDP. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is low, leaving ample headroom for a future GPU upgrade if the PSU is still sufficient. The platform supports 14th‑generation Intel processors, but no specific upgrade model is listed in the FACT PACK. A sensible next upgrade could be a CPU with more cores on the same socket, but that would require checking compatibility with the existing chipset. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is generous for current titles, so a future GPU upgrade would likely be for higher resolutions or ray tracing intensity.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing an Intel Core i5‑14490F with an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT. The CPU is a 10‑core, 16‑thread processor with a 5.00 GHz boost, and the GPU is a 16 GB GDDR6 card with a 2970 MHz boost clock. The combined percentile of 71 places it above the median, with the CPU significantly outperforming the GPU in percentile terms. The CPU’s average score is 38,149 (86th percentile), and the GPU’s average is 13,543 (55th percentile). This build is a mid‑range to high‑end desktop suitable for a wide range of workloads, from gaming to content creation.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How much VRAM does the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s boost clock?

A: The GPU’s boost clock is 2970 MHz.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The GPU has a launch MSRP of 599 USD.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 71.

Q: What is the CPU’s average benchmark score?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38,149, placing it in the 86th percentile.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 48 chip, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It has 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die. The GPU features 4,096 shading units, 256 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 64 RT cores. Memory is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256‑bit bus, with a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. The base clock is 1660 MHz, the game clock is 2400 MHz, and the boost clock is 2970 MHz. The memory clock is 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a outputs, and is a dual‑slot card with two 8‑pin power connectors. The suggested PSU is 700 W, and the TDP is 304 W.

Benchmark results include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7,260, GeekbenchOpenCL 17,428, Geekbench Vulkan 65,879, and PassMark G3D 26,795. The GPU’s average score is 13,543, placing it in the 55th percentile. Its nearest rivals are older GPUs (HD 7770M, GTX 570, P106‑090, Radeon Pro 555) with deltas of 0.1% to 1.0%, which indicates the benchmark pool may not reflect the GPU’s modern performance. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 48.66 TFLOPS, and it has 64 RT cores, which is substantial for ray tracing. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for current games and creative work. The GPU’s lower percentile relative to the CPU suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing, but its modern features (RDNA 4.0, RT, 16 GB) make it a strong choice for high‑detail gaming and rendering workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14490F

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds