SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14490F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT forms a desktop build that sits at the 71st combined percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings. This places the combination in the upper tier of systems, though the individual components tell a more nuanced story: the CPU ranks at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 55th percentile among all graphics cards. The data available for this pairing includes no measured FPS rows, so all gaming performance discussion must be framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p is the primary strength of this pairing, but the FPS figures are estimates since no measured rows exist for this exact combination. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3247 in Cinebench R23 suggests strong frame pacing in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 indicates it can push high frame rates at lower resolutions. The GPU’s 20 GB of GDDR6 memory and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for texture-heavy scenes, but the GPU’s 55th percentile overall means it is not a top-tier performer for extreme refresh rates like 360 Hz.

Streaming while gaming relies on both the CPU’s multi-threaded capacity and the GPU’s encoding capabilities. The i5-14490F’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 places it in the 86th percentile of CPUs, which is sufficient for software encoding at moderate bitrates. The RX 7900 XT’s 84 ray accelerators and 5376 shading units handle rendering tasks concurrently, but the lack of dedicated tensor cores means any AI-assisted streaming features are absent from the data. The 65 W TDP of the CPU leaves thermal headroom for simultaneous workloads, while the GPU’s 300 W TDP requires the suggested 700 W PSU to maintain stability.

Video editing benefits from the CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 28662, which ranks it above 86% of all processors. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9660 suggests timeline scrubbing and export tasks will be responsive, though the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 12756 indicates it can accelerate effects and color grading. The 20 GB VRAM is particularly useful for 4K timelines with multiple layers, as it reduces the need to spill to system memory. However, the GPU’s 55th percentile ranking means it is not a specialist in compute-heavy render tasks compared to the CPU’s stronger relative position.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Maya favors the CPU’s Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2318, which is nearly 99% of the score of the nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, at 38194 average. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 51.48 TFLOPS provides a solid baseline for GPU-accelerated renders, but the 55th percentile suggests it is outclassed by higher-tier cards in this workload. The CPU’s Passmark floating point math score of 66558 indicates strong single-precision performance, which aligns with physics simulations in rendering engines.

Software development workloads, including compilation and testing, are well-served by the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads. The Passmark integer math score of 87844 and data compression score of 340026 show strong throughput for code builds and database operations. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 71068 in Geekbench indicates it can handle graphics debugging and shader compilation without bottlenecking the CPU. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache on the CPU reduces latency for frequently accessed code segments, while the dual-channel memory bus supports either DDR4 or DDR5, giving builders flexibility.

Student and office work does not stress this hardware, but the data shows it is overkill for such tasks. The CPU’s single-thread Passmark score of 3873 ensures snappy application launches, while the GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 1232 covers basic 2D acceleration. The 65 W CPU TDP means low idle power draw, and the GPU’s dual-slot design fits standard mid-tower cases. For document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, this pairing is far beyond requirements, but it provides headroom for future software demands without needing an upgrade.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38149, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-13600KF with an average score of 38103, a delta of 0.1%, meaning the two are statistically equivalent. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38194, a -0.1% delta, while the AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221, a -0.2% delta, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261, a -0.3% delta. This clustering shows the i5-14490F sits at the center of a tight performance band, with no single rival exceeding it by more than 0.3%.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 13745, placing it at the 55th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon 660M with an average score of 13812, a -0.5% delta, meaning the RX 7900 XT is slightly behind. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile scores 13821, a -0.5% delta, while the AMD Radeon RX 570X scores 13871, a -0.9% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT scores 13543, a 1.5% delta, meaning the RX 7900 XT is ahead of that card by 1.5%. This places the GPU in a mid-pack position relative to both older and newer cards, not a standout performer.

Looking at specific benchmark tests, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 23000, while its single-core score is 3247. The Passmark multi-thread score of 28662 and single-thread score of 3873 reinforce the pattern of balanced performance. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 is its strongest result, while the Passmark G3D score of 29009 shows a high absolute number but a modest percentile. The combined picture is a CPU that punches above its weight class relative to all processors, paired with a GPU that is competent but not elite, resulting in the 71st combined percentile.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cheaper DDR4 modules or faster DDR5, though the memory bandwidth is not specified in the data. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, enabling high-speed NVMe storage and future graphics cards that might use Gen 5 interfaces, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The GPU’s suggested PSU is 700 W, while the CPU’s TDP is 65 W and the GPU’s TDP is 300 W. This leaves roughly 335 W of headroom for other components like drives, fans, and RGB lighting, assuming a 700 W PSU is used. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors, which are standard on most modern power supplies. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, meaning no future driver optimizations are guaranteed, while the CPU is active in production.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, since the CPU has a 31-percentage-point higher percentile ranking (86 vs 55) and is not the limiting factor in most workloads. The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within a 0.3% delta, so upgrading the CPU would yield negligible gains. Moving to a GPU with a higher percentile would better match the CPU’s performance, though the data does not specify which specific cards would be suitable. The motherboard socket supports 14th Gen Intel CPUs, so a higher-core-count model from the same series could be a drop-in upgrade, but the benchmark scores suggest the current CPU is already well-positioned.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 86th percentile versus the GPU’s 55th percentile creates a clear imbalance. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation or data compression, the GPU will be underutilized, as the CPU handles the bulk of the work. The Passmark data compression score of 340026 and integer math score of 87844 show the CPU excels at these tasks, while the GPU’s Passmark GPU compute score of 16828 is comparatively modest.

In GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the CPU will have headroom. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5623 and Passmark G3D score of 29009 indicate it is the limiting factor in these scenarios. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 is more than sufficient to feed the GPU’s rendering pipeline, so the bottleneck will be the GPU’s raw throughput.

For gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3247 in Cinebench R23 becomes more important, as lower resolutions put more strain on the CPU. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth become the primary drivers, and the CPU’s workload decreases. The data suggests that at higher resolutions, the GPU will be the limiting factor, while at lower resolutions, the CPU might occasionally hold back the GPU in very high-refresh scenarios. Since no measured FPS data exists, these are estimates based on the percentile positions.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2500 MHz with 20 Gbps effective speed. The GPU has 5376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 raster operation units. Its base clock is 1387 MHz, with a boost clock of 2394 MHz and a game clock of 2025 MHz.

The GPU is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC, containing 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. It has 84 ray accelerators for ray tracing workloads, but no tensor cores are listed, meaning AI-accelerated tasks are not a focus. The FP32 performance is 51.48 TFLOPS, while FP16 is 103.0 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 459.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 804.4 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 is its strongest metric, indicating solid DirectX 12 gaming performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 71068 is also high, suggesting good cross-platform API support. However, the Passmark DirectX 11 score of 340 and DirectX 12 score of 110 are lower relatively, which might reflect driver optimizations or test conditions. The GPU’s 55th percentile means it is outperformed by 45% of all GPUs, which is surprising given its high VRAM and bandwidth figures, suggesting that raw specs do not always translate to top-tier benchmark placements.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who play at 1440p or 4K resolutions, where the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM becomes an advantage for high-resolution textures. The CPU’s 86th percentile ensures it will not bottleneck at these resolutions, but the GPU’s 55th percentile means frame rates will be moderate, not extreme. Estimate-based FPS values would likely be playable at 60 FPS in most titles, but not at competitive 240 Hz levels.

Content creators working with 4K video or large 3D scenes benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance, as the Cinebench R23 score of 23000 and Passmark multi-thread score of 28662 show strong export and rendering capabilities. The GPU’s 20 GB VRAM helps with GPU-accelerated effects, but the 55th percentile suggests it is not a top choice for dedicated render farms.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 87844 and data compression score of 340026, which speed up build times. The GPU’s Vulkan support is adequate for graphics development, though the lack of tensor cores means no AI development acceleration. Students and office workers would find this system overkill, but it offers headroom for future software demands, and the 65 W CPU TDP keeps idle power low for always-on machines.

Small business workstations handling database operations or financial modeling would see benefits from the CPU’s data encryption score of 18225 and random string sorting score of 35608, which indicate strong multi-threaded throughput. The GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 1232 covers basic display needs, but the system is more than required for typical office tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and it has a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory, but does not support ECC memory. The CPU has no integrated graphics and is not multiplier-unlocked.

Benchmark results show the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 is its most impressive result, placing it at the 86th percentile. The single-core score of 3247 is also strong, indicating good per-thread performance for gaming and lightly-threaded apps. The Passmark single-thread score of 3873 reinforces this, while the multi-thread score of 28662 shows scalability across cores.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within a 0.3% delta, meaning real-world performance differences are negligible. The Intel Core i5-13600KF at 38103 average score is the closest match, with a 0.1% delta. This suggests the i5-14490F is essentially a rebadged or slightly adjusted version of existing 14th Gen parts, offering no unique performance advantage. The Passmark extended instructions score of 21731 and floating point math score of 66558 indicate strong SIMD performance for scientific and engineering workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 71, placing it in the upper tier of all desktop pairings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13600KF?

A: The i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38149, while the i5-13600KF scores 38103, a delta of 0.1%, meaning the i5-14490F is slightly ahead.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 7900 XT has 84 ray accelerators, which are dedicated hardware units for ray tracing workloads.

Q: What is the power requirement for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 700 W, with the CPU drawing 65 W and the GPU drawing 300 W.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all FPS values are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, but does not support ECC memory.

Q: How does the GPU rank relative to all GPUs?

A: The GPU is at the 55th percentile, meaning it outperforms 55% of all GPUs but is behind 45% of them.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so the following are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 suggests it can handle modern games at high settings, while the CPU’s single-thread score of 3247 in Cinebench R23 indicates it will not bottleneck most titles.

At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance becomes more critical, and the estimate is that frame rates will be high, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in esports titles, though the GPU’s 55th percentile limits the absolute ceiling. At 1440p, the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth provide smooth texture streaming, with estimated frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range for AAA games on ultra settings. At 4K, the GPU’s 55th percentile means it will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in the most demanding titles, though less intensive games may hit that mark.

The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 29009 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 71068 suggest it is well-optimized for modern APIs, which should translate to stable frame times. The lack of tensor cores means no DLSS-like AI upscaling, but the GPU’s FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS supports traditional rendering well. These estimates are provisional, and actual performance will vary by game optimization and driver maturity.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14490F with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. The CPU is from the Core 14th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture, and is actively in production. The GPU is from the Radeon RX 7000 series, based on RDNA 3.0 architecture, and is marked as end-of-life. The combined percentile is 71, which places this system above 71% of all benchmarked pairings.

The CPU’s 86th percentile indicates it is a strong performer relative to all processors, while the GPU’s 55th percentile shows it is a mid-pack graphics card. This asymmetry means the system is CPU-heavy, excelling in multi-threaded productivity tasks while being adequate, but not exceptional, in GPU-bound workloads. The launch MSRP for the GPU is 899 USD, which can be stated once as a reference point. The system is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-intensive work like compilation, rendering, and data processing, while still having enough GPU power for 1440p gaming. The overall tier is upper-midrange, with the CPU providing most of the performance advantage and the GPU serving as a capable but not flagship partner.