SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14490F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT form a desktop pairing that sits in the upper-middle tier of the benchmark database. The CPU, a 10-core Raptor Lake Refresh part, delivers strong multi-threaded performance with a 23,000 score in Cinebench R23 multicore, while the GPU, based on RDNA 3.0, offers 12 GB of VRAM and a 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The combined percentile of 77 indicates that this system outperforms most registered configurations, though the data shows specific strengths and weaknesses that matter for different workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F scores 23,000 in Cinebench R23 multicore, placing it nearly level with the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (deltaPct -0.1), Intel Core i5-13600KF (deltaPct 0.1), and AMD Ryzen 7 250 (deltaPct -0.2). The differences are within a fraction of a percent, meaning these processors are effectively tied in average benchmark score.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its closest competitors?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 XT has an average benchmark score of 22,549 and sits at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. It is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile and 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700, while trailing the RTX 4060 Mobile by 0.8% and the RTX 2080 by 1.5%.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The platform does not support ECC memory, which positions it for consumer desktop use rather than error-correcting workstation workloads.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The Core i5-14490F has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, but users cannot manually adjust the multiplier to push beyond these factory settings.

Q: What is the GPU’s power connector requirement?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT requires two 8-pin power connectors and has a TDP of 245 W. The suggested power supply is 550 W, which provides headroom for the GPU’s power draw alongside other system components.

Q: What API features does the GPU support?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This includes hardware ray tracing support through 54 RT cores, enabling modern graphics features in compatible titles.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded tasks?

A: The Core i5-14490F scores 3,247 in Cinebench R23 singlecore and 3,873 in Passmark single-thread tests. These figures indicate solid per-core performance that supports responsive everyday use and gaming, though not class-leading.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14490F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This dual-memory support gives builders flexibility, though the platform’s PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage and graphics cards. The CPU does not include integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. The GPU’s 245 W TDP and suggested 550 W power supply leave room for the 65 W CPU, meaning a 550 W unit can handle the combined load with modest headroom. However, the GPU’s two 8-pin connectors require a power supply with sufficient PCIe power cables.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on workload. For gaming, the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for current titles, but a higher-tier GPU would address the 67th percentile positioning. For productivity, the CPU’s locked multiplier limits tuning, so upgrading to an unlocked K-series part on the same socket would be the logical step, assuming the motherboard chipset supports it. The platform’s DDR4 support means existing memory can carry over, reducing upgrade costs.

The CPU’s 10 nm process node and 215 mm² die size are modest by current standards, while the GPU’s 5 nm process and 346 mm² die with 28,100 million transistors reflect a denser design. The platform’s active production status for both components suggests ongoing availability for new builds or replacements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps thermal requirements manageable for standard air coolers. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,000 places it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong performance for content creation and compilation tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 28,662 and integer math score of 87,844 reinforce this, showing capability in parallel processing. The data compression score of 340,026 suggests efficient handling of archiving and file management tasks.

Single-threaded performance is adequate but less remarkable. The Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 3,247 and Passmark single-thread score of 3,873 are competitive for everyday tasks and gaming, though they lag behind higher-clock parts. The Passmark floating point math score of 66,558 and extended instructions score of 21,731 indicate solid scientific and encryption performance, with data encryption scoring 18,225.

The nearest rivals show how tightly packed this segment is. The Core i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38,149, which is within 0.3% of the Core Ultra 5 245T, Core i5-13600KF, and Ryzen 7 250. This means real-world differences between these CPUs are negligible, and platform features or price would be the deciding factors. The CPU’s 10 nm process node is less advanced than the GPU’s 5 nm, but the architecture compensates with high boost clocks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of a 65 W 10-core CPU with a 245 W GPU suggests a GPU-bound system for most gaming scenarios. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs is higher than the GPU’s 67th percentile, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-heavy workloads. This is typical for a balanced gaming build, where the GPU handles rendering while the CPU manages game logic and physics.

The Passmark physics score of 2,093 and the CPU’s single-thread performance of 3,873 support this balance. In gaming, the CPU can feed the GPU with frames at high refresh rates, but the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,316 will cap frame rates in demanding titles. The GPU’s texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s are sufficient for 1440p gaming, but at 4K, the 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth may become constraints.

For productivity, the CPU becomes the bottleneck. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,000 is strong, but the GPU’s compute performance (Passmark GPU compute of 12,912) is less critical for CPU-bound tasks like compilation or spreadsheet processing. The data shows that neither component dramatically outclasses the other, so workload-specific tuning would be necessary to optimize performance.

The combined percentile of 77 reflects this balance, positioning the system above average but not at the top tier. The nearest GPU rivals, including the RTX 5060 Mobile and RTX 2080, are within 1.5% of the RX 7700 XT’s average score, so swapping the GPU would not fundamentally change the system’s character. The CPU’s rivals are similarly clustered, meaning the bottleneck is more about workload type than component selection.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. It features 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines, along with 54 RT cores for hardware ray tracing. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1435 MHz, a game clock of 2171 MHz, and a boost clock of 2544 MHz.

Memory configuration includes 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. This capacity and bandwidth support 1440p gaming with high textures, though 4K ultra settings may exceed the 12 GB buffer in some titles. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS (1:1) indicate strong compute capability for rendering and scientific workloads.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a capable mid-range GPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,316 and Passmark G3D score of 22,547 place it at the 67th percentile. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 138,383 shows robust compute performance, while the Vulkan score of 46,443 suggests good API efficiency. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 232 and DirectX 12 score of 79 indicate that the GPU handles modern APIs well but has room for improvement in legacy DirectX 9 (294) and DirectX 10 (119) scenarios.

The GPU’s nearest rivals are all within 1.7% of its average score, with the RTX 2080 being 1.5% faster and the RX 5700 being 1.7% slower. This tight grouping means the RX 7700 XT is competitive with older flagship cards and modern mid-range offerings. The dual-slot design, 267 mm length, and two 8-pin power connectors are standard for its class, and the display outputs include HDMI 2.1a, two DisplayPort 2.1, and one USB Type-C.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,873 and the GPU’s 3DMark score of 3,316 suggest the system can maintain high frame rates in esports titles, though the GPU’s 67th percentile may limit ultra settings in AAA games. The 12 GB VRAM provides headroom for texture-heavy titles.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s hardware encoding capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,000 allows simultaneous game and encode workloads without major frame drops, while the GPU’s compute resources handle video processing.

Video editing in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve would leverage the CPU’s multithread score of 28,662 in Passmark and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 138,383 for effects and rendering. The 24 MB L3 cache aids timeline scrubbing, and the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth supports 4K footage.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya is CPU-bound for most scenes. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,000 places the CPU at the 86th percentile, making it competitive for moderate rendering tasks. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS accelerates viewport rendering and final-frame ray tracing.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads, with the Passmark integer math score of 87,844 indicating strong compilation speed. The data encryption score of 18,225 supports secure coding practices, though the locked multiplier limits overclocking for build farms.

Student and office work is well-served by the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,873 and the GPU’s 2D performance (Passmark G2D score of 1,161). The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption low for daily use, while the GPU provides acceleration for spreadsheet visualizations or light photo editing.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a gamer playing at 1440p, where the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate, and the CPU’s 86th percentile ensures consistent frame pacing. The system’s combined 77th percentile means it outperforms most builds, making it suitable for enthusiasts who want high settings without flagship costs.

Content creators who edit 1080p or 1440p video will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,000 sufficient for export tasks, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 138,383 accelerates effects. The 16 threads handle multitasking between editing software and background processes.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 87,844 and the 24 MB L3 cache. The GPU is less critical for this workload, but its compute capabilities support machine learning experiments or local testing.

Students and small business workstations benefit from the CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s dual-slot form factor, which fits standard cases. The system handles office suites, web browsing, and light media creation without excessive power draw or noise.

The GPU’s 67th percentile and CPU’s 86th percentile mean the system is not optimized for 4K gaming or professional 3D rendering. Users targeting those workloads would need a higher-tier GPU or a more powerful CPU, respectively.

Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core i5-14490F, a 10-core Raptor Lake Refresh desktop processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, a RDNA 3.0 desktop GPU. Both components are in active production, with the CPU released in late 2023 and the GPU in September 2023. The pairing is classified as a desktop build with a combined percentile of 77, indicating it outperforms 77% of registered configurations.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 38,149 places it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU’s average score of 22,549 places it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. This discrepancy means the system is CPU-heavy relative to its GPU, which is advantageous for productivity tasks but limits pure gaming performance to the GPU’s tier.

The system’s overall tier is upper-midrange, sitting between budget builds and high-end workstations. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the RTX 5060 Mobile and RTX 2080, while the CPU’s rivals include the Core Ultra 5 245T and Ryzen 7 250. This places the build in a competitive segment where small benchmark differences translate to negligible real-world performance gaps.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite shows a strong multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench, the multicore scores are 2,318 (R15), 9,660 (R20), and 23,000 (R23), with singlecore scores of 327, 1,363, and 3,247 respectively. The Passmark tests reveal a similar pattern: multithread score of 28,662, single-thread score of 3,873, integer math of 87,844, and floating point math of 66,558.

The GPU’s benchmarks are led by the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,316 and the Passmark G3D score of 22,547. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 138,383 is notably strong, while the Vulkan score of 46,443 shows good cross-API performance. The DirectX 11 score of 232 and DirectX 12 score of 79 indicate modern API support, with the DirectX 9 score of 294 showing legacy compatibility.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The CPU’s 86th percentile versus the GPU’s 67th percentile means the GPU is the limiting factor for graphics-intensive tasks, but the overall 77th percentile indicates a well-rounded system for most users.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,316 and the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,873 suggest that at 1080p, the system can achieve high frame rates in esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, likely exceeding 144 FPS on medium settings.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth support high settings in most AAA games. The estimated frame rates would range from 60-100 FPS depending on the title, with the CPU’s 86th percentile ensuring no bottleneck at these resolutions. The GPU’s 67th percentile means it trails the RTX 2080 by 1.5%, so performance would be comparable to that older flagship.

At 4K, the GPU’s memory bandwidth becomes a constraint. The 192-bit bus and 12 GB capacity may cause texture streaming issues in the most demanding titles, with estimated frame rates dropping below 60 FPS on ultra settings. The 54 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the FP32 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS suggests ray-traced scenes will run at reduced frame rates.

The CPU’s Passmark physics score of 2,093 and the GPU’s texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s indicate that the system handles physics calculations and texture-heavy scenes without major stutters. However, the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, and actual performance may vary based on drivers, cooling, and game optimization.