SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

42,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis — Intel Core i5-14490F

The Intel Core i5-14490F is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (specifically Raptor Lake-R), manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Notably, it lacks integrated graphics, meaning a discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This arrangement favors workloads that benefit from large, fast intermediate storage, such as databases, compression tasks, and certain multi-threaded rendering pipelines. The 24 MB L3 is particularly useful for maintaining high hit rates in gaming and productivity applications where data reuse patterns are frequent.

Benchmark data places this chip in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 38,149. The nearest rivals show extremely tight competition: it trails the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T by only 0.1% (scores 38,194 vs. 38,149), beats the Intel Core i5-13600KF by 0.1% (38,103), trails the AMD Ryzen 7 250 by 0.2% (38,221), and trails the Intel Core i5-13600HX by 0.3% (38,261). These sub-1% deltas indicate that the i5-14490F sits in a performance cluster where architectural differences yield negligible practical impact in most real-world workloads.

In Cinebench testing, the multi-core scores scale impressively: R15 yields 2,318, R20 yields 9,660, and R23 yields 23,000. The single-core results are 327, 1,363, and 3,247 for R15, R20, and R23 respectively. The R23 multi-core score of 23,000 against a single-core score of 3,247 suggests a multi-threading efficiency of roughly 7.1x, which is reasonable for 10 cores / 16 threads but not perfectly linear, implying some shared resource contention. This matters for heavily threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D scene rendering, where the CPU will not scale perfectly with core count but still delivers strong throughput.

PassMark results further illuminate the chip's character. The multi-thread score is 28,662, while single-thread is 3,873. Integer math scores 87,844 and floating-point math scores 66,558, indicating that integer-heavy logic (spreadsheets, compilers, database queries) runs faster relative to floating-point operations. Data compression scores 340,026, which is a standout result, while data encryption scores 18,225. Extended instructions (SIMD/AVX) score 21,731, and random string sorting reaches 35,608. Physics simulation scores 2,093, and prime number finding scores 122. These numbers suggest the CPU is particularly adept at compression and sorting tasks, while physics and encryption workloads are comparatively less dominant — though still respectable.

The base clock of 2.50 GHz is modest, but the 5.00 GHz boost clock provides substantial single-thread headroom. For bursty workloads that rely on one or two threads — such as spreadsheet recalculation, light scripting, or the main thread of a game engine — the boost behavior is critical. The 65 W TDP indicates efficient power delivery, which in turn suggests that sustained all-core loads will be thermally manageable with a capable air cooler, though no cooler size or specification is provided in the data.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined CPU+GPU pairing achieves an overall percentile of 85 among all systems, placing it firmly in the upper tier of desktop configurations. The CPU alone sits at the 86th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 83rd percentile, indicating a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other.

For the CPU, the average benchmark score of 38,149 places it within a hair's breadth of its closest competitors. The delta percentages are all below 0.5% in magnitude, which means that in any given workload, the i5-14490F could plausibly trade places with the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, the Core i5-13600KF, the AMD Ryzen 7 250, or the Core i5-13600HX depending on thermal conditions, memory speed, and workload-specific optimizations. This is a highly competitive segment where micro-architectural nuances dominate.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, delivers an average benchmark score of 42,723, placing it in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are intriguing: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER scores 43,223 (1.2% higher), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43,262 (1.2% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43,268 (1.3% higher), and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 scores 43,301 (1.3% higher). The RX 7650 GRE trails these by roughly one to two percentage points, a margin that is often imperceptible in real-world frame rates but could matter in synthetic benchmarks or at specific resolution/quality combinations.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 2,336, and in Geekbench OpenCL it scores 83,109. The 3DMark result is a modern DirectX 12 test that stresses ray tracing, mesh shaders, and asynchronous compute. A score of 2,336 places the GPU in a mid-to-high tier, but the 8 GB VRAM could become a limiting factor at 4K ultra settings in VRAM-hungry titles. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 83,109 reflects strong compute performance for general-purpose GPU tasks, which is relevant for OpenCL-accelerated rendering or physics.

Combined, the CPU and GPU occupy the 85th percentile of all desktop systems. This means that in a typical gaming or productivity build, this pairing outperforms roughly 85% of systems in the database. The data indicates a cohesive mid-high-end desktop platform, suitable for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, as well as content creation tasks that benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core scores and the GPU's solid rasterization performance.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 83rd percentile ranking and the CPU's 86th percentile ranking suggest that at 1080p, the pairing can drive high refresh rates (144Hz or beyond) in most competitive titles. The CPU's single-core score of 3,247 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for maintaining high frame times in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality at 1440p in newer titles.

Streaming: For live streaming, the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads handle simultaneous gaming and encoding reasonably well. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,000 provides ample headroom for x264 encoding at medium presets while gaming. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores (null in the data) means that hardware-accelerated AV1 or NVENC-style encoding is not available; instead, encoding would fall to the CPU or the GPU's compute units, which are not specified for encode quality.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 28,662 and data compression score of 340,026 suggest strong performance for video editing workflows that involve timeline scrubbing, proxy generation, and exporting. The GPU's 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 performance aids in effects rendering and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p timelines but may choke on 4K multi-layer composites.

3D rendering: In CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles CPU), the Cinebench R23 score of 23,000 positions this CPU as a solid mid-range performer, roughly on par with its immediate rivals. For GPU-based rendering, the RX 7650 GRE's 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 is respectable, but the 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth could bottleneck complex scenes that require frequent geometry and texture fetching.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 87,844 and random string sorting score of 35,608 are strong indicators of compiler performance, code indexing, and build times. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases that exhibit locality. The lack of integrated graphics is irrelevant in a development environment with a discrete GPU.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,873 in PassMark ensures snappy response in word processors, web browsers, and spreadsheet applications. The GPU's 83rd percentile ranking is overkill for office tasks but provides future-proofing for occasional light gaming or CAD work. The 65 W CPU TDP and 170 W GPU TDP make this a reasonably efficient desktop for daily use.

# Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a gamer who wants high-refresh 1080p or 1440p performance without stepping into the top-tier GPU bracket. The GPU's 83rd percentile ranking and the CPU's 86th percentile ranking indicate a system that will not be the bottleneck in most games. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-core performance (3,247 in Cinebench R23) will drive high frame rates, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth handle textures and effects.

Content creators who edit 1080p or 1440p video, work with moderate 3D scenes, or compile large software projects will find the CPU's multi-core scores (23,000 in Cinebench R23, 28,662 in PassMark multi-thread) to be well-suited. The GPU's compute performance (83,109 in Geekbench OpenCL) accelerates rendering in OpenCL-compatible applications.

Students and small business workstations benefit from the CPU's efficiency (65 W TDP) and the overall system's 85th percentile ranking, which ensures longevity for several years of productivity software. The GPU, while powerful, is not so power-hungry (170 W TDP, 450 W suggested PSU) that it requires an exotic power supply.

Users in the 86th percentile CPU / 83rd percentile GPU range are typically enthusiasts who want high performance per component but are not chasing the absolute top-tier parts. The tight rivalry with the Intel Core i5-13600KF and AMD Ryzen 7 250 means that users can expect comparable performance to those chips, with the choice between them coming down to platform features (socket, memory support) rather than raw speed.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed "Hotpink Bonefish," using the Navi 33 chip manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. It contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 render output units (ROPs). It includes 32 ray tracing cores, with no dedicated tensor cores listed.

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1720 MHz, the boost clock is 2695 MHz, and the game clock is 2350 MHz. Memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s, texture rate is 345.0 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 22.08 TFLOPS. FP16 is also 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which is notable for AI workloads that use FP16 precision.

The GPU's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is a potential bottleneck for bandwidth-sensitive workloads when compared to a x16 interface, though for gaming this is rarely limiting. The TDP is 170 W with a single 8-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU is 450 W. The card is dual-slot, 204 mm in length, and 115 mm in height. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score of 2,336 places it in the 83rd percentile. This benchmark is demanding on ray tracing and DX12 features. The 1.2% delta to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (score 43,223 vs. 42,723 in average benchmark score) suggests that the RX 7650 GRE is slightly behind a high-end NVIDIA card but by a margin that is often invisible in actual gameplay. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 83,109 indicates strong compute throughput, which benefits rendering and some AI inference tasks.

The 8 GB VRAM at 288.0 GB/s is a double-edged sword. For 1080p ultra and 1440p high settings, it is generally sufficient. At 4K, or with high-resolution texture packs, the 128-bit bus may cause stutters as the GPU swaps textures in and out. The 32 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the performance in RT-heavy titles will be modest given the 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 budget.

# FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, meaning it outperforms 85% of all desktop systems in the database. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 83rd percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14490F compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13600KF?

A: The i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38,149, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-13600KF's 38,103. The difference is negligible in real-world performance.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is listed as "N/A," so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 23,000, while the single-core score is 3,247.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is 450 W. The GPU TDP is 170 W, and the CPU TDP is 65 W.

Q: Is the GPU's ray tracing performance competitive?

A: The GPU has 32 ray tracing cores. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2,336, which places it at the 83rd percentile, though its 8 GB VRAM may limit ray tracing at higher resolutions.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU percentiles (86 and 83 respectively) are close, indicating a well-balanced pairing. The CPU's average benchmark score of 38,149 is within 0.3% of its nearest rivals, while the GPU's score of 42,723 is within 1.3% of its rivals. This balance means that neither component will consistently be the sole bottleneck across all workloads.

In CPU-bound scenarios — such as low-resolution gaming (1080p), simulation games, or heavily threaded productivity tasks — the CPU will be the limiting factor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,000 is strong, but the single-core score of 3,247 may hold back frame rates in games that rely on one or two threads. The GPU, with 22.08 TFLOPS FP32, will often be waiting on the CPU to feed it draw calls.

In GPU-bound scenarios — such as 1440p or 4K gaming with ultra settings, or GPU-accelerated rendering — the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus (288.0 GB/s) are the primary constraints. At 4K, the memory bandwidth will be insufficient for high-texture workloads, causing frame rate drops. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,336 indicates that the GPU is capable of modern DX12 workloads, but the VRAM capacity is a hard limit for texture-heavy scenes.

The FPS scaling between these components is not measured for this exact combination. The data contains no measured FPS rows, so all FPS discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. Generally, at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance will dominate, and the GPU will be underutilized. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and at 4K, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. For content creation, the CPU's multi-threaded scores (23,000 in R23) and the GPU's compute (83,109 in OpenCL) complement each other, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM limits complex scenes.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") combining an Intel Core i5-14490F CPU with an AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE GPU. The CPU is part of the Core 14th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture, and the GPU is part of the Radeon RX 7000 series, based on RDNA 3.0. The combined percentile is 85, which places this system in the upper-middle tier of all desktop configurations.

The CPU's percentile of 86 and the GPU's percentile of 83 indicate that this is a cohesive mid-high-end build. The CPU is 10 cores / 16 threads with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, and the GPU has 8 GB VRAM with 22.08 TFLOPS FP32. This pairing is designed for users who want strong 1080p and 1440p gaming, productive multi-threaded workloads, and moderate content creation, without the cost or power draw of top-tier parts.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and GPU's 170 W TDP (with a 450 W suggested PSU) make this a relatively efficient desktop build. The GPU's dual-slot design and 204 mm length fit in most mid-tower cases. The CPU's lack of integrated graphics is offset by the presence of the discrete GPU, which offers HDMI 2.1a and DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

Based on the CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 83rd percentile, this system is expected to deliver high-refresh 1080p gaming in most titles. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3,247 suggests that frame rates in CPU-bound games (e.g., esports titles) will be high, potentially exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p with low-to-medium settings. The GPU's 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth support high texture quality at 1080p.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for most games at high settings, but may require lowering texture quality in newer titles with large texture packs. The expected frame rate range is 60-100 FPS depending on the game's optimization and the specific settings used.

At 4K, the GPU's 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB VRAM will be significant bottlenecks. Frame rates are expected to drop below 60 FPS in demanding titles, and texture quality will need to be reduced. The CPU's performance is less of a concern at 4K, as the GPU is overwhelmingly the bottleneck.

For ray tracing, the GPU's 32 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,336 suggests that ray tracing performance is modest. Enabling ray tracing at 1440p will likely result in frame rates below 60 FPS in most titles. At 1080p, ray tracing may be playable with upscaling techniques, though the data does not specify DLSS or FSR support.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bus is dual-channel, but the memory bandwidth is not specified in the data. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is forward-looking for future GPUs and NVMe storage. The CPU's TDP is 65 W, and it is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is not supported through the multiplier.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots (backward compatible). The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, and the GPU TDP is 170 W. The CPU TDP is 65 W, so the total system power draw is estimated to be around 235 W for the two main components, leaving ample headroom for the rest of the system within the 450 W PSU recommendation.

A sensible next upgrade would be a stronger GPU, as the CPU's performance (86th percentile) is slightly higher than the GPU's (83rd percentile). The PCIe Gen 5 slot on the CPU can accommodate a faster GPU without bandwidth limitations. However, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM is a current limitation, so upgrading to a GPU with more VRAM would be the most impactful change.

On the CPU side, the Socket 1700 platform supports other Core 14th Gen processors, but the specific upgrade options are not listed in the data. The CPU's 65 W TDP means that higher-TDP CPUs could be used with the same cooler, but power delivery and motherboard VRM quality would need to be verified. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that users can choose either memory type, but the actual performance difference is not quantified in the data.

The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support is a key future-proofing feature, as it enables faster SSDs and GPUs that utilize Gen 5 bandwidth. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is a minor limitation, but for gaming and most productivity tasks, the bandwidth difference between x8 and x16 is negligible. The overall system, with its 85th percentile ranking, has a clear upgrade path: improving the GPU first, then potentially the CPU, to push into the top 10% of desktop systems.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14490F

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds