SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Gaming Performance — Estimated Frame Rates

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame-rate discussion below is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores of the Intel Core i5-14490F and the AMD Radeon RX 7600, not from direct gameplay data. Treat these figures as directional indicators rather than lab-verified results.

At 1080p ultra settings, the RX 7600's PassMark G3D score of 16634 places it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs, which suggests it can handle most modern titles at high detail, though not at maximum refresh rates. The GPU's pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s point to solid rasterization throughput for 1080p gaming. With 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, texture-heavy scenes should load adequately, but the memory capacity may become a limiting factor in the most demanding titles.

The CPU side strengthens the gaming picture considerably. The i5-14490F's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3247 and multi-core score of 23000 place it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its PassMark single-thread score of 3873 and multithread score of 28662 are strong for a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor. For 1080p gaming, where single-thread performance often dictates frame pacing, the i5-14490F's 5.00 GHz boost clock should keep frame times consistent.

Scaling to 1440p or 4K ultra, the balance shifts. The RX 7600's 57th GPU percentile is notably lower than the CPU's 86th percentile, indicating the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions. At 1440p, expect playable frame rates in most titles, but the 8 GB VRAM buffer and 128-bit bus will likely force texture quality reductions in newer releases. At 4K, the GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is insufficient for ultra settings in demanding games; medium-to-high presets would be more realistic.

The estimated FPS deltas between the RX 7600 and its nearest GPU rivals are minimal — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM sits just 0.2% behind, while the AMD Radeon 680M integrated graphics is 0.7% ahead in average benchmark score. This tight clustering means the RX 7600's real-world gaming performance will feel comparable to those alternatives, with the 680M's lead in synthetic benchmarks suggesting the RX 7600 is not a class leader at its tier.

For competitive titles like esports shooters, the combination of high CPU single-thread performance and the GPU's 2655 MHz boost clock should deliver high frame rates at 1080p with reduced settings. The data implies 144+ FPS is achievable in lighter games, though not guaranteed without measured results.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-14490F delivers an average benchmark score of 38149, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, scores 38194 — a mere 0.1% advantage. The Intel Core i5-13600KF sits 0.1% behind at 38103, while the AMD Ryzen 7 250 is 0.2% ahead at 38221, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX leads this group by 0.3% at 38261. These sub-one-percent deltas indicate the i5-14490F is squarely mid-pack among high-end desktop processors.

Cinebench results reinforce this positioning. The R23 multi-core score of 23000 is substantial for a 65W TDP part, while the single-core score of 3247 shows strong per-thread efficiency. The R20 scores of 9660 multi-core and 1363 single-core follow the same pattern, and the older R15 test yields 2318 multi-core and 327 single-core. PassMark results are equally consistent: multithread at 28662, single-thread at 3873, integer math at 87844, floating-point math at 66558, and extended instructions at 21731.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 posts an average benchmark score of 15171, sitting in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, scores 15199 — just 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X trails by 0.6% at 15082, while the AMD Radeon 680M leads by 0.7% at 15270. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti lags 0.7% at 15063. This clustering means the RX 7600 has no meaningful performance separation from its closest competitors.

In DirectX tests, the RX 7600 scores 84 in DX10, 172 in DX11, and 58 in DX12 via PassMark. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051 and Vulkan score of 34401 indicate strong compute capability relative to its rasterization tier. The GPU compute score of 8790 in PassMark, combined with 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2310, paints a picture of a mid-range GPU that excels in raw throughput but lacks the feature-set advantages of higher-tier cards.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 72 — a full 14 points below the CPU's individual percentile and 15 points above the GPU's. This gap quantifies the imbalance: the CPU is significantly more capable than the GPU, and the overall system performance is dragged down by the graphics card.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The i5-14490F's 86th CPU percentile and 3873 single-thread score provide the frame-pacing headroom needed for high-refresh monitors, but the RX 7600's 57th GPU percentile limits achievable frame rates. At 1080p with competitive settings, the system should push high refresh rates in lighter titles, but demanding AAA games will likely hover around 60-90 FPS at high settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, evidenced by the 28662 multithread PassMark score and 23000 R23 multi-core score, can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. However, the RX 7600 lacks dedicated tensor cores or hardware encoders beyond standard RDNA 3.0 video codecs, meaning x264 encoding on the CPU is viable but may impact gaming frame rates in CPU-bound titles.

Video editing: The CPU's 87844 integer math and 66558 floating-point math scores indicate strong computational throughput for codec-heavy workloads. The GPU's 88051 OpenCL score provides acceleration for effects and rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit timeline complexity in 4K projects. The 24 MB shared L3 cache helps with multi-stream editing workflows.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 23000 places the CPU comfortably for CPU-based rendering. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 is respectable for GPU rendering, though the 57th percentile ranking means longer render times than higher-tier cards. The 128-bit memory bus could bottleneck large scenes that exceed 8 GB VRAM.

Software development: The CPU's 86th percentile and 340026 PassMark data compression score indicate fast compilation times and snappy build processes. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-thread score of 3873 ensures responsive IDE interactions. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this workload.

Student and office work: The 65W TDP of the CPU and 165W TDP of the GPU keep power demands modest, making this a reasonable desktop for mixed-use environments. The 3873 single-thread score ensures smooth multitasking in office suites, while the GPU's 984 G2D score indicates adequate 2D performance for document work and web browsing.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The percentiles tell a clear story of imbalance. The CPU's 86th percentile versus the GPU's 57th percentile creates a 29-point gap, with the combined system at 72. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the bottleneck at 1440p and 4K resolutions, where pixel throughput and memory bandwidth become the limiting factors. The RX 7600's 288.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB capacity will constrain texture streaming and high-resolution assets.

At 1080p, the bottleneck shifts depending on the title. In CPU-light games, the GPU still limits frame rates. In CPU-heavy simulations or strategy games, the i5-14490F's strong single-thread performance prevents it from being the constraint. The FPS scaling between the GPU's 57th percentile and the CPU's 86th percentile suggests that lowering resolution or graphical settings will yield diminishing returns — the GPU simply cannot push frame rates much higher regardless of CPU headroom.

For productivity workloads, the CPU dominates and the GPU contributes minimally. Rendering tasks that use GPU acceleration will see the RX 7600 as the limiting factor, while CPU-only tasks like compilation or data processing will fully utilize the i5-14490F's 16 threads. The 0.7% delta between the RX 7600 and the AMD Radeon 680M in average score is telling — the discrete GPU barely outperforms an integrated solution in synthetic benchmarks, suggesting the RX 7600 is a modest step up from iGPU territory.

The 65W CPU TDP paired with the 165W GPU TDP means the system's power delivery is GPU-dominated. A 450W suggested PSU covers both components, but overclocking headroom is minimal given the CPU's locked multiplier and the GPU's fixed boost behavior.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14490F is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and is manufactured on a 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size. The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 65W.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. There is no integrated graphics, and ECC memory is not supported. The multiplier is locked, preventing user overclocking.

Benchmark results show a processor that punches above its 65W power envelope. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 rivals higher-TDP parts, while the single-core score of 3247 demonstrates excellent per-thread performance. The PassMark data compression score of 340026 is particularly strong, indicating efficient cache utilization and memory throughput. The extended instructions score of 21731 shows robust SIMD performance for vectorized workloads.

The nearest rival comparisons are striking — the i5-14490F trades blows with the Intel Core i5-13600KF and Core Ultra 5 245T within 0.1%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 and Core i5-13600HX within 0.3%. This clustering suggests the i5-14490F is a well-balanced mid-high-range CPU that neither leads nor lags its class meaningfully.

The 86th percentile placement means the i5-14490F outperforms roughly six out of seven CPUs in the database. For real workloads, this translates to responsive system operations, fast application launches, and capable multi-tasking. The 16 threads handle parallel workloads efficiently, while the high boost clock ensures single-threaded tasks complete quickly.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize CPU headroom over GPU performance. The i5-14490F's 86th percentile ensures that games at 1080p will rarely be CPU-limited, making this an ideal build for esports titles and lighter AAA games where frame rates above 100 FPS are achievable with the RX 7600's 57th percentile GPU.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound applications — video encoding, 3D rendering with CPU engines, or software compilation — will benefit from the i5-14490F's 23000 R23 multi-core score. The RX 7600 provides basic GPU acceleration for effects and previews, but the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus limit its utility for GPU-heavy rendering workloads.

Software developers will find the 340026 data compression score and 87844 integer math score valuable for build times and data processing. The 65W TDP keeps power costs low for always-on development machines, and the 16 threads handle containerized builds efficiently.

Students and small business users building a general-purpose desktop will appreciate the balance of CPU performance and GPU capability for light gaming and productivity. The 984 G2D score ensures smooth 2D graphics for office work, while the 3873 single-thread score keeps spreadsheets and documents responsive.

Gamers planning to upgrade their GPU within a year or two are the ideal buyers — the CPU has headroom to support a significantly faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The 86th CPU percentile versus 57th GPU percentile means the CPU is ready for a future GPU upgrade.

# FAQ

Q: Does this CPU+GPU combination support ray tracing?

A: Yes. The RX 7600 includes 32 dedicated ray accelerators as part of its RDNA 3.0 architecture, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). However, the 57th GPU percentile suggests ray tracing performance will be modest compared to higher-tier cards.

Q: What is the maximum memory bandwidth of the RX 7600?

A: The GPU has 288.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, derived from 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with an effective 18 Gbps memory clock.

Q: Can the CPU handle DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The specific memory type is determined by the motherboard.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 72, which sits between the CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 57th percentile, reflecting the GPU's role as the limiting component.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i5-13600KF?

A: The i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38149, which is 0.1% behind the i5-13600KF's 38103, a negligible difference in real-world performance.

Q: Does the RX 7600 support PCIe Gen 5?

A: No. The RX 7600 uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, but the GPU operates at PCIe 4.0 speeds.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The RX 7600 has a 165W TDP and the i5-14490F has a 65W TDP. The suggested PSU rating for the GPU is 450W, which should cover the entire system.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-14490F with the AMD Radeon RX 7600. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake refresh processor with a 65W TDP, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.0-based card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 165W TDP. The combined performance percentile is 72, placing this system above the majority of desktop configurations in the database.

The CPU's 86th percentile ranking is the standout feature — it outperforms the GPU's 57th percentile by a wide margin. This creates a system that feels responsive and capable in CPU-intensive tasks but is held back in graphics-heavy workloads. The overall tier is upper-mid-range, with the CPU providing near high-end performance and the GPU delivering entry-to-mid-range graphics capability.

This pairing makes sense for users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity and gaming at 1080p, with the understanding that the GPU is the component that will need upgrading to unlock higher resolutions and frame rates. The 72 combined percentile reflects a system that is better than average but not exceptional, with the CPU carrying most of the performance weight.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The i5-14490F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with a locked multiplier, meaning overclocking is not available. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility in motherboard selection. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU is available, though the RX 7600 only uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The 65W CPU TDP and 165W GPU TDP mean the system runs cool and efficient, with a 450W suggested PSU providing ample headroom. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU — the CPU's 86th percentile has significant headroom to support a much faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The 29-point gap between CPU and GPU percentiles quantifies this headroom.

For memory, the 24 MB L3 cache and dual-channel support mean that upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 could improve memory-bound workloads, though the benchmark data does not specify the memory type used in testing. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU is forward-looking, but the GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface means no immediate benefit.

The platform is mature — Socket 1700 has been widely used across multiple Intel generations, so motherboard availability is extensive. The CPU's active production status suggests ongoing availability, though the platform is likely nearing the end of its upgrade cycle given the Raptor Lake refresh architecture.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on the Navi 33 chip using RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray accelerators. Clock speeds include a 1720 MHz base, 2250 MHz game, and 2655 MHz boost, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s. Peak FP32 performance is 21.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The card is dual-slot with a 1x 8-pin power connector and a 165W TDP, requiring a 450W PSU.

Benchmark scores place the RX 7600 in the 57th percentile, with an average score of 15171. The PassMark G3D score of 16634 is the highest graphics benchmark, while the G2D score of 984 indicates modest 2D capability. DirectX performance varies significantly — 226 in DX9, 172 in DX11, 84 in DX10, and 58 in DX12 — suggesting the GPU is better optimized for older APIs.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051 is robust, and the Vulkan score of 34401 shows good compute performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310 provides a modern gaming benchmark reference. Nearest rival comparisons show the RX 7600 within 0.7% of several competitors, including the RTX 3050 OEM (0.2% behind), Radeon 680M (0.7% ahead), and GTX 660 Ti (0.7% ahead).

For rendering workloads, the 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 provides decent compute throughput, but the 128-bit bus and 8 GB VRAM limit large scene handling. The 32 ray accelerators offer entry-level ray tracing, but the 57th percentile ranking indicates this is not a strong ray tracing card. The 1:1 FP16/FP32 ratio supports efficient compute workloads, though the lack of tensor cores means no AI acceleration beyond standard shader math.