SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 7400: A Desktop Pairing Analysis

This build pairs Intel's Core i5-14490F, a 10-core Raptor Lake Refresh desktop processor, with AMD's Radeon RX 7400, an entry-level RDNA 3.0 GPU based on the Navi 33 chip. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at only the 17th percentile, creating a stark performance imbalance that defines this system's character. The combined percentile of 52 reflects this divide — a build that can handle demanding CPU workloads but struggles with graphics-intensive tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing is not suited for high-refresh gaming at demanding settings. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking places it among the lowest-performing discrete graphics cards, and its PassMark G3D score of 11897 indicates limited rasterization capability. The CPU's single-thread score of 3873 in PassMark suggests it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU will bottleneck resolution and detail settings well before refresh rates become the limiting factor. For esports titles at lower settings, the CPU's strength might allow modest frame rates, but the GPU's 44 PassMark DirectX 12 score signals that modern API workloads will struggle.

Streaming: The i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, meaning all display output and encoding tasks fall to the Radeon RX 7400. The GPU's 28 ray accelerators and RDNA 3.0 architecture provide some hardware encoding capability, but the 5152 PassMark GPU compute score suggests limited parallel processing headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The CPU's 16 threads could handle software encoding, but this would consume resources needed for game logic, and the overall system balance makes concurrent streaming a challenging proposition.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 places it well ahead of most desktop processors, enabling smooth timeline scrubbing and export rendering. The PassMark data compression score of 340026 indicates strong performance for codec-heavy operations. However, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest by modern standards, and effects that rely on GPU acceleration will see limited performance. The 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 compute rating is respectable for a low-power card, but it will not accelerate complex effects chains significantly.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be this system's strength. The i5-14490F's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9660 and R15 multi-core score of 2318 demonstrate excellent multi-threaded throughput for its 65 W TDP. The GPU's 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 257.6 GTexel/s texture rate can handle basic viewport rendering and simple GPU renders, but the 17th percentile GPU ranking means complex scenes will render slowly on the GPU path. The 24 MB shared L3 cache helps keep CPU render threads fed with data.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 87844 and extended instructions score of 21731 indicate strong compile performance and SIMD throughput. The 10 cores and 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the 3873 single-thread score ensures responsive IDE interactions. The GPU's 1209 PassMark G2D score provides adequate 2D acceleration for multiple monitors, and the 10 nm process node keeps power consumption low during long compile sessions. The 65 W TDP makes this an efficient development workstation.

Student and office work: This system is overpowered for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3873 and the 340026 data compression score make spreadsheet calculations, document rendering, and web browsing feel instantaneous. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking is irrelevant for office workloads, and the 43 W GPU TDP alongside the 65 W CPU TDP keeps total system power modest. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support allows flexible configuration for budget-conscious academic builds.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon RX 7400 is built on the Navi 33 chip using TSMC's 6 nm process, packing 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128-bit bus, yielding 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth — sufficient for 1080p gaming but potentially limiting at higher resolutions. The clock speeds are modest: 1452 MHz base, 2200 MHz game clock, and 2300 MHz boost, producing a pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s.

The GPU's 1792 shading units provide 16.49 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, with FP16 performance doubling to 32.97 TFLOPS via the 2:1 ratio. The 28 ray accelerators support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) features, including hardware ray tracing, but the 17th percentile ranking suggests these capabilities are limited in practice. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 confirms that modern DX12 workloads stress this GPU significantly. The PassMark DirectX scores paint a clearer picture: 176 for DX9, 97 for DX11, and only 44 for DX12 — indicating that the GPU performs relatively better on older APIs and struggles with modern rendering paths. The compute score of 5152 is similarly modest. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate given its performance class, and the 43 W TDP means the single 6-pin power connector and 200 W suggested PSU are more than sufficient.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 and single-core score of 3247, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 38149 sits within 0.3% of its nearest rivals: the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38194, -0.1% delta), Intel Core i5-13600KF (38103, +0.1%), AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38221, -0.2%), and Intel Core i5-13600HX (38261, -0.3%). This clustering shows the i5-14490F is finely positioned in a competitive mid-range CPU segment, offering performance essentially identical to the 13600KF while likely consuming less power.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 2467 places it at the 17th percentile, with nearest rivals being the AMD Radeon 8040S (2440, +1.1%), NVIDIA GeForce 710M (2433, +1.4%), Intel HD Graphics 610 (2425, +1.8%), and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M (2422, +1.9%). This is a striking comparison — the RX 7400 is barely ahead of integrated and entry-level mobile graphics solutions from previous generations. The PassMark G3D score of 11897 is the only bright spot, but the DirectX 12 score of 44 is alarmingly low. The combined picture is a system where the CPU outperforms 86% of all processors while the GPU outperforms only 17%, resulting in a combined percentile of 52 — a system that is exactly average overall but wildly inconsistent across components.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14490F uses the LGA 1700 socket, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the memory bandwidth figures are not specified in the data. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring future graphics cards can run at full bandwidth. The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a 10-core processor, meaning most motherboards with adequate VRM cooling will handle it without issue.

The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is a potential bottleneck when paired with newer GPUs that use PCIe 4.0 x16, but for the RX 7400's performance class, x8 bandwidth is unlikely to limit performance. The 200 W suggested PSU is very modest, leaving substantial headroom for a GPU upgrade without changing the power supply. The 43 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP together draw less than 110 W under full load, so even a 300 W PSU would be comfortable. A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the RX 7400 with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 86th percentile ranking means it can support significantly more powerful graphics cards without becoming the limiting factor. The 8 GB VRAM on the current GPU is adequate for 1080p but will become a constraint at higher resolutions or with texture-heavy mods.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this build. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 17th percentile creates a massive bottleneck in graphics-bound workloads. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor in nearly every scenario — the CPU can easily feed frames, but the GPU cannot render them quickly enough to utilize the CPU's throughput. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 44 versus the CPU's single-thread score of 3873 quantifies this imbalance: the CPU is over 80 percentage points higher in its respective percentile ranking.

For CPU-bound workloads like rendering, compilation, and data processing, the balance is reversed. The GPU's limited compute capability (5152 PassMark GPU compute) means GPU-accelerated tasks will not benefit from the CPU's strength. The combined percentile of 52 reflects this split personality — the system is neither a gaming powerhouse nor a compute workstation, but rather a CPU-centric build with a placeholder GPU. The 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 figure seems reasonable on paper, but the 17th percentile ranking suggests real-world performance is far below what the theoretical compute suggests. The GPU's 28 ray accelerators are present but likely too few for meaningful ray tracing at playable frame rates, further emphasizing the GPU bottleneck in modern games.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics. Software developers will benefit from the 10 cores, 16 threads, and 87844 integer math score, which accelerate compilation and testing. Students and office workers get a responsive system for productivity tasks, with the CPU's 3873 single-thread score ensuring snappy application launches and multitasking. Small business workstations handling data processing, spreadsheet analysis, and database operations will leverage the 340026 data compression score and 28662 multithread score effectively.

Content creators working primarily in CPU-bound workflows, such as video encoding with software codecs or 3D rendering on the CPU, will find the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 compelling. However, gamers should avoid this build unless they plan to immediately upgrade the GPU, as the 17th percentile graphics performance will severely limit gaming experiences at any resolution above 720p or at medium settings. The system is also suitable for users who need a low-power desktop (65 W CPU + 43 W GPU) that can handle occasional light gaming but is primarily a productivity machine.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates at a 2.50 GHz base clock and boosts up to 5.00 GHz, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3 cache, providing ample fast memory for multi-threaded workloads. The 65 W TDP is notable for a processor with this core count, enabling efficient operation in compact desktop builds.

The benchmark results demonstrate strong multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R15 multi-core of 2318, R20 of 9660, and R23 of 23000. Single-core scores of 327 (R15), 1363 (R20), and 3247 (R23) confirm excellent per-thread performance for a 5.00 GHz boost clock. PassMark results show 3873 for single-thread, 28662 for multithread, and 2093 for physics, indicating well-rounded CPU capability. The 340026 data compression score and 87844 integer math score are particularly strong, suggesting excellent performance in data-intensive and integer-heavy workloads. The 18225 data encryption score and 21731 extended instructions score round out a processor that excels at general purpose computing. The 86th percentile ranking places it among the top 14% of all CPUs, and its near-identical average score to the Core i5-13600KF (38103 vs 38149) shows it delivers performance on par with that popular chip.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines a top-tier mid-range CPU with an entry-level GPU, creating a system that is fundamentally CPU-centric. The i5-14490F is an active production processor from Intel's Core 14th Gen series, released in late 2023, while the RX 7400 is a newer RDNA 3.0 GPU released in mid-2025. The combined percentile of 52 places this system exactly at the median of all builds, but this average masks the extreme component imbalance. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 17th percentile represent a 69-point gap, making this one of the most lopsided pairings in the database. The build class is desktop, indicating a traditional tower form factor. The 65 W CPU TDP and 43 W GPU TDP make this an energy-efficient system, and the 200 W suggested PSU keeps the power supply requirements minimal. This is a system that will excel at productivity and CPU-heavy tasks while disappointing in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-14490F compare to its closest rival, the Core i5-13600KF?

A: The two processors have nearly identical average benchmark scores, with the i5-14490F at 38149 and the 13600KF at 38103, a delta of just 0.1%. This means real-world performance will be effectively indistinguishable between the two chips.

Q: What is the GPU's most significant limitation?

A: The DirectX 12 benchmark score of 44 is the most telling metric, indicating that the RX 7400 struggles with modern graphics APIs. The 17th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM further constrain performance in current games.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking and 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are insufficient for 4K gaming. Even at 1080p, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and higher resolutions are not realistic with this graphics card.

Q: What type of memory does the CPU support?

A: The i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5 modules.

Q: Is the power supply requirement demanding?

A: No. The suggested PSU is 200 W, which is very modest. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 43 W TDP, so total system power draw is low.

Q: How does the CPU perform in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 and a PassMark multithread score of 28662, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. This indicates strong performance for rendering, compilation, and other parallel workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The RX 7400 has 28 ray accelerators and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate features, but its 17th percentile ranking and low DirectX 12 score of 44 suggest ray tracing performance will be very limited in practice.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking and PassMark G3D score of 11897 suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, modern AAA games will likely run at low-to-medium frame rates, typically in the 20-40 FPS range. The DirectX 12 score of 44 is particularly concerning, as most contemporary games use DX12 or Vulkan, and this score predicts poor performance in API-heavy titles. At 720p or with reduced settings, the GPU might achieve playable frame rates in less demanding games, but the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus limit texture quality and resolution scaling.

The CPU's strength does not translate to gaming performance in this pairing. While the i5-14490F's 5.00 GHz boost clock and 3873 single-thread score can handle game logic and physics calculations, the GPU cannot render frames fast enough to benefit. Esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends might run at 60+ FPS on low settings, but the GPU's 176 DirectX 9 score suggests older games will perform better than modern ones. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 confirms that the GPU is not designed for modern gaming workloads. Users considering this build for gaming should expect a console-like experience at best, with significant compromises in resolution, detail settings, and frame rates. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking places it near integrated graphics solutions, and the gaming experience will reflect that positioning.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14490F

AMD Radeon RX 7400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds