SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

50,951 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-14490F and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT form a pairing where the CPU and GPU sit at nearly identical performance percentiles — the processor at the 86th percentile among all CPUs and the graphics card at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. This symmetry suggests a balanced platform where neither component dramatically overshadows the other in aggregate benchmark terms, though the nature of specific workloads will still tilt the balance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 38149 places it within 0.3% of its nearest rivals, while the GPU's average score of 50951 puts it within 2.4% of its closest competitors, indicating that both components are competitive within their respective tiers.

The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, provide substantial single-threaded headroom for gaming and lightly threaded applications. Its PassMark single-thread score of 3873 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3247 demonstrate strong per-core performance, which is critical for games that rely on a few fast threads rather than many slower ones. Conversely, the GPU's 5120 shading units and 128 ROPs deliver massive parallel throughput, with an FP32 rating of 23.04 TFLOPS, making it a compute-heavy part that excels in rendering and GPU-accelerated workloads.

Bottleneck analysis from the benchmark data reveals that the CPU's multithreaded performance, while solid, is not exceptional for its class. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23000 is respectable for a 65W TDP part, but the GPU's raw compute capabilities are proportionally higher relative to its peers — the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 26732 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4079 indicate that the graphics card is the dominant force in gaming scenarios. In CPU-bound games at lower resolutions, the i5-14490F's single-thread performance will be the limiting factor, while at higher resolutions where GPU load increases, the RX 6900 XT becomes the primary constraint. The data suggests that in 1080p esports titles, the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock will keep frame rates high, but in 4K AAA games, the GPU's 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM will determine the ceiling.

The 65W TDP of the CPU versus the 300W TDP of the GPU creates a thermal and power imbalance that favors the CPU in terms of efficiency, but the GPU's 700W suggested PSU requirement means the system power delivery must be designed around the graphics card. This is not a bottleneck in performance terms but rather a practical consideration: the platform can run the CPU well within its thermal envelope while the GPU demands substantial power headroom.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — there is no measuredFpsUltraByGame data available. All frame rate figures discussed below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than empirical results. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, so these projections rely on the relative performance indicators from the CPU and GPU benchmarks.

Based on the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3247 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4079, this pairing should deliver strong 1440p gaming performance in most titles. The GPU's 16 GB GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures, and the 256-bit bus width supports sustained throughput in memory-intensive scenes. At 1080p, the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock will likely keep frame rates high in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's raw pixel rate of 288.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 720.0 GTexel/s suggest that the graphics card will not be the limiting factor at this resolution.

For 1440p gaming, the RX 6900 XT's 5120 shading units and 80 RT cores offer a balanced mix of rasterization and ray tracing performance, though the latter is not a primary strength given the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 113 and DirectX 11 score of 279 indicate strong API-level performance, which translates to good frame rates in modern DirectX 12 titles. In 4K gaming, the 16 GB VRAM becomes an advantage, preventing memory-related stuttering in games that exceed 8-10 GB of VRAM usage, but the GPU's 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will be the determining factor for sustaining high frame rates at this resolution.

The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 340026 and encryption score of 18225 are not directly gaming-relevant but indicate that the processor can handle background tasks without impacting gaming performance. The lack of integrated graphics on the i5-14490F means the GPU is mandatory for any display output, which is standard for this class of build. Gaming estimates suggest that esports titles at 1080p will see frame rates well above 144 Hz, AAA games at 1440p will hover in the 80-120 FPS range depending on optimization, and 4K gaming will require settings adjustments to maintain smooth gameplay.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates on a 10 nm process node from Intel with a die size of 215 mm², and its 65W TDP makes it a power-efficient choice for desktop builds. The base clock of 2.50 GHz boosts to 5.00 GHz, providing a 2.5 GHz boost headroom that is substantial for a non-unlocked part — the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option, but the factory boost is aggressive.

The cache hierarchy features 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the 16 threads by reducing memory latency, which is evident in the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3247 and multicore score of 23000. The PassMark multithread score of 28662 and integer math score of 87844 indicate strong general-purpose compute, while the floating-point math score of 66558 shows capability in scientific and engineering workloads. The extended instructions score of 21731 suggests that the CPU handles AVX and similar instruction sets well, which is relevant for video encoding and simulation software.

The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T with an average score of 38194 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i5-13600KF at 38103 (0.1% lower), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38221 (0.2% higher), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX at 38261 (0.3% higher). These deltaPct values are all within 0.3%, meaning the i5-14490F is effectively equivalent to these parts in aggregate performance. The 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs places it in the upper tier of desktop processors, suitable for gaming and productivity, but not at the extreme high end where higher-core-count parts dominate.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with no ECC support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This makes it flexible for both budget-oriented DDR4 builds and newer DDR5 platforms. The PassMark find prime numbers score of 122 is notably low, but this is a specialized workload that rarely reflects real-world performance. The physics score of 2093 and random string sorting score of 35608 round out the benchmark profile, showing that the CPU handles a mix of integer and memory-bound tasks competently.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i5-14490F?

A: The CPU has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 6900 XT have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption of each component?

A: The CPU has a 65W TDP, while the GPU has a 300W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the system is 700W.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so the i5-14490F cannot be overclocked; it relies on its 5.00 GHz factory boost clock.

Q: What memory types are compatible with this CPU?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, but does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing performance like?

A: The RX 6900 XT has 80 RT cores based on RDNA 2.0 architecture, which provides ray tracing capability but is not the card's primary strength compared to rasterization.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score compare to its rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 50951 is 1.6% lower than the NVIDIA CMP 50HX, 1.9% higher than the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, 2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, and 2.4% higher than the Intel Arc A550M.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 38149, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, scores 38194, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the i5-14490F is essentially tied with it. The Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38103 (0.1% higher than the i5-14490F, so the i5-14490F is marginally ahead), while the AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221 (0.2% higher than the i5-14490F) and the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261 (0.3% higher). These sub-0.5% deltas indicate that all four CPUs are statistically equivalent in aggregate benchmark terms.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 50951, also at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show more variance: the NVIDIA CMP 50HX scores 51790, which is 1.6% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001 (1.9% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957 (2% lower), and the Intel Arc A550M scores 49737 (2.4% lower). The GPU is thus competitive with its peers, sitting slightly below the CMP 50HX but clearly above the other three rivals.

The combined percentile for this build is 86, reflecting the balanced performance of both components. In Cinebench, the CPU scores 2318 in R15 multicore, 327 in R15 single-core, 9660 in R20 multicore, 1363 in R20 single-core, 23000 in R23 multicore, and 3247 in R23 single-core. These scores show a multicore-to-single-core ratio of approximately 7:1 in R23, which is typical for a 10-core/16-thread part — the hyperthreading provides a modest boost over the physical core count. The PassMark results include a multithread score of 28662, single-thread score of 3873, and GPU compute score of 14547 for the graphics card, which is separate from the CPU benchmarks.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4079 and Geekbench scores of 177021 (Metal), 187673 (OpenCL), and 148525 (Vulkan) provide a comprehensive view of its compute capabilities across different APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 26732 and G2D score of 1055 round out the graphics benchmarks. The combined picture is a platform that performs at the 86th percentile for both CPU and GPU, making it a well-matched pair for high-end gaming and content creation workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is built on the Navi 21 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process with 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die. This transistor density of 51.5 million transistors per mm² is high for the time, enabling the 5120 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 128 ROPs. The GPU has 80 RT cores for ray tracing, but no tensor cores — it relies on standard compute units for AI-accelerated tasks, which is a notable difference from NVIDIA parts that have dedicated tensor hardware.

The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, running at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, yielding 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is ample for 4K gaming with high-resolution textures, and the 16 GB capacity future-proofs against VRAM-heavy titles. The clocks are set at 1825 MHz base, 2015 MHz game clock, and 2250 MHz boost, which translate to pixel rate of 288.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 720.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 23.04 TFLOPS and FP16 of 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicate strong compute performance for rendering and GPGPU workloads.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, and 1x USB Type-C. The triple-slot cooler with 2x 8-pin power connectors and a 300W TDP require a 700W suggested PSU. The 267 mm length (10.5 inches) makes it compatible with most mid-tower cases, but the triple-slot width (50 mm) may interfere with adjacent PCIe slots. The GPU is end-of-life, released in 2020, with a launch MSRP of 999 USD, and its successor is Navi III.

In benchmarks, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4079 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance, while the PassMark G3D score of 26732 and GPU compute score of 14547 show balanced rasterization and compute capabilities. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 187673 is the highest of the three API scores, suggesting strong performance in OpenCL-based applications like video encoding and scientific computing. The Metal score of 177021 is relevant for macOS compatibility scenarios, though this is a Windows-focused build. The DirectX 9, 10, and 11 scores of 268, 167, and 279 respectively are legacy metrics but show that the GPU maintains backward compatibility without significant performance degradation in older APIs.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU combination targets gamers and content creators who want high-refresh 1440p performance without stepping up to the extreme high-end tier. The 86th percentile ranking for both components means this build sits comfortably in the upper quartile of desktop systems, suitable for users who play AAA titles at 1440p with high settings or 4K with adjusted settings. Gamers at 1080p will find the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock sufficient for high frame rates in competitive shooters, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM handles texture-heavy mods and large open-world games without memory pressure.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or GPU-accelerated effects will benefit from the GPU's 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 5120 shading units. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23000 supports multithreaded rendering tasks, though it is not as strong as higher-core-count parts. The combination of 10 CPU cores and 5120 GPU shading units provides a balanced platform for Adobe Creative Suite, Blender, and similar applications where both CPU and GPU are utilized. Developers compiling code will appreciate the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 87844 and data encryption score of 18225, which indicate strong general-purpose compute.

Students and small business workstations benefit from the 65W CPU TDP, which reduces cooling requirements and energy costs, while the GPU's 300W TDP is manageable with a 700W PSU. The DDR4 and DDR5 memory support allows builders to choose between budget and performance memory options. The lack of integrated graphics means a dedicated GPU is mandatory, but the RX 6900 XT is more than adequate for this purpose. The end-of-life status of the GPU and the active production status of the CPU suggest that this is not a forward-looking platform, but it remains capable for current-generation games and productivity software.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14490F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a single high-bandwidth GPU like the RX 6900 XT, which uses PCIe 4.0 x16 — this is backward compatible with PCIe 5.0 slots. The socket supports Raptor Lake and Raptor Lake Refresh processors, so users can upgrade to a higher-core-count part like an i7 or i9 from the same generation if they need more multithreaded performance. The locked multiplier on the i5-14490F means that overclocking is not available, so a CPU upgrade would be the primary path to improved performance.

The GPU is end-of-life, so there is no direct upgrade within the same generation, but the PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface is forward-compatible with newer GPUs that use PCIe 4.0 or 5.0. The 700W suggested PSU provides headroom for a GPU upgrade to a part with similar or slightly higher power draw, though a future GPU with higher TDP may require a larger PSU. The triple-slot form factor of the RX 6900 XT limits case compatibility for multi-GPU setups, but modern systems typically use a single GPU. The DDR4 and DDR5 support means that memory upgrades are possible without changing the motherboard, but the platform itself is at the end of its socket lifecycle — a future upgrade would require a new motherboard and CPU.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase the CPU to a higher-core-count Socket 1700 part if multithreaded workloads are the bottleneck, or to replace the GPU with a newer generation when it becomes available. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for current games, so GPU upgrades can be deferred until next-generation titles demand more memory. The 24 MB L3 cache on the CPU is adequate for gaming, and the 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures that single-threaded performance remains competitive. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support is a future-proofing feature, though the RX 6900 XT only uses PCIe 4.0, so there is no immediate benefit.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-14490F with the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, resulting in a combined percentile of 86. The CPU is a Raptor Lake Refresh part with 10 cores and 16 threads, running at up to 5.00 GHz, while the GPU is a RDNA 2.0 flagship with 16 GB of VRAM and 5120 shading units. Both components sit at the 86th percentile in their respective categories, making this a well-matched pair that delivers high-end performance without reaching the absolute top tier.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 38149 and the GPU's average score of 50951 place this build in the upper quartile of desktop systems. The CPU is competitive with parts like the Intel Core i5-13600KF and AMD Ryzen 7 250, while the GPU outperforms the RTX 5070 Ti and RX Vega 64 in aggregate benchmarks. The combination is suitable for 1440p gaming at high settings, 4K gaming with adjustments, and content creation workloads that benefit from both CPU multithreading and GPU compute. The 65W CPU TDP and 300W GPU TDP are manageable with a 700W PSU, and the DDR4/DDR5 support provides memory flexibility.

The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is high-end mainstream — not a flagship or enthusiast platform, but one that handles most modern workloads with ease. The lack of measured FPS data means that gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores, but the underlying metrics suggest a capable gaming machine. The end-of-life status of the GPU and the locked CPU multiplier indicate that this is not a platform for overclocking or future expansion, but it remains a solid choice for users who want reliable high performance today.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14490F

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds