SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14490F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT form a desktop pairing that sits in the upper-middle tier of the benchmark database. The CPU holds an 86th percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU holds a 71st percentile ranking among all graphics cards. The combined percentile for this specific pairing is 79, placing it ahead of the majority of desktop configurations. The data represents a balanced mid-range-to-upper-mid-range system, with the CPU demonstrating notably stronger relative standing than the GPU in their respective pools.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, specifically the Navi 22 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 17,200 million transistors across a 335 mm² area. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2150 MHz, a boost clock of 2600 MHz, and a game clock of 2495 MHz. Memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 192-bit bus. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory is a substantial allocation for the performance class, providing headroom for high-resolution textures and complex scenes.

The compute configuration includes 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations pipelines. The GPU features 40 ray accelerators, providing dedicated hardware for ray-traced workloads. The pixel rate is 166.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 416.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 13.31 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 26.62 TFLOPS for FP16 operations at a 2:1 ratio. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering pipelines.

Benchmark results show the GPU achieving a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548. In Geekbench compute tests, it scores 137249 in Metal, 16360 in OpenCL, and 98089 in Vulkan. PassMark results include a G3D score of 20700 and a GPU compute score of 9550. The average benchmark score across all tests is 26011, placing the GPU at the 71st percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Radeon R9 M395X with an average score of 25891 (0.5% difference), the AMD FirePro W7100 at 25856 (0.6% difference), and the AMD FirePro D700 at 25842 (0.7% difference). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile sits at 25740, representing a 1.1% difference. These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating the RX 6750 XT performs essentially on par with these alternatives.

For rendering workloads, the 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides strong raw compute for rasterization and general graphics tasks. The 40 ray accelerators enable ray-traced effects, though the RDNA 2 implementation is less performant than dedicated RT implementations on rival architectures. The 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p rendering, though 4K workloads may stress the 192-bit bus. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is beneficial for texture-heavy scenes, allowing larger texture sets to reside in memory without spilling to system RAM.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's Cinebench scores establish a clear multi-core strength: 2318 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 9660 in R20 multi-core, and 23000 in R23 multi-core. Single-core performance is 327 in R15, 1363 in R20, and 3247 in R23. PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 28662 and a single-thread score of 3873. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 38149, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, scores 38194, a -0.1% difference. The Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38103, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221, a -0.2% difference, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261, a -0.3% difference.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 26011, placing it at the 71st percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, scores 25891, a 0.5% difference. The AMD FirePro W7100 scores 25856, a 0.6% difference, and the AMD FirePro D700 scores 25842, a 0.7% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile scores 25740, a 1.1% difference.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 79, indicating the system overall outperforms roughly four-fifths of tracked configurations. The CPU's 86th percentile is notably higher than the GPU's 71st percentile, suggesting the processor has more relative headroom in its respective market than the graphics card does. The combined picture is one of a CPU-led system where the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU provides competent but less exceptional performance. The narrow rival deltas on both sides indicate the components are well-positioned within their performance brackets, with no single competitor holding a significant advantage.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is part of the Core 14th Gen series, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, providing a wide frequency range for both efficiency and peak performance. The TDP is rated at 65 W, a modest figure for the core count. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in platform choices. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The socket is Intel Socket 1700. The processor has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU for any display output. The multiplier is locked, limiting overclocking headroom. The production status is active, with a release date of 2024-01-01.

Benchmark results demonstrate strong multi-threaded capability. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 indicates sustained throughput for heavily threaded workloads. The single-core score of 3247 in R23 reflects strong per-thread performance, driven by the 5.00 GHz boost clock. PassMark results provide additional detail: data compression scores 340026, data encryption 18225, extended instructions 21731, floating-point math 66558, integer math 87844, and random string sorting 35608. The physics score is 2093, and the prime number finding score is 122.

The 86th percentile ranking places this CPU above most alternatives. The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, is essentially identical with a -0.1% delta, meaning the two processors are statistically indistinguishable in average performance. The Intel Core i5-13600KF and AMD Ryzen 7 250 also fall within a 0.2% band, indicating the i5-14490F sits at a competitive equilibrium point. For real workloads, the 16 threads handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks effectively. The 24 MB L3 cache supports data-intensive workloads, while the 5.00 GHz boost clock provides responsive single-threaded performance for applications that rely on fewer cores.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU's 86th percentile versus the GPU's 71st percentile creates a predictable imbalance. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics calculations, data compression, or single-threaded productivity tasks, the processor will not be the limiting factor. The PassMark physics score of 2093 and multi-thread score of 28662 confirm strong CPU throughput. The GPU becomes the constraint in graphics-heavy workloads, particularly at higher resolutions where the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 13.31 TFLOPS compute are taxed.

The combined percentile of 79 sits between the two component percentiles, reflecting the fact that the system's overall performance is gated by the slower component in any given task. For gaming at 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3873 in PassMark and 3247 in Cinebench R23 suggests the processor can feed frames to the GPU without dropping below its capability. At 1440p and above, the GPU's workload increases, and the 71st percentile ranking means it will likely become the bottleneck in demanding titles.

The narrow rival deltas on the GPU side, with the nearest competitor only 0.5% ahead, indicate the RX 6750 XT is at a performance plateau where no single GPU in its class holds a decisive edge. This means frame rates will be consistent across similar GPUs, but the GPU's absolute performance ceiling is below what the CPU can theoretically support. The data does not include measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all FPS discussion is estimated from benchmark scores. The implication is that the CPU will often wait for the GPU to complete rendering tasks, particularly in GPU-intensive scenarios.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. The data does not include measuredFps data, so the following frame rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than verified measurements. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 and PassMark G3D score of 20700 indicate solid DirectX 12 performance, which translates to modern game titles. The 12 GB VRAM capacity provides room for high-resolution textures, and the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth supports smooth texture streaming.

At 1080p resolution, the system is expected to deliver high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance preventing bottlenecks. The GPU's 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 compute is sufficient for many competitive and action games at this resolution. At 1440p, frame rates will depend on the title's graphics intensity, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor. The 71st percentile ranking suggests the GPU sits above the median but below top-tier cards, so ultra settings at 1440p may require adjustments in demanding games. At 4K, the 192-bit memory bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely constrain performance, and the GPU may not sustain high frame rates at ultra settings.

The CPU's boost clock of 5.00 GHz ensures that frame pacing remains consistent in CPU-light scenarios. The 24 MB L3 cache helps maintain data locality for game engines. For esports titles with low graphics requirements, the system is expected to perform exceptionally well, with the CPU's 86th percentile providing ample headroom. For AAA titles with heavy graphics demands, the GPU will determine the experience, and users should expect solid but not outstanding performance relative to higher-tier GPUs.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

The system targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance with competent graphics capability. Gamers at 1080p resolution will benefit from the CPU's 86th percentile ranking and the GPU's 71st percentile, which together support high frame rates in most titles. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or data processing will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 and PassMark multi-thread score of 28662 well-suited for their workloads. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 13.31 TFLOPS compute provide adequate acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects and rendering.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16 threads and 5.00 GHz boost clock, which reduce build times. Students in engineering or computer science programs can run simulations and development environments without CPU bottlenecks. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office applications will find the CPU's data compression score of 340026 and integer math score of 87844 sufficient for demanding productivity tasks. The GPU's compute capability of 9550 in PassMark GPU compute supports light machine learning or data processing workloads.

Users who require high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p will find the system well-matched, with the CPU unlikely to bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. Those targeting 1440p gaming should expect good but not exceptional performance, with the GPU being the primary limiter. The system is not ideal for 4K gaming or heavy ray-traced workloads, where the GPU's RDNA 2 architecture with 40 ray accelerators will struggle relative to higher-tier alternatives.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F holds an 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38149.

Q: How much VRAM does the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i5-14490F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 79.

Q: What is the GPU's nearest rival in the benchmark database, and by how much does it differ?

A: The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon R9 M395X with an average score of 25891, representing a 0.5% difference from the RX 6750 XT's score of 26011.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, with a specification of N/A for iGPU, requiring a discrete GPU for display output.

Q: What is the boost clock of the CPU, and how many threads does it have?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz and 16 threads across 10 cores.

Q: What is the GPU's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 549 USD.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built on Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing flexibility for builders to choose between existing DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits. The PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, offering high bandwidth for storage and expansion cards. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the GPU will operate at its native Gen 4 speed.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 250 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 600 W, providing ample headroom for the combined system power draw. The GPU requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, and the dual-slot design with a length of 267 mm (10.5 inches) requires adequate case clearance. The power supply headroom means the system can accommodate additional drives or accessories without straining the PSU.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU's 86th percentile ranking indicates it has more headroom than the GPU's 71st percentile. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would better balance the system and unlock the CPU's full potential in graphics-heavy workloads. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster storage would benefit productivity tasks, though the CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory support are already adequate for most workloads. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs the system for next-generation storage devices.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-14490F with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT. The build class is explicitly identified as desktop, confirming it is intended for a stationary tower or workstation configuration. The combined percentile of 79 places this system in the upper-middle tier of the benchmark database, outperforming roughly 79% of tracked configurations. The CPU's 86th percentile is the stronger component, while the GPU's 71st percentile is competent but less exceptional.

The system represents a balanced mid-range-to-upper-mid-range desktop, suitable for a wide range of workloads. The CPU provides strong multi-threaded performance for productivity and creative tasks, while the GPU offers solid 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming capability. The 12 GB VRAM and 13.31 TFLOPS compute make the GPU versatile for both gaming and light compute workloads. The overall tier is defined by the 79th combined percentile, indicating a system that is above average but not at the top of the performance spectrum. The pairing is well-matched for users who prioritize CPU performance while maintaining a capable GPU.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is well-supported by this system. The CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and 3873 PassMark single-thread score ensure fast frame processing, while the GPU's 20700 PassMark G3D score delivers the graphics throughput needed for high frame rates. The 12 GB VRAM prevents texture swapping in modern titles, and the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth maintains consistent frame pacing.

Streaming benefits from the CPU's 16 threads and 23000 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, which handle encoding alongside game logic. The GPU's 26.62 TFLOPS FP16 performance provides additional compute for encoding tasks, and the 65 W CPU TDP keeps power draw manageable during extended streaming sessions.

Video editing is a strong use case, with the CPU's multi-thread score of 28662 in PassMark accelerating timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 compute supports GPU-accelerated effects, and the 12 GB VRAM handles large preview buffers. The 340026 data compression score indicates fast file I/O processing for media assets.

3D rendering relies heavily on CPU and GPU compute. The CPU's 23000 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provides solid CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU's 9550 PassMark GPU compute score accelerates GPU-based renderers. The 24 MB L3 cache supports geometry data, and the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth moves vertex data efficiently.

Software development benefits from the CPU's 16 threads and 5.00 GHz boost clock, which reduce compilation times. The 87844 integer math score and 21731 extended instructions score support complex code execution. The 66558 floating-point math score aids in numerical computation and simulation workloads.

Student and office work is well-served by the CPU's strong single-thread performance of 3247 in Cinebench R23, which ensures responsive application usage. The 28662 PassMark multi-thread score handles multitasking across office applications, while the GPU provides adequate acceleration for presentation and spreadsheet graphics. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system quiet and energy-efficient for daily use.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14490F

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds