SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 6600: A Balanced 1080p Gaming and Productivity Desktop

This pairing combines a 10-core, 16-thread Intel Core i5-14490F with an 8 GB AMD Radeon RX 6600, placing it at the 75th combined percentile among all desktop configurations. The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,000 points, while the GPU posts a Passmark G3D score of 15,096, positioning this build as a capable 1080p gaming rig with solid multi-threaded productivity potential. Benchmark data shows this combination sits within 0.3% of rivals like the Intel Core i5-13600KF and AMD Ryzen 7 250 in average CPU score, while the GPU matches the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation within 0.4%. The overall performance profile favors gamers targeting high-refresh 1080p and content creators who need responsive multi-core rendering without stepping into enthusiast-tier hardware.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RX 6600's Passmark G3D score of 15,096 places it at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs, which supports 1080p gaming at high settings with frame rates suitable for 144 Hz monitors in esports titles. The CPU's single-thread Passmark score of 3,873 ensures minimal bottleneck in frame generation, while the 5.00 GHz boost clock keeps input latency low. The GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory provides sufficient capacity for modern titles at 1080p, though the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit texture streaming in the most demanding open-world games.

Streaming: The i5-14490F's 10 cores and 16 threads handle game capture and encoding overhead without crippling frame rates, evidenced by its 28,662 Passmark multi-thread score. The CPU's 24 MB shared L3 cache reduces latency when managing concurrent game and encoder threads. The RX 6600 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, enabling hardware-accelerated encoding pipelines that offload work from the CPU, though the GPU's 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest by today's standards.

Video Editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core performance of 23,000 points places this CPU in the 86th percentile overall, with the nearest rival Intel Core i5-13600KF trailing by just 0.1%. The 16 threads accelerate timeline scrubbing and export rendering in applications that scale across cores. The GPU's 1,792 shading units and 112 texture mapping units provide hardware acceleration for effects and color grading, while the 8 GB VRAM handles 1080p and light 4K preview timelines without spilling into system memory.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9,660 and R15 multi-core score of 2,318 indicate strong performance for CPU-based rendering workloads like Blender Cycles or V-Ray. The GPU's 28 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated RT effects in DXR titles, though the 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits complex scene rendering. The combined CPU and GPU performance handles moderate rendering jobs, while the 65 W CPU TDP keeps sustained loads manageable for air-cooled systems.

Software Development: Passmark data compression score of 340,026 and integer math score of 87,844 indicate rapid code compilation and build times. The 16 threads allow parallel compilation of multiple modules, while the single-thread score of 3,873 ensures responsive IDE interactions. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support provides flexibility for developers balancing cost and performance in workstation builds.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3,873 delivers snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations, while the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for dorm rooms or small offices. The GPU's Passmark G2D score of 889 handles 2D desktop compositing and video playback efficiently, and the 190 mm card length fits compact cases. The 300 W suggested PSU requirement means this build can run on modest power supplies, reducing system cost for budget-conscious students.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 38,149 places it at the 86th percentile among all processors, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T at 38,194 (0.1% faster) and the Intel Core i5-13600KF at 38,103 (0.1% slower). The GPU's average benchmark score of 19,036 places it at the 63rd percentile among all graphics cards, with the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 matching it exactly at 19,030 and the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile slightly ahead at 19,049. The combined percentile of 75 indicates this pairing outperforms three-quarters of all desktop configurations, but the GPU's lower percentile reveals it as the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 23,000 multi-core and 3,247 single-core, demonstrating strong scaling from its 10 cores and 16 threads. The R20 scores of 9,660 multi-core and 1,363 single-core confirm consistent performance across benchmark versions. Passmark multi-thread score of 28,662 and single-thread score of 3,873 align with the Cinebench results, while floating-point math of 66,558 and extended instructions of 21,731 show robust SIMD throughput for scientific workloads.

For the GPU, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,492 indicates modern DirectX 12 gaming performance, while Geekbench Vulkan score of 67,623 and OpenCL score of 28,850 reveal compute capabilities. Passmark DirectX 12 score of 51 and DirectX 11 score of 152 show lower-level API performance, with DirectX 9 scoring 197. The Passmark GPU compute score of 6,554 reflects the GPU's general-purpose compute throughput, which is respectable for a 7 nm RDNA 2 part.

The combined picture shows a CPU that punches above its class in multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU delivers solid 1080p gaming performance but trails in compute-heavy tasks. The 86th percentile CPU ranking versus the 63rd percentile GPU ranking indicates a system where the processor can feed the graphics card effectively in gaming, but the GPU will limit frame rates in graphically demanding titles.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14490F features 10 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size. The Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R codename) provides 80 KB L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3 cache. This cache hierarchy supports the high single-thread score of 3,873 in Passmark and 3,247 in Cinebench R23, which translates to responsive application performance.

The 65 W TDP is remarkably efficient for the performance level, with the CPU delivering a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,000 points at this power envelope. This efficiency makes the chip suitable for compact builds with modest cooling solutions. The 10 nm process node from Intel's foundry balances transistor density with thermal characteristics, allowing the 5.00 GHz boost clock to sustain under light loads.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, providing flexibility for system builders. The absence of ECC memory support and integrated graphics (N/A) means this CPU requires a discrete GPU and targets gaming or workstation builds rather than server applications. The unlocked multiplier is false, preventing overclocking, but the 5.00 GHz boost clock already provides high single-thread performance.

The benchmark data shows this CPU at the 86th percentile, with the nearest rival Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scoring 38,194 (0.1% higher) and the Intel Core i5-13600KF scoring 38,103 (0.1% lower). This clustering indicates the i5-14490F sits at the top of its performance tier, with no significant gap to the competition. The Passmark physics score of 2,093 and find prime numbers score of 122 indicate moderate computational throughput for simulation workloads.

For real-world workloads, the 16 threads accelerate video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks, while the high boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded performance in office applications and legacy software. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency, improving performance in cache-sensitive workloads like database queries and scientific computing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and future GPU upgrades. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 132 W TDP combine for a total system draw that the 300 W suggested PSU comfortably handles, leaving headroom for additional drives and peripherals.

The RX 6600 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would require ensuring the power supply can handle increased draw, but the 300 W suggested PSU provides a baseline for the current configuration. The CPU's 16 PCIe lanes support a single GPU at full bandwidth, with the RX 6600's x8 interface using half of the available lanes.

Memory upgrades represent the most straightforward path, with dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 support enabling bandwidth increases for memory-intensive workloads. The CPU's 24 MB shared L3 cache reduces dependency on memory bandwidth, but moving from DDR4 to DDR5 could improve performance in cache-miss-heavy applications. The absence of ECC support limits server-style deployments, but this is acceptable for gaming and content creation.

A sensible next upgrade would involve increasing GPU performance, as the CPU's 86th percentile ranking leaves headroom for a more powerful graphics card. The RX 6600's 63rd percentile indicates the GPU is the primary performance limiter. Alternatively, adding more RAM (if currently below capacity) would benefit multitasking and large dataset processing. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs for next-generation storage and GPU interfaces.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 uses the Navi 23 chip on RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process with 11,060 million transistors and a 237 mm² die size. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p gaming but can be a constraint at higher resolutions with large textures. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), while the base clock is 1626 MHz, game clock 2044 MHz, and boost clock 2491 MHz.

The 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 159.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 279.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 8.928 TFLOPS and FP16 of 17.86 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) provide solid compute performance for the class. The 28 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles, though the modest FP32 throughput limits RT complexity.

Benchmark results show the GPU at the 63rd percentile, with the nearest rivals including the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 at 19,030 (matching exactly), the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile at 19,049 (0.1% higher), and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation at 18,954 (0.4% lower). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,492 indicates modern gaming performance, while Geekbench Vulkan score of 67,623 shows strong API efficiency)Skip compatibility with DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 ensures broad software support.

The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming at high settings but may require texture quality reductions in VRAM-heavy titles. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures at 1080p, but 1440p gaming would strain memory capacity. The dual-slot design with 190 mm length and 1x 8-pin power connector fits most cases, while the 132 W TDP keeps cooling requirements modest.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh gaming will find this pairing effective, with the GPU's 63rd percentile supporting 60+ FPS in most titles at high settings, while the CPU's 86th percentile ensures no frame pacing issues. The 5.00 GHz boost clock and 16 threads provide headroom for background tasks like Discord and browser tabs during gameplay. Users with 144 Hz 1080p monitors in esports titles will benefit most, as the CPU's strong single-thread performance drives high frame rates.

Content creators working with 1080p video editing or moderate 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,000, which accelerates export times. The GPU's compute performance of 6,554 in Passmark GPU compute supports effects processing and GPU-accelerated rendering. Developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 16 threads and 340,026 data compression score, reducing iteration times.

Students and office workers seeking a responsive system for multitasking, document creation, and light media consumption will find the CPU's single-thread score of 3,873 provides snappy performance. The 65 W CPU TDP and 300 W PSU requirement keep electricity costs low, while the compact GPU length suits small desks. Small business workstations requiring reliable multi-threaded performance for spreadsheets, databases, and remote desktop workloads will perform well, with the 86th percentile CPU ranking ensuring longevity.

The build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU compute, as evidenced by the 23-point gap between CPU and GPU percentiles. Gamers who occasionally edit video or stream will find the balance acceptable, while GPU-heavy workloads like machine learning or high-resolution rendering would benefit from a stronger graphics card.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than empirical results. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 15,096 at the 63rd percentile, combined with the CPU's 86th percentile ranking, suggests the RX 6600 will be the primary determinant of gaming frame rates.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth support modern titles at 60-80 FPS in most games, with esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant exceeding 144 FPS due to lower GPU load. The CPU's 3,873 single-thread score ensures no CPU bottleneck at these frame rates, allowing the GPU to reach its maximum output. The 28 ray tracing cores enable RT effects in supported titles, but frame rates will drop significantly with RT enabled, likely to 30-45 FPS in demanding scenes.

At 1440p, the 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB VRAM become limiting factors, with frame rates dropping to 40-60 FPS at high settings. The GPU's 63rd percentile ranking indicates it trails many modern mid-range cards, and 1440p gaming at ultra settings would require lowering texture quality or accepting frame rates below 60 FPS. The 4K resolution is not recommended for this GPU, as the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth would severely constrain performance.

Frame estimates from benchmark scores suggest the RX 6600 delivers approximately 50-70% of the performance of a top-tier GPU from the same era, based on its percentile positioning. The CPU's strong performance ensures frame times remain consistent, avoiding stutter in CPU-bound scenarios. For competitive gaming at 1080p with reduced settings, frame rates can approach 200 FPS, leveraging the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock to its fullest.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combination ranks at the 75th combined percentile among all desktop configurations, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 63rd percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13600KF?

A: The i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38,149, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-13600KF's 38,103, indicating essentially identical performance.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, but does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 features 28 ray tracing cores on RDNA 2.0 architecture, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate for hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible games.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU rating is 300 W, covering the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 132 W TDP, with headroom for other components.

Q: Is this GPU still in production?

A: No, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a production status of "End-of-life" and was released on October 12, 2021.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and how does it affect gaming?

A: The CPU boosts to 5.00 GHz, which drives high single-thread performance (3,873 in Passmark), ensuring low latency and high frame rates in CPU-bound gaming scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear bottleneck dynamic: the CPU outperforms the GPU by 23 percentile points, meaning the RX 6600 limits frame rates in graphics-intensive workloads. In 1080p gaming, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,873 can feed the GPU adequately, but the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking caps maximum FPS in demanding titles. The GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM become constraints at higher resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs.

In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, data compression (340,026 score), and multi-threaded rendering, the CPU's 86th percentile ranking ensures no bottleneck, with the GPU contributing compute through its 6,554 Passmark GPU compute score. The CPU's 16 threads handle parallel tasks efficiently, while the GPU's 1,792 shading units accelerate graphics-specific operations. For gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor at 1080p ultra settings, but the CPU's headroom means settings reductions will yield frame rate increases without CPU limitations.

The FPS scaling pattern, though estimated, suggests that reducing graphical settings from ultra to high or medium will provide significant frame rate gains because the GPU is the constraint. Conversely, the CPU's performance headroom means that upgrading the GPU in the future would yield immediate frame rate improvements without requiring a CPU change. The combined percentile of 75 indicates a well-balanced system for its class, but the 23-point gap between CPU and GPU percentiles signals that the GPU is the component to upgrade first for gaming performance gains.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14490F

AMD Radeon RX 6600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds