SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14450HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14450HX

32,040 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

45,152 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14450HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile pairing represents a fascinating, albeit unusual, combination of a mid-range mobile CPU with a top-tier flagship GPU. The data shows a system with significant compute capability across both CPU and GPU tasks, but with a clear imbalance in gaming workloads where the CPU is likely to hold back the GPU's full potential. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32040 places it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU’s average score of 45152 places it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, giving the combined system a solid 83rd percentile overall. This analysis will break down the strengths and limitations of this pairing, focusing on what the benchmark numbers indicate for real-world use, rather than speculative marketing claims.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14450HX is a 10-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture. It features a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The processor uses Intel’s 10 nm process node and has a die size of 257 mm². This is a performance-oriented laptop chip, evidenced by its high boost clock and substantial core count for the mobile segment. The cache hierarchy is notable: 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. This configuration is designed to feed the high-frequency cores, and the benchmark results confirm that the design delivers strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scored 20108 points in the multi-core test and 2838 points in the single-core test. The single-core score is particularly strong, indicating excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks. The multi-core score shows that the 16 threads are well-utilized, making it capable of handling demanding productivity workloads. PassMark results further illustrate the CPU’s character. The multithread score of 23680 and integer math score of 78330 suggest strong performance in general processing and scientific calculations. The floating-point math score of 58037 is also high, which is beneficial for engineering and analytical software. The data compression score of 278538 is exceptionally high, indicating that this CPU can handle file archiving and compression tasks with ease.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the CPU’s average score of 32040 is essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-13705H (32076, deltaPct -0.1%) and the Intel Core i5-14400 (32115, deltaPct -0.2%). It is also within a fraction of a percent of the Intel Core i7-12800H (32121, deltaPct -0.3%) and the Intel Core i9-11900 (32226, deltaPct -0.6%). This means the i5-14450HX offers performance nearly identical to those processors, despite being a lower-tier part in the 14th Gen lineup. The architecture is based on the Raptor Lake design, which is a refined version of Alder Lake, and the high L3 cache size helps mitigate latency in complex workloads. Overall, the CPU is a very capable workhorse for a laptop, but its 10-core, 16-thread configuration is not at the absolute top of the mobile heap, as indicated by its 82nd percentile ranking.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the relative benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5871 and its PassMark G3D score of 30034 indicate it has massive rendering throughput. In contrast, the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3643 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2838 are good, but not class-leading.

For high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the data suggests the CPU will be the primary limiter. The GPU is capable of producing very high frame rates, but the CPU’s physics score of 1475 in PassMark and its single-thread performance may bottleneck the GPU in games that rely heavily on CPU-side game logic and draw calls. The benchmark results indicate that while the GPU can push well over 200 FPS in esports titles, the CPU may struggle to maintain those frame times consistently. At 1440p and 4K, the load shifts more to the GPU. The RTX 5090 Mobile’s impressive pixel rate of 169.7 GPixel/s and texture rate of 496.9 GTexel/s allow it to maintain high frame rates at these higher resolutions, but the CPU bottleneck will still cap the maximum FPS. For instance, in a demanding AAA title at 4K, the GPU might be able to render at 100 FPS, but the CPU’s frame pacing might limit the actual output to slightly lower if the game is CPU-intensive. The estimates suggest this system is best suited for 1440p gaming where the balance between CPU and GPU load is more even, allowing the GPU’s power to shine without the CPU holding it back as severely as at 1080p.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The data indicates this system is excellent for high-refresh gaming at 1440p. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5871 suggests it can handle modern titles at high settings with high frame rates. However, the CPU’s single-thread score of 2838 in Cinebench R23 means that at 1080p, where the CPU is more often the limiting factor, achieving maximum refresh rates might be inconsistent. The system will excel at 1440p and 4K, where the GPU is the dominant processing unit.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and strong multi-core score of 20108 in Cinebench R23 make it capable of handling game capture and encoding while gaming. The GPU also has 328 tensor cores, which can accelerate encoding tasks. The data suggests that streaming at high bitrates with x264 encoding on the CPU is feasible, while using NVENC on the GPU could free up CPU resources for gaming, leading to a smoother experience overall.

Video Editing: This workload heavily benefits from both CPU and GPU performance. The CPU’s high data compression score of 278538 and floating-point score of 58037 help with timeline scrubbing and effect processing. The GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM and 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide ample headroom for 4K and 8K video timelines, color grading, and rendering effects. The combination is very strong for this task, though the CPU is not the absolute fastest, so final export times will be respectable but not class-leading.

3D Rendering: For CPU-based rendering, the i5-14450HX’s multi-core score of 20108 will produce results faster than many older desktop processors, but slower than the top-tier mobile HX chips. For GPU-based rendering (like Blender Cycles or Octane), the RTX 5090 Mobile is a powerhouse. Its FP32 performance of 31.80 TFLOPS and 82 RT cores will dramatically accelerate ray-traced renders. The data shows this is a strong system for hybrid rendering workflows, where the GPU does the heavy lifting.

Software Development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 2838 (Cinebench R23) ensures fast compilation for single-threaded parts of a build process, while the multi-thread score of 20108 helps with parallel compilation tasks. The 20 MB of L3 cache and 16 threads make it a responsive platform for coding, running virtual machines, and using containers. The PassMark data encryption score of 15574 suggests secure operations, like code signing and SSH, are handled quickly.

Student and Office Work: This is a case of massive overkill for basic tasks. The CPU’s single-thread performance is more than sufficient for web browsing, word processing, and spreadsheets. The integrated UHD Graphics 710 is present, but the discrete GPU would be used for any hardware acceleration. The system is more than capable, but the power draw of the components suggests a shorter battery life, making it less ideal for all-day portability, though the data does not explicitly measure battery life.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly identifies the CPU as the bottleneck in this pairing for gaming and other latency-sensitive tasks. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 45152 is higher than the CPU’s 32040, and the GPU sits in the 84th percentile versus the CPU’s 82nd. This skew is more pronounced in gaming. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 1475 is a weak point. Physics calculations are often single-threaded and CPU-bound; a low score here directly translates to lower frame rates in games with complex physics engines.

The FPS scaling, although not measured, can be inferred. In a game where the GPU is the sole limiter, the FPS would scale linearly with resolution. However, because the CPU has a fixed frame time, the FPS will hit a ceiling. The data suggests that at 1080p, the FPS ceiling is reached due to the CPU’s limits, meaning the GPU is underutilized. At 4K, the GPU’s rendering time increases, but the CPU’s frame time remains constant, so the system becomes more GPU-bound, and the GPU’s high pixel rate of 169.7 GPixel/s is better utilized. In compute-heavy workloads like 3D rendering, the balance is better. The CPU can feed the GPU with data, and the GPU’s massive compute throughput (31.80 TFLOPS) handles the bulk of the parallel work, meaning the bottleneck shifts to the GPU, which is a desirable situation for render times.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is the flagship mobile GPU in the 50-series lineup. It is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and uses the GB203 chip manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The GPU features 10496 shading units, 328 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. It is equipped with 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores, which are the dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration. The GPU operates at a base clock of 990 MHz and a boost clock of 1515 MHz. The memory subsystem is a highlight: 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a massive 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The 24 GB VRAM is a significant advantage for professional rendering and AI workloads. It allows large models and high-resolution textures to fit entirely in VRAM, avoiding the performance penalty of spilling to system memory. The 896.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that the 10496 shading units are well-fed with data. The FP32 performance of 31.80 TFLOPS is the raw compute power, and the FP16 performance is also 31.80 TFLOPS (1:1), which is highly unusual and indicates that the GPU can handle FP16 workloads without a speed penalty, a benefit for AI inference and some scientific compute tasks. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5871 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 201834 indicate that the GPU is a top-tier performer, sitting in the 84th percentile of all GPUs.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the GPU’s average score of 45152 is closely matched with the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45384, deltaPct -0.5%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (44795, deltaPct 0.8%), and the Intel Arc A730M (45592, deltaPct -1%). It is also within 1.8% of the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45972). This is interesting because it shows that while the RTX 5090 Mobile is a flagship in name, its mobile power constraints bring its performance in line with desktop mid-range cards from the previous generation. The PassMark G2D score of 1057 is low, suggesting that 2D desktop workloads are not where this GPU excels, but that is not a primary use case for a processor with this specification.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is for users who prioritize GPU compute performance above all else. The target user is a content creator or professional working with 3D rendering, video editing, or AI model training/inference. The 24 GB VRAM and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth are tailor-made for these tasks. In these scenarios, the CPU is sufficient to keep the GPU fed and handle the non-parallel aspects of the work, and the high core count helps with tasks like video encoding and scene preparation.

For gamers, this system targets those who play at 1440p or 4K resolution. At these resolutions, the GPU’s power is the primary driver of frame rates, and the CPU bottleneck is less pronounced. It is not recommended for 1080p gaming where the CPU will hold back the GPU, wasting potential. It is also a suitable option for small business workstations that need to run complex simulations or large data processing tasks, where the CPU’s 16 threads and fast single-core performance handle the logic while the GPU accelerates the parallel math. However, for students and office workers, this system is overkill; the power and cost of the GPU are not needed for basic productivity tasks, and a more balanced system would be more efficient.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is based on the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile platform. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in the traditional sense. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility in system building, but the memory bus is dual-channel. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is more than enough for the GPU’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The GPU is also an IGP (Integrated Graphics Processor) form factor, meaning it is also soldered onto the board, making it impossible to upgrade the GPU independently.

Given this, the upgrade path is limited. The primary upgrade would be increasing system memory (RAM) to the maximum supported by the motherboard, as this is often the only user-serviceable component in a laptop. The TDP of the CPU is 55 W, and the GPU TDP is 95 W, so the total power draw is significant. There is no suggested PSU listed, but the system would require a robust power delivery system to handle the combined load. A sensible “next upgrade” for users of this system would be external storage via Thunderbolt or USB4, or a high-quality external display to take advantage of the GPU’s output capabilities. Since the components are fixed, the only meaningful long-term upgrade is to an entirely new laptop platform.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this system is 83, placing it above the vast majority of other laptop configurations.

Q: Does the CPU performance match the GPU performance in this system?

A: No. The CPU has an average benchmark score of 32040 (82nd percentile), while the GPU has an average score of 45152 (84th percentile). The GPU is significantly more powerful, which can lead to a CPU bottleneck in gaming.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The GPU features 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s.

Q: Is this system suitable for 1080p high-refresh gaming?

A: The data suggests it is not ideal. The CPU’s performance is likely to limit frame rates at 1080p, preventing the GPU from being fully utilized. It is better suited for 1440p or 4K gaming.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU is based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-HX) and is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node.

Q: What APIs does the GPU support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-13705H?

A: The CPU’s average score is 32040, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-13705H’s score of 32076, a delta of -0.1%. They are effectively tied in performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s key benchmark scores are strong across the board. In Cinebench R23, it achieves 20108 multi-core and 2838 single-core. Its PassMark multithread score is 23680, and its single-thread score is 3643. These scores place the CPU in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32040. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13705H, scores 32076, a negligible 0.1% difference. The data confirms the CPU is a solid mid-to-high-tier mobile processor.

The GPU’s benchmark performance is exceptional. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5871. In Geekbench, it scores 201834 in OpenCL and 198405 in Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score is 30034, and the GPU compute score is 13401. These results place the GPU in the 84th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 45152. The GPU is closely matched with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, which scores 44795 (deltaPct 0.8%). The combined picture is that of a system with a very powerful GPU that is slightly let down by a comparatively weaker CPU. The GPU is the star of the show, offering performance near the top of the mobile charts, but the CPU is merely average for a high-end laptop, creating an imbalance that affects gaming performance but not professional compute workloads. The combined 83rd percentile ranking is impressive, but it is the GPU that is pulling the score up.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14450HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14450HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds