SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14450HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14450HX

32,040 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core i5-14450HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile defines a mainstream laptop configuration aimed at balancing multi-threaded CPU work with entry-level dedicated graphics. The data indicates a system that sits at the 73rd percentile overall, suggesting a comfortable middle-to-upper tier position for a portable machine. The CPU provides a substantial 10-core, 16-thread foundation based on the Raptor Lake architecture, while the GPU offers modern Ada Lovelace features in a power-efficient package. This analysis examines the benchmark data to determine the specific strengths and limitations of this component combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14450HX is a 10-core processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX refresh. It operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and can boost up to 4.80 GHz, providing a wide frequency range for scaling from light to heavy workloads. The 10 cores and 16 threads are configured to handle parallel tasks effectively, and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. This memory layout is designed to reduce latency for frequently accessed data, aiding both productivity applications and gaming. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support, a feature typically found in workstation-class hardware.

Benchmark results show the CPU is a strong performer in its class. In Cinebench R23, it scores 20,108 points in the multi-core test and 2,838 points in the single-core test. The multi-core score indicates significant capability for rendering and compilation tasks, while the single-core score ensures responsive performance in everyday applications. The PassMark suite further illustrates its strengths: a multi-thread score of 23,680 and a single-thread score of 3,643. The processor excels in integer math (78,330) and floating-point math (58,037), which are relevant for scientific calculations and media processing. The data compression score of 278,538 and encryption score of 15,574 suggest robust performance for file archiving and security-related workloads.

Positioned against its nearest rivals, the i5-14450HX has an average benchmark score of 32,040. It is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-13705H, which scores 32,076 with a delta of -0.1%. The i5-14450HX also matches the Intel Core i5-14400 (32,115, -0.2%) and Intel Core i7-12800H (32,121, -0.3%). The most significant gap is against the Intel Core i9-11900, which scores 32,226; the i5-14450HX trails it by 0.6%. This data shows that the i5-14450HX delivers performance comparable to previous-generation i7 and i9 parts, putting it in a strong position for a mid-range laptop. With an 82nd percentile rank among all CPUs, it outperforms the majority of processors available, making it a solid choice for mobile workstations and gaming laptops that require significant compute power.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU each contribute distinct benchmark profiles. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32,040, placing it at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its direct rivals are tightly clustered, with the closest competitor, the Intel Core i7-13705H, being just 0.1% faster. This indicates that the i5-14450HX offers performance parity with several other high-end mobile and desktop processors. The GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, has an average benchmark score of 19,049, which places it at the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6600, which scores 19,036, a delta of 0.1%, putting them on nearly equal footing. The RTX 4050 Mobile also closely matches the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU. The CPU’s 82nd percentile rank is significantly higher than the GPU’s 63rd percentile. This suggests the processor has more headroom relative to the broader market than the graphics card does. In practical terms, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU will likely be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks. The combined percentile for the build is 73rd, which reflects a balanced system that is above average but not top-tier in either component. The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so the gaming analysis must rely on the individual component benchmark scores to estimate performance.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The RTX 4050 Mobile’s PassMark G3D score of 14,423 and its position near the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (which scores 19,036) suggest it is a capable 1080p gaming GPU. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3,643 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,838 are sufficient to avoid bottlenecking in most games. For competitive esports titles and older games, the system should be capable of delivering high frame rates at 1080p with high settings. For more demanding AAA titles, the GPU will likely require lowering graphical settings to maintain smooth performance at 1080p, as its 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are moderate by modern standards. The CPU’s multi-core performance will help in games that utilize multiple threads, but the overall gaming experience will be dictated by the GPU’s rendering capabilities.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear balance of power that favors the CPU. With the CPU at the 82nd percentile and the GPU at the 63rd percentile, the processor is the stronger component relative to its market segment. In gaming workloads, this typically means the RTX 4050 Mobile will be the primary bottleneck, limiting frame rates in graphics-heavy scenes. The CPU’s high single-thread performance ensures it can handle game logic and physics calculations without holding back the GPU. In productivity workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the balance shifts. The CPU’s 16 threads will be fully utilized, and the GPU’s compute capabilities (PassMark G3D score of 14,423) will assist in acceleration, but the CPU will likely be the determining factor for final render times. The data shows the CPU is not a limiting factor in most scenarios; instead, the GPU defines the upper bound for graphical performance. The FPS scaling, though unmeasured, would logically follow this pattern, with CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions and GPU-bound scenarios at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the estimated level of gaming performance for this system?

A: The system is estimated to handle 1080p gaming well, with the RTX 4050 Mobile’s PassMark G3D score of 14,423 suggesting it can run many titles at high settings. For demanding AAA games, lowering settings may be necessary to maintain playable frame rates.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its direct competitors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14450HX has an average benchmark score of 32,040, which is within 0.6% of the Intel Core i9-11900 (32,226). It is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-13705H, i5-14400, and i7-12800H, all scoring near 32,100.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is listed as unlocked, indicating the CPU can be overclocked if the laptop’s BIOS and cooling solution allow it.

Q: What type of memory does this CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i5-14450HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility in system builds.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for content creation tasks?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has 80 tensor cores and 20 RT cores, making it suitable for AI-accelerated tasks and ray-traced workloads. Its PassMark GPU compute score of 5,947 indicates moderate compute capability for tasks like video editing and 3D modeling.

Q: What is the relative strength of the CPU versus the GPU?

A: The CPU is relatively stronger, holding an 82nd percentile rank among all CPUs, while the GPU holds a 63rd percentile rank among all GPUs. This suggests the CPU is less likely to be a bottleneck than the GPU in most workloads.

Q: What is the manufacturing process for the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on a 5 nm process node at TSMC, with a die size of 159 mm² and containing 18,900 million transistors.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets users who need a balanced laptop for both productivity and gaming. The CPU’s 16 threads and high multi-core scores (20,108 in Cinebench R23) make it suitable for content creators, software developers, and data analysts who run multi-threaded applications. The 82nd percentile CPU performance ensures smooth operation in demanding professional software. The GPU, while not top-tier, is sufficient for gamers who play at 1080p resolution, as indicated by its 63rd percentile rank and similarity to the AMD Radeon RX 6600. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU’s compile times and the GPU’s ability to handle CAD or visualization tools. Small business workstations requiring a mix of office productivity and occasional media editing would also find this configuration capable, provided the workloads do not exceed the GPU’s 6 GB VRAM limit for large 3D scenes.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3,643 in PassMark will keep frame rates high in CPU-bound titles, while the RTX 4050 Mobile can push respectable frame rates in less demanding games. Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 16 threads, which can handle encoding and game logic simultaneously, though the GPU’s NVENC capabilities (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture) would offload this work. Video editing in 1080p or 1440p will be smooth, with the CPU’s multi-core score of 23,680 in PassMark handling timeline rendering and the GPU’s compute score of 5,947 accelerating effects. For 3D rendering, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,108 indicates solid performance for CPU-based renderers like Blender’s Cycles, while the GPU can assist with OptiX-accelerated rendering. Software development is a strong suit, as the CPU’s high integer math score of 78,330 speeds up code compilation. Finally, for student and office work, the system is overqualified, with the CPU’s single-core performance ensuring snappy application launches and the GPU providing ample power for any graphical user interface demands.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the CPU is soldered and not upgradable in a traditional sense. The memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration provides some flexibility for upgrades, but the specifics depend on the laptop’s motherboard design. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is forward-looking for fast NVMe SSDs. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. The system’s TDP is 55 W for the CPU and 50 W for the GPU, totaling 105 W for the core components. The absence of a suggested PSU in the data is typical for a laptop, where the power supply is proprietary. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing the amount of RAM, especially if the system uses DDR5, and adding a high-capacity PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD to leverage the available lanes. The GPU and CPU are not user-upgradable, so the primary storage and memory are the only practical areas for future enhancement.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14450HX processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile graphics card. The system achieves a combined percentile of 73, indicating it is a solid mid-range performer. The CPU is the stronger component, with an 82nd percentile rank, while the GPU’s 63rd percentile rank is more modest. This pairing is designed for users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity tasks but do not require top-tier graphics performance. It represents a balanced configuration for a portable machine, capable of handling a wide range of tasks from professional software to 1080p gaming. The overall tier is that of a capable mainstream laptop, suitable for a broad audience.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, with a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². The GPU has 2,560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units. It includes 20 RT cores for ray tracing and 80 tensor cores for AI and DLSS workloads. The memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1455 MHz and a boost clock of 1755 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The pixel rate is 84.24 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 140.4 GTexel/s, yielding an FP32 performance of 8.986 TFLOPS.

The benchmark results show the GPU’s capabilities. Its PassMark G3D score of 14,423 places it at the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, with a performance level nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (19,036, 0.1% delta). In compute tasks, it scores 5,947 in PassMark GPU compute, which is modest. The GPU achieves 75,235 in Geekbench Vulkan and 74,748 in Geekbench OpenCL, indicating solid API support. For graphics, the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 61 and DirectX 11 score of 130 are relatively low, suggesting that the GPU is not optimized for extreme high-end rendering. The 20 RT cores will enable ray tracing in supported games, but the 6 GB VRAM may limit texture quality at higher resolutions. For rendering workloads, the GPU can accelerate tasks via its tensor cores for AI denoising and RT cores for ray-traced scenes, but the FP32 performance of 8.986 TFLOPS means it is not a primary renderer for complex scenes. It is best suited for 1080p gaming with some graphical features enabled and as an accelerator in creative applications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14450HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14450HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds