SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14401E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

76%

GPU

99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14401E

5,253 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14401E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation — Benchmark Database Analysis

This pairing combines a 14th-generation Intel desktop processor with NVIDIA's workstation-class Ada Lovelace GPU, producing a system that ranks in the 79th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU sits at the 60th percentile against all processors, while the GPU reaches the 98th percentile against all graphics cards, creating an asymmetric pairing where the graphics subsystem is dramatically more powerful relative to the broader market than the processor. The following analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data and specifications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14401E uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface, which places it within the Raptor Lake platform generation. This is a desktop-class build, and the socket compatibility means users can consider other Socket 1700 processors as potential upgrades without changing the motherboard. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology based on what their specific motherboard model supports. ECC memory support is present, which is a meaningful feature for workstation reliability scenarios where data integrity matters more than raw memory speed.

The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU in this pairing uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. This means the graphics card operates within the bandwidth capabilities of the PCIe 4.0 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots through backward compatibility. The CPU's 65-watt TDP is modest, while the GPU has a 250-watt TDP and the suggested power supply for the graphics card is 600 watts. This suggests that the power delivery requirements are dominated by the GPU, and a system builder should ensure the power supply can handle the combined load of both components plus other system hardware.

The integrated UHD Graphics 730 in the CPU provides a fallback display output capability, though the discrete RTX 5000 Ada Generation will handle all demanding graphics workloads. For a sensible next upgrade path, users could consider moving to a higher-core-count Socket 1700 processor if their workloads scale well with additional cores, since the platform itself remains the same. Alternatively, the GPU could be upgraded to a newer workstation card in the future, as the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot has not yet become a bottleneck for the current GPU's performance level. The platform's DDR4/DDR5 flexibility also means that a future system rebuild could reuse the memory modules if they are DDR5, reducing the cost of a platform transition.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 5253, placing it at the 60th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 with an average score of 5259, a difference of only 0.1 percent — essentially a statistical tie. The Core i7-11700B scores 5241, which is 0.2 percent lower than the i5-14401E, and the Core i9-10850K also scores 5240, again 0.2 percent lower. The i5-13400T scores 5210, which is 0.8 percent lower. These narrow margins indicate the i5-14401E sits in a crowded performance band where many processors deliver nearly identical aggregate benchmark results, despite differences in core counts and architectures.

Looking at the specific Cinebench results, the multicore scores show a clear progression: Cinebench R15 multicore scores 1830, Cinebench R20 multicore scores 7627, and Cinebench R23 multicore scores 18161. The single-core results are 258, 1076, and 2564 for R15, R20, and R23 respectively. The ratio between multicore and single-core scores in R23 is approximately 7.1, which reflects the 6-core, 12-thread configuration. The GPU's average benchmark score is 184664, placing it at the 98th percentile among all GPUs. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 175286, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 194041. The GPU's nearest rival is the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB with a score of 183725, which is 0.5 percent lower, while the A100 SXM4 40 GB scores 187147, which is 1.3 percent higher. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 182109, 1.4 percent lower, and the GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178050, 3.7 percent lower.

The combined picture is one of a processor that performs competently in the mid-range of the CPU market, while the GPU performs at the very top tier of the graphics market. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this asymmetry — the system as a whole is well above average, but the CPU prevents the pairing from reaching the heights that the GPU alone achieves.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and its Geekbench scores of 175286 in OpenCL and 194041 in Vulkan indicate exceptional raw compute capability that should translate to very high frame rates in most games at standard resolutions. The CPU's 60th percentile ranking with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2564 suggests that single-threaded gaming performance is adequate but not class-leading.

For 1080p gaming, the CPU is likely to be the limiting factor in many titles, especially those that rely heavily on single-core performance. The GPU has headroom to render frames much faster than the CPU can feed it game state updates, which could result in the CPU being the bottleneck even at lower resolutions. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes more fully utilized, and the system should deliver very high frame rates in most games, though the exact numbers would depend on the specific title and settings.

For esports titles that are less demanding on the GPU, the CPU's single-core performance of 2564 in Cinebench R23 single-core should be sufficient for high refresh rate gaming at 1080p, though not necessarily at the absolute highest frame rates achievable with top-tier gaming CPUs. For graphically demanding AAA titles, the GPU's 32 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide ample resources for high-resolution textures and ray tracing effects, though the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation card rather than a gaming-focused product. These are estimates based on benchmark data, and actual gaming performance would need to be measured directly to confirm.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The GPU operates at the 98th percentile against all GPUs, while the CPU operates at the 60th percentile against all CPUs. This 38-percentage-point gap indicates that the GPU is dramatically more capable relative to its market segment than the CPU. In CPU-bound workloads such as physics calculations, game logic, or single-threaded applications, the processor will be the limiting factor. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18161 is respectable but not exceptional, meaning heavily threaded workloads will not scale as well as they would with a higher-core-count processor.

In GPU-bound workloads such as 3D rendering, video encoding, or machine learning inference, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation will dominate the performance profile. Its FP32 performance of 65.28 TFLOPS and 12800 shading units provide massive parallel compute capability that far exceeds what the CPU can deliver. The GPU's 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores also provide specialized acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads that the CPU cannot match.

The FPS scaling between resolutions would likely show the CPU bottleneck becoming less severe at higher resolutions, because the GPU takes longer to render each frame, giving the CPU more time to prepare the next frame. This is a common pattern in asymmetric pairings, and the 98th percentile GPU combined with the 60th percentile CPU suggests that 4K gaming would be GPU-limited while 1080p gaming would be CPU-limited in many scenarios. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this balance — the system performs well overall, but users should be aware that the CPU represents the weaker link in the chain.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, meaning this system outperforms approximately 79 percent of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database, though the GPU's 98th percentile is significantly higher than the CPU's 60th percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E has an average benchmark score of 5253, which is 0.1 percent lower than the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 at 5259, and 0.2 percent higher than both the Intel Core i7-11700B and Intel Core i9-10850K, which score 5241 and 5240 respectively.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14401E supports ECC memory, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types through a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 600 watts, while the GPU itself has a 250-watt TDP and uses a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 184664 on average, which is 0.5 percent higher than the A100 SXM4 80 GB's score of 183725, making them nearly equivalent in aggregate benchmark performance.

Q: What is the CPU's cache configuration?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 98th percentile performance provides ample frame generation capability for high refresh rate displays, but the CPU's 60th percentile ranking with a single-core score of 2564 in Cinebench R23 may limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles at 1080p. At 1440p and above, the system should deliver very high frame rates in most games, though exact figures are estimated rather than measured.

Streaming: The GPU's 400 tensor cores and 65.28 TFLOPS of FP16 performance provide strong acceleration for AI-based encoding and streaming enhancements, while the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads can handle game logic and streaming overhead simultaneously, though the CPU is not the strongest multi-threaded performer.

Video editing: The GPU's 32 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle large video projects and effects-heavy timelines, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18161 provides competent but not exceptional rendering performance for export tasks.

3D rendering: The GPU's 12800 shading units and 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance make it exceptionally well-suited for GPU-accelerated rendering, where it will dramatically outperform the CPU's 18161 multicore score in Cinebench R23. The CPU will not be a significant factor in GPU-rendered scenes.

Software development: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads with a 4.70 GHz boost clock provide responsive compilation times for moderate-sized projects, while the GPU's compute capabilities can accelerate parallel workloads such as testing or simulation. The 60th percentile CPU ranking indicates mid-range performance for developer workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65-watt TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 730 provide an efficient baseline for productivity tasks, while the GPU's massive compute resources are largely unnecessary for document editing, web browsing, or spreadsheet work. The system is over-specified for these tasks but would handle them without difficulty.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need workstation-class GPU compute but do not require top-tier CPU performance. Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions will benefit from the GPU's 98th percentile performance, which should deliver very high frame rates in graphically demanding titles, though they should accept that the CPU will limit performance at 1080p in some games. Content creators working with GPU-accelerated rendering, video editing, or 3D modeling will find the 32 GB of VRAM and 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance exceptionally capable, and the ECC memory support on the CPU provides stability for long-running render jobs.

Developers working on compute-intensive applications, machine learning models, or scientific simulations will benefit from the GPU's 400 tensor cores and 100 RT cores, which accelerate AI and ray tracing workloads respectively. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the system capable of handling demanding coursework, though the GPU is more powerful than most student workloads require. Small business workstations that need reliable, high-performance graphics for CAD, visualization, or data analysis will find the combination of ECC memory support and workstation-class GPU performance attractive, though the CPU's 60th percentile ranking means it is not the most powerful option for CPU-bound business applications.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-14401E with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from Intel's Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node. The GPU is a workstation-class graphics card from NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process node at TSMC with 76,300 million transistors. The combined percentile of 79 places this system well above average, but the asymmetry between the CPU's 60th percentile and the GPU's 98th percentile defines the character of this build — it is a GPU-dominant system where the graphics card is the clear star, while the processor provides competent but not exceptional support.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14401E features 6 cores and 12 threads with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. It is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 215 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited to what the motherboard and BIOS allow.

The benchmark results place this CPU at the 60th percentile among all processors, with an average score of 5253. In Cinebench R23, it scores 18161 in multicore and 2564 in single-core tests. These scores indicate that the CPU performs competitively in its segment, nearly matching the Xeon E5-2699A v4 and slightly outperforming the Core i7-11700B and Core i9-10850K. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle everyday productivity tasks, moderate multi-threaded workloads, and gaming without significant bottlenecks, but it will not excel in heavily threaded applications where higher-core-count processors have a clear advantage.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation features 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The GPU has 12800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, along with 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores. The base clock is 1155 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz, and the memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The GPU is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. It has a 250-watt TDP and requires a 600-watt power supply, using a single 16-pin power connector.

The benchmark results place this GPU at the 98th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 184664. It scores 175286 in Geekbench OpenCL and 194041 in Geekbench Vulkan, making it nearly equivalent to the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB and slightly ahead of the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. The FP32 performance of 65.28 TFLOPS and texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s indicate exceptional raw compute throughput, while the pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s supports high-resolution rendering. For rendering workloads, this GPU provides workstation-class performance with substantial VRAM capacity, making it suitable for large scenes, high-resolution textures, and GPU-accelerated rendering engines.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14401E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14401E

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds