SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14401E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

76%

GPU

97%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14401E

5,253 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14401E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination represents a desktop pairing where a high-end, end-of-life GPU is matched with a mid-range, power-efficient 14th Gen processor. The data indicates a significant performance imbalance in the GPU’s favor, placing the overall build in the 73rd percentile. The CPU, scoring in the 60th percentile overall, is a capable 6-core processor with strong single-threaded performance, while the GPU, sitting in the 86th percentile, is an absolute rendering powerhouse. This is not a balanced configuration; it is a build designed primarily for high-resolution and graphically intense workloads where the RTX 4080 can stretch its legs.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14401E is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It features 6 physical cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The chip has a 65 W TDP and relies on a dual-channel memory controller supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 modules, along with ECC memory support. Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 pool. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited to BCLK adjustments. It also includes UHD Graphics 730 integrated graphics, providing a display output fallback.

Benchmark scores from Cinebench reveal the processor's strengths. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,161 and single-core score of 2,564 indicate a chip that handles threaded workloads well but truly excels in lightly-threaded tasks. For context, the average benchmark score of 5,253 places it in the 60th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4, scores 5,259, a negligible 0.1% difference, suggesting the i5-14401E offers compute performance on par with a high-core-count server chip in this specific aggregate metric. Compared to the Intel Core i7-11700B, the i5 is 0.2% faster. This shows that while the i5 has fewer cores than many rivals, its architecture and high boost clock allow it to compete effectively in mixed workloads. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2,564 is a standout figure, indicating excellent responsiveness for applications that rely on a single thread, such as older games or certain scripting tasks in production software.

In real-world terms, the 6-core/12-thread configuration is sufficient for modern gaming and general productivity. The 20 MB of L3 cache helps with game performance, while the DDR5 memory support allows for high bandwidth if paired with appropriate modules. The data suggests this CPU is a strong performer for its class, but it is not a top-tier part; the 60th percentile ranking confirms it sits in the upper-midrange of the desktop CPU landscape. For heavy multi-threaded rendering, it will be outclassed by higher-core-count processors, but its single-core speed ensures snappy system operation and strong frame pacing in games.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data paints a clear picture of the balance in this system: the GPU is the dominant component. The RTX 4080 sits in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, while the i5-14401E sits in the 60th percentile of CPUs. This 26-percentile gap is substantial and indicates that in scenarios where the GPU is fully utilized, the CPU will be the limiting factor. This is a classic GPU-bound configuration at high resolutions, but a CPU-bound one at lower resolutions.

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,161 is respectable, but it is not extraordinary. When paired with a GPU of the RTX 4080's caliber, the i5 will likely struggle to feed the GPU enough frames in less demanding titles or at 1080p resolution. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,567 and Passmark G3D score of 34,457 are high enough that they will often wait for the CPU to finish its draw calls. Conversely, the GPU's massive 716.8 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB of VRAM ensure that it will never be the bottleneck in standard gaming scenarios unless the CPU cannot keep up.

The data does not include FPS scaling metrics, but the percentile disparity alone is evidence of the bottleneck. The CPU's 0.2% deltaPct over the Intel Core i7-11700B and 0.8% over the i5-13400T suggests it is performing near the limit of its 6-core design. This is not a pairing for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming where CPU limits are often reached first. Instead, the balance shifts in favor of the system at 4K or with ray tracing enabled, where the GPU's workload increases exponentially and the CPU’s 60th-percentile performance becomes less of a constraint. The weak link is the processor; every workload will be gated by its 6-core/12-thread throughput when the GPU is pushed to its limits.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates, the CPU will be the primary limiter. The i5-14401E's single-core performance is strong, but its 6-core limit will cap frame rates in modern titles. The RTX 4080 is capable of far more FPS than the CPU can deliver in this scenario, making the CPU a bottleneck. The data suggests this is not the ideal setup for competitive esports at maximum frame rates.

Streaming: This workload benefits from the RTX 4080's dedicated hardware encoders, which can handle the video encoding without taxing the CPU. The i5-14401E's 12 threads are sufficient to run the game and streaming software simultaneously, provided the game is not too CPU-intensive. The GPU's 86th percentile performance ensures high-quality encoding at high bitrates, while the CPU's 60th percentile score is adequate for the overhead. This is a viable scenario, though not optimal for heavily threaded games.

Video Editing: The combination of the i5-14401E and RTX 4080 is strong for video editing. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,161 handles timeline scrubbing and effects processing, while the GPU accelerates rendering and export via CUDA and NVENC. The 16 GB of VRAM on the GPU allows for smooth playback of high-resolution footage and complex compositions. The 60th percentile CPU score is workable, but export times will be longer than with a higher-end processor.

3D Rendering: This is a mixed bag. The RTX 4080's 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 304 tensor cores make it a monster for GPU-accelerated rendering engines. However, for CPU-based rendering, the i5-14401E's 6 cores will be a significant bottleneck. The Cinebench R23 score of 18,161 is modest, and render times will be slow compared to systems with more cores. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking is the saving grace, making this a good choice for real-time viewport rendering but a poor one for final CPU renders.

Software Development: The i5-14401E is a good fit for development. The 12 threads and high boost clock of 4.70 GHz provide fast compile times for small to medium projects, and the single-core performance of 2,564 in Cinebench R23 ensures a responsive IDE. The RTX 4080 is overkill for this task, but the system's overall speed makes for a pleasant development environment. The 60th percentile CPU score indicates it is better than average for this workload.

Student and Office Work: This system is massively overpowered for this scenario. The CPU's 65 W TDP and efficient design make it a reasonable choice for a desktop, but the RTX 4080's 320 W TDP and triple-slot design are excessive for word processing or spreadsheets. The UHD Graphics 730 integrated GPU is sufficient for this task, making the discrete GPU unnecessary. The performance data shows this is a high-end workstation that is not cost-effective for basic tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize GPU compute and rendering over CPU-centric tasks. The primary audience is gamers who play at 4K resolution or with ray tracing enabled, where the RTX 4080's 86th percentile performance is the main driver. The CPU's 60th percentile ranking is sufficient to avoid major stuttering in these scenarios, though it will limit maximum frame rates. Content creators who use GPU-accelerated renderers, such as those leveraging CUDA or OptiX, will benefit from the 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 power and 304 tensor cores. Video editors working with high-resolution timelines will appreciate the 16 GB of VRAM, which prevents memory overflow during previews.

The system is less suited for developers or professionals who rely on CPU-heavy compilation or simulation, as the 6-core i5-14401E will be a limiting factor. Small business workstations that run single-threaded office applications will find the system fast, but the GPU is a luxury that is never utilized. The data suggests this is a niche product for enthusiasts who demand high-end graphics without the cost of a flagship CPU. The 73rd combined percentile ranking reflects a system that is powerful overall but held back by its processor in certain tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance gap between the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The GPU sits in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU sits in the 60th percentile of all CPUs, indicating a 26-percentile gap where the CPU is the weaker component.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-10850K?

A: The i5-14401E has an average benchmark score of 5,253, which is 0.2% higher than the i9-10850K's score of 5,240.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4080?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s, based on a 256-bit bus and 16 GB of GDDR6X memory.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the CPU is not multiplier-unlocked and does not support traditional overclocking.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The RTX 4080 delivers 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is useful for general compute and rendering workloads.

Q: What is the release date of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E was released on June 30, 2024.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for error-sensitive workstation tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD103 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GPU contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. Clock speeds are set at a base of 2205 MHz and a boost of 2505 MHz, with memory running at an effective 22.4 Gbps. The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The GPU is equipped with 9,728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. For ray tracing and AI, it includes 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores.

Benchmark results demonstrate the GPU's high-end status. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,567 is a strong indicator of modern DirectX 12 gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 214,739 and Vulkan score of 263,779 show excellent compute and API versatility. The Passmark G3D score of 34,457 places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,247. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, is only 0.1% faster, showing that the standard 4080 is virtually identical in performance to its successor. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% slower, while the RX 6750 GRE is 2.6% slower.

The 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth and 16 GB of VRAM are critical for high-resolution textures and complex 3D scenes. The 76 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing, while the 304 tensor cores accelerate DLSS and AI-based features. The pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s indicate immense raw fill rate capabilities. This GPU is a top-tier part, with the data showing it is near the top of the performance heap in its generation, though the production status is end-of-life. The 320 W TDP and triple-slot cooler require a substantial power supply and case clearance, but the performance is commensurate with the physical footprint.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture is defined by the disparity between the two components. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 scores are 18,161 multi-core and 2,564 single-core, with an average benchmark score of 5,253 (60th percentile). The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 6,567, and its Passmark G3D score is 34,457, with an average benchmark score of 54,247 (86th percentile). The combined percentile for the build is 73, which is lower than the GPU's individual percentile due to the CPU's drag.

In aggregate, the CPU’s average score of 5,253 is nearly identical to the Xeon E5-2699A v4 (5,259), showing it is a solid mid-range performer. The GPU’s average score of 54,247 is just 0.1% above the RTX 4080 SUPER, indicating it performs at the very top of its class. The data shows that in CPU-bound tasks, the system will perform at the 60th percentile level, while in GPU-bound tasks, it will perform at the 86th percentile level. This means the system is excellent for 4K gaming and GPU rendering, but merely average for CPU-heavy productivity. The overall 73rd percentile ranking is a compromise between these two extremes, reflecting a build that is stronger in graphics than in processing.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build, as indicated by the build class and the CPU's Intel Socket 1700 and market segment. It pairs a 6-core Intel Core i5-14401E with a 16 GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080. The CPU is a 14th Gen Raptor Lake part, while the GPU is an end-of-life Ada Lovelace part. The overall tier, based on the 73rd combined percentile, is upper-midrange. It is not a top-tier system because the CPU lacks the core count and multi-threaded throughput of higher-end processors. However, the GPU is a high-end part, and the system is capable of exceptional graphical performance.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU's 320 W TDP mean the system requires a robust power supply, with the GPU suggesting a 700 W PSU. The GPU is a triple-slot card, 310 mm in length, requiring a full-sized ATX case. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, ensuring compatibility. This is a system built for gamers and creators who know they need maximum GPU power, accepting the CPU as a secondary consideration. The launch MSRP for the GPU is 1,199 USD.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The data shows the GPU is in the 86th percentile, while the CPU is in the 60th percentile. In gaming, this translates to strong 4K performance, where the GPU is the primary bottleneck. At this resolution, the RTX 4080’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,567 suggests it can handle modern titles at high settings.

At 1440p, the system will still be GPU-bound in most games, but the CPU will begin to matter. The i5-14401E's single-core score of 2,564 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient for most titles, but very CPU-intensive games may see frame rate dips. At 1080p, the CPU will likely be the limiting factor, preventing the GPU from reaching its maximum frame output. The estimated FPS figures are not available, but the percentile data indicates that this system is best suited for 4K gaming and less so for 1080p esports. The figures are estimates and should be treated as such, with the understanding that the GPU is the star of the show.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14401E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14401E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds