SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14401E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
76%
VS
GPU
99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14401E

5,253 Benchmark Score
Top 24% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

131,938 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14401E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti: A Practical Hardware Analysis

This pairing combines a 6-core Intel Raptor Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's flagship Ampere GPU, creating a system that sits at the 78th percentile overall among all desktop builds. The CPU is a modest 60th-percentile performer while the GPU dominates at 95th percentile, making this a configuration where the graphics card clearly drives the system's capabilities. The Core i5-14401E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, with 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes available from the CPU. The RTX 3090 Ti connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which works fine with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes since the GPU uses the older standard. This is a desktop build, and the data shows no measured frame rates for this exact combination — all FPS figures discussed here are estimated from benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform places this CPU in a mature ecosystem that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility depending on motherboard choice and budget constraints. The dual-channel memory bus means two DIMMs are the optimal configuration for bandwidth, though the CPU's ECC memory support is an unusual feature for a mainstream Core i5 — it opens the door to workstation-oriented motherboards that accept error-correcting memory. The 65W TDP is modest, so the CPU itself requires nothing more than a capable air cooler, leaving plenty of thermal headroom inside the chassis. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are forward-looking, though the RTX 3090 Ti's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface means the GPU won't saturate the newer standard — this is a non-issue for current workloads.

The GPU's power demands are the real constraint: the RTX 3090 Ti has a 450W TDP and requires an 850W suggested PSU, which is substantial but reasonable for a high-end build. The triple-slot cooler is 336mm long, 140mm tall, and 61mm wide, so case compatibility is a genuine consideration — smaller towers will not accommodate this card without careful measurement. The power connector is a single 16-pin, so builders need a PSU with that connector or an appropriate adapter. The CPU's 65W draw is trivial next to the GPU's 450W, meaning the PSU choice is dictated entirely by the graphics card. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 for storage or other expansion cards, which is a future-proofing bonus. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count Raptor Lake CPU on the same socket, keeping the existing motherboard and memory while boosting multi-threaded performance — though the current 6-core/12-thread configuration handles most tasks adequately.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results show a balanced single-core and multi-core profile. In Cinebench R23, the i5-14401E scores 2,564 points single-core and 18,161 points multi-core, which positions it at the 60th percentile among all CPUs. The R20 results follow the same pattern: 1,076 single-core and 7,627 multi-core. The R15 scores of 258 single-core and 1,830 multi-core round out the picture. The average benchmark score of 5,253 places the CPU within 0.1% of the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 (5,259), 0.2% ahead of the Core i7-11700B (5,241) and Core i9-10850K (5,240), and 0.8% ahead of the Core i5-13400T (5,210). These are tight margins — the i5-14401E is essentially tied with its nearest rivals, meaning real-world differences will be negligible outside synthetic benchmarks.

The GPU is an entirely different story. The RTX 3090 Ti's average benchmark score of 131,938 puts it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs, a dominant position. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 5,741; in Geekbench OpenCL, 174,441; and in Geekbench Vulkan, 215,633. The nearest rivals are close: the NVIDIA L4 (131,072) is 0.7% behind, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation (135,218), NVIDIA A10M (135,230), and AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (135,396) are all 2.4% to 2.6% ahead. This puts the 3090 Ti in professional-class territory — it trades blows with workstation cards that cost significantly more today. The combined picture is a system where the GPU outperforms the CPU by a wide margin in relative terms: 95th percentile versus 60th percentile. For gaming at high resolutions and GPU-accelerated workloads, this skew is acceptable; for CPU-bound tasks, the processor becomes the limiting factor.

FAQ

Q: Does this CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14401E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, so the choice depends on the motherboard.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 4.70 GHz, while the base clock is 2.50 GHz. This is a locked multiplier (not unlocked), so overclocking via multiplier adjustment is not supported.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3090 Ti have?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. This is a large amount of VRAM for demanding workloads.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the RTX 3090 Ti is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of 2022-01-26. The launch MSRP was 1,999 USD. Its predecessor was the GeForce 20 series and its successor is the GeForce 40 series.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 850 W, and the GPU's TDP is 450 W. The CPU's TDP is only 65 W, so the PSU requirement is driven by the graphics card.

Q: What PCIe version does the GPU use?

A: The RTX 3090 Ti uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds, which is backward compatible.

Q: What is the CPU's L3 cache size?

A: The L3 cache is 20 MB shared across all cores. Each core also has 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 cache.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need extreme GPU performance without compromising on a reasonable CPU. Gamers aiming for 4K resolution will benefit most, since the RTX 3090 Ti's 95th-percentile standing means it can push high frame rates at demanding settings, while the i5-14401E's 60th-percentile single-core performance is sufficient for most game engines. Content creators working with 4K or 8K video editing, 3D rendering, or large-scale image processing will appreciate the 24 GB of VRAM and the GPU's compute capabilities — the 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are workstation-class numbers. Developers building and testing GPU-accelerated applications, particularly those using DirectX 12 Ultimate or Vulkan, will find the API support comprehensive.

Students in computer science or digital arts programs can benefit from this system for both coursework and personal projects, though the cost of the GPU may be prohibitive for many. Small business workstations handling CAD, simulation, or AI inference tasks will see strong performance — the GPU's percentile ranking rivals professional workstation cards like the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation and AMD Radeon PRO W6800, which are 2.4% to 2.6% ahead. The CPU's ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compute jobs, a feature typically absent from consumer chips. For users whose workloads are GPU-bound, this pairing is well-suited; for those needing heavy multi-threaded CPU work, the 6-core/12-thread processor may feel limiting compared to higher-core alternatives.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14401E is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size. It belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, released on 2024-06-30. The base clock of 2.50 GHz boosts to 4.70 GHz, and the CPU includes UHD Graphics 730 as integrated graphics — useful for troubleshooting or basic display output without the discrete GPU. The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3, which helps with latency-sensitive workloads.

The benchmark scores place this CPU in a narrow band around the 5,253 average. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 18,161 is roughly 7.1 times the single-core score of 2,564, which is reasonable for a 6-core/12-thread chip — perfect scaling is impossible due to thermal and power limits. The R20 multi-core score of 7,627 and R15 multi-core of 1,830 follow the expected pattern. The nearest rivals include the Xeon E5-2699A v4 (0.1% behind), Core i7-11700B and Core i9-10850K (both 0.2% behind), and Core i5-13400T (0.8% behind). These deltas are tiny, meaning the i5-14401E performs essentially identically to those four CPUs in aggregate benchmarks. For real workloads, this translates to solid 1080p gaming, responsive productivity, and capable multi-threaded tasks up to moderate thread counts. The 65W TDP is notable — it delivers near-parity with higher-power rivals like the 10850K while consuming less power, though the locked multiplier prevents manual overclocking.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA102 chip, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. The base clock is 1,560 MHz with a boost of 1,860 MHz, and memory runs at 1,313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus delivers 1.01 TB/s bandwidth — a figure that remains competitive even in the current market. The GPU has 10,752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores, giving it 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 and 40.00 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 208.3 GPixel/s and texture rate is 625.0 GTexel/s.

The benchmark results confirm the GPU's high-end status. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,741 and Geekbench scores of 174,441 (OpenCL) and 215,633 (Vulkan) contribute to the 95th-percentile ranking. The nearest rivals are all professional or workstation cards: the NVIDIA L4 is 0.7% behind, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation, A10M, and Radeon PRO W6800 are 2.4% to 2.6% ahead. This is remarkable for a consumer gaming card — it matches or exceeds dedicated workstation GPUs in aggregate benchmarks. The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI tasks, respectively, making this GPU suitable for rendering with ray-traced effects, DLSS-style upscaling, and machine learning inference. The 24 GB VRAM is the standout feature; it allows loading large models or textures that would exceed the capacity of smaller cards. The triple-slot cooler and 450W TDP are the trade-offs — this is a physically large, power-hungry card that requires a substantial case and PSU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 95th-percentile position and the CPU's 60th-percentile position suggest that at 1080p, the CPU may become the limiting factor in lightly-threaded games, potentially holding the GPU back from its maximum frame output. At 1440p and especially 4K, the GPU's workload increases and the CPU bottleneck diminishes, allowing the RTX 3090 Ti to stretch its legs. The 24 GB VRAM is overkill for current games at any resolution, which means texture quality can be maxed out without hitting memory limits.

For esports titles at 1080p, the i5-14401E's single-core performance (2,564 in Cinebench R23) should drive very high frame rates, though the GPU's raw power may be underutilized. For AAA games at 4K with ultra settings, the GPU's 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth should deliver smooth gameplay, with the CPU providing adequate frame pacing. Ray tracing performance benefits from the 84 RT cores, and the 336 tensor cores enable DLSS where supported, which can boost frame rates significantly. The lack of measured data means these expectations are qualitative — the exact FPS will vary by game and driver version. Users should expect the GPU to be the dominant factor in gaming performance, with the CPU playing a supporting role that matters most at lower resolutions and high refresh rates.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining a 60th-percentile CPU with a 95th-percentile GPU, yielding a combined percentile of 78. The Core i5-14401E is a mainstream 6-core processor with a 65W TDP, while the RTX 3090 Ti is a flagship-tier GPU with a 450W TDP and a 850W suggested PSU. The class is desktop, meaning this is a full-size system with no portability constraints. The overall tier is upper-midrange to high-end, driven almost entirely by the GPU. The CPU is a competent performer that sits in the middle of the pack, while the GPU is near the top of all graphics cards. This asymmetry defines the build's character: it is a GPU-first system where the graphics card does the heavy lifting in gaming and compute workloads.

The RTX 3090 Ti's launch MSRP was 1,999 USD, and it is now end-of-life, so availability may be limited. The CPU is active in production, released in mid-2024. The pairing makes sense for users who prioritize graphics performance over CPU throughput, such as 4K gamers or GPU-accelerated compute users. For CPU-bound tasks like heavy multitasking or rendering that scales with cores, the 6-core/12-thread configuration is adequate but not exceptional. The build's 78th-percentile ranking reflects the GPU's dominance — without the 3090 Ti, this system would be a modest performer. With it, the system competes with much more expensive workstation configurations in GPU-centric benchmarks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU (60th percentile) and GPU (95th percentile) creates a clear bottleneck profile. In GPU-bound workloads — 4K gaming, ray tracing, rendering, video encoding, AI inference — the GPU is the limiting factor only in the sense that it is the component doing the work; the CPU has enough headroom to feed it data without stalling. The GPU's 95th-percentile score versus the CPU's 60th-percentile score means the CPU will saturate first in CPU-bound scenarios. For example, in esports titles at 1080p, the CPU's single-core performance determines the maximum frame rate, and the GPU's extra power goes unused. In contrast, at 4K with ultra settings, the GPU's workload increases, and the CPU can keep up, allowing the GPU to reach its potential.

The benchmark deltas support this: the CPU is within 0.8% of its nearest rivals, meaning it is not a standout performer, while the GPU is within 2.6% of workstation cards that cost more. The FPS scaling between resolutions would show the GPU becoming more relevant as resolution increases — at 1080p, the CPU limits; at 4K, the GPU is the primary driver. For multi-threaded CPU workloads like video encoding or software compilation, the 6-core/12-thread configuration will be the bottleneck, and the GPU's power goes underutilized. Conversely, for GPU compute workloads like 3D rendering or machine learning, the CPU's role is minor. The practical advice is: this build excels when the workload is graphics-heavy, and it underperforms when the workload is CPU-heavy. Users who do a mix should expect the CPU to cap performance in some tasks and the GPU to dominate in others, with the overall system being well-balanced for gaming at high resolutions but less so for CPU-intensive productivity.