SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14401E + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

76%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14401E

5,253 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

19,410 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14401E paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a desktop configuration that combines a mid-range 14th Gen processor with a high-end RDNA 3 flagship GPU. This pairing sits at the 62nd percentile overall among all builds, indicating it outperforms the majority of systems while leaving headroom for improvement. The data shows a significant imbalance between the components, with the GPU’s raw compute potential vastly outstripping what the CPU can feed it in many scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture using the Navi 31 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. This flagship GPU packs 57,700 million transistors across a 529 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 109.1M per mm². The memory subsystem is substantial, featuring 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2500 MHz, translating to 20 Gbps effective, which provides ample headroom for high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

Clock speeds are competitive, with a base clock of 1929 MHz, a game clock of 2365 MHz, and a boost clock of 2498 MHz. The GPU contains 6144 shading units, 384 texture mapping units, and 192 raster operation units. For ray tracing, there are 96 dedicated RT cores, though the tensor core count is not specified, meaning AI-accelerated features rely on standard compute. The compute throughput is impressive: FP32 performance reaches 61.39 TFLOPS, while FP16 hits 122.8 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, making this card exceptionally fast for both gaming and general-purpose compute.

Pixel and texture rates are equally strong, with the GPU achieving 479.6 GPixel/s and 959.2 GTexel/s. Benchmark results confirm its high-end status. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 6841 points. Geekbench results show 50465 in OpenCL and 85612 in Vulkan, indicating strong cross-API performance. Passmark G3D score is 31238, with a GPU compute score of 17689. These figures place the GPU at the 64th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it sits above the median but not at the absolute top tier.

The nearest rivals in the benchmark database provide context. The NVIDIA TITAN Xp scores 19177, which is 1.2% lower than the RX 7900 XTX’s average of 19410. The AMD FirePro D300 scores 19637, 1.2% higher, while the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 scores 19602, 1% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB scores 19334, 0.4% lower. This shows the RX 7900 XTX is clustered tightly with these older or workstation-class cards in average benchmark scores, though its 24 GB memory and modern architecture give it advantages in memory-heavy tasks that these aggregate scores do not fully capture.

For rendering workloads, the 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 122.8 TFLOPS FP16 performance are directly relevant. The 24 GB memory capacity prevents out-of-memory errors in complex scenes, while the 960.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures texture streaming keeps up with the compute units. The 96 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the absence of tensor cores means AI-based upscaling and denoising rely on the general-purpose compute units.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores show a consistent pattern across Cinebench versions. In Cinebench R15, the Core i5-14401E scores 1830 multi-core and 258 single-core. In R20, it reaches 7627 multi-core and 1076 single-core. The R23 results show 18161 multi-core and 2564 single-core. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 5253, placing it at the 60th percentile among all CPUs.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 19410, placing it at the 64th percentile among all GPUs. The combined build percentile is 62, indicating that the pairing as a whole outperforms 62% of all recorded configurations. The CPU’s nearest rivals highlight its positioning: the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 scores 5259, just 0.1% higher, while the Intel Core i7-11700B scores 5241, 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i9-10850K scores 5240, 0.2% lower, and the Intel Core i5-13400T scores 5210, 0.8% lower.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is solidly mid-pack and a GPU that is also mid-pack relative to all GPUs, but the nature of the workloads matters. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18161 suggests strong multi-threaded performance for a 6-core part, while the single-core score of 2564 indicates good per-thread performance. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6841 is a modern DirectX 12 benchmark that stresses the GPU heavily, and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 85612 shows strong low-level API performance.

The build’s overall percentile of 62 means it sits in the upper-middle range of all systems. The CPU’s 60th percentile is slightly below the GPU’s 64th percentile, suggesting the CPU is the limiting factor in most scenarios. The average benchmark scores do not tell the full story, as the GPU’s specialized compute capabilities and large memory pool make it more capable than the raw percentile suggests for specific workloads like 4K gaming or machine learning inference.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component characteristics. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6841 and its 64th GPU percentile indicate strong rasterization performance, while the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2564 suggests adequate per-thread performance for gaming.

Based on these scores, the RX 7900 XTX is capable of high frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions in most titles. The 24 GB memory capacity is more than sufficient for modern game textures, and the 960.0 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory bottlenecks at high resolutions. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for most games, but the 2.50 GHz base clock and 4.70 GHz boost clock mean it will not be the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios.

At 4K resolution, the GPU will likely be the bottleneck in most games, as the pixel rate of 479.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 959.2 GTexel/s are high enough to saturate the CPU’s capabilities. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-core performance becomes more relevant, and games that rely heavily on single-threaded performance may see lower frame rates than the GPU alone would suggest. The estimated FPS figures should be treated as approximations, as the actual performance depends on game optimization, driver maturity, and the specific workload.

The 96 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but the lack of tensor cores means DLSS-style AI upscaling is not available. This is not a limitation for rasterized games, but it means ray-traced titles may see lower performance than competing NVIDIA cards with dedicated AI hardware. The passmark DirectX 12 score of 131 and DirectX 11 score of 356 suggest the GPU handles modern APIs efficiently, though the Passmark DirectX 10 score of 166 and DirectX 9 score of 330 indicate legacy API performance is not a priority.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly indicates that the GPU is the stronger component in this pairing, with a 64th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 60th percentile. This 4-percentile gap is small but meaningful, as it suggests the CPU will frequently be the limiting factor in GPU-heavy workloads. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 19410 is significantly higher than the CPU’s 5253, though these are not directly comparable across different benchmark suites.

In gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads may cause bottlenecks in titles that favor higher core counts, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18161 is solid but not exceptional. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s workload increases, and the CPU has more headroom to keep up. The GPU’s 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 performance means it can generate frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls in many scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect but telling. The GPU’s high pixel rate of 479.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 959.2 GTexel/s suggest it can push high frame rates at 1440p, but the CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2564 may limit maximum frame rates in games that are not well multi-threaded. For content creation workloads like video rendering or 3D modeling, the CPU’s 6 cores will be the bottleneck, as the GPU’s compute power is largely idle during CPU-bound tasks.

The power draw imbalance is notable. The GPU has a TDP of 355 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 65 W. This 5.5x difference means the GPU dominates system power consumption, and the CPU is unlikely to be a thermal or power constraint. The suggested PSU of 750 W is sufficient for this pairing, but the GPU’s power connectors of 2x 8-pin must be present on the power supply.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14401E is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is built on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 2.50 GHz, boosting to 4.70 GHz, which provides respectable single-threaded performance for a mid-range part. The TDP is 65 W, making it a power-efficient choice for desktop builds.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for a 6-core chip. Each core has 80 KB of L1 cache and 1.25 MB of L2 cache, with a shared 20 MB L3 cache. This large L3 cache helps reduce memory latency and improves performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, offering flexibility in platform choice. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual for a consumer chip and valuable for workstation use.

The CPU’s benchmark scores are competitive for its class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18161 is strong, given the 6-core configuration, and the single-core score of 2564 indicates good per-thread performance. The Cinebench R20 scores of 7627 multi-core and 1076 single-core follow the same pattern. These results place the CPU at the 60th percentile, which is above average but not top-tier.

The nearest rivals show how close the field is. The Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 scores 5259, just 0.1% higher, meaning the i5-14401E is effectively tied with a high-core-count server chip in average benchmark scores. The Intel Core i7-11700B scores 5241, 0.2% lower, while the Intel Core i9-10850K scores 5240, 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i5-13400T scores 5210, 0.8% lower, showing that the 14401E is a slight step up from its immediate predecessor.

In real workloads, the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are suitable for mainstream productivity, but they will struggle with heavily multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or software compilation. The 4.70 GHz boost clock helps with single-threaded responsiveness, which is important for everyday tasks and gaming. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means overclocking is not possible, but the 65 W TDP keeps thermals manageable with a capable air cooler.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 62nd percentile overall, meaning it outperforms 62% of all recorded configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-11700B?

A: The Core i5-14401E has an average benchmark score of 5253, while the Core i7-11700B scores 5241, making the i5-14401E 0.2% faster in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 7900 XTX has a memory bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s, delivered through a 384-bit bus with 24 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14401E supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation and server-like workloads.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 compute performance?

A: The RX 7900 XTX achieves 61.39 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, making it highly capable for compute-intensive tasks.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA TITAN Xp in average benchmark scores?

A: The RX 7900 XTX has an average score of 19410, while the NVIDIA TITAN Xp scores 19177, making the RX 7900 XTX 1.2% faster.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with 12th and 13th Gen motherboards.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers who prioritize high-resolution gaming, particularly at 1440p and 4K, where the GPU’s 24 GB memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth shine. The RX 7900 XTX’s 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 performance handles modern titles with ease, and the CPU’s 4.70 GHz boost clock provides enough single-threaded power for most games. However, esports titles at 1080p may be CPU-limited, so competitive gamers seeking maximum frame rates should consider a higher-core-count CPU.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or machine learning will benefit from the GPU’s 122.8 TFLOPS FP16 performance and 24 GB memory, which can handle large datasets and complex scenes. The CPU’s 6 cores are adequate for these workloads, though render times will be longer than with a higher-core-count processor. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compute tasks.

Software developers compiling large codebases will find the CPU’s 20 MB L3 cache helpful, but the 6-core limit means compilation times will be moderate. Students and small business users running office productivity, web development, or light CAD work will find this build more than sufficient, with the GPU providing headroom for future demanding applications. The 65 W CPU TDP means system noise and heat are manageable, making it suitable for office environments.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-14401E with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread part from the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a 65 W TDP and a 4.70 GHz boost clock. The GPU is a dual-slot, 355 W flagship from the Radeon RX 7000 series, featuring 24 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 2498 MHz boost clock.

The overall tier of this build is the 62nd percentile, which places it in the upper-middle range of all systems. The CPU’s 60th percentile and GPU’s 64th percentile are closely aligned, but the GPU’s larger performance headroom makes it the dominant component. This is a balanced pairing for 1440p gaming and productivity, but the CPU will hold back the GPU in CPU-bound scenarios.

The GPU is end-of-life in production status, meaning it may be harder to find new, but the CPU is active and readily available. The GPU’s launch MSRP was 999 USD, which reflects its high-end positioning. The build class is desktop, confirming it is intended for stationary use with full-size components.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. This provides flexibility in memory selection, though the motherboard must match the chosen memory type. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon in consumer platforms and valuable for data integrity. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring compatibility with the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The 750 W suggested PSU is adequate for this build, given the CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 355 W TDP. The system has headroom for additional drives or peripherals, but a higher-wattage PSU may be needed if adding more power-hungry components.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, such as a Core i7 or i9 from the 14th Gen series, to better match the GPU’s performance in multi-threaded workloads. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster storage would improve overall system responsiveness. The GPU is already at the high end, so upgrading it would yield diminishing returns unless moving to a newer generation, but the 24 GB memory ensures longevity for future games and compute tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14401E + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14401E

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds