SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400T

27,166 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines Intel’s power-sipping Core i5-14400T with NVIDIA’s professional-grade RTX 4000 Ada Generation workstation GPU. The result is a desktop system that targets a very specific niche: high-efficiency compute and professional content creation, rather than raw gaming throughput. The data shows a CPU that sits near the middle of the pack and a GPU that ranks in the top 5% of all graphics cards, creating a pronounced imbalance where the graphics card will almost always be the star of the show.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build holds a combined percentile of 87 across all tested configurations, placing it comfortably in the upper echelon of desktop systems, though not at the absolute top.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400T compare to an older flagship like the Intel Core i9-9900K?

A: The i5-14400T has an average benchmark score of 27,166, which is roughly 0.3% higher than the Core i9-9900K's score of 27,097. This indicates the modern low-power i5 essentially matches the performance of the older high-end i9.

Q: What is the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's main performance rival?

A: Its average benchmark score of 135,218 is virtually identical to the NVIDIA A10M, which scores 135,230, showing a performance delta of 0.0%. It is also very close to the AMD Radeon PRO W6800.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14400T has memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the power consumption profile of this build?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP, and the GPU has a 130 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the graphics card is 300 W, indicating a relatively low overall system power draw.

Q: Is this a gaming laptop or a desktop workstation?

A: The build class is explicitly listed as "desktop." It pairs a desktop CPU on the Intel Socket 1700 platform with a single-slot workstation graphics card.

Q: Are there any measured gaming frame rates for this specific combination?

A: No. The data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, meaning all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores.

Benchmark Performance

The performance picture here is defined by a stark contrast between the two primary components. The CPU, the Intel Core i5-14400T, holds a percentile rank of 79 versus all CPUs, indicating it is better than roughly four out of five processors on the market. Its average benchmark score of 27,166 places it in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals: it is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-9900K (27,097) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G (27,051), while trailing the Intel Core i7-13700H by 0.7% and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G by 0.8%. This suggests the 14400T's performance is essentially a dead heat with these other mid-range and older high-end parts.

The GPU, however, is a different beast entirely. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation sits at the 95th percentile against all GPUs, a dominant position. Its average benchmark score of 135,218 is nearly neck-and-neck with its professional rivals: it is 0.0% off the NVIDIA A10M (135,230), 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (135,396), and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo (135,774). The sheer gap between the CPU score (27k) and the GPU score (135k) in raw benchmark numbers is the single most important takeaway from the data.

The combined picture is one of a system with a strong but not exceptional CPU, paired with an exceptionally powerful GPU. The combined percentile of 87 reflects the GPU's heavy influence on the overall score. In workloads that heavily utilize the GPU, this system will perform like a top-tier workstation. In CPU-limited tasks, it will perform like a competent mid-range desktop, similar to a Ryzen 7 5700G system.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400T is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R refresh). It operates with a modest base clock of 1.50 GHz but can boost up to 4.50 GHz under load. This is a 10 nm Intel chip with a die size of 215 mm². The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and includes integrated UHD Graphics 730, though the discrete RTX 4000 GPU makes that irrelevant in this build.

Benchmark results show a processor that is balanced but not extreme in any single area. In Cinebench R23, it scores 17,189 points in multi-core and 2,426 points in single-core. The multi-core score is respectable, reflecting the 16 threads. The single-core score of 2,426 suggests solid per-thread performance, which is crucial for responsiveness.

The PassMark suite provides more granular insights. Data encryption scores 13,244, while integer math hits 65,667 and floating-point math reaches 49,139. The data compression test shows a score of 235,636, indicating strong throughput for archiving and compression workloads. The extended instructions score of 14,562 suggests it handles modern SIMD workloads competently. The single-thread score of 3,512 is good, but the physics score of 1,244 is relatively low, which might indicate some throttling or power limits affecting sustained heavy multi-threaded loads, a common trait of "T" series low-power chips.

For real-world workloads, this CPU is a capable all-rounder. It handles office productivity, software compilation, and light video editing without breaking a sweat, given its 16 threads. The 35 W TDP is a defining feature; it is designed for efficiency and lower sustained power draw, which means it will run cooler and quieter than higher-wattage chips but may not sustain peak boost clocks indefinitely under an all-core load. It is a chip that prioritizes a balance of performance and power efficiency over raw multi-core dominance.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is heavily compromised by the CPU. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation card, not a gaming card, and its 95th percentile GPU score suggests immense raw power. However, the CPU's 79th percentile rank, with a single-thread score of 3,512, may struggle to feed the GPU in CPU-bound scenarios, limiting frame rates in esports titles. Expect high frame rates, but the processor will likely bottleneck in less demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU has 16 threads, which is a good foundation for software encoding. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,189 shows it can handle encoding a 1080p stream while gaming, though the low 35 W TDP may cause thermal or power limits that affect the stream quality during intense, all-core loads. The GPU also supports NVIDIA NVENC, but the data does not specify encoder quality.

Video Editing: This is a strong use case. The RTX 4000 Ada's 20 GB of GDDR6 memory and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle large timelines and effects. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 indicates massive compute acceleration for rendering and effects. The CPU's 16 threads are sufficient for decoding and timeline scrubbing, making this a very capable editing rig.

3D Rendering: This is the primary strength of this build. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 192 tensor cores are designed for professional rendering. The GPU's 95th percentile rank means render times will be drastically shorter than most systems. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,189 will handle CPU-based rendering tasks adequately, but the GPU will be the primary render engine.

Software Development: The i5-14400T is a solid choice for this task. The 16 threads handle parallel compilation well, and the PassMark integer math score of 65,667 indicates good performance for code processing. The 20 MB L3 cache is beneficial for holding large codebases and build dependencies. The GPU is irrelevant for most coding tasks, so the system's performance here is defined by the CPU's 79th percentile rank.

Student and Office Work: This is massive overkill. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,512 and its 16 threads provide a fluid, responsive experience for document editing, web browsing, and multitasking. The GPU's power is entirely wasted in this scenario, as office applications will not utilize its 6,144 shading units. The system will be exceptionally fast, but the cost is unjustified if this is the primary use.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The data is not measured. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a professional workstation card, not a consumer GeForce gaming card. While its raw compute power is immense, the data does not tell us how its drivers and hardware are tuned for DirectX 12 Ultimate or Vulkan gaming workloads.

That said, the GPU's 95th percentile and its 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance suggest it is capable of high frame rates at 1440p and 4K in most titles at ultra settings, provided the game is not CPU-limited. Its 20 GB of VRAM offers massive headroom for high-resolution textures. The CPU, however, is the limiting factor. With a PassMark single-thread score of 3,512, it is above average, but not a top-tier gaming chip. In CPU-heavy games, or at 1080p where the CPU is more likely to be the bottleneck, frame rates may not scale as well as the GPU's raw power suggests.

For a rough estimate, one could look at the GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 123,842. This suggests excellent graphics API performance. However, without measured game data, it is safer to say that this system would likely deliver playable, if not exceptional, frame rates at 1440p and 4K, but it is not purpose-built for high-refresh 1080p gaming due to the CPU's lower performance tier.

Who Should Build It

This system is for a very specific user: a professional content creator or engineer who needs massive GPU compute power but does not require a top-tier multi-core CPU. The target user is someone who works in 3D rendering, simulation, or complex data visualization, where the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 95th percentile performance is the primary requirement.

The GPU's 20 GB of memory and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth make it ideal for large dataset processing in fields like scientific computing, architectural visualization, and high-end video post-production. The CPU's 79th percentile ensures that general system tasks, code compilation, and application logic run smoothly. It is not for a gamer seeking maximum FPS, as the CPU will hold back the GPU. It is also not for a student or office worker, as the GPU cost is unjustifiable. The target audience is a small business building a single workstation for a high-end engineering or creative professional.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data paints a clear picture of imbalance. The GPU, at the 95th percentile, is a top-tier performer. The CPU, at the 79th percentile, is a competent mid-ranger. The GPU's average benchmark score is nearly 5 times higher than the CPU's. In this configuration, the GPU is the dominant component.

The bottleneck is workload-dependent. In GPU-accelerated tasks like 3D rendering, ray tracing, or deep learning inference, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation will be working at near 100% capacity, and the CPU will be waiting for it. There is no bottleneck here; the GPU is the engine. However, in CPU-bound workloads—such as physics simulations, game logic, or single-threaded tasks—the CPU becomes the limiting factor. The CPU's 1,244 PassMark physics score is notably low, suggesting it might struggle to keep up with the GPU in simulation-heavy scenarios.

In gaming, the bottleneck is almost certainly the CPU. The GPU has the raw power to generate very high frame rates, but the CPU's single-thread performance (3,512) and its low TDP may prevent it from issuing draw calls fast enough to keep the GPU fed, particularly at lower resolutions. The FPS scaling would show diminishing returns as resolution drops, with the CPU capping the frame rate.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a 10-core Intel Core i5-14400T CPU with an NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation workstation GPU. The overall tier of this system is high, given its combined percentile of 87. It is a professional workstation configuration, not a gaming rig. The CPU is a low-power Raptor Lake part designed for efficiency, while the GPU is a professional Ada Lovelace part designed for maximum compute throughput. This is a system built for one purpose: to accelerate professional graphics and compute workloads, with general-purpose computing as a secondary function.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is built for the Intel Socket 1700 platform. This socket supports the Core 14th Gen series, and the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility on motherboard and RAM choices. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, but the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, meaning the GPU will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds. This is not a bottleneck, as PCIe 4.0 x16 offers ample bandwidth.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 300 W, and its TDP is 130 W. Combined with the CPU's 35 W TDP, the entire system has a very low power draw. This means the suggested 300 W PSU provides significant headroom for the current components. There is ample room in the power budget for upgrades, but the platform itself is a potential dead-end. Socket 1700 is a mature platform, and the Core 14th Gen series represents the final generation for this socket. A sensible next upgrade would be to a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, such as a Core i7 or i9 14th Gen part, but any future upgrade would require a new motherboard.

For the GPU, there is little reason to upgrade. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is already at the 95th percentile. A more sensible upgrade path would be to focus on the CPU, potentially moving to a higher-core-count part on the same platform to better balance the system. The memory support for DDR5 allows for a future-proof memory upgrade, but the platform itself is at the end of its life.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400T

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds