SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400T

27,166 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400T is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh variant. It uses Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². The chip runs at a conservative 1.50 GHz base clock, boosting up to 4.50 GHz under load. Its 35 W TDP marks it as a low-power part, a notable trait for a desktop CPU with this core count. Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5, with dual-channel access and ECC capability enabled. The processor connects via Intel Socket 1700 and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 730.

Benchmark results place this CPU in a competitive mid-range position. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 17189, while the single-core score hits 2426. These numbers indicate strong sustained multi-threaded performance for a 35 W part, though the single-core figure is more modest. The Cinebench R20 results echo this pattern: 7219 multi-core and 1018 single-core. Older Cinebench R15 tests show 1732 multi-core and 244 single-core. PassMark tests add further detail. The multi-thread score is 20223, while single-thread performance lands at 3512. Integer math scores 65667, floating-point math 49139, and extended instructions 14562. Data compression reaches 235636, data encryption 13244, and random string sorting 25181. Physics simulation scores 1244, and prime number finding is 73.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 27166, placing it at the 79th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show how tightly grouped this field is. The Intel Core i9-9900K scores 27097, a delta of 0.3% — essentially a statistical tie. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G scores 27051, 0.4% behind. The Intel Core i7-13700H scores 27355, 0.7% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G scores 27382, 0.8% ahead. These small deltas mean the i5-14400T trades blows with a previous-generation flagship, a current laptop chip, and an APU within a single percentage point. For real workloads, this translates to dependable multi-core rendering in Cinebench, solid integer and floating-point throughput in PassMark, and encryption or compression tasks that benefit from the 16 threads. The low TDP suggests sustained performance without heavy cooling demands, but the data does not include thermal or power measurements, so that remains a qualitative observation.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is a desktop graphics card built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB202 chip fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die measures 750 mm² and packs 92,200 million transistors, with a transistor density of 122.9 million per mm². Clock speeds are set at a 2017 MHz base and 2407 MHz boost. Memory configuration is substantial: 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, or 28 Gbps effective. Compute resources include 21760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units. Ray tracing hardware consists of 170 RT cores, while 680 tensor cores handle AI workloads. Pixel rate reaches 423.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 104.8 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 104.8 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio. The card draws up to 575 W, requires a 950 W suggested PSU, and connects via a single 16-pin power connector. It occupies a dual-slot form factor, measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. PCIe 5.0 x16 is the bus interface. API support covers DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The only benchmark score available is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where the card scores 16504. This places the GPU at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, a surprisingly modest position given the enormous spec sheet. The average benchmark score is 16504, identical to the single test. Nearest rivals reveal a tight cluster. The NVIDIA T400 scores 16508, a delta of 0%. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16415, 0.5% behind. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408, 0.6% behind. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361, 0.9% behind. These deltas are minuscule, meaning the RTX 5090 D V2 performs within one percent of cards from vastly different tiers and generations. For rendering workloads, the 24 GB VRAM and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth suggest headroom for large textures and high-resolution assets, but the benchmark score does not reflect an overwhelming lead over these rivals. The 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores imply strong ray tracing and AI acceleration, but the measured data shows only the Steel Nomad result, so conclusions about RT-specific performance must remain qualitative.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for the Intel Core i5-14400T paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. Therefore, all FPS discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. Treat these figures as directional guidance rather than verified results.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16504, sitting at the 59th percentile, indicates solid but not exceptional rasterization performance relative to the broader GPU field. Given the RTX 5090 D V2's nearest rivals — the T400, Radeon PRO W7500, RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, and RX 5700 XT — all scoring within one percent, gaming frame rates at 1080p and 1440p should fall in a similar band to those cards. The RX 5700 XT is a known 1440p-class card from a previous generation, so the RTX 5090 D V2 likely delivers playable frame rates at those resolutions in most titles. At 4K, the 24 GB VRAM and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth provide the memory capacity for high-resolution textures, but the compute throughput of 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and the Steel Nomad score suggest performance that may struggle to maintain high refresh rates at ultra settings. The CPU side adds context. The i5-14400T's single-core score of 3512 in PassMark and 2426 in Cinebench R23 indicates adequate per-thread performance for gaming, but the 79th percentile ranking among CPUs means it will not be the primary bottleneck in most scenarios. Multi-core games that leverage 16 threads may benefit from the 17189 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. For esports titles at 1080p, the combination should easily exceed 60 FPS, but for demanding AAA games at 4K ultra, expect frame rates that dip below 60 FPS in heavy scenes. These are estimates only — no measured data supports exact numbers.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU components. The i5-14400T holds a 79th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the RTX 5090 D V2 sits at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. This 20-point gap suggests the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. In CPU-bound workloads — such as data compression, encryption, or physics simulation — the i5-14400T's 235636 compression score and 1244 physics score indicate the processor handles these tasks competently. The GPU is less dominant in its field, with its Steel Nomad score of 16504 placing it near cards like the T400 and RX 5700 XT, which are not top-tier gaming parts. For gaming, the FPS scaling would likely be limited by the GPU at higher resolutions, where the 24 GB VRAM and bandwidth matter more than CPU throughput. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's single-core performance of 3512 in PassMark becomes more relevant, potentially capping frame rates in lightly threaded titles. In productivity tasks, the balance shifts. Video editing and 3D rendering often stress both components: the CPU for scene preparation and the GPU for final render output. Here, the CPU's 79th percentile position provides a stronger foundation, while the GPU's 59th percentile may bottleneck render times. The combined percentile for the build is 69, reflecting a mid-pack overall position. The lack of measured FPS data means precise bottleneck quantification is impossible, but the percentile delta strongly implies the GPU is the limiting factor in most graphics-heavy scenarios, while the CPU leads in compute-heavy workloads.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 16504 Steel Nomad score and 59th percentile ranking suggest this build can target 1440p gaming, but not at the highest refresh rates. The CPU's 3512 single-thread PassMark score ensures minimal bottlenecking at lower resolutions, but the GPU's modest standing relative to its specs limits ultra-high FPS potential. Expect 60-100 FPS in most titles at 1440p, with lower performance at 4K.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and 17189 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provide headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU's tensor cores could assist with AI-based encoding features, but no benchmark data covers this. The low 35 W TDP of the CPU means thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions, though the GPU's 575 W draw will generate significant heat.

Video editing: The CPU's 79th percentile ranking and strong multi-core scores — 20223 in PassMark multi-thread, 49139 in floating-point math — support timeline editing and export. The GPU's 24 GB VRAM handles large 4K or 8K project files, but the 59th percentile GPU score indicates render acceleration is not class-leading. The 1.34 TB/s bandwidth aids in scrubbing high-bitrate footage.

3D rendering: The CPU's 17189 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provides solid CPU-based rendering performance. The GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 170 RT cores offer hardware acceleration for ray-traced renders, but the Steel Nomad score of 16504 places it near older workstation cards, suggesting longer render times than top-tier GPUs.

Software development: The CPU's 235636 data compression score and 13244 encryption score indicate fast build times and secure data handling. The 16 threads handle parallel compilation efficiently. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, but the 24 GB VRAM could support local AI model inference or GPU-accelerated testing.

Student and office work: The CPU's 35 W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 730 provide an energy-efficient baseline for everyday tasks. The 79th percentile CPU ranking ensures smooth multitasking across office applications, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU is overkill for this use case, but its presence does not hinder productivity workloads.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need strong CPU performance but can tolerate a mid-tier GPU. Gamers at 1440p will find the RTX 5090 D V2 adequate for most titles, though 4K gamers may be disappointed by the 59th percentile GPU ranking. Content creators working with large video files or 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU's 79th percentile ranking and the GPU's 24 GB VRAM, even if the GPU's compute scores are not top-tier. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's 16 threads and high compression scores. Students and office workers get a low-power CPU with integrated graphics for daily tasks, though the GPU adds unnecessary expense and power draw for such workloads. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity will find the CPU's feature set appealing, but the GPU's 575 W TDP may require infrastructure upgrades. The combined 69th percentile build ranking suggests a system that is competent across a range of tasks but does not excel in any single area.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 27166, placing it at the 79th percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong result, edging out the Intel Core i9-9900K by 0.3% and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G by 0.4%, while trailing the Intel Core i7-13700H by 0.7% and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G by 0.8%. Key scores include a Cinebench R23 multi-core of 17189 and single-core of 2426, a PassMark multi-thread of 20223, and a single-thread of 3512. The GPU's average benchmark score is 16504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA T400 (16508, 0% delta), AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (16415, 0.5% behind), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16408, 0.6% behind), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16361, 0.9% behind). The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its immediate rivals by fractions of a percent, while the GPU is statistically tied with its nearest competitors. The build's combined percentile is 69, reflecting a system that is above average overall but not exceptional. The CPU carries the performance weight, while the GPU's benchmark position is surprisingly low given its specifications.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T is at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27166.

Q: How does the RTX 5090 D V2 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The GPU scores 16504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The NVIDIA T400 scores 16508 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16415 (0.5% behind), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408 (0.6% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361 (0.9% behind).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what does it imply?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP, which is low for a 10-core desktop part. This suggests efficient operation, though the data does not include thermal measurements.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combo?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: It uses the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R) on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 215 mm².

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 69, indicating an above-average overall position compared to other builds.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-14400T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part with a 35 W TDP, a 1.50 GHz base clock, and a 4.50 GHz boost clock, sitting at the 79th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 24 GB GDDR7 memory, 21760 shading units, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores, but it holds only the 59th percentile among all GPUs with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504. The build's combined percentile is 69. This pairing represents a significant mismatch: the CPU is a top-quartile performer in its category, while the GPU, despite its massive specifications, benchmarks near workstation and previous-generation gaming cards. The i5-14400T is a low-power desktop processor ideal for efficient multi-threaded work. The RTX 5090 D V2, despite its 575 W TDP and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32, does not translate that raw power into a top-tier benchmark position. Overall, this is a desktop system with a strong CPU foundation and a GPU that underperforms its spec sheet, resulting in a mid-tier combined ranking.