SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400T

27,166 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400T is a 10-core, 16-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². It operates with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, while its thermal design power is rated at just 35 W. This low TDP is a defining characteristic—it signals a processor designed for power-efficient operation rather than raw sustained multi-core performance. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 79th percentile among all processors, which is a strong showing for a low-power part. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,189 indicates that the 10 cores and 16 threads can handle demanding threaded workloads competently, though this figure is modest compared to higher-TDP desktop chips. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2,426 is more impressive, reflecting solid single-thread performance from the 4.50 GHz boost clock. In PassMark tests, the multi-thread score of 20,223 and single-thread score of 3,512 reinforce the balanced nature of this chip.

The nearest rivals provide context. The Intel Core i9-9900K scores an average of 27,097 across benchmarks, which is 0.3% higher than the i5-14400T's average of 27,166. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G trails by 0.4% with an average of 27,051. The Intel Core i7-13700H is 0.7% ahead at 27,355, and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G leads by 0.8% at 27,382. These deltas are remarkably tight—within 1% of each other—which tells a clear story: the i5-14400T delivers performance on par with several higher-profile chips from previous generations, despite its 35 W TDP.

For real workloads, this means the i5-14400T is a capable all-rounder. The data compression score of 235,636 in PassMark suggests strong file archive and database performance. The floating-point math score of 49,139 and integer math score of 65,667 indicate solid number-crunching ability for scientific and financial computations. The extended instructions score of 14,562 and data encryption score of 13,244 show that modern instruction set extensions are well-supported. The physics score of 1,244 is modest, which may impact simulation-heavy tasks.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The combination of a 35 W, 10-core CPU with the flagship RTX 5090 GPU creates an inherent imbalance that benchmark data reveals clearly. The GPU's average benchmark score is 79,842, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU sits in the 79th percentile. This 13-percentile gap indicates that the graphics card is substantially more powerful relative to its peers than the processor is relative to its own competition.

In gaming workloads, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes the limiting factor. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,426 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,512 are respectable but not elite. The RTX 5090's raw rendering capability—evidenced by its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 and PassMark G3D score of 39,650—means that at lower resolutions, frame rates will be constrained by the CPU's ability to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic updates. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, as pixel throughput requirements scale beyond what even this flagship card can sustain at maximum settings.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the data set—no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. However, the percentile gap between CPU and GPU strongly suggests that CPU-bound scenarios will emerge in lighter graphical loads. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 1,244 is particularly low, which could impact games with complex physics simulations. Conversely, the GPU's FP32 throughput of 104.8 TFLOPS and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s indicate that once the GPU is fully engaged, it will not be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

For non-gaming workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's multi-thread score of 20,223 in PassMark, while decent, will bottleneck the GPU in compute tasks like 3D rendering or machine learning inference where the GPU's 26,756 PassMark GPU compute score and 334,370 Geekbench OpenCL score vastly outstrip the processor's capabilities. This is a system where the GPU dominates in parallel workloads, and the CPU's role is primarily to feed data efficiently.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 27,166 with a percentile rank of 79 among all CPUs. This places it in the upper quintile of processors, which is notable given its power efficiency. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1,732 and single-core score of 244 establish a baseline for older rendering workloads. The Cinebench R20 scores of 7,219 multi-core and 1,018 single-core show scaling consistent with the newer Cinebench versions. The Cinebench R23 scores of 17,189 multi-core and 2,426 single-core are the most relevant for modern rendering tasks.

The PassMark suite provides a broader picture. The multi-thread score of 20,223 and single-thread score of 3,512 are complemented by specialized tests: data compression at 235,636, data encryption at 13,244, extended instructions at 14,562, prime number finding at 73, floating-point math at 49,139, integer math at 65,667, physics at 1,244, and random string sorting at 25,181.

The GPU's benchmark results are more dramatic. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 is a strong indicator of DirectX 12 gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 334,370 and Vulkan score of 376,728 demonstrate exceptional compute capability across different APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 39,650 places the GPU in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. The PassMark GPU compute score of 26,756 shows strong general-purpose compute performance. The DirectX 9 score of 395, DirectX 10 score of 226, DirectX 11 score of 341, and DirectX 12 score of 185 provide a legacy API performance profile, while the G2D score of 1,413 covers 2D workloads.

The combined percentile for this build is 86, which reflects the high performance of the GPU pulling the overall score upward. The nearest GPU rivals are interesting: the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB scores 79,605 (0.3% behind), the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB scores 79,396 (0.6% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78,940 (1.1% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 80,959 (1.4% ahead). These deltas are small, but they indicate that the RTX 5090's average score is competitive with professional-grade compute cards.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize GPU horsepower above all else. The RTX 5090's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth makes it suitable for large dataset processing, high-resolution texture work, and AI model training. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking means it will not embarrass the GPU in most tasks, but the pairing is clearly GPU-forward.

For gamers at 4K resolution, this system is designed to maximize ultra-settings frame rates in graphically intensive titles. The GPU's 92nd percentile ranking ensures it can handle the most demanding modern games, while the CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient to avoid severe bottlenecks at this resolution where GPU load dominates.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the GPU's compute power. The FP32 throughput of 104.8 TFLOPS and the 92,200 million transistors on the GB202 chip provide substantial parallel processing capability. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads handle timeline scrubbing and asset management adequately, though the 35 W TDP means sustained multi-core rendering on the CPU will be slower than on higher-power parts.

Software developers compiling large codebases will find the CPU's multi-thread performance adequate but not exceptional. The PassMark integer math score of 65,667 and data compression score of 235,636 suggest reasonable compilation and build times. Students and small business workstations that need occasional GPU acceleration for visualization or simulation tasks will find this system overqualified but functional.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rate monitors, the CPU's single-thread performance will be the primary constraint. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,512 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,426 indicate that frame rates above 200 FPS in esports titles may be CPU-limited, but the GPU's massive rendering power will push frame rates to extreme levels in most games.

Streaming: The combination of CPU and GPU provides ample headroom for game capture and encoding. The GPU's tensor cores (680 total) and the CPU's 16 threads can handle both gaming and encoding workloads, though the GPU's dedicated hardware encoders are likely to be the preferred path for low-latency streaming.

Video editing: The GPU's 32 GB of VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth enable smooth timeline performance with 4K or 8K footage. The CPU's multi-thread score of 20,223 in PassMark supports efficient export encoding, while the GPU accelerates effects and color grading through its 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 compute.

3D rendering: GPU rendering will dominate. The RTX 5090's 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores accelerate ray tracing and denoising, while the CPU's 10 cores handle scene setup and geometry processing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,189 suggests CPU rendering is feasible but slower than GPU-based approaches.

Software development: The CPU's 16 threads and 20 MB of L3 cache support parallel compilation and testing. The PassMark integer math score of 65,667 indicates strong performance for code execution and unit testing. The GPU is largely idle in this scenario, making this build inefficient for pure development work.

Student and office work: This system is massively overprovisioned for document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing. The CPU's efficient 35 W TDP keeps power consumption low for office tasks, but the GPU's 575 W TDP makes this an impractical choice for typical student or office use.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a flagship graphics card built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB202 chip fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² area, achieving a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². This massive chip is configured with 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, 176 raster output units, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores.

Memory configuration is equally impressive: 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, providing 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 28 Gbps effective. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz. Pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s. Compute performance reaches 104.8 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio).

The benchmark scores reflect this hardware. The PassMark G3D score of 39,650 places the GPU in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 indicates strong DirectX 12 gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 334,370 and Vulkan score of 376,728 demonstrate exceptional cross-API compute capability. The PassMark GPU compute score of 26,756 shows robust general-purpose compute for tasks like physics simulation and data processing.

The nearest rivals in the GPU benchmark comparisons are primarily professional compute cards—Tesla P100 variants and AMD workstation parts—which indicates that the RTX 5090's performance profile extends well beyond gaming into professional acceleration territory. The average benchmark score of 79,842 is 1.4% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 80,959, which is the closest competitor.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps fields, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 and PassMark G3D score of 39,650 indicate that this card is positioned in the top 8% of all GPUs, suggesting it can run virtually any modern game at maximum settings.

At 4K resolution with ultra settings, the RTX 5090's 32 GB of VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth provide ample memory bandwidth for high-resolution textures and effects. The 176 ROPs ensure adequate pixel throughput for 4K rendering. The CPU's single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,426, should be sufficient to feed the GPU at this resolution where the GPU is typically the bottleneck.

At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward CPU dependency. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,512 suggests that frame rates in CPU-intensive games may be limited by the processor, but the GPU's raw power will still deliver high frame rates in most titles. At 1080p, the CPU becomes a more significant constraint, and frame rates may not scale linearly with the GPU's capability.

The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 185 in PassMark is relatively low compared to the DX11 score of 341, but this reflects the specific benchmark methodology rather than real-world gaming performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 is a more representative indicator of modern gaming performance. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with all current game APIs.

# FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-14400T a good match for the RTX 5090?

A: The CPU's 79th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 92nd percentile creates a GPU-forward balance. The CPU will limit performance in CPU-bound scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions, but the GPU's massive compute power ensures high frame rates in most gaming and rendering workloads.

Q: What is the power consumption of this build?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP, while the GPU has a 575 W TDP. The GPU's suggested PSU is 950 W, which accounts for the total system power draw under load.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14400T supports ECC memory. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What PCIe generation does this system use?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, providing full bandwidth for the RTX 5090.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5090 have?

A: The RTX 5090 has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for high-resolution textures and large compute workloads.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for these components?

A: The CPU has a launch MSRP of $221, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 1,999 USD.

Q: Is this system good for 4K gaming?

A: Yes, the GPU's 92nd percentile performance and 32 GB of VRAM make it well-suited for 4K gaming at ultra settings. The CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient for 4K where GPU load dominates.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th, 13th, and 14th generation Core processors. The Raptor Lake architecture supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in memory selection. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which matches the RTX 5090's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface for full bandwidth.

The GPU requires a 950 W suggested PSU, which is a significant power supply requirement. The 575 W TDP of the GPU, combined with the 35 W TDP of the CPU, leaves substantial headroom for other components within the 950 W budget. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot width, fitting into most standard ATX cases with a length of 304 mm.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU is the limiting factor in this system. Moving to a higher-core-count Socket 1700 processor would improve multi-threaded performance and reduce CPU bottlenecks in gaming. The GPU, by contrast, has limited headroom for meaningful upgrades within the same generation—the RTX 5090 is already the flagship. Memory can be upgraded to higher-capacity DDR5 modules if the motherboard supports it, and storage can be expanded via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The platform supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop CPU and may appeal to users requiring data integrity for workstation tasks. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails, which is a practical redundancy. The 10 nm process node and 35 W TDP make this CPU an efficient choice for systems that prioritize low idle power consumption, though the GPU's high TDP dominates overall system power draw.