SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400T

27,166 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400T paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 creates an unusual desktop configuration, combining a low-power, efficiency-focused processor with NVIDIA's flagship consumer graphics card. The data indicates a substantial imbalance in raw capability between the two components, with the CPU holding a 79th percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU achieving an 88th percentile ranking among all graphics cards. This discrepancy in relative standing is the defining characteristic of the build, suggesting that the processor will be the primary constraint in many performance-intensive scenarios. The following analysis examines the benchmark data to determine the practical implications of this pairing for various workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400T is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, with a modest 35 W TDP that highlights its efficiency-focused design. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, which is notable for workstation applications. The CPU is built for the Intel Socket 1700 platform and provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes from the CPU. Its integrated graphics are handled by the UHD Graphics 730.

Benchmark results show a processor that delivers solid multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 17,189 points in the multi-core test and 2,426 points in the single-core test. The single-thread score of 2,426 indicates strong per-core performance for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-core score of 17,189 suggests capable throughput for content creation and compilation workloads, though the low base clock and 35 W TDP limit sustained all-core performance under heavy loads. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 20,223 and a single-thread score of 3,512. The data compression score of 235,636 and integer math score of 65,667 indicate that the CPU handles data manipulation and productivity tasks efficiently. The floating-point math score of 49,139 shows moderate capability for scientific and engineering calculations.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 27,166 places it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Comparing it to its nearest rivals, the data shows it performs within a narrow band of its peers. The Intel Core i9-9900K has an average score of 27,097, which is 0.3% lower than the i5-14400T. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G scores 27,051, a 0.4% deficit. Conversely, the Intel Core i7-13700H scores 27,355, which is 0.7% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G scores 27,382, a 0.8% advantage. These figures indicate that the i5-14400T is competitive with previous-generation high-end desktop chips and current-generation mobile chips, but it does not represent a significant step forward in raw throughput. The PassMark physics score of 1,244 and find prime numbers score of 73 suggest that the processor's performance is more balanced toward integer and general-purpose workloads than heavily vectorized or physics-heavy tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process node, with a massive transistor count of 76,300 million on a 609 mm² die. It features 16,384 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation pipelines. The GPU is equipped with 128 RT cores for ray tracing and 512 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads. The memory subsystem consists of 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a substantial 1.01 TB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz, with an effective speed of 21 Gbps. The base clock is 2,235 MHz, and the boost clock is 2,520 MHz. The GPU has a TDP of 450 W and requires a suggested power supply of 850 W, with a single 16-pin power connector. It is a triple-slot card, measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The RTX 4090's benchmark scores illustrate its dominance in graphics and compute tasks. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 9,223 points. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 255,416, and the Vulkan score is 271,631. PassMark G3D results show a score of 38,194, with a G2D score of 1,299 and a GPU compute score of 26,613. The pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,290.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 82.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 82.58 TFLOPS as well. These figures translate to exceptional performance in rasterization, ray tracing, and compute-intensive rendering tasks. The 24 GB VRAM capacity and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for high-resolution textures, large 3D scenes, and AI model inference at the consumer level.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 60,347, placing it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database show a tight grouping. The Intel Arc Pro A60 has an average score of 60,326, essentially matching the RTX 4090 with a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 60,140, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61,896, a 2.5% advantage, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657, a 2.9% deficit. This comparison is notable because the RTX 4090 is placed alongside professional workstation cards, indicating that its raw compute capabilities are in the same class as dedicated pro-grade solutions.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear performance hierarchy in this pairing: the GPU is the far more capable component. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 88th percentile ranking establishes a baseline imbalance. In CPU-bound workloads, the Core i5-14400T will be the limiting factor, capping the system's overall performance. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads, the processor will struggle to feed the RTX 4090's enormous processing throughput, leading to a bottleneck where frame rates are constrained by the CPU's single-thread and multi-thread capabilities.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,189 is respectable, but it is not sufficient to keep up with the RTX 4090's 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute in gaming scenarios. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 38,194 far exceeds the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 20,223, suggesting that in gaming at lower resolutions, the CPU will severely limit the system's ability to reach high frame rates. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,512 in PassMark is strong enough for general responsiveness, but the RTX 4090 is designed for 4K and high-refresh 1440p gaming, which requires a processor with exceptionally high per-core performance to avoid becoming the limiting factor. The data does not include measured FPS figures for this exact combination, so all frame rate expectations must be treated as estimates based on the benchmark scores.

In productivity workloads, the balance is more nuanced. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads are capable of handling video encoding and 3D rendering tasks, but the GPU's compute capabilities will dominate tasks that are GPU-accelerated, such as rendering in Blender or using CUDA-accelerated effects. In these cases, the CPU will still be a bottleneck for scene preparation and physics calculations, but the GPU will handle the bulk of the rendering work. The CPU's ECC memory support and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 compatibility suggest that it can serve in a workstation context, but the RTX 4090's 450 W TDP and 850 W suggested PSU requirement mean that the system will draw substantial power, which is at odds with the CPU's 35 W TDP.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize GPU-accelerated performance above all else and who are willing to accept CPU limitations in exchange for the RTX 4090's capabilities. Gamers playing at 4K resolution will see the most benefit, as the GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth can handle the high-resolution textures and memory loads typical of modern titles. At this resolution, the CPU bottleneck is less pronounced because the GPU is the primary driver of frame rates. Content creators working with 3D rendering, video editing, or AI inference will find the RTX 4090's 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 512 tensor cores invaluable for accelerating their workflows. The CPU's 20 MB of L3 cache and 16 threads provide enough processing power for managing project files and running the host application.

Software developers who rely on GPU compute for tasks like machine learning model training or data processing will benefit from the RTX 4090's compute capabilities, but they must be aware that the CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 13,244 and extended instructions score of 14,562 indicate moderate performance in these specific workloads. Students and small business workstations that require occasional GPU acceleration but primarily run office applications will find the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,512 sufficient for daily tasks, but the overall system cost is dominated by the GPU. The CPU's launch MSRP is $221, while the GPU's launch MSRP is 1,599 USD, making this a GPU-centric build where the processor is a secondary consideration. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of the pairing is 84, indicating that the system as a whole sits in the upper tier of performance, though the CPU drags this figure down from what the GPU alone would achieve.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i5-14400T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is 84, placing it in the upper tier of desktop systems.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-9900K?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T has an average benchmark score of 27,166, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i9-9900K's average score of 27,097.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4090?

A: The RTX 4090 has a memory bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s, provided by 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14400T supports ECC memory, which is a feature relevant for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 450 W and requires a suggested power supply of 850 W.

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core and single-core scores?

A: The CPU scores 17,189 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2,426 points in Cinebench R23 single-core.

Q: How does the GPU's PassMark G3D score compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Arc Pro A60?

A: The RTX 4090 has a PassMark G3D score of 38,194, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 has an average benchmark score of 60,326, with a 0% delta between the two in the nearest rivals data.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows in the FACT PACK for this exact CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The data indicates that the RTX 4090 is an exceptionally powerful gaming GPU, with a PassMark G3D score of 38,194 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223. This suggests that at 4K resolution, the GPU will deliver very high frame rates in most titles, with the 24 GB VRAM providing ample capacity for high-resolution textures. However, the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,426 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,512 will likely limit performance at lower resolutions, such as 1080p, where the CPU is more likely to be the bottleneck.

At 1440p, the system should still provide excellent gaming performance, with the GPU's 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 compute handling the majority of the rendering load. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for modern game engines that use multiple threads, but the low base clock of 1.50 GHz may result in lower minimum frame rates in CPU-intensive scenes. For esports titles that are not graphically demanding, the CPU's single-thread performance will be the limiting factor, and the RTX 4090's power will be underutilized. The GPU's 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores provide strong ray tracing and DLSS performance, which can help maintain high frame rates at 4K with ray tracing enabled, but the CPU must still be able to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system where the GPU is the dominant component. The CPU's average benchmark score is 27,166, with a percentile ranking of 79. Its nearest rivals are all within a 1% delta, showing that it is a middle-of-the-pack performer in its class. The GPU's average benchmark score is 60,347, with a percentile ranking of 88. Its nearest rivals include professional workstation cards, indicating that it is a top-tier performer. The combined percentile for the build is 84, which is higher than the CPU's individual percentile but lower than the GPU's individual percentile, reflecting the drag the CPU imposes on the overall system.

The CPU's best benchmark results are in PassMark data compression (235,636) and integer math (65,667), while its weakest results are in find prime numbers (73) and physics (1,244). The GPU's best results are in Geekbench Vulkan (271,631) and OpenCL (255,416), with a strong PassMark G3D score of 38,194. In a workload that uses both components, such as gaming or rendering, the GPU will perform most of the heavy lifting, but the CPU's lower scores in physics and floating-point math indicate that it may struggle with game physics calculations or scientific simulations. The data suggests that this is a system built around the GPU, and the CPU is a reasonable, but not ideal, companion.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14400T is based on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This gives builders flexibility in choosing memory, though the dual-channel memory bus will limit bandwidth compared to higher-end platforms. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes, which is a feature typically found on more expensive processors. The GPU is a PCIe 4.0 x16 card, so it will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a plus for workstation use.

The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, meaning it does not require a high-end cooling solution or a robust power delivery system. However, the GPU requires a 450 W TDP and a suggested power supply of 850 W, so the power supply must be chosen based on the GPU's requirements. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning it has a successor in the GeForce 50 series, but it is still a current product. A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful CPU on the same socket, though the 35 W TDP of the current CPU suggests that the platform may not be designed for high-end processors with much higher power draws. Alternatively, the GPU could be upgraded in the future, but given that it is already an 88th percentile part, the CPU would be the primary bottleneck in any gaming or rendering scenario.

Build Overview

This build is a desktop-class system pairing the Intel Core i5-14400T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, designed for efficiency with a 35 W TDP. The GPU is NVIDIA's flagship GeForce 40-series card, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 16,384 shading units. The combined percentile for this pairing is 84, placing it in the upper tier of desktop systems, though the CPU's 79th percentile is the weaker link in the chain. The CPU's average benchmark score of 27,166 is competitive with its nearest rivals, but the GPU's average benchmark score of 60,347 is in a different class. This is a GPU-centric build where the processor is chosen for its low power draw and adequate multi-threaded performance, rather than its ability to fully unlock the RTX 4090's potential.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1440p, this system will deliver excellent frame rates in most titles, but the CPU will be the limiting factor in CPU-intensive games. The RTX 4090's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223 and PassMark G3D score of 38,194 indicate that the GPU can handle demanding graphics, but the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,426 will cap performance in games that rely heavily on a single thread.

Streaming while gaming is a viable scenario, as the GPU's 512 tensor cores and 128 RT cores can handle encoding and ray tracing simultaneously. The CPU's 16 threads are sufficient for running the game and streaming software, though the 35 W TDP may limit sustained performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 20,223 supports this use case, but the CPU is not the primary strength of this build.

Video editing in applications like Adobe Premiere will benefit from the GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which can accelerate effects and rendering. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 235,636 helps with file I/O and project management, but the editor will be GPU-accelerated, and the CPU will handle timeline scrubbing and other tasks adequately.

3D rendering in Blender or similar software will be dominated by the GPU, with the RTX 4090's 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth and 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 compute providing massive acceleration. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,189 will handle scene setup and physics, but the rendering itself is GPU-bound, making this a strong scenario for the build.

Software development, particularly tasks that require compilation, will see moderate performance. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 65,667 and multi-thread score of 20,223 indicate that compilation tasks will be handled reasonably well, but not at the speed of higher-end CPUs. The GPU's compute capabilities can accelerate certain development tasks, such as running local AI models, where the 512 tensor cores are a significant advantage.

For students and office work, this system is overkill, but the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,512 ensures smooth operation in productivity applications. The GPU will be idle most of the time, making this a poor cost-to-performance choice for basic tasks, but it will handle any GPU-accelerated workload that a student might encounter, such as CAD or data visualization, with ease.