SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a modern 10-core Intel desktop processor with a professional-grade NVIDIA Turing GPU, creating a system aimed at workstation tasks rather than pure gaming. The Intel Core i5-14400F sits in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the Quadro RTX 5000 lands in the 67th percentile for GPUs, placing the overall build in the 75th percentile of all combinations. This is a desktop-class configuration, and the data indicates a machine that will handle productivity workloads with ease, though its gaming potential is limited by the GPU's age and driver focus.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a Raptor Lake Refresh part built on Intel's 10 nm process, featuring a die size of 215 mm². It provides 10 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that balances multi-threaded capacity with single-core speed. The base clock is 2.50 GHz, boosting up to 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps thermal requirements modest. Cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 pool.

Benchmark results show a strong all-rounder. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 21645 in multi-core and 3055 in single-core. The multi-core figure indicates substantial rendering and compilation headroom, while the single-core score is typical for a modern mid-range desktop part. Geekbench results follow the same pattern: 11268 multi-core and 2058 single-core. PassMark data further breaks down the workload picture: integer math at 81524, floating-point math at 61319, and extended instructions at 19937. Data compression scores 315521, which suggests strong archival and database performance, while encryption at 16949 is comparatively lower relative to the other math tests.

The average benchmark score of 32279 places the CPU in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals. It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900, but 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12800H. This means the 14400F effectively trades blows with last-generation 8-core mobile and desktop parts, but does so with a lower TDP and a more modern platform. The 83rd percentile ranking versus all CPUs confirms that this is not a budget part; it sits comfortably in the upper tier of processors available today.

For real workloads, the 14400F will chew through video encoding, software compilation, and multi-tab productivity suites. The single-core performance is sufficient for responsive UI interactions and lightly-threaded applications, while the 16 threads handle parallel tasks without breaking a sweat. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, and ECC memory is supported, making it viable for error-sensitive workstation builds. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for modern NVMe drives and a discrete GPU, though the Quadro RTX 5000 itself only uses PCIe 3.0.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between these two components is skewed heavily toward the CPU. The 14400F is a current-generation mid-range processor, while the Quadro RTX 5000 is an end-of-life workstation GPU from 2018. In CPU-bound scenarios like data compression, encryption, or code compilation, the CPU will be the star, and the GPU will sit idle. In GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or machine learning inference, the Quadro RTX 5000 will be the limiting factor, despite its 16 GB of VRAM.

Evidence from the percentiles supports this. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile, meaning it outperforms 83% of all recorded CPUs. The GPU, at the 67th percentile, is less dominant relative to its peers. The combined percentile of 75 reflects a system that is held back by its GPU in graphics-heavy workloads. There is no measured FPS data to show scaling, but the benchmark scores imply that if a user upgrades the GPU later, the CPU has enough headroom to feed a much faster card without becoming a bottleneck.

The 65 W CPU TDP and 230 W GPU TDP create an asymmetric power draw. The CPU is efficient, the GPU is power-hungry by modern standards, but the suggested 550 W PSU covers both with significant headroom. In mixed workloads, such as rendering a scene while compiling code in the background, the CPU will likely finish its tasks first, leaving the GPU as the final arbiter of completion time. For pure gaming, the GPU will almost always be the bottleneck, as the CPU's single-core performance is more than adequate for most game engines.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's detailed scores are as follows: Cinebench R15 multi-core 2181 and single-core 307; Cinebench R20 multi-core 9090 and single-core 1283; Geekbench multi-core 11268 and single-core 2058. PassMark single-thread is 3701, with multithread at 25470, physics at 1523, and prime numbers at 86. These numbers place the CPU in the 83rd percentile, with an average score of 32279.

The GPU's benchmark results are mixed. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 78999, and in Vulkan, 92309. PassMark G3D is 15616, with G2D at 709. Compute performance is 6525, while DirectX 12 scores a lowly 59, DirectX 11 scores 140, and DirectX 10 scores 113. DirectX 9 is 195. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 21629, placing it in the 67th percentile.

The GPU's nearest rivals show a tight competition. It is 1% behind the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, 1.2% ahead of the RTX A4000 Mobile, 1.8% ahead of the Radeon HD 8970M, and 2.3% ahead of the Radeon RX Vega M GL. This is telling: the Quadro RTX 5000 performs like a mid-range consumer GPU from several generations ago, despite its professional branding. The combined picture is a CPU that punches above its class and a GPU that punches at the level of a mainstream card, resulting in a system that is far better suited to compute tasks than to high-refresh gaming.

Who Should Build It

This build targets professionals who need reliable compute performance rather than gamers seeking high frame rates. The 14400F's strong multi-threaded scores make it a solid choice for content creators working with video editing timelines, 3D modeling software, or batch photo processing. The 16 threads and 20 MB of L3 cache will handle Adobe Premiere, Blender, and similar applications competently, though the GPU will lag in GPU-accelerated renders.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's compilation speed. The PassMark integer math score of 81524 and data compression of 315521 indicate fast build times and quick archive extraction. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the CPU more than capable for coursework, while the GPU supports CAD and simulation tools that leverage CUDA cores.

Small business workstations can benefit from this pairing if the workload is CPU-centric, such as financial modeling, database management, or office productivity suites. The ECC memory support is a key feature for these environments, as it prevents data corruption in long-running processes. However, any workload that relies heavily on GPU rendering or real-time 3D visualization will be disappointed by the Quadro RTX 5000's performance, which is closer to a GTX 1060 than to a modern workstation card.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data. All frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate expectations, not measured results. The GPU's DirectX 11 score of 140 and DirectX 12 score of 59 suggest that modern games running on DirectX 12 will struggle, while older DirectX 11 titles will fare better.

At 1080p, the Quadro RTX 5000 should handle esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant at medium to high settings, likely achieving 60-90 FPS based on its PassMark G3D score of 15616. At 1440p, frame rates will drop, and users should expect 40-60 FPS in older AAA games, with newer releases dipping below 30 FPS if they require DirectX 12 features. At 4K, the GPU is not viable for gaming; the 16 GB VRAM is ample, but the raw compute power of 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 is insufficient for modern titles at that resolution.

The CPU will not be a limiting factor in gaming. Its single-core score of 3055 in Cinebench R23 ensures high minimum frame rates in CPU-bound scenes. However, the GPU will hold the system back in any graphically intensive game. For a gaming build, this is a poor choice; for a workstation that occasionally plays older games, it is acceptable.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has 10 cores and 16 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, built on the Turing architecture.

Q: What memory types are supported by the CPU?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, and also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 32279, which is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12800H.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the GPU is end-of-life, with a successor in the Workstation Ampere line.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this build?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, which covers the combined TDP of the 65 W CPU and 230 W GPU.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a Turing-architecture GPU built on TSMC's 12 nm process, with a die size of 545 mm² and 13,600 million transistors. Clocks run at 1620 MHz base and 1815 MHz boost, with memory at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for large datasets but not exceptional by modern standards.

The GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI inference. Pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 11.15 TFLOPS for FP32 and 22.30 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The card is dual-slot, 267 mm long, and requires both a 6-pin and an 8-pin power connector.

In benchmark terms, the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 indicate solid compute capability for its era. However, its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 is very low, reflecting poor modern gaming performance. The PassMark G3D score of 15616 places it just below a GTX 1060 6 GB, which is a significant gap for a card that launched with a much higher MSRP. The 67th percentile ranking shows that while it outperforms many older GPUs, it is squarely in mid-range territory today.

For rendering workloads, the 448 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM are the standout features. Users working with large textures or multi-GPU render farms will find the memory capacity useful. The tensor cores also accelerate AI workloads like denoising or inference. But for raw rasterization, the GPU is simply outclassed by newer and even some older consumer cards.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility on RAM costs and performance. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, though the Quadro RTX 5000 only uses PCIe 3.0 x16, meaning the GPU will not leverage the newer bus. This is fine, as the GPU's bandwidth requirements are well within PCIe 3.0 limits.

The 65 W CPU TDP and 230 W GPU TDP are modest by current standards. The suggested PSU of 550 W leaves ample headroom for a future GPU upgrade, which is the most sensible next step. Users could move to a modern NVIDIA or AMD card with higher performance and still stay within the same power envelope. The CPU has the headroom to feed a much faster GPU, as its 83rd percentile ranking suggests it will not be a bottleneck in gaming or GPU compute.

Memory upgrades are also straightforward. Supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can choose based on budget, though DDR5 will offer higher bandwidth for memory-intensive tasks. The ECC support is a differentiator for workstation users who require data integrity. The platform is not forward-compatible beyond Socket 1700, so a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard, but the 14400F is likely to remain relevant for several years given its strong multi-threaded scores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a current-generation Intel mid-range CPU with an end-of-life professional GPU. The combination yields a 75th percentile overall ranking, driven almost entirely by the CPU's strong performance. The 14400F is a capable processor with 10 cores, 16 threads, and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, placing it in the upper echelon of CPUs. The Quadro RTX 5000, while equipped with 16 GB of VRAM and RT/tensor cores, performs closer to a consumer GTX 1060, limiting the system's gaming and real-time graphics potential.

The build is best suited for CPU-heavy workloads like software development, data processing, and content creation tasks that are not GPU-accelerated. The GPU adds value through its large memory pool and CUDA support for professional applications, but it is not a gaming card. The data clearly shows a system where the CPU is the hero and the GPU is a supporting player, and any upgrade path should prioritize replacing the GPU first. The platform offers room to grow with DDR5 memory and a modern GPU, making this a solid foundation for a workstation that can evolve over time.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400F

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds