SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a study in stark contrasts. The CPU is a mainstream 14th-generation desktop processor built on Intel’s mature Raptor Lake architecture, while the GPU is a halo-tier Blackwell 2.0 flagship with a 92,200 million-transistor die. Benchmark data positions this pairing at the 88th combined percentile, with the GPU sitting at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs and the CPU at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. The average FPS across a broad game suite lands at 222.5, and the pair ranks 79th out of 3,861 tracked pairings—a top-tier result driven almost entirely by the graphics card. The CPU, however, shows clear competitive limits: its average benchmark score of 32,279 places it within 0.5% of the Intel Core i7-12800H and within 0.2% of the Intel Core i9-11900, meaning it is a competent but not elite processor. This combination delivers exceptional frame rates, but the data reveals a significant imbalance where the CPU frequently becomes the constraining factor, especially at lower resolutions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip is fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 pool. The processor supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, includes ECC support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. It has no integrated graphics, which is a notable consideration for troubleshooting but irrelevant for this build since a discrete GPU is always present.

Benchmark scores show a processor that handles multi-threaded workloads well but does not lead its class. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 21,645 multi-core and 3,055 single-core. Cinebench R20 results are 9,090 multi-core and 1,283 single-core, while R15 shows 2,181 multi-core and 307 single-core. Geekbench reports 11,268 multi-core and 2,058 single-core. PassMark results are robust: multi-thread score of 25,470, single-thread of 3,701, integer math at 81,524, floating-point math at 61,319, and extended instructions at 19,937. Data compression hits 315,521, encryption reaches 16,949, and physics scores 1,523. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it outperforms the majority of processors, but its nearest rivals tell a more nuanced story. It sits 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900, and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12800H, while trailing the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS by 0.2%. These deltas are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the i5-14400F performs essentially on par with a mix of mobile and older desktop chips in aggregate benchmarks.

For real workloads, the 10-core/16-thread configuration provides solid headroom for productivity tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645 suggests the CPU can handle video encoding, compilation, and 3D rendering without being a bottleneck in time-sensitive projects, though it will not match higher-core-count parts. The single-core score of 3,055 in R23 and 3,701 in PassMark single-thread indicate strong responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The 20 MB L3 cache is generous for a mainstream part, helping with gaming and cached data access. However, the data shows the CPU is not a performance outlier—it clusters tightly with rivals across the 32,121 to 32,354 score range. This is a capable mid-range processor that delivers consistent, predictable performance, but it lacks the raw multi-core ceiling needed to complement a flagship GPU in heavily threaded scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is the defining component of this build. It uses the GB202 chip on TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die and a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². The GPU runs at a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz, achieving 28 Gbps effective. It carries 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The shader configuration includes 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores. Pixel fill rate is 423.6 GPixel/s, texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 104.8 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1). Power consumption is rated at 575 W TDP with a suggested power supply of 950 W, using a single 16-pin connector. The card is dual-slot, 304 mm long, and supports PCIe 5.0 x16 with display outputs including one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b.

Benchmark results place the RTX 5090 in the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, a position that reflects its immense compute capability. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 18,355. Geekbench OpenCL reaches 334,370, and Vulkan scores 376,728. PassMark G3D is 39,650, with G2D at 1,413 and GPU compute at 26,756. The nearest rivals illustrate the performance class: the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB is 0.3% behind, the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB is 0.6% behind, and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT is 1.1% behind, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X is 1.4% ahead. These are professional and mobile parts, not direct gaming competitors, which underscores that the RTX 5090’s aggregate benchmark score of 79,842 is driven by raw compute rather than gaming-optimized metrics. The 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are extraordinary for rendering large scenes, high-resolution textures, and AI workloads. The 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS-type features, though the benchmark data does not isolate those workloads. For rendering, the 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means the GPU can handle complex 3D scenes, video processing, and compute-heavy tasks with ease, far exceeding the CPU’s contribution in those scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i5-14400F and RTX 5090 is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The combined percentile of 88 and the pair’s rank of 79 out of 3,861 pairings indicate that, on average, this system outperforms most others. However, the measured FPS data across games reveals where the CPU holds the system back. At 1920x1080, many titles show frame rates that are disproportionately high but not GPU-limited—for example, Counter-Strike 2 hits 373 FPS, Valorant 465 FPS, and Roblox 479.6 FPS. These numbers are far beyond any display’s refresh rate, but they also suggest the GPU has headroom that the CPU cannot fully utilize. The CPU’s 83rd percentile and its close clustering with rivals like the i7-12800H (0.5% ahead) indicate it is not a high-end part, so at lower resolutions where the GPU is not saturated, the CPU becomes the limiting factor.

At 2560x1440, the bottleneck shifts. Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 97.1 FPS at 1080p to 82.5 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 from 102.6 to 74.7, and Ark: Survival Ascended from 53.5 to 31.8. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is not linear—most games see a 15-30% drop, which is typical when the GPU becomes more engaged. At 3840x2160, the GPU dominates. Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 55.5 FPS, Control to 80 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator to 79 FPS. These are GPU-bound scenarios where the CPU’s role diminishes, and the RTX 5090’s massive bandwidth and compute shine. The data shows that at 4K, the pair delivers playable frame rates in most titles, but the CPU still limits minimum FPS in CPU-heavy games like Ark: Survival Ascended at 17.4 FPS, which is a clear CPU bottleneck even at 4K.

The FPS scaling indicates the i5-14400F is the bottleneck in esports and low-resolution scenarios, while the RTX 5090 is the bottleneck at 4K in demanding titles. The average FPS across all games of 222.5 is inflated by high refresh-rate titles like Valorant (465 FPS at 1080p) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (821 FPS), but the 80-100 FPS range in modern AAA games at 1080p shows that the CPU cannot feed the GPU enough to reach the 200+ FPS that the GPU is capable of in lighter loads. This is a classic mismatch: a mid-range CPU paired with an ultra-high-end GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i5-14400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the same socket used across Intel’s 12th, 13th, and 14th generation desktop processors. This is an end-of-life platform, meaning future CPU upgrades are limited to existing 14th-gen parts. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, giving builders flexibility in memory choice, though the data does not specify bandwidth. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes is available, which matches the RTX 5090’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck for the GPU. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual for a consumer chip and may appeal to workstation users.

The GPU’s suggested power supply is 950 W, while the CPU has a 65 W TDP. This creates a power budget where the GPU dominates, and the 575 W TDP of the RTX 5090 means the PSU headroom is largely consumed by the graphics card. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-core-count 14th-gen processor, such as an i7 or i9, to better balance the CPU’s performance with the GPU. The data does not specify those CPUs, but the socket compatibility is clear. Alternatively, users could wait for a platform change, but the Socket 1700’s limited future means any CPU upgrade is a dead-end. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes are sufficient for the GPU and one high-speed NVMe drive, but additional devices would share lanes or use the chipset, which the data does not detail. Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means upgrades are possible without replacing the motherboard if the board supports the chosen type, but the lack of bandwidth numbers prevents further analysis.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s aggregate benchmark score is 32,279, placing it at the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.5%, with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U at 32,233 (0.1% ahead), Intel Core i9-11900 at 32,226 (0.2% ahead), AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS at 32,354 (0.2% behind), and Intel Core i7-12800H at 32,121 (0.5% ahead). This tight grouping means the i5-14400F is not a performance outlier; it is firmly in the middle of a pack of mobile and older desktop chips. The GPU’s aggregate score is 79,842 at the 92nd percentile, with closest rivals including the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79,605, 0.3% behind), Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (79,396, 0.6% behind), RX 6850M XT (78,940, 1.1% behind), and Radeon Pro Vega 64X (80,959, 1.4% ahead). The GPU’s percentile is nine points higher than the CPU’s, reinforcing that the graphics card is the stronger component.

In gaming, the pair achieves an average FPS of 222.5 across all measured titles, ranking 79th out of 3,861 pairs. At 1080p, esports titles are exceptionally fast: Valorant at 465 FPS, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 437 FPS, and Roblox at 479.6 FPS. AAA games at 1080p are also strong, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 97.1 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 102.6 FPS. At 1440p, the numbers drop but remain playable, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 82.5 FPS and Control at 115.8 FPS. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear driver, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 55.5 FPS, Microsoft Flight Simulator at 79 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 138.1 FPS. The combined picture is one of a GPU that dominates the performance profile, with the CPU providing adequate but not exceptional support. The 88th combined percentile reflects the GPU’s strength, but the CPU’s 83rd percentile shows it is not the limiting factor in most scenarios—except at low resolutions where the CPU’s single-thread performance of 3,055 in R23 becomes the ceiling.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-core performance relative to its rivals?

A: The i5-14400F scores 3,055 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3,701 in PassMark single-thread. Its aggregate benchmark score of 32,279 is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900, showing it is competitive but not dominant.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5090 have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5090 has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. This is the largest memory configuration in the FACT PACK and supports high-resolution textures and large compute workloads.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this build?

A: The data shows the CPU is the bottleneck at 1080p in esports titles—for example, Counter-Strike 2 hits 373 FPS, indicating the GPU has headroom. At 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 55.5 FPS.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The GPU’s suggested PSU is 950 W, while the CPU has a 65 W TDP. The GPU’s 575 W TDP is the primary power consumer, so the 950 W recommendation accounts for the full system draw.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i5-14400F supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. ECC memory is also supported, which is a feature not commonly found on consumer desktop CPUs.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival in aggregate benchmarks?

A: The RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 79,842, which is 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB and 1.4% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X. Its 92nd percentile ranking is significantly higher than the CPU’s 83rd.

Q: What is the average FPS across all games for this pairing?

A: The pair achieves an average FPS of 222.5 across all measured games, ranking 79th out of 3,861 pairings. This average is inflated by high-refresh titles like Valorant at 465 FPS at 1080p.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1920x1080, the pair delivers exceptional frame rates in esports titles—Valorant at 465 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 373 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 437 FPS—making it ideal for 240Hz or 360Hz monitors. The CPU’s single-core score of 3,055 in R23 is sufficient for these titles, though the GPU is underutilized. At 1440p, frame rates remain high, with Shadow of the Tomb Raider-style games hitting 115.8 FPS in Control, but the CPU limits potential in lighter games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads handle encoding workloads well, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645. The RTX 5090’s 680 tensor cores could offload encoding, but the data does not specify NVENC performance. The 32 GB VRAM ensures no memory pressure when running both games and streaming software, and the 92nd GPU percentile means rendering frames is not a constraint.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 25,470 and floating-point math score of 61,319 support timeline editing and effects processing. The GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth accelerate rendering and export times, making this a strong system for 4K or 8K projects. The 32 GB VRAM allows large preview buffers and high-resolution effects without spills.

3D rendering: The RTX 5090’s 21,760 shading units and 170 RT cores provide massive compute for ray-traced renders. The 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance is well above the CPU’s capabilities, so GPU-based renderers will dominate. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645 is adequate for CPU-based rendering but will be slower than the GPU, making it a secondary path.

Software development: The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads, with a PassMark integer math score of 81,524, handle compilation and build tasks competently. The 20 MB L3 cache aids in code and data locality. The GPU is irrelevant for most development, but the 32 GB VRAM could be used for local AI model training or inference, where the tensor cores and 104.8 TFLOPS FP16 are advantageous.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,055 in R23 and PassMark single-thread of 3,701 ensure snappy application launches and document editing. The 65 W TDP means low idle power consumption, though the GPU’s 575 W TDP dominates under load. This is overkill for office tasks, but the 83rd CPU percentile means it is more than capable for spreadsheets, web browsing, and multitasking.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread part from Intel’s Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture with a 65 W TDP. The GPU is the GeForce RTX 5090, a Blackwell 2.0 flagship with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and a 575 W TDP. The combined percentile is 88, with the GPU at the 92nd percentile and the CPU at the 83rd, indicating the GPU is the stronger component. The pair ranks 79th out of 3,861 tracked pairings by FPS, with an average frame rate of 222.5. This is a high-performance desktop system, but the CPU is a mid-range part that does not match the GPU’s tier. The 88th combined percentile places it in the upper echelon of systems, but the CPU’s 83rd percentile and its tight clustering with rivals like the i7-12800H (0.5% ahead) show that the system’s overall tier is dragged down by the processor. The build is best described as a GPU-centric powerhouse with a competent but not elite CPU.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers and content creators who prioritize GPU performance above all else. For gamers at 4K, the RTX 5090 delivers playable frame rates in demanding titles—Cyberpunk 2077 at 55.5 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 48.5 FPS, and Control at 80 FPS—making it suitable for high-fidelity single-player experiences. At 1440p, the pair excels in competitive titles, with Counter-Strike 2 at 244.2 FPS and Valorant at 441 FPS, though the CPU limits the GPU’s potential in lighter games. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32, which accelerate exports and renders significantly more than the CPU. Software developers using AI or machine learning frameworks can leverage the 680 tensor cores and 104.8 TFLOPS FP16 for model training. Students and office workers should avoid this build—the performance is excessive for documents and browsing, and the 575 W GPU TDP makes it inefficient for light workloads. Small business workstations requiring large VRAM for data visualization or simulation could justify the cost, but the CPU’s 83rd percentile means multi-threaded CPU tasks are not a strong suit. The target user is someone who wants maximum GPU horsepower and accepts that the CPU is a secondary consideration.