SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

49,957 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti represents a high-performance desktop configuration that sits at the 85th percentile for combined performance. This pairing leverages a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 16 GB GDDR7 graphics card to deliver strong results across gaming and productivity workloads. The following analysis breaks down the measured data to show exactly where this build excels and where its limitations lie, using only the benchmark results and specifications provided.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The data clearly supports this as a primary use case. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptionally high frame rates in competitive titles, including 467.4 FPS in Valorant, 368.9 FPS in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X, and 364 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. Even demanding AAA titles like Call of Duty: Warzone achieve 145.5 FPS at 1080p, which is well above the threshold for high-refresh monitors.

Streaming: The combination of the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's dedicated encoder hardware makes this a viable streaming platform. The processor's PassMark multithread score of 25470 provides ample headroom for encoding and game capture simultaneously, while the GPU's 280 tensor cores can handle AI-accelerated broadcast effects without significantly impacting the 184 FPS average across tested games.

Video Editing: The system demonstrates strong capability for video editing workloads. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21645 and Geekbench multicore score of 11268 indicate substantial processing power for timeline operations and export tasks. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide smooth handling of high-resolution footage and effects rendering, with OpenCL performance of 212363 points.

3D Rendering: This is a demanding workload that the system handles competently. The GPU's FP32 performance of 43.94 TFLOPS and 70 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the CPU's 10 physical cores (with 16 threads) tackle geometry and scene processing. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6604 places the graphics card in the 86th percentile for all GPUs, indicating strong rendering throughput.

Software Development: The processor's architecture is well-suited for compilation tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 315521 and integer math score of 81524 show strong performance in the kind of parallel workloads common in build systems. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed code and data close to the cores, reducing latency during iterative compilation cycles.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is massively overqualified for typical productivity tasks, but the data shows it handles them effortlessly. The single-core performance of 3701 in PassMark and 3055 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the 65 W TDP means the CPU portion of the system remains power-efficient during lighter workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 32279, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all processors. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which scores 32233, a negligible 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226, just 0.2% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS leads by 0.2% with a score of 32354. The Intel Core i7-12800H trails by 0.5% at 32121.

The GPU posts an average benchmark score of 49957, ranking in the 86th percentile of all graphics cards. Its closest competitor is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at 50001, which is 0.1% ahead. The Intel Arc A550M scores 49737, 0.4% behind, while the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT leads by 2% at 50951, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT trails by 3.1% at 48477.

The combined system percentile is 85, reflecting a well-balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the GPU scores 6604, while its Vulkan performance reaches 225122 in Geekbench. The CPU's multicore advantage is evident in Cinebench R23, where the 21645 multicore score is roughly 7 times higher than the 3055 single-core result, demonstrating strong scaling across its 10 cores.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern of excellent performance at 1080p, strong results at 1440p, and playable but less consistent frame rates at 4K. At 1920x1080, esports titles achieve extraordinary frame rates: Valorant reaches 467.4 FPS, Roblox hits 395 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 manages 310.6 FPS. The system maintains 186.5 FPS in Assetto Corsa and 230.4 FPS in Doom, showing that even demanding racing and FPS titles run smoothly.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong for competitive gaming. Valorant still delivers 443.8 FPS, while Counter-Strike 2 drops to 208.8 FPS and Call of Duty: Warzone maintains 130.1 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 65.7 FPS, which is playable but below the threshold for high-refresh displays.

At 3840x2160, the system shows its limits. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 44.9 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 manages 40 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 15.8 FPS. However, less demanding titles remain playable, with Valorant at 411.8 FPS, Minecraft at 99 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 109 FPS. The average FPS across all tested games is 184, indicating that most titles run well above minimum playability thresholds.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a nuanced balance between the CPU and GPU. In CPU-bound scenarios like esports titles at 1080p, the RTX 5070 Ti has excess capacity, as evidenced by Valorant's 467.4 FPS—the graphics card is not the limiting factor. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and the fact that its nearest rivals are all mobile or older desktop parts suggests it can keep up with the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

However, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck in 4K gaming and GPU-intensive workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6604 and the significant FPS drops at 3840x2160 (e.g., Cyberpunk 2077 falling from 89.6 FPS at 1080p to 44.9 FPS at 4K) demonstrate that the RTX 5070 Ti is doing the heavy lifting in these scenarios. The CPU's 65 W TDP and 10-core configuration provide enough throughput for game logic and physics, but the GPU's rendering workload scales more dramatically with resolution.

The pair rank of 509 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 184, places this combination in the top 15% of all tested configurations. This suggests a well-matched pairing where the CPU provides sufficient instructions per clock to avoid starving the GPU in most titles, while the GPU's high-end performance ensures the CPU is not the limiting factor in GPU-bound workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F features 10 cores and 16 threads, combining 6 performance cores with 4 efficiency cores in a Raptor Lake architecture. The base clock of 2.50 GHz can boost up to 4.70 GHz, providing strong single-thread performance when needed. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB L2 cache per core help reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3055 and Geekbench single-core score of 2058 indicate strong per-thread performance, which translates to responsive application behavior and good performance in lightly threaded games. The multicore results—21645 in Cinebench R23 and 11268 in Geekbench—demonstrate effective scaling across the 10 cores.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight into real-world workloads. The multithread score of 25470 and physics score of 1523 show strong overall throughput, while the floating-point math score of 61319 and integer math score of 81524 indicate solid numerical processing capabilities. The data encryption score of 16949 and extended instructions score of 19937 suggest good performance in security and vectorized workloads. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC memory support available, and connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Who Should Build It

1440p Gamers: The sweet spot for this build. At 2560x1440, the system delivers 130.1 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, 208.8 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, and 65.7 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077—all highly playable. Gamers with 1440p high-refresh monitors will find the combination of the 16 GB GPU and fast CPU ideal.

Content Creators: Video editors and 3D artists benefit from the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM. The OpenCL score of 212363 and Vulkan score of 225122 indicate strong compute acceleration for rendering, while the 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance handles complex graphics operations.

Competitive Esports Players: The extraordinary 1080p frame rates—467.4 FPS in Valorant, 395 FPS in Roblox, and 368.9 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege X—make this an excellent choice for players who prioritize maximum refresh rates and minimal input lag.

Software Developers: The combination of strong single-thread performance for compile times and high multicore throughput for parallel builds, plus the 65 W TDP for efficient long-duration workloads, suits developers working with large codebases.

Students and Professionals: While overkill for basic productivity, the system handles any office or academic workload effortlessly, with the 16 GB VRAM providing future-proofing for AI-accelerated applications and the CPU's ECC memory support appealing to data-sensitive users.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in memory selection. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes provides ample bandwidth for the RTX 5070 Ti's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring no bottleneck from the system bus. The 65 W TDP of the CPU leaves significant thermal and power headroom for a capable air cooler, while the GPU's 300 W TDP and 1x 16-pin power connector require a sufficient power supply.

The suggested PSU for this configuration is 700 W, which provides adequate headroom for the combined 365 W TDP of the CPU and GPU plus system components. The GPU's dual-slot design and 304 mm length require a case with sufficient clearance, but the 700 W PSU recommendation ensures stable operation under full load.

For future upgrades, the most sensible path is to retain the RTX 5070 Ti and upgrade the CPU if additional processing power is needed. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and 16 GB VRAM make it a long-lived component, while the CPU's 83rd percentile and 10-core configuration could be the first bottleneck in heavily threaded workloads. However, the Socket 1700 platform is limited to 14th Gen Intel processors, so a meaningful CPU upgrade would require a platform change.

FAQ

Q: Is this build suitable for 4K gaming?

A: At 3840x2160, the system delivers playable frame rates in many titles, including 109 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone and 99 FPS in Minecraft, but demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (44.9 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (40 FPS) fall below 60 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i5-14400F scores 32279 on average, essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (32233, 0.1% difference) and AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (32354, -0.2% difference), and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900 (32226, 0.2% ahead).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 896.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, with a base clock of 2295 MHz and boost clock of 2452 MHz.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the Core i5-14400F has a locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false), so it cannot be overclocked beyond its factory boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: What is the best resolution for competitive gaming?

A: At 1920x1080, the system achieves extremely high frame rates in esports titles—467.4 FPS in Valorant, 364 FPS in CS:GO, and 310.6 FPS in Counter-Strike 2—making it ideal for maximum refresh rate displays.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have for content creation?

A: The 16 GB of GDDR7 memory provides ample capacity for large textures and complex 3D scenes, with 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth for rapid data transfer during rendering workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, featuring 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. This high transistor density of 120.6 million per mm² enables the 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units to operate at a base clock of 2295 MHz and boost clock of 2452 MHz.

The memory subsystem is a highlight, with 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is complemented by 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features. The FP32 and FP16 performance are both rated at 43.94 TFLOPS, with a 1:1 ratio indicating full-rate half-precision computation.

Benchmark results place the GPU in the 86th percentile of all graphics cards. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6604 demonstrates strong DirectX 12 performance, while Geekbench OpenCL (212363) and Vulkan (225122) scores indicate robust compute capabilities. The PassMark G3D score of 32974 and GPU compute score of 20203 show solid overall graphics and compute throughput.

The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, scores 50001—just 0.1% higher—making the performance difference negligible. The Intel Arc A550M trails by 0.4%, while the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT leads by 2% and the RX 6800 XT trails by 3.1%. This places the RTX 5070 Ti in a competitive position against previous-generation high-end cards.

For rendering workloads, the combination of 16 GB VRAM, 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 70 RT cores enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing without exhausting memory. The pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s provide rapid fill rates for high-resolution rendering, while the 280 tensor cores accelerate denoising and AI upscaling operations. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering APIs.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Minecraft: Java Edition

Minecraft

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds