SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

27,565 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size and fits the Intel Socket 1700. The chip packs 10 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that pairs performance and efficiency cores to balance throughput with power draw. Its base clock sits at 2.50 GHz with a boost clock reaching 4.70 GHz, giving it solid single-thread headroom for responsive workloads while the multi-core arrangement handles parallel tasks.

The 65 W TDP is notably modest for a processor with this core count, and the platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. ECC memory support is present, which broadens its suitability for workstation-class builds despite its mainstream positioning. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, enabling fast attachment for modern storage and expansion cards. There is no integrated graphics — the "F" suffix means a discrete GPU is mandatory, and the pairing here with an RTX 3090 is a natural fit.

Cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. That L3 allocation is crucial for gaming and productivity workloads where frequently accessed data can stay close to the cores. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option, but the stock boost behavior already delivers competitive performance.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs on the database, reflecting strong overall capability. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 is a strong indicator of multi-threaded productivity performance, while the single-core score of 3055 shows respectable per-thread speed. Geekbench scores of 11268 multi-core and 2058 single-core corroborate the same story: this is a well-rounded processor that punches above its modest power envelope.

The PassMark suite adds further color. Multi-thread performance sits at 25470, while single-thread is 3701. Integer math reaches 81524, floating-point math hits 61319, and extended instructions score 19937. Data encryption yields 16949, data compression produces 315521, and random string sorting reaches 32680. Physics simulation scores 1523, and finding prime numbers returns 86. These numbers indicate a chip that handles encryption workloads, compression tasks, and general number-crunching with ease, though extreme compute tasks may not match higher-tier workstation chips.

The average benchmark score of 32279 places it within a tight cluster of rivals. It sits 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900. Meanwhile, it trails the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS by 0.2% and the Intel Core i7-12800H by 0.5%. This grouping shows that the i5-14400F is effectively in the same performance tier as several upper-midrange mobile and desktop chips from the previous generation, despite being a mainstream desktop part.

# Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-14400F's average benchmark score of 32279 places it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, scores 32233 with a delta of 0.1% — essentially a statistical tie. The Intel Core i9-11900 at 32226 is also within 0.2%, so any of these chips would deliver nearly identical multi-threaded throughput in practice.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 achieves an average benchmark score of 27565, which lands it in the 73rd percentile among all GPUs. Its closest competitor is the RTX 4070 Mobile at 27435, just 0.5% behind, followed by the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT at 27425, also 0.5% behind. On the other side, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 27839, running 1% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 7800M scores 27883, also 1.1% ahead. The RTX 3090 thus sits in a well-contested mid-to-high tier, with mobile and desktop rivals all clustered within a 1.1% band.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 78, reflecting above-average performance across the board. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 3090 scores 5118, indicating strong DirectX 12 rendering capability. Geekbench OpenCL returns 172758, while Vulkan scores 53927 — the gap between these two API results suggests the card favors compute-heavy OpenCL workloads over Vulkan graphics tasks, though both are healthy numbers.

The PassMark GPU suite shows DirectX 9 at 268, DirectX 10 at 182, DirectX 11 at 220, and DirectX 12 at 110. These scores are heavily influenced by the test's resolution and driver overhead, but the G3D score of 26645 and G2D score of 1063 paint a picture of a capable rendering engine. GPU compute performance is 15356, which aligns with the card's compute-oriented architecture.

Taken together, the CPU sits at the 83rd percentile while the GPU sits at the 73rd, and the combined percentile is 78. This indicates the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, but the GPU is no slouch — it still outperforms most graphics cards in the database. For real workloads, this means multi-threaded productivity tasks will see a slight CPU advantage, while gaming and rendering workloads will be primarily GPU-bound but still well-served.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA102 chip, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process. The die spans 628 mm² and contains 28,300 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 45.1 million per square millimeter. This is a large, power-hungry chip with a 350 W TDP, requiring a 750 W suggested power supply and a single 12-pin power connector. The card is triple-slot, measures 336 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, so it demands substantial case space.

Memory is a standout feature: 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus delivers 936.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This is an enormous memory pool and bandwidth figure that remains relevant for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and AI model loading. The memory clock is 1219 MHz, translating to 19.5 Gbps effective. Such bandwidth is essential for 4K gaming and content creation workloads where texture streaming and buffer transfers dominate.

The compute configuration is equally impressive. Shading units number 10496, with 328 texture mapping units and 112 raster output units. Ray tracing cores total 82, and tensor cores total 328, enabling dedicated hardware acceleration for both ray-traced lighting and AI-based features like DLSS. The pixel rate reaches 189.8 GPixel/s, and texture rate hits 556.0 GTexel/s, ensuring high fill rates for demanding scenes. FP32 performance is 35.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 35.58 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio, meaning the card can double-pump compute when workloads permit.

The base clock is 1395 MHz with a boost clock of 1695 MHz, and the card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting modern high-refresh monitors. API support covers DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest graphics features.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5118 reflects strong rasterization and compute under DirectX 12. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172758 is particularly notable — it suggests the card excels at general-purpose GPU compute, which benefits video encoding, physics simulations, and machine learning inference. The Vulkan score of 53927 is lower by comparison, indicating the card's Vulkan driver path may not extract the same level of performance as OpenCL.

PassMark DirectX scores are mixed: DirectX 9 at 268, DirectX 10 at 182, DirectX 11 at 220, and DirectX 12 at 110. These numbers are lower than the 3DMark result, likely due to different test methodologies and driver optimizations. The G3D score of 26645 and G2D score of 1063 provide a broader view of 2D and 3D capability. GPU compute at 15356 confirms the card's parallel processing strength.

With a 73rd percentile ranking among all GPUs, the RTX 3090 is a high-end card that remains competitive against newer mobile parts and mid-range desktop cards. Its nearest rivals include the RTX 4070 Mobile at 0.5% behind and the Radeon RX 6700 XT also at 0.5% behind, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 and Radeon RX 7800M run 1% and 1.1% ahead, respectively. The 24 GB VRAM and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth are class-leading features that the benchmark scores alone do not fully capture.

# FAQ

Q: What is the Core i5-14400F's core and thread configuration?

A: The CPU has 10 cores and 16 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node.

Q: How does the RTX 3090 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: It scores 0.5% higher than the RTX 4070 Mobile and Radeon RX 6700 XT, but trails the Radeon Pro Vega 20 by 1% and the Radeon RX 7800M by 1.1%.

Q: What memory capacity and bandwidth does the RTX 3090 offer?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 936.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the Core i5-14400F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the "F" suffix indicates no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 78, with the CPU at the 83rd percentile and the GPU at the 73rd percentile among all parts.

Q: What is the RTX 3090's ray tracing and tensor core count?

A: It has 82 ray tracing cores and 328 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features.

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score and how does it compare to rivals?

A: The average benchmark score is 32279, placing it 0.1% ahead of the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.2% ahead of the Core i9-11900, while trailing the Ryzen 7 6800HS by 0.2% and Core i7-12800H by 0.5%.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. The data contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

The RTX 3090's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5118, combined with its 73rd percentile GPU ranking, indicates strong 1080p and 1440p gaming capability. The 24 GB VRAM and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for high-resolution textures and large game worlds. The Core i5-14400F's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3055 and 83rd percentile CPU ranking suggest it will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles, especially at higher resolutions where GPU load dominates.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance should keep frame rates high, though some esports titles may see CPU limitations at extreme refresh rates. At 1440p, the GPU's compute power and memory bandwidth become the primary drivers, and the card should sustain high settings comfortably. At 4K, the 24 GB VRAM prevents capacity-related stuttering, and the 936.2 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution texture streaming. The estimated frame rates are expected to be strong across all resolutions, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor as resolution increases.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need both strong multi-threaded CPU performance and high-end GPU compute. Gamers playing at 1440p or 4K will benefit from the RTX 3090's 24 GB VRAM and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth, which handle modern game assets with ease. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking ensures that gaming workloads remain GPU-bound rather than CPU-limited, especially at higher resolutions.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or large image processing will find the combination of the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 172758 compelling. The 328 tensor cores and 82 ray tracing cores enable AI-accelerated workflows and ray-traced previews in supported applications. The 24 GB VRAM is particularly valuable for GPU-accelerated rendering where large scenes exceed the capacity of smaller cards.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 81524 and multi-thread score of 25470. Students and small business workstations running office applications, web browsing, and light productivity suites will find this system overqualified but future-proof, with the CPU's 65 W TDP keeping power draw reasonable during bursty workloads. The ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive tasks.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3090's 73rd percentile ranking and the CPU's 83rd percentile suggest smooth frame rates at 1440p with competitive settings, while the 24 GB VRAM prevents capacity issues in demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads handle game capture and encoding overhead, while the GPU's 328 tensor cores can accelerate AI-based stream enhancement features.

Video editing: The GPU's OpenCL score of 172758 accelerates effects and exports, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 handles timeline scrubbing and format conversions.

3D rendering: The 24 GB VRAM and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth allow large scene loading, and the CPU's 20 MB L3 cache keeps geometry data close to the cores for viewport responsiveness.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 81524 and data encryption score of 16949 speed up compilation and secure coding workflows.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low, and the 83rd percentile CPU ranking ensures snappy application launches and multitasking.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-14400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 350 W Ampere flagship with 24 GB GDDR6X memory. The combined percentile of 78 places this system above the majority of builds in the database, with the CPU at the 83rd percentile and the GPU at the 73rd percentile.

The pairing represents a mainstream CPU with a high-end GPU, creating a system where the GPU is the more powerful component in absolute terms, but the CPU holds a higher relative ranking among its peers. This is a sensible configuration for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads where the graphics card does the heavy lifting, while the CPU provides solid multi-threaded support without becoming a bottleneck.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 73rd percentile indicates the processor is relatively stronger among its peers than the graphics card is among its own. In gaming workloads, the GPU is typically the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput and memory bandwidth dominate. The RTX 3090's 936.2 GB/s bandwidth and 35.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance will drive frame rates, while the CPU's single-core score of 3055 in Cinebench R23 ensures it can feed the GPU without stalling.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. Multi-threaded CPU tasks like video encoding or code compilation will leverage the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645, while the GPU's compute power accelerates parallel workloads. The GPU's OpenCL score of 172758 indicates it can handle compute tasks that exceed CPU capabilities, but the CPU's 20 MB L3 cache and 16 threads prevent it from being a drag on most applications.

The bottleneck analysis shows that for gaming, the GPU is the primary limiter at 4K, while at 1080p the CPU becomes more relevant. For compute-heavy workloads, the GPU's 24 GB VRAM and tensor cores provide acceleration, but the CPU's modest 65 W TDP may limit sustained multi-threaded performance compared to higher-tier workstation chips. Overall, this is a well-balanced pairing where component strengths complement each other across different workload types.