SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM pairing presents a clear asymmetry in processing capability. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 57th percentile among all graphics cards. This 26-point gap indicates that the CPU is substantially stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own competition. In practical terms, the RTX 3050 OEM will be the limiting factor in nearly every gaming scenario, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU load increases.

Benchmark data supports this interpretation. The i5-14400F achieves a PassMark multithread score of 25470 and a single-thread score of 3701, placing it in the upper tier of desktop processors. The RTX 3050 OEM, by contrast, posts a PassMark G3D score of 11857, which is only slightly above the midpoint of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 70, which reflects the GPU dragging the overall system tier downward despite the CPU's strength.

For CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data compression, and physics calculations, the i5-14400F will not bottleneck. Its PassMark integer math score of 81524 and floating-point score of 61319 demonstrate robust throughput. However, in gaming, the GPU becomes the constraint. The RTX 3050 OEM's FP32 throughput of 8.087 TFLOPS and its 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will limit frame rates well before the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads become saturated. Frame pacing in esports titles at 1080p will likely be GPU-limited, while the CPU idles with headroom to spare.

The memory subsystem further clarifies the balance. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5, but the GPU's 128-bit memory bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest by current standards. This means textures and geometry data transfer will bottleneck at the GPU level, not the CPU's L3 cache or memory controller. For productivity tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering that leverage both components, the CPU will dominate compute while the GPU handles acceleration where available, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 72 tensor cores will cap acceleration potential.

# Benchmark Performance

The i5-14400F delivers strong multi-core results across all major benchmarks. In Cinebench R23, it scores 21645 multi-core and 3055 single-core. The R20 results are 9090 and 1283 respectively, while R15 shows 2181 multi-core and 307 single-core. Geekbench scores are 11268 multi-core and 2058 single-core. These numbers place the CPU at the 83rd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 32279. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U at 32233 (0.1% slower), the Intel Core i9-11900 at 32226 (0.2% slower), the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS at 32354 (0.2% faster), and the Intel Core i7-12800H at 32121 (0.5% slower). The i5-14400F sits essentially at parity with these competitors, trading blows within a fraction of a percent.

The RTX 3050 OEM shows more modest performance. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 60740 and Vulkan score is 57103. PassMark results include a G3D score of 11857, a GPU compute score of 5779, and DirectX 12 score of 58. The GPU averages 15199 across all benchmarks, placing it at the 57th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 7600 at 15171 (0.2% slower), the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270 (0.5% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 at 15283 (0.5% faster), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 at 15290 (0.6% faster). The RTX 3050 OEM is effectively indistinguishable from these cards in aggregate benchmark performance, despite architectural differences.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer for its class, while the GPU is a mid-pack option. The CPU's average benchmark score of 32279 is roughly double the GPU's 15199, but that comparison spans different benchmark suites. More relevantly, the CPU's 83rd percentile versus the GPU's 57th percentile means the system's overall 70th percentile is dragged down by the graphics card. In mixed workloads like gaming with streaming or rendering with GPU acceleration, the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor, but the GPU will consistently cap visual fidelity and frame rates.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile and 11857 PassMark G3D score indicate it can handle 1080p gaming at moderate settings, but high-refresh 144Hz+ monitors will strain its capabilities. The i5-14400F's strong single-thread score of 3701 ensures the CPU will not hold back frame generation, but the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM will limit performance in demanding titles. Expect frame rates well below 144 FPS in AAA games at ultra settings.

Streaming: The i5-14400F's 16 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's 72 tensor cores and 18 RT cores support NVIDIA's hardware acceleration features, which can offload encoding work. However, the GPU's modest overall performance means streaming at high bitrates while gaming will require lowering in-game settings to maintain smooth output.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 315521 and encryption score of 16949 indicate strong throughput for codec operations and file handling. The GPU's 60740 OpenCL score can accelerate effects and renders, but 8 GB VRAM may limit timeline complexity. For 1080p editing, this pairing is capable; for 4K multi-layer timelines, the GPU will be the bottleneck.

3D rendering: The i5-14400F's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 makes CPU-based rendering viable for moderate scenes. The GPU's 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 72 tensor cores support GPU-accelerated rendering, but its 57th percentile places it below dedicated rendering cards. Expect longer render times than professional workstation GPUs, but acceptable results for hobbyist or occasional use.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 81524 and multithread score of 25470 make compilation and testing efficient. The 10 cores and 16 threads handle parallel builds well. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development, making this an ideal pairing for coders who also game occasionally.

Student and office work: The i5-14400F's single-thread score of 3701 and Geekbench single-core score of 2058 ensure snappy responsiveness in office applications. The GPU's 973 PassMark G2D score handles 2D desktop acceleration without issue. This system is overkill for basic office tasks but provides headroom for more demanding academic software.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279, placing it at the 83rd percentile. It is 0.1% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, 0.2% faster than the Intel Core i9-11900, 0.2% slower than the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, and 0.5% faster than the Intel Core i7-12800H.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to other graphics cards?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM sits at the 57th percentile with an average benchmark score of 15199. It is 0.2% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 7600, 0.5% slower than the AMD Radeon 680M, 0.5% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580, and 0.6% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060.

Q: Does this system have measured gaming frame rate data?

A: No. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the data. All frame rate expectations must be inferred qualitatively from the benchmark scores, and any specific FPS figures would be estimates.

Q: What memory does the CPU support?

A: The i5-14400F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It does not support ECC memory, though the fact pack lists ECC as true, so this should be verified.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No. The i5-14400F has a locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false), so it cannot be overclocked. Its boost clock is 4.70 GHz with a base clock of 2.50 GHz.

Q: What is the overall system tier?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 70, meaning it outperforms 70% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The CPU contributes a strong 83rd percentile, while the GPU pulls the average down with its 57th percentile.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 and has a TDP of 65 W. Its base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and it has a 20 MB shared L3 cache, with 1.25 MB L2 per core and 80 KB L1 per core. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The processor has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU. Its launch MSRP is $196, and it was released in January 2024, with an active production status.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 is strong for a 65 W part, and the single-core score of 3055 indicates solid per-thread performance. Geekbench results of 11268 multi-core and 2058 single-core confirm this profile. The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths: data compression at 315521, integer math at 81524, floating-point math at 61319, and multithread at 25470. The physics score of 1523 and extended instructions score of 19937 further demonstrate compute capability. The single-thread PassMark score of 3701 is respectable, though not class-leading.

The 83rd percentile ranking places this CPU above the vast majority of processors. Its nearest rivals include mobile chips like the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Ryzen 7 6800HS, as well as older desktop parts like the Core i9-11900 and mobile Core i7-12800H. The i5-14400F essentially matches all of these within 0.5% deltaPct, making it a versatile choice. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means no overclocking headroom, but the stock boost of 4.70 GHz is sufficient for most workloads. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration handles modern games and productivity tasks well, and the 65 W TDP keeps cooling requirements modest, allowing for capable air coolers.

For real workloads, the data indicates the i5-14400F is a strong all-rounder. The high multi-core scores make it suitable for video rendering, software compilation, and data processing. The single-core scores ensure responsiveness in everyday tasks and gaming. The lack of integrated graphics is a minor drawback for troubleshooting or low-power use, but with a discrete GPU in this pairing, it is irrelevant. The DDR4 and DDR5 support offers flexibility in memory selection, though the dual-channel bus means bandwidth is typical for consumer platforms.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is based on the GA106 chip, built on Samsung's 8 nm process with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. It uses the Ampere architecture, belonging to the GeForce 30-series, and is now end-of-life with a release date of January 2022. The card has 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. It includes 18 ray tracing cores and 72 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The base clock is 1515 MHz with a boost clock of 1755 MHz. Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The card has a TDP of 130 W, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 300 W PSU. It occupies a dual-slot design, measures 242 mm in length, and offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

Benchmark results show a mid-range GPU. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 and Vulkan score of 57103 indicate general compute capability. PassMark results are more varied: G3D at 11857, GPU compute at 5779, DirectX 9 at 137, DirectX 10 at 61, DirectX 11 at 86, and DirectX 12 at 58. The G2D score of 973 covers 2D acceleration. These scores place the GPU at the 57th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 15199. Its nearest rivals are surprisingly close: the AMD Radeon RX 7600 at 15171, AMD Radeon 680M at 15270, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 at 15283, and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 at 15290. The RTX 3050 OEM is within 0.6% of all these cards, making it effectively equivalent in aggregate performance.

The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming and light 1440p, but the 128-bit bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are limiting factors for high-resolution textures and heavy compute. The 18 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the GPU's raw performance means RT effects must be used sparingly. The 72 tensor cores support DLSS and AI acceleration, which can improve frame rates in supported titles. The FP32 throughput of 8.087 TFLOPS is modest; the pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s and texture rate of 126.4 GTexel/s are similarly mid-range. For rendering workloads, the GPU can accelerate some tasks, but its 57th percentile means it is not a professional-grade compute card. The 130 W TDP is low, making cooling and power delivery straightforward.

# Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The fact pack contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should not be treated as empirical results.

The RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile and 11857 PassMark G3D score suggest it is capable of 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but its 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may cause stuttering in games with large open worlds or heavy asset streaming. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3701 PassMark single-thread) ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU will be the limiting factor for achieving high frame rates. In esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the GPU should push well above 60 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings, but the exact figure depends on the game's optimization. In AAA titles at ultra settings, expect frame rates to drop significantly, possibly below 60 FPS in the most demanding scenes.

At 1440p, the GPU's limitations become more pronounced. The 128-bit memory bus and 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 will struggle to maintain smooth frame rates in modern games, and the 8 GB VRAM may be insufficient for ultra texture packs. The CPU would have headroom to spare, but the GPU would cap performance. At 4K, this pairing is not viable for gaming at playable frame rates, as the GPU's bandwidth and compute are far too limited. The 18 RT cores enable ray tracing, but enabling RT effects will significantly reduce frame rates, making the feature usable only in less demanding titles or at low RT settings. Overall, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings, with the CPU ensuring consistent frame pacing and the GPU providing entry-level visual fidelity.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-14400F desktop processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM graphics card. It is a desktop-class system, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU is a mainstream 10-core, 16-thread part from the Core 14th Gen series, while the GPU is an end-of-life entry-level Ampere card. The combined percentile is 70, meaning this system outperforms 70% of all tracked CPU+GPU combinations. However, the CPU's 83rd percentile and GPU's 57th percentile create an imbalance: the processor is well above average, while the graphics card is only slightly above the midpoint.

This pairing is typical of a prebuilt or OEM desktop where the CPU is chosen for productivity strength and the GPU is a budget option for light gaming. The i5-14400F's strong multi-core performance makes it a capable workstation processor, but the RTX 3050 OEM limits the system's gaming and GPU-accelerated compute potential. The 65 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP together keep power requirements manageable, with the suggested PSU rating of 300 W being conservative. The system uses PCIe Gen 5 for the CPU and PCIe 4.0 x8 for the GPU, which is sufficient for the GPU's bandwidth needs. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5, allowing builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5 memory.

The overall tier is mid-range, with the CPU raising the system above entry-level status while the GPU keeps it from reaching high-performance territory. The 70th combined percentile reflects a system that can handle most productivity tasks with ease but requires compromises in gaming. This is not a high-refresh-rate gaming rig nor a professional rendering workstation; it is a balanced but GPU-limited desktop for general use and moderate gaming.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity but only need entry-level gaming capability. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium settings will find the RTX 3050 OEM sufficient for most titles, and the i5-14400F ensures the CPU never becomes a bottleneck. Those who play esports titles at 1080p will benefit from the CPU's 3701 single-thread score, which supports high frame rates when the GPU allows. However, gamers seeking 1440p or high-refresh 1080p gaming should look for a stronger GPU, as the RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile will limit frame rates.

Content creators working on video editing or 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and PassMark multithread score of 25470. The GPU can accelerate some effects with its 60740 OpenCL score, but 8 GB VRAM may cap timeline complexity. For hobbyist creators, this system offers a good balance, but professionals needing faster render times should upgrade the GPU.

Software developers will find the CPU's integer math score of 81524 and data compression score of 315521 valuable for compilation and build tasks. The 10 cores and 16 threads handle parallel workloads efficiently, making this a strong choice for developers who also game occasionally. Students and office workers will find the CPU's single-thread score of 3701 provides snappy performance for everyday applications, though the GPU is overkill for basic tasks. Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive applications like accounting software or data analysis tools will benefit from the CPU's multi-core strength, while the GPU handles standard display output without issue.

The system is not suited for users who need maximum gaming performance, professional-grade GPU compute, or 4K gaming. It is best for builders on a moderate budget who want strong CPU performance for work and acceptable GPU performance for light gaming. The CPU's 83rd percentile makes it a future-proof choice for productivity, while the GPU can be upgraded later without replacing the motherboard or CPU. The 65 W TDP and 130 W GPU TDP allow for compact cooling solutions and modest power supplies, making this a practical choice for small form factor builds.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds