SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop combination that delivers a distinct split in performance characteristics. The CPU is a solid mid-range workhorse, while the GPU is a high-end rendering monster, and the benchmark data shows how their individual strengths and weaknesses shape the overall experience. This analysis uses the provided benchmark results to break down what each component brings to the table and how they function together in a real-world build.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is the dominant force in this pairing, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 31 chip. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, housing 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1387 MHz, with a game clock of 2025 MHz and a boost clock of 2394 MHz, providing a substantial performance envelope for demanding titles.

Memory is a key strength, with 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 320-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. This large frame buffer and high bandwidth are critical for high-resolution textures and demanding workloads, allowing the card to operate without memory bottlenecks in most scenarios. The GPU also features 5376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 ROPs, along with 84 dedicated ray tracing cores.

In raw compute, the card is capable of 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 103.0 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio). It also has a pixel rate of 459.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 804.4 GTexel/s. The benchmark scores reflect this power. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 5623, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 71068. The Passmark G3D score is 29009, which is the highest of its listed GPU benchmarks, indicating strong DirectX 11 and general 3D rendering performance. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 16828 shows its capability for general-purpose compute tasks.

However, the percentile data presents a nuanced picture. The GPU holds a percentile rank of 55 when compared to all GPUs, meaning it performs better than 55% of them. Its average benchmark score is 13745. The nearest rivals are not high-end desktop cards; they include the AMD Radeon 660M (avg score 13812, deltaPct -0.5), NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (avg score 13821, deltaPct -0.5), and AMD Radeon RX 570X (avg score 13871, deltaPct -0.9). This suggests that the average benchmark score calculation, which includes the lower-scoring DirectX 9, 10, and 11 Passmark tests, drags down its overall standing. The only rival with a comparable or higher score is the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, which has an avg score of 13543, a deltaPct of 1.5, showing the 7900 XT is slightly behind that newer card in this specific aggregate metric.

For rendering, the data shows a clear picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score is a strong indicator of DX12 gaming performance, and the high Vulkan score suggests excellent performance in modern APIs. The 20 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage for 4K texture packs and professional 3D applications. The RT cores are present, but the data does not provide a specific ray tracing benchmark, so its RT performance must be inferred from the overall architecture and compute capabilities.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmarks shows a system that is far more capable on the CPU side than the GPU side when compared to their respective peers. The CPU holds a percentile rank of 83, placing it in the top 17% of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 55th percentile. This is a significant gap. The CPU's average benchmark score is 32279, while the GPU's is 13745.

The CPU's nearest rivals in the data are all mobile or older desktop parts. For instance, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U has an avg score of 32233, a deltaPct of 0.1, meaning the i5-14400F is essentially tied with it. It is also 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900 (avg score 32226), and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12800H (avg score 32121). It is only 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (avg score 32354). This shows that the i5-14400F's aggregate performance is closely matched with a range of other CPUs from different generations and power classes, but its high percentile rank indicates that many of these rivals are not as common or as high-performing in the overall CPU landscape.

The GPU's rivals, as noted, are mostly integrated graphics or older mobile professional cards, which is unusual for a card with a 55th percentile rank. This suggests the average benchmark score is heavily weighted by legacy tests. The combined percentile for the build is 69, indicating that this pairing, as a whole, is better than 69% of all tested configurations.

The measured FPS data from games shows a strong overall average. The pair has a rank of 713 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the top 20% of all tested pairs. The average FPS across all tested games is 172.2. This high average is driven by excellent performance in esports titles, but the data also shows the limits in more demanding games. The CPU's high percentile and the GPU's lower percentile suggest that in many games, especially at lower resolutions, the CPU is the more capable component relative to its peers, while the GPU, while powerful, is not as exceptional when placed against the entire field of GPUs.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture (specifically Raptor Lake-R). It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, which provides flexibility for builders. It also supports ECC memory, a feature often found in workstation-class components. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 and has a TDP of 65 W. It has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for a mid-range part, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 20 MB of L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for gaming and productivity tasks that rely on frequently accessed data. The CPU also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring it is not a bottleneck for the latest storage and GPU technologies.

Benchmark results show a strong single-core and multi-core performer. In Cinebench R23, it scores 3055 in single-core and 21645 in multi-core. The Geekbench scores are 2058 for single-core and 11268 for multi-core. Passmark results are also strong, with a single-thread score of 3701 and a multi-thread score of 25470. The CPU's performance in specialized tasks is notable: it scores 315521 in data compression and 16949 in data encryption, indicating strong throughput for those specific workloads.

The CPU's percentile rank of 83 and its average score of 32279 place it above the majority of processors. The nearest rival data shows it is competitive with a Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which is a high-end mobile chip, and an older Core i9-11900, which is a desktop part with more cores in some configurations. This indicates that the i5-14400F offers performance that punches above its core count in many aggregate benchmarks. For real workloads, this translates to snappy application responsiveness, fast compilation times, and smooth multitasking, making it a strong choice for a content creation or productivity-focused build.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing builders to choose between the lower cost of DDR4 or the higher bandwidth of DDR5. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is the current standard for high-end GPUs and NVMe SSDs.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slot and will not bottleneck the connection. The GPU has a TDP of 300 W and requires two 8-pin power connectors. The suggested PSU for this GPU is 700 W, which is a reasonable recommendation for a system with this CPU and GPU.

A sensible next upgrade path for this platform would be to upgrade to a higher-core-count 14th Gen processor on the same socket. The CPU's 65 W TDP means it is efficient, and the 300 W GPU TDP means a high-quality 700 W power supply is a good choice. If more performance is needed, a CPU upgrade to a larger 14th Gen chip would be straightforward. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that a system builder could potentially reuse existing DDR4 memory, although for maximum performance, DDR5 would be the preferred choice. The platform is not future-proof for new sockets, but it is a mature and stable platform with a clear upgrade path within its own generation.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's socket and what memory does it support?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what type is it?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is 700 W.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-14400F has no integrated graphics (N/A), so a discrete GPU is required.

Q: What is the GPU's process node and architecture?

A: The GPU is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The CPU has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's boost clock speed?

A: The GPU's boost clock is 2394 MHz.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured: true) provides a detailed look at gaming performance across three resolutions: 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160. The data shows that this system is exceptionally strong for esports and competitive titles. For example, in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, it achieves 604.2 FPS at 1080p, 418.6 FPS at 1440p, and 247 FPS at 4K. Similarly, Valorant scores 465 FPS at 1080p, 441 FPS at 1440p, and 409 FPS at 4K, showing minimal performance drop at higher resolutions. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege also performs very well, with 325 FPS at 1080p and 118 FPS at 4K.

For triple-A and more demanding titles, the performance is still strong but shows the expected scaling. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 81 FPS at 1080p, drops to 60 FPS at 1440p, and is 40 FPS at 4K. Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 73 FPS at 1080p, 55 FPS at 1440p, and 36 FPS at 4K. The most demanding title in the data, Ark: Survival Ascended, only manages 38.6 FPS at 1080p, 24.2 FPS at 1440p, and 11.5 FPS at 4K, showing that this game is exceptionally heavy. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 101.2 FPS at 1080p, 77.3 FPS at 1440p, and 59.1 FPS at 4K.

The average FPS across all games is 172.2, which is heavily skewed by the high performance in esports titles. The data suggests that for 1080p and 1440p gaming, this system is capable of high refresh rates in most titles. At 4K, performance is playable in most games, but the most demanding titles will see frame rates in the 30-60 FPS range, which may require adjusting settings for a smoother experience.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed, with the CPU being a higher percentile performer (83rd) than the GPU (55th). This suggests that in many scenarios, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data, but the GPU may be the limiting factor in terms of raw frame rate output compared to other high-end GPUs. However, the data shows that the GPU is not a weak component; it is just not as exceptional as the CPU.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts depending on the title and resolution. In esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 and Valorant, where frame rates are very high (275 and 465 FPS at 1080p respectively), the CPU is likely the primary driver, and the GPU is still able to keep up. However, at 4K, the GPU becomes more stressed, and the frame rates in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (40 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (36 FPS) indicate that the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's high percentile means it is less likely to be a bottleneck in most games.

For non-gaming workloads, the CPU's strength is clear. Data compression (315521) and encryption (16949) scores are high, and the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 21645 is solid. The GPU's compute score of 16828 in Passmark is respectable, but its overall percentile is lower. This means for tasks that are heavily GPU-accelerated, like 3D rendering in some applications, the GPU's relative performance might not be as impressive as the CPU's. The data shows a system where the CPU is the more robust component relative to its peers, and the GPU, while powerful, is the component that will determine the absolute limit of gaming performance at high resolutions.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) that pairs a high-end enthusiast GPU with a strong mid-range CPU. The Intel Core i5-14400F is a mainstream processor, while the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is a high-end graphics card. The combined percentile of 69 indicates that this pairing is better than 69% of all tested configurations.

The CPU is the more exceptional part of the pair, with an 83rd percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the 55th percentile. This makes the build a well-rounded machine that excels in CPU-bound tasks and provides very good gaming performance, but the GPU is not the top-tier part that its price point might suggest when compared to the entire field of GPUs. The overall tier of this build is solidly upper-mid-range, with the CPU providing a strong foundation and the GPU delivering high frame rates in most games, with the caveat that it is not as exceptional as the CPU in its respective market. The build is a capable desktop for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, and it can handle 4K gaming in many titles, though not always at maximum settings.

Who Should Build It

This combination is well-suited for gamers who prioritize high frame rates in competitive and esports titles. The data shows exceptional performance in Counter-Strike 2 (275 FPS at 1080p) and Valorant (465 FPS at 1080p), making it ideal for players with high-refresh-rate monitors. The system is also a strong choice for those who play a mix of games, as it handles triple-A titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (81 FPS at 1080p) and Microsoft Flight Simulator (101 FPS at 1080p) very well.

For content creators, the CPU's strong multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645) and high data compression scores (315521) make it suitable for video editing, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The GPU's 20 GB of VRAM is a significant asset for working with large 3D scenes or high-resolution video editing projects.

The build is also a practical choice for developers and students who need a fast, responsive system for programming, virtual machines, and general productivity. The CPU's high single-core performance (3055 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures snappy application loading and compilation times. Small business workstations that handle data-heavy tasks, such as database management or financial modeling, would also benefit from the CPU's strong encryption and compression performance. The system is less ideal for users who want the absolute best 4K gaming performance, as the GPU's 55th percentile suggests it is not a top-tier part, and the most demanding games at 4K will see frame rates below 60 FPS.