SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

87%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

11,627 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT form a desktop pairing that sits at the 67th combined percentile among all CPU-GPU combinations in the benchmark database. This places the system in the upper-middle tier of measured configurations, with the CPU contributing an 83rd percentile ranking against all CPUs and the GPU a 51st percentile ranking against all GPUs. The data shows a processor that is clearly above average in compute capability paired with a graphics card that is essentially average in overall GPU performance, making the balance of this build particularly important for understanding which workloads it will serve well.

The benchmark results indicate that the CPU, scoring 32,279 on average across all tested workloads, is the stronger component relative to its peers. The GPU, with an average benchmark score of 11,627, is positioned in the middle of the GPU field. This distinction is critical, as it suggests the CPU will not be the limiting factor in most real-world applications, while the GPU may be the component that determines frame rates in demanding 3D workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture (codename Raptor Lake-R) and fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². It operates at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts to 4.70 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported. The CPU connects to the platform via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU. The production status is active, and the launch MSRP is $196.

In Cinebench testing, the processor achieved 21,645 in R23 multi-core and 3,055 in R23 single-core. The R20 results are 9,090 multi-core and 1,283 single-core, while the older R15 test shows 2,181 multi-core and 307 single-core. Geekbench results show 11,268 multi-core and 2,058 single-core. The PassMark suite shows 25,470 in multithread and 3,701 in single-thread, with specific workloads including 81,524 in integer math, 61,319 in floating point math, 31,552 in data compression, 16,949 in data encryption, and 19,937 in extended instructions.

The 10-core configuration with 16 threads indicates a hybrid arrangement of performance and efficiency cores, though the base and boost clocks suggest the performance cores reach 4.70 GHz. The 20 MB shared L3 cache is a meaningful capacity for gaming and content creation workloads, where repeated data access patterns benefit from a larger on-chip cache. The 65W TDP indicates a relatively power-efficient processor that can be cooled by a capable air cooler, making it suitable for space-constrained or quieter builds.

Compared to the nearest rivals in the database, the 32,279 average CPU score places it within a tight band of competitors. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 32,233, a 0.1% delta, while the Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32,226, a 0.2% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 32,354, a -0.2% delta, and the Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32,121, a 0.5% delta. All four rivals are within 0.5% of the i5-14400F, meaning the CPU's performance is essentially indistinguishable from these higher-tier mobile and older desktop processors.

In real workloads, the R23 multi-core score of 21,645 suggests strong multi-threaded capability for tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific calculations. The single-core score of 3,055 indicates a high-performing core that will drive responsive single-threaded applications such as games, web browsing, and Office suites. The Geekbench multi-core score of 11,268 further supports this, showing that the processor can handle moderate parallel workloads efficiently.

The PassMark data compression score of 31,552 and data encryption score of 16,949 indicate that the CPU handles compression and encryption tasks at a competitive level, which affects file archiving and security-related workloads. The floating point math score of 61,319 is notably high, suggesting that the CPU is well-suited for scientific and analytical calculations that rely on floating-point operations. The integer math score of 81,524 shows strong fixed-point arithmetic capabilities, which benefits database operations and general computation.

The CPU lacks integrated graphics (integrated graphics: N/A), so a discrete GPU is mandatory for any video output. This is a notable point for builds that might otherwise rely on the iGPU for troubleshooting or power-saving scenarios. The multiplier is not unlocked, so overclocking is limited, though the boost clock of 4.70 GHz provides a high enough frequency for most workloads.

The 65W TDP is low for a 10-core processor, suggesting that the CPU can be kept cool with a decent air cooler and that it draws modest power under load. This is a positive for the overall system power budget, as the GPU's 263W TDP is the dominant power consumer.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a desktop system that performs above average overall, with a combined percentile of 67. The CPU's average benchmark score of 32,279 places it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating it is significantly above the median in general-purpose computation. In contrast, the GPU's average benchmark score of 11,627 places it at the 51st percentile among all GPUs, showing that the GPU is just above the midpoint in comprehensive GPU performance.

The pair's rank by FPS across 3,732 benchmark pairs is 1,250, with an average FPS of 146.6 across all measured games. This rank puts the pairing in the top third of all CPU-GPU combinations, which is consistent with the CPU being a high-performer and the GPU being average.

Looking at the individual scores, the CPU's R23 multi-core score of 21,645 and R20 multi-core of 9,090 indicate that it is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U in average CPU score, and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900. These are small margins, but they show that the i5-14400F is competitive with processors that are typically more expensive or come from different market segments.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,157 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 18,290 indicate a mid-range GPU that can handle 3D workloads but is not a top-tier performer. The PassMark G3D score of 24,176 and PassMark GPU compute score of 13,473 are consistent with a GPU that is in the 51st percentile of all GPUs.

The combined picture is that this system will handle most modern games at 1080p with ease, will play games at 1440p with some settings adjustments, and will struggle at 4K ultra settings. The CPU will not be the bottleneck for the GPU, as the CPU's 83rd percentile is well above the GPU's 51st percentile, meaning the GPU will be the limiting factor in most GPU-intensive workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is based on the Navi 32 chip with the RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The die has 28,100 million transistors across 346 mm², with a transistor density of 81.2 million per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1295 MHz, a boost clock of 2430 MHz, and a game clock of 2124 MHz. The memory subsystem includes 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s and a memory clock of 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective).

Rendering hardware includes 3,840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 96 raster output units (ROPs). The GPU has 60 ray tracing cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing for supported games. The GPU's pixel rate is 233.3 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 583.2 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 37.32 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with the FP16 being 1:1 with FP32. The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x16, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM is a significant asset for modern games and content creation, as it can accommodate high-resolution textures and large datasets without hitting memory limits. The 624.1 GB/s bandwidth is ample for the shading units and texture units, allowing high fill rates and fast texture sampling. The memory bus width of 256-bit is a balanced design choice for a mid-range GPU.

Benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,157 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 54,228. The PassMark DirectX 12 score is 93, DirectX 11 is 249, and DirectX 10 is 121. The PassMark G2D score is 1,177, and the G3D score is 24,176. The GPU compute score is 13,473. These numbers indicate that the GPU is capable of handling modern 3D APIs, with strong Vulkan performance and moderate DirectX 12 performance.

The GPU's nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 with an average score of 11,680 (a -0.5% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M with 11,528 (a 0.9% delta), the NVIDIA Tesla K20c with 11,479 (a 1.3% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT with 11,842 (a -1.8% delta). These deltas are all within 1.8% of the RX 7800 XT's average score, meaning the GPU sits in a narrow performance band with these mid-range cards.

The GPU's clock speeds are high enough to deliver good rasterization performance, and the 60 ray tracing cores allow for ray-traced effects in games that support them, albeit with a performance cost. The 16 GB of VRAM is future-proof for 4K gaming and content creation, and the dual-slot design with two 8-pin power connectors is standard.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14400F uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for Intel's 12th through 14th generation Core processors. This socket allows for a range of CPU upgrades, including both low-power and high-performance options. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing for a flexible memory choice depending on the motherboard. It also supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstations and stability-critical applications.

The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 from the CPU, which provides 16 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible. This means the GPU will run at PCIe 4.0 x16 speeds, which is sufficient for the RX 7800 XT's bandwidth needs. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes are a future-proofing measure for faster NVMe SSDs and other expansion cards.

The TDP of the CPU is 65W, and the GPU has a suggested PSU of 600W, which is the recommended PSU wattage for the whole system. This suggests that a 600W or higher PSU is sufficient, though the actual power draw will depend on the rest of the system. The CPU and GPU together draw significant power, with the GPU's 263W TDP being the primary power consumer.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a better GPU. The CPU's 83rd percentile performance is well ahead of the GPU's 51st percentile, meaning that a GPU upgrade would be the most straightforward way to improve overall system performance in GPU-bound workloads. A more powerful GPU would allow the system to handle higher frame rates at higher resolutions, though the CPU would eventually become a limiting factor if the GPU were to be significantly faster.

The platform is also a good candidate for a CPU upgrade, as the LGA 1700 socket and the 14th gen series allow for the i5 to be replaced with a higher-tier processor if the GPU is upgraded to a more balanced pairing. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that the motherboard choice will determine which type of memory is used, and the system can be configured with 16 GB, 32 GB, or more depending on the workload.

The PCIe 4.0 x16 GPU interface is standard for current GPUs, and the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes are not used for the GPU but can be used for a Gen 5 NVMe SSD, which would benefit from the higher bandwidth. The PSU headroom from the 600W suggested PSU is sufficient for the CPU and GPU, and a 600W PSU would be a safe choice for a system with this CPU and GPU, though a higher-wattage PSU is always an option for future expansion.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows that the CPU is the stronger component of this pairing. The CPU's 83rd percentile versus the GPU's 51st percentile indicates that the CPU has more performance headroom than the GPU. In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression, encryption, and single-threaded tasks, the CPU will perform well and not be a bottleneck. In GPU-bound workloads, such as 3D rendering, AI, and gaming at high settings, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

The pair's average frame rate across games is 146.6 FPS, which is a reasonable average for a mid-range GPU. The rank among all pairs is 1,250 out of 3,732, which places it in the 67th percentile. This means that there are 2,482 pairs with a lower average FPS, and the performance is above average for the platform.

The bottleneck analysis shows that in games at 1080p, the CPU may still have headroom, but at 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p and 1440p to 4K is consistent with GPU's rendering load increasing. For example, in Call of Duty: Warzone, the FPS drops from 144.5 at 1080p to 130.8 at 1440p and 110.3 at 4K, showing that the GPU is the bottleneck as the resolution increases. In contrast, the CPU-bound game Counter-Strike 2 shows a drop from 231 at 1080p to 153.5 at 1440p and 85.7 at 4K, which is a more dramatic drop, but still indicates the GPU is increasingly the limit.

The CPU can keep pace with the GPU at 1080p in most games, but in games that are CPU-heavy, like Total War and simulation titles, the CPU may be the limiter. However, the percentile data suggests that the CPU is not the main bottleneck in this pairing, and that the GPU is the component to upgrade for better gaming performance.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the system delivers 144.5 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone and 231 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, which are well above 144 Hz monitors. At 1080p, the GPU can keep up with 144Hz and 165Hz displays in many esports and AAA titles, provided settings are high.

For streaming, the CPU's 16 threads and 83rd percentile ensure that encoding and playing simultaneously will be handled without stutter, though the GPU's compute performance is sufficient for streaming overlays and effects. The 16 GB VRAM allows for high-quality streaming at high resolution, and the CPU can handle the concurrent workloads.

Video editing is supported by the CPU's multi-core score of 21,645 in R23, which is good for timeline rendering and encoding. The 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth help with GPU acceleration in effects and color grading, and the CPU's high single-core performance ensures responsive scrubbing and preview.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or CAD will be GPU-accelerated with the RX 7800 XT, and the GPU's FP32 performance of 32.32 TFLOPS and 16 GB VRAM will handle medium to high complexity scenes. The CPU's multi-core score will help with CPU-based rendering for scenes that don't use the GPU.

Software development benefits from the CPU's fast compile times, and the 10 cores and 16 threads allow for parallel builds. The single-core score of 3,055 in R23 ensures fast IDE performance and compilation, and the ECC memory support is a plus for stability-critical development.

For student and office work, the CPU's single-core performance will make applications like Word and Excel responsive, and the 16 threads will handle multitasking. The GPU is overkill for this use, but the 16 GB VRAM can be used for GPU-accelerated tasks, and the system is more than capable for these workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score, and what percentile does it fall into?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 32,279, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score, and its percentile?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 11,627, placing it in the 51st percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU build?

A: The combined percentile is 67, meaning it is in the 67th percentile of all benchmark pairs.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's base and boost clock?

A: The base clock is 2.50 GHz, and the boost clock is 4.70 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the CPU has no integrated graphics (N/A), so a discrete GPU is required.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel, with ECC memory also supported.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs the Intel Core i5-14400F Raptor Lake-R CPU with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT Navi 32 GPU. The CPU at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs is the stronger component, while the GPU at the 51st percentile is the average performer. The build's combined percentile is 67, and the pair ranks 1,250 out of 3,732 pairs by FPS, with an average FPS of 146.6. This is an upper-mid-tier desktop that will handle most gaming and content creation tasks at 1080p and some at 1440p.

Who Should Build It

The target audience is a gamer who plays at 1080p and 1440p with high refresh rates. In games like Call of Duty: Warzone, 144.5 FPS at 1080p and 130.8 FPS at 1440p are achievable. For content creators, the CPU's 21,645 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 16 GB VRAM are suitable for video editing and 3D rendering, though the GPU is not a top-tier. Software developers will benefit from the fast CPU and ECC support, and students and office workers will find the system more than adequate, even if the GPU is overkill. Small business workstations can use the CPU's performance and EEC memory for stable operations.

Gaming Performance

The data in measuredFpsUltraByGame shows that this pairing delivers strong performance at 1080p in many titles. Counter-Strike 2 provides 231 FPS at 1080p, 153.5 FPS at 1440p, and 85.7 FPS at 4K. Call of Duty: Warzone provides 144.5 FPS at 1080p, 130.8 FPS at 1440p, and 110.3 FPS at 4K. Valorant is high with 463.5 FPS at 1080p, 440.2 FPS at 1440p, and 353.3 FPS at 4K. For single-player games, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 64.7 FPS at 1080p, 51.9 FPS at 1440p, and 35.6 FPS at 4K. Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 63.1 FPS at 1080p, 46 FPS at 1440p, and 30.1 FPS at 4K, which is playable but below 60 FPS at 1440p.

The high FPS in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege shows that the system is well-suited for competitive gaming. The 1080p FPS in many games exceed 100 FPS, including Minecraft (226 FPS), Roblox (293.5 FPS), and Apex Legends (not listed). The 4K performance is less impressive, with many games getting 30-50 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth 4K gaming.

The average FPS across all measured games is 146.6, with the pair ranked 1,250th out of 3,732 pairs. This is a solid average, but the GPU is not a high-end one, so for 4K gaming, the user will need to lower settings or use upscaling to achieve 60 FPS in the most demanding titles. The CPU, however, will be able to handle future games without issue, and the 16 GB VRAM is a good buffer for upcoming titles.

At 1440p, the system is more balanced, with many games delivering 60 FPS or higher at high/ultra settings. For example, Assetto Corsa runs at 93.3 FPS, Fortnite at 71.4 FPS, and Rust at 60 FPS. For 4K, the system is only suitable for less demanding games, with only Valorant, Counter-Strike, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege exceeding 60 FPS. The overall trend is that this system is optimized for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, and can handle 4K at medium/ high settings for some titles.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400F

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds