SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 represents a mid-range desktop build that targets a specific balance of multi-threaded productivity and 1080p/1440p gaming. The CPU, a 10-core/16-thread Raptor Lake part, delivers strong multi-core performance for its class, while the GPU offers substantial memory bandwidth and compute resources. The data indicates this is a desktop system (buildClass: desktop) with a combined percentile of 71, placing it above the majority of tracked configurations.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates on a 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². The chip has 10 physical cores and 16 threads, a configuration that balances high-performance cores for latency-sensitive tasks with additional cores for parallel workloads. The base clock is 2.50 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 4.70 GHz. This clock range allows the processor to scale from power-efficient idling to high-frequency single-threaded execution when needed.

Benchmark results show the CPU’s capabilities across a range of tests. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 21645, while the single-core score is 3055. The multi-core result indicates strong sustained performance for rendering and compilation tasks, as the 10 cores and 16 threads can handle significant parallel load. The single-core score is competitive for gaming and general responsiveness. In Geekbench, the multi-core score is 11268, and the single-core score is 2058. These numbers align with the Cinebench data, confirming a consistent performance profile.

The CPU’s avgBenchmarkScore is 32279, and it holds an 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs. This percentile places it comfortably in the upper tier of processors. The nearest rivals show a tight competition: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 32233, a delta of 0.1% behind; the Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226, 0.2% behind; the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 32354, 0.2% ahead; and the Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32121, 0.5% behind. The i5-14400F sits almost exactly in the middle of this group, meaning its overall performance is statistically indistinguishable from these alternatives. The data suggests that for real workloads, the choice between these CPUs comes down to platform features and cost rather than raw compute.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. This L3 capacity is sufficient for gaming and typical productivity applications, reducing the need to access slower system memory. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel bus. This flexibility allows builders to choose between older, cheaper DDR4 or newer, faster DDR5, though the benchmark data does not specify which memory type was used in testing. ECC memory support is listed as true, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class systems.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 71, indicating that the system outperforms 71% of all tracked pairings. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile, while the GPU sits at the 58th percentile. This disparity suggests that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. In gaming workloads, the CPU is less likely to be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the GPU becomes the primary constraint.

The measured FPS data supports this analysis. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across games is 125. At 2560x1440, the average drops, and at 3840x2160, it drops further. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the frame rate goes from 195 FPS at 1080p to 129 FPS at 1440p and 72 FPS at 4K. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU-bound system at higher resolutions. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3055 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that it can feed the GPU with enough frames at lower resolutions, but the GPU’s raw throughput limits the maximum frame rate.

The pairRankByFps data shows a rank of 1794 out of 3732 pairs, placing this build slightly below the median in terms of average FPS across all games. The avgFpsAcrossGames is 125. This figure is pulled down by demanding titles like Ark: Survival Ascended (28 FPS at 1080p) and Cyberpunk 2077 (58 FPS at 1080p), and pulled up by esports titles like Valorant (447 FPS at 1080p). The balance is therefore a mix: the CPU is more than capable for high-refresh gaming, but the GPU cannot sustain ultra-high frame rates in the most demanding AAA games.

Benchmark Performance

The GPU’s benchmark scores provide a detailed picture of its capabilities. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2865. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 106028. PassMark scores include DirectX 10 at 92, DirectX 11 at 186, DirectX 12 at 96, and DirectX 9 at 261. The G2D score is 1206, and the G3D score is 20974. The GPU compute score is 10963.

The GPU’s avgBenchmarkScore is 15852, and its percentileVsAllGpus is 58. This places it in the upper half of all GPUs. The nearest rivals show a close grouping: the AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15862, 0.1% ahead; the AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16014, 1% ahead; the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15679, 1.1% behind; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129, 1.7% ahead. The RX 7700 is thus within a narrow performance band of these cards, with the RTX 3060 Ti being the strongest competitor in this group.

The CPU’s benchmark scores, when combined with the GPU’s, produce a system that is well-rounded. The CPU’s 21645 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates that it can handle heavy productivity tasks without bottlenecking. The GPU’s 20974 PassMark G3D score indicates solid rasterization performance. The combined picture is a system that can do both: render video or compile code, and then play games at high settings.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data is extensive, covering 51 games at three resolutions. The dataIsMeasured flag confirms these are real measurements, not estimates. At 1920x1080, the system achieves high frame rates in esports titles. Valorant runs at 447 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 431 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 195 FPS. These numbers indicate the CPU and GPU combination can easily drive high-refresh monitors at 1080p. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege runs at 232 FPS, and Roblox at 252 FPS.

For AAA titles at 1080p, the frame rates are playable but not always high-refresh. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 58 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 52 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 28 FPS. The latter is particularly demanding, indicating that this game will require lower settings for smooth play. The Medium runs at 41 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 70 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop by roughly 30-40% on average. Valorant still runs at 381 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 297 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 129 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 128 FPS, which is excellent for a competitive shooter. However, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 43 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 39 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 18 FPS, making it nearly unplayable without significant settings reductions.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles with most modern games. Valorant runs at 305 FPS, but this is an outlier. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 109 FPS, which is good for 4K. Most other titles fall below 60 FPS: Cyberpunk 2077 at 28 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 9 FPS. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is not the limiting factor here; rather, the raw compute power is insufficient for 4K ultra settings in demanding titles.

Who Should Build It

This system is suited for gamers who primarily play at 1080p or 1440p. At 1080p, the system achieves over 60 FPS in the majority of tested games, with many esports titles exceeding 144 FPS. At 1440p, the system still delivers over 60 FPS in most games, but some AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2 will require settings adjustments to hit that mark. The data suggests that 4K gaming is possible but not ideal, as many titles will not reach 60 FPS.

Content creators will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 indicates that video editing, 3D rendering, and code compilation will be smooth. The GPU’s compute score of 10963 in PassMark also supports GPU-accelerated workflows. Students and small business users will find the system more than adequate for office tasks, web browsing, and light productivity, though the dedicated GPU is overkill for these uses.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is forward-looking for high-speed NVMe SSDs and future GPUs. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slot.

The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 200 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, which provides headroom for the combined system draw. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors. The CPU is not multiplier unlocked, so overclocking is limited to adjusting via the base clock or relying on the boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the primary candidate. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking suggests it has more headroom than the GPU’s 58th percentile. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would improve 1440p and 4K performance, as the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 memory could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, though the data does not quantify this.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 71, meaning it outperforms 71% of all tracked CPU+GPU pairings.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games?

A: The average FPS across all games is 125.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed as true for the Intel Core i5-14400F.

Q: What is the GPU's boost clock speed?

A: The GPU's boost clock is 2459 MHz.

Q: What is the CPU's launch MSRP?

A: The CPU's launch MSRP is $196.

Q: What is the pair rank by FPS?

A: The pair ranks 1794 out of 3732 pairs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) that combines the Intel Core i5-14400F with the AMD Radeon RX 7700. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part with an 83rd percentile ranking, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.0 part with a 58th percentile ranking. The combined percentile is 71, placing this system in the upper-middle tier of all tracked builds.

The CPU’s avgBenchmarkScore is 32279, and the GPU’s avgBenchmarkScore is 15852. The system’s average FPS across games is 125. The pair is ranked 1794 out of 3732, which is slightly below the median. This indicates that while the system is capable, there are many faster pairings. The build is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it excels, rather than 4K gaming, where it is limited.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is based on the Navi 32 chip, built on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. It also has 40 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 1900 MHz, the boost clock is 2459 MHz, and the game clock is 2041 MHz.

The memory subsystem is substantial: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This bandwidth is critical for high-resolution textures and compute workloads. The pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 25.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). This compute capability is reflected in the PassMark GPU compute score of 10963.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C. The card is dual-slot, 267 mm long, 135 mm high, and 50 mm wide. It requires a 550 W PSU and 2x 8-pin power connectors.

For rendering tasks, the GPU’s 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance is significant. This makes it suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that support OpenCL or DirectX compute. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance. The PassMark G3D score of 20974 shows strong rasterization. The GPU’s 58th percentile ranking means it is better than most, but not at the top tier.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the system achieves over 144 FPS in many esports titles. Valorant runs at 447 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 431 FPS. This makes it ideal for competitive gamers with high-refresh monitors. At 1440p, the frame rates are still high, with Valorant at 381 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 129 FPS.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and 10 cores provide enough headroom to encode video while gaming. The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 21645 indicates strong performance for x264 encoding. The GPU’s compute capabilities can also offload encoding tasks, though the data does not specify encoder quality.

Video Editing: The CPU’s multi-core performance is well-suited for video editing. The Geekbench multi-core score of 11268 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 indicate smooth timeline scrubbing and fast export times. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM can handle large video projects and GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads will render scenes efficiently in CPU-based renderers. The GPU’s 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates GPU-based renderers. The combination allows for hybrid rendering workflows, though the GPU’s 58th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier renderer.

Software Development: The CPU’s multi-core performance speeds up code compilation. The 25470 PassMark multithread score and 81524 integer math score indicate strong performance for build tasks. The 16 threads allow for parallel compilation, reducing wait times.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for basic office tasks. The CPU’s single-thread performance of 3701 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness. The GPU is unnecessary for document editing or web browsing, but the system will handle these tasks with no performance issues.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400F

AMD Radeon RX 7700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds