SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

42,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE form a desktop pairing that sits at the 83rd percentile across all CPU and GPU combinations, according to the aggregated benchmark database. The CPU, a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part on Intel Socket 1700, delivers strong multi-threaded throughput with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645, while the GPU, based on the RDNA 3.0 Navi 33 chip, posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336. This combination targets high-refresh 1080p gaming and mainstream content creation, though the data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate discussions below are estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor built on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. Its base clock runs at 2.50 GHz, boosting up to 4.70 GHz, and it carries a 65 W TDP, making it a power-efficient choice for a desktop build. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache, which contributes to its responsiveness in both lightly threaded and heavily threaded workloads.

In multi-threaded benchmarks, the chip demonstrates its core-count advantage. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 places it well ahead of many older high-end parts, while the single-core score of 3055 shows strong per-thread performance for everyday tasks. Geekbench results reinforce this picture: a multi-core score of 11268 and a single-core score of 2058. The PassMark suite adds granularity—integer math scores 81524, floating point math scores 61319, and multithreaded performance scores 25470. Data compression hits 315521, encryption manages 16949, and extended instructions score 19937. Prime number finding is a weak point at 86, indicating that certain specialized workloads will not scale as well, but the overall average benchmark score of 32279 places the CPU at the 83rd percentile of all processors.

Looking at nearest rivals, the i5-14400F is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which scores 32233, a delta of just 0.1%. It also edges out the Intel Core i9-11900 (32226, 0.2% ahead) and the Intel Core i7-12800H (32121, 0.5% ahead), while trailing the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS by a negligible 0.2% (32354). This means the chip sits in a dense performance band where no single rival dominates—real-world differences will come down to platform features and thermals rather than raw compute. For software development, the 16 threads handle compilation parallelism well, and the single-core boost supports snappy IDE responsiveness. For office work, the 65 W TDP keeps cooling simple, and the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support offers flexibility in platform cost.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 7650 GRE’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2336, combined with the i5-14400F’s strong single-core Cinebench R23 result of 3055, suggests the pairing can drive high frame rates at 1080p in esports titles, though exact FPS figures are not measured. The GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for most competitive shooters, while the CPU’s 4.70 GHz boost ensures minimal frame-time spikes.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and 20 MB L3 cache provide headroom for encoding overhead, but the PassMark encryption score of 16949 indicates that hardware encoding on the GPU—which supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4—will offload the burden more efficiently. The 65 W TDP keeps thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing: Cinebench R20 multi-core at 9090 and R15 multi-core at 2181 show strong render scaling, while the GPU’s 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates effects and exports in GPU-accelerated editors. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and light 1440p timelines, but 4K multi-layer projects may exceed it.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 places it in the upper tier for CPU-based rendering, and the GPU’s 2048 shading units with 64 ROPs handle viewport and final-frame GPU renderers. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2336 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance for real-time viewports.

Software development: With 16 threads and a PassMark multithreaded score of 25470, the CPU excels at parallel builds. The 215 mm² die size and 10 nm process contribute to consistent all-core boost behavior, while the memory bus supports both DDR4 and DDR5, letting developers choose capacity over speed.

Student and office work: Single-core Cinebench R23 at 3055 and Geekbench single-core at 2058 ensure snappy document editing and web browsing. The 65 W TDP and active production status mean the CPU is readily available for budget-conscious builds, though the launch MSRP of $196 reflects its midrange positioning.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has 10 cores and 16 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node.

Q: What are the CPU’s clock speeds?

A: The base clock is 2.50 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Which memory types does the CPU support?

A: It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U?

A: The i5-14400F scores 32279 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U’s 32233, making them statistically equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU’s power requirement?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 170 W, and the suggested PSU is 450 W, with a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: Does the database include measured FPS for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

The i5-14400F and RX 7650 GRE combination suits gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh monitors, as the CPU’s single-core score of 3055 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2336 align with the demands of fast-paced titles. Content creators working on 1080p video editing will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9090 and the GPU’s 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, though they should watch the 8 GB VRAM ceiling. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16 threads and PassMark multithreaded score of 25470, while the DDR4/DDR5 support allows flexible memory configurations. Students and office workers get a quiet, power-efficient system with a 65 W CPU TDP, and small business workstations can leverage the ECC memory support for data integrity. The GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking among all GPUs, tied with the CPU’s same percentile, makes this a balanced midrange desktop for users who do not need flagship performance but refuse to compromise on everyday responsiveness.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32279, placing it at the 83rd percentile versus all CPUs. Its strongest results come from Cinebench R23 multi-core at 21645 and PassMark integer math at 81524, while the weakest is the PassMark prime number score of 86. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 42723, also at the 83rd percentile versus all GPUs, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109. The combined percentile for this pairing is 83, meaning it outperforms roughly 83% of all recorded CPU-GPU combinations.

Compared to nearest GPU rivals, the RX 7650 GRE sits 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43223) and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43262), and 1.3% behind the RTX 5050 Mobile (43268) and the Quadro M6000 (43301). These deltas are small, so the RX 7650 GRE trades blows with those cards in most workloads, though the RTX 4070 SUPER’s higher raw score suggests better ray tracing or driver optimization in certain titles. The CPU’s nearest rivals show it is effectively tied with the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and i9-11900, meaning no single competitor holds a decisive edge. Together, the CPU and GPU form a pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other, which is a sign of good balance for mixed workloads.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2336 and the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3055 suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, the pairing can likely maintain 60–100 FPS in AAA titles, depending on the game’s engine optimization. For esports titles like competitive shooters, the high boost clock and strong single-core performance point toward 144+ FPS at 1080p with reduced settings, though again this is an estimate. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth may become limiting in texture-heavy games, dropping frame rates into the 50–70 FPS range on ultra. The GPU’s 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 compute handles modern DirectX 12 Ultimate titles well, but the 128-bit memory bus will constrain performance in VRAM-hungry scenarios. Since there are no measured rows, treat these numbers as directional rather than precise.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU both sit at the 83rd percentile, which indicates a well-matched pairing where neither component consistently limits the other. In CPU-bound scenarios like high-refresh 1080p gaming, the i5-14400F’s single-core score of 3055 and boost clock of 4.70 GHz provide enough headroom to feed the GPU, so the RX 7650 GRE becomes the limiting factor in most titles. In multi-threaded workloads like 3D rendering, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 will be the bottleneck, as the GPU’s compute is not fully utilized. The PassMark data shows the CPU excels at integer math (81524) and floating point (61319), which covers most game logic and physics, while the GPU’s 2048 shading units handle pixel and vertex processing. The 65 W CPU TDP versus the 170 W GPU TDP means the GPU draws significantly more power, so a 450 W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom without leaving excessive margin. The CPU’s 20 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in games, while the GPU’s 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p but may bottleneck at higher resolutions. Overall, the bottleneck shifts between workloads, but the matched percentiles suggest neither component is a glaring weak point.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, giving builders the option to reuse older DDR4 sticks or invest in newer DDR5 kits. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a forward-looking feature for future GPUs and NVMe storage, though the RX 7650 GRE itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The platform supports ECC memory, which is valuable for small business workstations handling critical data. The 65 W TDP means most mainstream coolers will suffice, and the CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is off the table—upgrades will come from replacing the CPU entirely. On the GPU side, the RX 7650 GRE uses a single 8-pin power connector and has a 170 W TDP, with a 450 W suggested PSU, so a PSU upgrade may be necessary if the rest of the system draws significant power. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU with more VRAM, as the 8 GB capacity is the most likely future constraint, while the CPU’s 16 threads and 4.70 GHz boost will remain relevant for several years. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a future GPU upgrade will not be bottlenecked by the bus interface.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class pairing the Intel Core i5-14400F with the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part on Intel Socket 1700, with a 65 W TDP and a launch MSRP of $196. The GPU is a Radeon RX 7000 series card based on the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, 8 GB GDDR6 memory, and a 170 W TDP, released in February 2025. Both components hold the 83rd percentile in their respective categories, and the combined percentile is also 83, indicating a mid-to-upper-tier system that outperforms the majority of recorded builds. The pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming at high settings, mainstream content creation, and developer workloads that benefit from 16 threads. With no measured FPS data available, performance expectations rest on the benchmark scores, which show a balanced system where CPU and GPU contribute roughly equally across workloads. This is a practical, power-conscious desktop that avoids the extremes of flagship pricing while delivering solid all-around performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400F

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds