SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

17,083 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT form a cohesive desktop pairing that lands at the 72nd percentile among all CPU-GPU combinations. The data indicates a system engineered for high-refresh 1080p gaming and capable 1440p performance, with the CPU’s strong single-threaded showing complementing the GPU’s substantial 16 GB frame buffer. This analysis walks through the benchmark data to clarify where each component leads, where the system bottlenecks, and which workloads benefit most from this configuration.

Balance and Bottleneck

Examining the performance distribution, the CPU holds an 83rd percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 60th percentile among all graphics cards. This 23-percentile gap is the primary indicator of system balance: the Core i5-14400F is positioned to feed frames faster than the RX 7600 XT can render them at higher resolutions. In practical terms, at 1080p, the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3701 and multi-thread score of 25470 provide ample headroom for the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 17132, meaning the graphics card will typically be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

The FPS scaling across resolutions confirms this dynamic. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the system delivers 162.9 FPS at 1920x1080, dropping to 109.4 FPS at 2560x1440, and further to 60.9 FPS at 3840x2160. This steep decline with resolution indicates GPU-bound behavior; the CPU’s workload remains relatively constant, but the GPU’s pixel-pushing demands increase. Conversely, in CPU-light titles like Valorant, the system achieves 366.8 FPS at 1080p, showing that the processor can drive very high frame rates when the GPU is not saturated. The bottleneck shifts decisively to the GPU as resolution climbs, which is expected given the GPU’s 60th percentile standing versus the CPU’s 83rd.

The data suggests a slight CPU advantage in raw compute, but this does not translate to a problematic imbalance. The pair’s average FPS across all tested games is 106.2, ranking 2417 out of 3732 pairs. This rank, while in the lower-middle of the distribution, reflects the GPU’s mid-tier positioning rather than a CPU deficiency. For 1080p high-refresh gaming, the balance is favorable; for 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as evidenced by the significant FPS drops—for instance, Red Dead Redemption 2 falls from 42.5 FPS at 1080p to 21.7 FPS at 4K.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-14400F delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and a single-core score of 3055, which positions it 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900 in average benchmark score. In Geekbench, the CPU scores 11268 multi-core and 2058 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 25470 and a single-thread score of 3701, with specialized workloads like data compression hitting 315521 and floating-point math reaching 61319. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32279, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 92426, and a Vulkan score of 48366. Its PassMark G3D score is 17132, with a GPU compute score of 8987. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 17083, putting it in the 60th percentile. Compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 7600 XT is 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 7970M, but 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its immediate rivals in multi-threaded tasks, while the GPU sits just below the RTX 3070 in average score. This means the pair is well-suited for applications that leverage the CPU’s multi-core strength—such as video encoding or compilation—while the GPU handles graphics workloads adequately for mid-range 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming. The 72nd combined percentile suggests a system that is better than average but not top-tier, with the CPU providing more headroom than the GPU can utilize at higher resolutions.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s base clock is 1980 MHz, with a game clock of 2470 MHz and a boost clock of 2755 MHz. Memory runs at 2250 MHz, effectively 18 Gbps. The card has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 raster operations pipelines, and 32 ray tracing cores. It achieves a pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s, and delivers 22.57 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 compute (1:1).

The 16 GB VRAM is a defining feature, particularly for modern titles and content creation. In the benchmark data, the GPU’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 65 and DirectX 11 score of 167 are modest, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2348 indicates solid DX12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 92426 suggests strong general-purpose compute, which is useful for rendering tasks. For ray tracing, the 32 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, but the performance in RT-heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077—which runs at 47.9 FPS at 1080p—shows that the GPU is not a ray tracing powerhouse. The 22.57 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is respectable for a mid-range card, making it suitable for GPU-accelerated workloads like video encoding or Blender rendering, though the 60th percentile ranking indicates it is not a top-tier compute device.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is targeted at gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh rates and are willing to accept 1440p as a secondary resolution. The CPU’s 83rd percentile and the GPU’s 60th percentile mean that esports titles like Valorant (366.8 FPS at 1080p) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (360 FPS at 1080p) will run exceptionally well on high-refresh monitors. For AAA games at 1440p, the system delivers playable frame rates—Call of Duty: Warzone hits 128.1 FPS, while Cyberpunk 2077 manages 39 FPS—making it suitable for gamers who prefer competitive titles over maxed-out visuals.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 21645) and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM, which allows for larger textures and scenes. Software developers compiling code will leverage the 10 cores and 16 threads, with PassMark integer math scoring 81524. Students and small business users building a workstation will find the system handles office productivity, web browsing, and light multitasking without issue, supported by the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3701. The system is not ideal for 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing workloads, as the FPS data shows significant drops at 3840x2160.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the system excels at 1080p. Valorant runs at 366.8 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 162.9 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 194 FPS, all well above the 144 Hz threshold. At 1440p, these titles still maintain high frame rates—Valorant at 312.8 FPS and Rainbow Six Siege at 127 FPS—making the system a strong choice for competitive shooters.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 ensures the processor can handle game encoding alongside gameplay. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM also provides headroom for streaming overlays and background applications. In practice, titles like Fortnite (77.4 FPS at 1080p) or Warzone (145 FPS at 1080p) can be streamed without significant frame drops, though the GPU may become a limiting factor at higher resolutions.

Video editing is a mixed scenario. The CPU’s multi-core performance accelerates rendering and export times, with PassMark multi-thread scoring 25470. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is beneficial for timeline scrubbing and effect previews, but the 60th percentile GPU ranking means 4K editing with heavy effects may lag. For 1080p editing, the system is more than capable.

3D rendering relies on both CPU and GPU. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 handles CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates GPU-based renderers. The 16 GB VRAM allows for larger scenes, but the 60th percentile GPU ranking suggests render times will be moderate compared to higher-end cards.

Software development is a strong suit for the CPU. The 10 cores and 16 threads, combined with PassMark integer math of 81524 and data encryption of 16949, handle compilation and testing efficiently. The GPU is sufficient for running virtualized environments or basic graphical interfaces, though the system is not designed for machine learning training, given the GPU’s lack of tensor cores.

Student and office work is easily handled. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3701 ensures responsive application performance, while the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low. The system can run multiple productivity applications, web browsers, and communication tools simultaneously, as evidenced by the CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings shows the system’s strengths and weaknesses. At 1920x1080, esports titles perform exceptionally: Valorant at 366.8 FPS, CS:GO at 360 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 194 FPS. Competitive shooters like Counter-Strike 2 hit 162.9 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone reaches 145 FPS. Slightly older or lighter titles also run well—Minecraft at 161 FPS, Roblox at 211 FPS, and Barony at 139.9 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance remains playable for most titles. Valorant drops to 312.8 FPS, Warzone to 128.1 FPS, and CS2 to 109.4 FPS. Heavier games like Cyberpunk 2077 fall to 39 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 31.8 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 15 FPS, indicating that 1440p ultra is only viable for less demanding games. At 3840x2160, the system struggles: Cyberpunk 2077 at 26.2 FPS, RDR2 at 21.7 FPS, and Ark at 8 FPS are not playable. Lighter titles like Valorant (251.6 FPS) and CS:GO (146 FPS) remain smooth, but the GPU is clearly the bottleneck at 4K.

The data confirms that 1080p is the sweet spot, with an average of 106.2 FPS across all tested games. For 1440p, users should expect to lower settings for demanding titles, as the GPU’s 60th percentile ranking limits ultra-settings performance. The system is not recommended for 4K gaming, as the FPS data shows most AAA games fall below 30 FPS at that resolution.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14400F uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. This means the motherboard must have a compatible socket and chipset to support the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 interface is backward compatible. The system supports ECC memory, which is a bonus for workstation use.

The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 190 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. This indicates a modest power draw, allowing for a wide range of power supplies. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card measuring 204 mm in length. For upgrades, the platform supports a range of 14th Gen Core processors, allowing users to move to a higher-core-count CPU without changing the motherboard. However, the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface means future GPU upgrades should use PCIe 4.0 or better, though the 16 GB VRAM on the current card is already substantial.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to increase the GPU to a higher-tier card, as the CPU has headroom (83rd percentile) to support faster graphics. The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for several more years, but users seeking more multi-threaded performance could upgrade to a Core i7 or i9 on the same socket. Memory can be upgraded to DDR5 for better bandwidth, though the current dual-channel support is adequate. The 450 W PSU requirement suggests there is headroom for a more power-hungry GPU, but users should verify the PSU’s capacity before upgrading.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i5-14400F scores 21645 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, with an average benchmark score of 32279. This places it 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900, but 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a substantial amount for a mid-range card, aiding in high-resolution textures and larger scenes.

Q: Is this system suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. Measured FPS at 3840x2160 shows most AAA titles below 30 FPS—Cyberpunk 2077 at 26.2 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 8 FPS. Lighter titles like Valorant (251.6 FPS) are playable, but the GPU is the bottleneck.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The pair ranks at the 72nd combined percentile, with an average FPS of 106.2 across all tested games, ranking 2417 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14400F supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation stability. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing performance?

A: The GPU has 32 RT cores, but performance in ray-traced titles is modest. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 47.9 FPS at 1080p ultra, indicating that ray tracing will require lower settings for playable frame rates.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this system?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W, based on the CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 190 W TDP. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. It has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU.

The benchmark scores indicate a strong multi-threaded performer. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 21645, and PassMark multi-thread scores 25470. Single-thread performance is equally robust, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3055 and PassMark single-thread at 3701. In specialized workloads, the CPU excels at data compression (315521), integer math (81524), and floating-point math (61319), but its find prime numbers score of 86 is notably low. The 83rd percentile ranking shows it outperforms most CPUs, with the nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which is only 0.1% behind in average score.

For real workloads, the 10 cores and 16 threads handle multitasking, video editing, and software compilation efficiently. The high single-thread score ensures responsiveness in everyday applications and gaming, where the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them. The 20 MB L3 cache aids in gaming performance, and the lack of integrated graphics means the system relies entirely on the discrete GPU, which is a deliberate choice for users who will always have a dedicated graphics card.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines the Intel Core i5-14400F with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, creating a mid-range system that prioritizes 1080p high-refresh gaming and productivity. The CPU, with its 83rd percentile ranking, is a strong performer for its class, while the GPU, at the 60th percentile, is a capable mid-tier card. The combined 72nd percentile places this system above average but not in the top tier of performance.

The pairing is well-matched for 1080p gaming, where the CPU’s single-thread strength and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM deliver high frame rates in esports titles and playable performance in AAA games. At 1440p, the system is viable for less demanding games, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor for heavier titles. The CPU’s multi-core prowess makes the system suitable for content creation and development, while the 65 W TDP and 450 W PSU requirement keep power consumption reasonable.

Overall, this build represents a sensible mid-range desktop for gamers who prioritize frame rates over resolution, and for users who need a balanced system for both gaming and productivity. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU is a future-proofing advantage, while the CPU’s 10 cores provide ample processing power for years to come. The system is not designed for 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, but within its intended use case, it delivers strong, measured performance.