SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 form a mainstream desktop pairing that targets 1080p and 1440p gaming without demanding flagship investment. The CPU, a Raptor Lake Refresh part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, brings a 10-core, 16-thread configuration with a 2.50 GHz base clock and a 4.70 GHz boost clock. This is a locked multiplier chip, meaning overclocking is not part of the equation, but the 65 W TDP keeps thermal and power requirements modest. The architecture is Raptor Lake on a 10 nm process, with a 215 mm² die size. Cache is generous for the class: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 pool. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and it includes ECC memory support, a feature typically found in workstation-oriented parts. It also provides PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, though the GPU in this build runs on PCIe 4.0 x8, so the platform has headroom for future expansion.

Benchmark results for the i5-14400F show a strong all-rounder profile. In Cinebench R23, it scores 21,645 in multi-core and 3,055 in single-core. The multi-core figure is the headline: it indicates the 10 cores can sustain heavy threaded loads like video encoding and 3D rendering. Single-core performance of 3,055 is equally important for everyday responsiveness and gaming, where the boost clock of 4.70 GHz does the heavy lifting. The Geekbench scores of 11,268 multi-core and 2,058 single-core corroborate this, with the multi-core result being particularly strong for a 65 W part. The PassMark suite breaks down specialized tasks: integer math at 81,524, floating point at 61,319, and extended instructions at 19,937. Data compression scores 315,521, while encryption hits 16,949. The multithread score of 25,470 and single-thread score of 3,701 place this CPU in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs tracked. Its average benchmark score of 32,279 sits within 0.5% of rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (32,233), Intel Core i9-11900 (32,226), and AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (32,354), making it statistically equivalent to those parts in raw aggregate performance. In real workloads, this means the i5-14400F is not a specialist; it handles a mix of productivity, content creation, and gaming without a clear weak point.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i5-14400F and RX 7600 is typical of a mid-range build, where the GPU is the primary limiter in gaming scenarios, but the CPU is no slouch. The combined percentile for this pair is 70, indicating that both components are above average but not top-tier. The data shows that in games, the pair’s average FPS across all tested titles at 1080p is 104.5, but this number hides significant variance. The pair’s rank by FPS is 2,504 out of 3,732 pairs, meaning that while it is not in the top tier, it outperforms a majority of other CPU-GPU combinations. The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. In lightly-threaded, high-refresh esports titles like Valorant, the CPU’s single-core strength (3,055 Cinebench R23 single-core) is crucial, and the data shows 361.1 FPS at 1080p, indicating the CPU is not holding back the GPU. Conversely, in graphically demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the RX 7600’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus become the limiting factor, with only 46.4 FPS at 1080p, suggesting the GPU is saturated.

The FPS scaling across resolutions reveals where the bottleneck sits. For example, in Call of Duty: Warzone, the pair drops from 143.1 FPS at 1080p to 128.7 FPS at 1440p, but still manages 107.1 FPS at 4K. This small drop from 1440p to 4K indicates the CPU is doing the heavy lifting at lower resolutions, while the GPU’s memory bandwidth (288.0 GB/s) starts to constrain at 4K. In contrast, Ark: Survival Ascended drops from 21.4 FPS at 1080p to 6.8 FPS at 4K, a catastrophic scaling that points squarely at the GPU being overwhelmed by the game’s demands. The data suggests that for most modern AAA titles, the RX 7600 is the bottleneck at 1440p and above, while the i5-14400F has enough headroom to keep up with faster GPUs if the user upgrades later. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 1,523 and multithread score of 25,470 indicate it can handle the background tasks of streaming or recording without significantly impacting game FPS, but the GPU’s compute score of 8,790 in PassMark shows it is the weaker link for compute-heavy rendering.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The die size is 204 mm² with 13,300 million transistors, a dense packing that yields a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². Clock speeds are a highlight: a base of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2250 MHz, and a boost clock of 2655 MHz. The memory subsystem is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is the card’s main limitation; 8 GB is becoming marginal for 1440p ultra settings in the latest titles, and the 128-bit bus restricts bandwidth compared to wider-memory rivals. The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray accelerators, which are the RDNA 3 equivalent of RT cores. The lack of dedicated tensor cores is notable, as AMD relies on shader-based FSR rather than dedicated AI hardware for upscaling.

The RX 7600’s pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s and texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 21.75 TFLOPS. In benchmarks, it scores 16,634 in PassMark G3D, which places it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 15,171. The nearest rivals are revealing: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15,199 (0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro 560X scores 15,082 (0.6% higher), and the AMD Radeon 680M integrated GPU scores 15,270 (0.7% higher). This means the RX 7600 is essentially tied with an entry-level discrete GPU and a high-end integrated GPU, which is a sobering comparison. However, the RX 7600’s advantage is in modern API support: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2,310, and in Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan, it scores 88,051 and 34,401 respectively. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 58 and DirectX 11 score of 172 are low, but these are synthetic and do not reflect real gaming performance. The GPU’s 165 W TDP and suggested 450 W PSU make it easy to integrate into a wide range of systems, and the dual-slot cooler with a single 8-pin connector is physically compact at 204 mm length.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this pair excels. Counter-Strike 2 hits 155.6 FPS, Valorant reaches 361.1 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X achieves 188.1 FPS. The CPU’s single-core strength ensures these esports titles run at high frame rates, and the GPU is sufficient for 144Hz monitors in most competitive shooters.

Streaming: The i5-14400F’s 16 threads handle encoding overhead well, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645. The PassMark multithread score of 25,470 confirms this. The GPU’s lack of dedicated tensor cores means streaming will rely on CPU encoding, but the 10 cores can manage game and encode simultaneously without severe FPS loss, as seen in games like Call of Duty: Warzone which still hit 143.1 FPS at 1080p.

Video editing: The CPU is the star here. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9,090 and Geekbench multi-core of 11,268 indicate strong rendering performance for 1080p and 1440p timelines. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 help with effects and previews, but the 128-bit bus may slow down 4K timeline scrubbing.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 20 MB L3 cache and 16 threads provide solid performance for CPU-based rendering, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645. For GPU rendering, the RX 7600’s 21.75 TFLOPS is respectable, but the 8 GB VRAM is a hard limit for complex scenes, making this a capable entry-level renderer rather than a professional tool.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 16 threads, with PassMark integer math scoring 81,524. The single-thread score of 3,701 in PassMark ensures fast IDE responsiveness. The ECC memory support is a bonus for stability in long compile sessions.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP and compact GPU make this build efficient. For office suites, web browsing, and light multitasking, the i5-14400F’s single-thread performance (3,055 Cinebench R23) is more than adequate. The GPU’s 2D performance in PassMark G2D is 984, which is sufficient for multiple monitors and productivity apps.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32,279, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong showing, with the nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U at 32,233 (0.1% higher). The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645 is particularly impressive for a 65 W part, and the single-core score of 3,055 beats many previous-generation high-end CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 15,171, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. The most direct rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM at 15,199 (0.2% lower), showing they are performance peers. The combined percentile for this pair is 70, indicating that while the CPU is well above average, the GPU drags the overall score down. In the pair ranking by FPS, this combination sits at 2,504 out of 3,732 pairs, with an average FPS of 104.5 across all games. This means the pair is faster than roughly 67% of all tested CPU-GPU combinations, a solid mid-pack result. The data shows that the i5-14400F is a top-tier mid-range CPU, while the RX 7600 is a competent but not exceptional GPU, and the combination performs as expected for a mainstream build.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured is true) provides a comprehensive view. At 1920x1080 ultra settings, the pair delivers playable frame rates in most titles, with notable exceptions. Esports and light games excel: Valorant leads at 361.1 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 344 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X reaches 188.1 FPS. Minecraft runs at 153 FPS, and Roblox at 200.6 FPS. For AAA titles, the picture is more mixed. Call of Duty: Warzone manages 143.1 FPS, which is excellent, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 46.4 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 43 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended is the worst at 21.4 FPS, and The Medium is at 34.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop significantly. Valorant still hits 304.2 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 34.2 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 32.4 FPS. Warzone remains playable at 128.7 FPS. At 3840x2160, only esports titles remain smooth: Valorant at 244.1 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 60.9 FPS, and Warzone at 107.1 FPS. Most AAA titles fall below 30 FPS at 4K, such as Cyberpunk 2077 at 22.5 FPS and Ark at 6.8 FPS. The data clearly shows that 1080p is the sweet spot, 1440p is viable for less demanding games, and 4K is only for esports or older titles.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who primarily play at 1080p and want high refresh rates in competitive shooters. The data shows 155.6 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 361.1 FPS in Valorant at 1080p, making it ideal for 144Hz or 240Hz monitors. For AAA gaming at 1080p, the pair delivers 60+ FPS in most titles, with exceptions like Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2 requiring settings adjustments. Content creators who edit 1080p or 1440p video will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, as shown by the Cinebench R23 score of 21,645. Students and office workers running productivity suites will find the 65 W CPU and 165 W GPU easy to power and cool. Small business workstations that need ECC memory support and reliable multi-threaded performance for spreadsheets, databases, and light virtualization can leverage the i5-14400F’s 16 threads and 20 MB L3 cache. However, 4K gamers or those who want to play the latest AAA titles at maximum settings should look elsewhere, as the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus of the RX 7600 are insufficient, as evidenced by 22.5 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i5-14400F’s average benchmark score is 32,279, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U’s 32,233 and 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i9-11900’s 32,226.

Q: Can this build handle 4K gaming?

A: Only for esports titles. Valorant hits 244.1 FPS at 4K, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 22.5 FPS and Ark: Survival Ascended to 6.8 FPS.

Q: What is the power supply requirement?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W, with the CPU having a 65 W TDP.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 32 ray accelerators and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The i5-14400F has a 65 W TDP, leaving significant headroom in a system with a 450 W suggested PSU. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 lanes, but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so there is bandwidth headroom for future expansion. The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU, as the CPU has a strong average benchmark score (32,279, 83rd percentile) that can keep up with faster cards. The RX 7600’s 8 GB VRAM is the limiting factor in modern games, so moving to a GPU with more VRAM and a wider bus would benefit 1440p and 4K gaming. The CPU’s 65 W TDP also means it could be paired with a more powerful GPU without thermal or power constraints, as long as the PSU is upgraded accordingly. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows users to choose based on motherboard price and availability. The ECC memory support is a unique feature for this segment, making it viable for entry-level workstations. The platform’s longevity is tied to the LGA 1700 socket, which is not expected to support future generations beyond Raptor Lake, but the current performance is sufficient for several years of mainstream use.