SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT — Desktop Build Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 10-core Raptor Lake Refresh CPU (Core i5-14400F) with AMD's RDNA 2 flagship GPU (Radeon RX 6950 XT), creating a desktop configuration that sits at the 86th percentile overall. The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 32279 (83rd percentile among all CPUs), while the GPU posts 58392 (88th percentile among all GPUs). Importantly, no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame-rate discussions below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores, not direct gameplay measurements.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has 10 cores and 16 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node. It runs at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts up to 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), with a boost clock of 2310 MHz and a game clock of 2100 MHz.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14400F supports ECC memory. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types over a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which means the GPU will operate at its full bandwidth without bottleneck from the CPU's PCIe lanes.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing hardware configuration?

A: The RX 6950 XT has 80 ray tracing cores, 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the Core i5-14400F has a locked multiplier. The "F" suffix also means it has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory for display output.

Q: What are the GPU's physical dimensions and power requirements?

A: The RX 6950 XT is a triple-slot card measuring 267 mm (10.5 inches) long, 120 mm (4.7 inches) tall, and 50 mm (2 inches) wide. It requires 2x 8-pin power connectors and a 700 W suggested PSU, with a 335 W TDP.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing where neither component dramatically overshadows the other in typical workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 32279 places it at the 83rd percentile, while the GPU's 58392 average score sits at the 88th percentile — a close alignment that suggests the CPU can feed the GPU adequately in most scenarios without severe starvation.

In CPU-bound workloads, the i5-14400F's single-thread performance is strong: Geekbench single-core scores 2058, Cinebench R23 single-core scores 3055, and PassMark single-thread scores 3701. These numbers indicate the CPU can sustain high instruction throughput per thread, which directly benefits gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-core picture is equally solid, with Cinebench R23 multi-core scoring 21645, Geekbench multi-core at 11268, and PassMark multithread at 25470. The PassMark physics score of 1523 reflects the CPU's capability in physics simulation, a common bottleneck in game engines.

The GPU's compute potential is substantial — PassMark G3D scores 28070, Geekbench OpenCL scores 205998, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 165212. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 4235 confirms strong DirectX 12 performance. With 16 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, the GPU is unlikely to be memory-starved in most gaming scenarios through 1440p and into 4K.

The bottleneck profile shifts by workload. For high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming, the CPU's single-core scores (307 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 1283 in Cinebench R20 single-core) will be the primary limiter, as frame generation rates depend heavily on per-thread performance. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's rasterization throughput (295.7 GPixel/s pixel rate, 739.2 GTexel/s texture rate) becomes the dominant factor, with the CPU's 10 cores providing ample headroom for background tasks and streaming overhead. For multi-threaded productivity, the CPU's 16 threads handle compilation and rendering workloads well, but the GPU's FP32 compute (23.65 TFLOPS) will accelerate GPU-accelerated tasks more decisively.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile of 86 places this pairing in the upper echelon of desktop configurations. The CPU's average benchmark score of 32279 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals: it sits 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (32233), 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900 (32226), 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (32354), and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12800H (32121). This clustering shows the i5-14400F is competitively positioned against both mobile and desktop parts from previous generations, though its 10-core/16-thread configuration delivers that performance at a 65 W TDP.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 58392 places it 0.2% behind the NVIDIA P102-100 (58528), 0.3% ahead of the Intel Arc A570M (58239), 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58657), and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085). The RX 6950 XT's 88th percentile ranking among all GPUs means it outperforms the vast majority of graphics cards, with its 16 GB VRAM buffer providing headroom for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

The combined picture shows a desktop build that excels at both CPU-intensive and GPU-intensive tasks. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 315521 and data encryption score of 16949 indicate strong throughput for storage and security workloads. The GPU's PassMark compute score of 14199 and Geekbench Metal score of 222653 (for macOS contexts, though this is a Windows-focused desktop) confirm robust compute capability. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4235 places the GPU in a class that handles demanding DX12 titles comfortably. Together, the CPU and GPU scores suggest a system that can handle 1440p gaming at high settings, 4K gaming at reduced settings, and content creation workloads without major compromises.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh monitors are the primary audience. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking and 16 GB VRAM, combined with the CPU's strong single-core scores (Cinebench R23 single-core 3055, Geekbench single-core 2058), provide the foundation for smooth frame rates in modern titles. At 4K, the GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 295.7 GPixel/s pixel rate support high-resolution textures, though frame rates will vary by title.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will find the CPU's 16 threads (Cinebench R23 multi-core 21645) and the GPU's FP32 compute (23.65 TFLOPS) useful for both CPU-based rendering and GPU-accelerated effects. The PassMark floating point math score of 61319 and integer math score of 81524 indicate strong arithmetic throughput for simulation and data processing tasks.

Software developers benefit from the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads for parallel compilation, while the PassMark extended instructions score of 19937 shows good SIMD (single instruction, multiple data) performance for optimized code. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build servers or workstations where data integrity is critical.

Students and small business users building a single workstation for mixed use will find this pairing overkill for basic office tasks but well-suited for engineering software, scientific computing, or media production coursework. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps cooling requirements modest, while the GPU's 335 W TDP requires a 700 W PSU and triple-slot case clearance — a practical consideration for desktop footprint.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R codename, 14th Gen series). It uses Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3. Base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and the chip carries a 65 W TDP. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support enabled. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, with PCIe Gen 5 providing 16 lanes for the CPU. Released on 2024-01-07, it has an active production status and a launch MSRP of $196.

Benchmark scores reveal a CPU that punches above its power envelope. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 21645, which is 0.1-0.5% above several rival processors including the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Core i9-11900. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3055 is competitive for gaming, where per-thread performance dictates frame pacing. PassMark single-thread scores 3701, while PassMark multithread scores 25470 — the delta between these numbers shows good scaling across the 16 threads.

For real workloads, the data suggests the i5-14400F handles compilation tasks efficiently (PassMark integer math 81524), manages compression workloads well (PassMark data compression 315521), and encrypts data quickly (PassMark data encryption 16949). The PassMark find prime numbers score of 86 is a weak point, indicating slower performance in heavy integer iteration loops that stress branch prediction and memory latency. The PassMark physics score of 1523 reflects adequate simulation performance but not class-leading physics throughput. The 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs means this processor outperforms roughly five out of six CPUs in the database, making it a solid mid-to-upper-range choice.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is built on the Navi 21 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. It packs 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 51.5M per mm². The GPU has 5120 shading units, 320 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 80 ray tracing cores. Base clock is 1860 MHz, boost clock is 2310 MHz, and game clock is 2100 MHz. Memory consists of 16 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and an effective 18 Gbps memory speed. The card draws 335 W TDP, requires 2x 8-pin power connectors, and carries a suggested PSU rating of 700 W. It is a triple-slot design measuring 267 mm long, 120 mm tall, and 50 mm wide. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 2x DisplayPort 1.4a. The GPU is end-of-life in production status, released 2022-05-09, with a launch MSRP of 1,099 USD.

Benchmark results show strong rasterization and compute performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 confirms DirectX 12 capability that rivals and in some cases exceeds newer mid-range parts — it sits 0.3% ahead of the Intel Arc A570M and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM. The PassMark G3D score of 28070 is robust for gaming, while PassMark G2D at 1063 indicates solid 2D acceleration for desktop and UI workloads.

Rendering performance is driven by the pixel rate of 295.7 GPixel/s and texture rate of 739.2 GTexel/s, which together allow high fill rates at 1440p and 4K. The FP32 compute of 23.65 TFLOPS (and FP16 at 47.31 TFLOPS with 2:1 ratio) provides substantial horsepower for GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender, DaVinci Resolve, or similar applications. The 80 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though RDNA 2's RT implementation is less mature than the competition — the 88th percentile ranking reflects overall performance, not RT-specific leadership. Geekbench OpenCL (205998) and Vulkan (165212) scores indicate strong cross-API compute compatibility. The 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage for large textures and machine learning inference workloads that exceed 8 GB or 12 GB capacities.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's single-core scores (Cinebench R23 single-core 3055, PassMark single-thread 3701) combined with the GPU's 570.6 GB/s-class bandwidth (576.0 GB/s) support frame rates that can push 144 Hz or higher in esports titles. The 88th percentile GPU ranking means most mainstream games will run at high-to-ultra settings without issue. These are estimates — no measured FPS data exists for this pairing.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads provide dedicated headroom for encoding software (x264) while gaming, with PassMark multithread at 25470 indicating sufficient parallel throughput. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 80 RT cores allow for hardware-accelerated encoding or streaming with high bitrate without excessive VRAM pressure. The combined percentile of 86 suggests a smooth streaming experience at 1080p or 1440p output.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding, while the GPU's FP32 compute of 23.65 TFLOPS accelerates effects, transitions, and color grading. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K multi-layer timelines without spilling to system memory. The PassMark data compression score of 315521 helps with intermediate codec handling.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering uses the 16 threads effectively (PassMark floating point math 61319), while GPU-based renderers (Blender Cycles, Octane) leverage the RX 6950 XT's 5120 shading units and 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces texture streaming bottlenecks in complex scenes.

Software development: The 10 cores and 16 threads accelerate compilation of large codebases, with PassMark integer math at 81524 showing strong arithmetic throughput. The ECC memory support provides data integrity for long builds or server-side development. The PassMark extended instructions score of 19937 indicates good SIMD performance for optimized code paths.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for basic productivity, but the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking means spreadsheet, database, and browser workloads run with zero perceptible lag. The GPU's 1063 PassMark G2D score ensures smooth UI rendering and multi-monitor setups (1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a). For engineering students running CAD or simulation software, the 16 GB VRAM and 128 ROPs provide ample acceleration.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") combining the Intel Core i5-14400F with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part on Socket 1700, while the GPU is a triple-slot RDNA 2 card with 16 GB GDDR6. The combined percentile of 86 places this system in the upper 14% of all configurations in the database. The CPU's 83rd percentile and GPU's 88th percentile are closely aligned, indicating a balanced pairing where neither component is a clear bottleneck. The CPU has a launch MSRP of $196; the GPU's launch MSRP is 1,099 USD. The CPU's 65 W TDP makes it easy to cool with a capable air cooler, while the GPU's 335 W TDP requires a 700 W PSU and triple-slot case clearance. The CPU's locked multiplier (no overclocking) and lack of integrated graphics (F-suffix) mean the system relies entirely on the discrete GPU for display output. The GPU is end-of-life in production status, but its 88th percentile performance keeps it relevant for current and near-future titles.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All frame-rate figures below are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores, not direct gameplay measurements.

The CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3055, Geekbench single-core 2058, PassMark single-thread 3701) suggests it can sustain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, particularly at 1080p where per-thread performance is critical. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 and PassMark G3D score of 28070 indicate strong rasterization throughput for modern titles.

At 1080p ultra settings, this pairing should deliver frame rates well above 100 FPS in most competitive shooters and action games, with the GPU's 5120 shading units and 295.7 GPixel/s pixel rate providing ample fill rate. The 16 GB VRAM ensures texture detail remains high without stutter.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU's 88th percentile ranking suggests it can maintain 60-100+ FPS in demanding AAA titles, with the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth reducing memory-related frame hitches. The CPU's 10 cores handle background tasks and game logic without bottlenecking the GPU at this resolution.

At 4K ultra, expect 30-60 FPS in the most demanding titles, with the GPU's 128 ROPs and 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 compute becoming the primary limiters. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures, but the 88th percentile means it trails top-tier current-gen GPUs in raw throughput.

Ray tracing performance is supported by 80 RT cores, but RDNA 2's RT implementation is not class-leading — expect to lower RT settings or resolution for playable frame rates in RT-heavy titles. For non-RT gaming, the estimates are favorable: this pairing should handle 1440p high-refresh gaming comfortably, with 4K as a viable but less consistent option.