SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT: Database Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's Core i5-14400F desktop processor with AMD's Radeon RX 6750 XT graphics card, creating a mainstream desktop build that sits at the 77th combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairs in the database. The CPU holds an 83rd percentile position among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 71st percentile among all graphics cards. Measured gaming data shows an average of 128.7 FPS across tested titles, placing this pair at rank 1657 out of 3732 tracked configurations. This is a capable, balanced desktop system for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with enough compute headroom for content creation and productivity workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The measured FPS data strongly supports this use case. At 1920x1080, esports titles like Valorant hit 444.9 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 reaches 195 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege delivers 232 FPS. Even more demanding titles at 1080p remain playable on high-refresh displays: Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 144 FPS, while Cyberpunk 2077 manages 58.2 FPS. The pair's average FPS across all tested games of 128.7 confirms 1080p high-refresh capability is a realistic expectation.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads provide solid headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 indicates strong multi-threaded throughput, which supports game capture and stream encoding alongside gameplay. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25470 reinforces this capacity. At 1440p, where the GPU handles more rendering load, the CPU has ample spare capacity for encoding tasks, though measured FPS in AAA titles at this resolution (e.g., 45.7 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077) suggests streamers should target 1080p for demanding games.

Video editing: The processor's multi-core performance is the key asset here. Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9090 and Geekbench multi-core score of 11268 indicate efficient timeline scrubbing and export rendering. The GPU's compute capability, measured at 9550 in PassMark GPU compute, accelerates effects processing and encoding. The 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth supports working with high-resolution footage without constant texture swapping. This is a competent 1080p or entry-level 1440p editing workstation.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering workloads will perform admirably. Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2181 and R23 multi-core score of 21645 show the i5-14400F handles sequential rendering tasks well. GPU-accelerated rendering benefits from the RX 6750 XT's 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 2560 shading units. The 40 ray accelerators provide hardware RT support, though measured gaming RT performance (e.g., 58.2 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p) suggests ray-traced rendering will be modest rather than state-of-the-art.

Software development: Compilation workloads leverage the 10-core, 16-thread configuration effectively. PassMark integer math score of 81524 and data compression score of 315521 indicate strong performance for code compilation and build processes. The 20 MB shared L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code segments. Single-threaded performance, measured at 3055 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3701 in PassMark single-thread, ensures responsive IDE interaction and fast syntax checking. DDR4 and DDR5 memory support allows builders to match memory speed to their budget.

Student and office work: This configuration is overwhelmingly sufficient for document processing, spreadsheet work, and web browsing. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of installed processors. Single-core Geekbench score of 2058 handles office applications with ease. The GPU's capabilities are largely unnecessary for this workload, but the headroom means no task will ever feel sluggish. The 65W CPU TDP keeps power consumption modest, and the GPU's 250W TDP is manageable for standard office power supplies.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance ranking of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The pair sits at the 77th combined percentile across all tracked CPU+GPU configurations. It ranks 1657th out of 3732 pairs by average FPS across tested games, with an average of 128.7 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14400F's average benchmark score of 32279 is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900, 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12800H, and 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is also supported, which is unusual for a consumer desktop processor.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and how does it compare to rivals?

A: The Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks at the 71st percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 26011 is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, 0.6% ahead of the AMD FirePro W7100, 0.7% ahead of the AMD FirePro D700, and 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU rating is 600 W. The CPU has a 65W TDP, and the GPU has a 250W TDP, so a quality 600W unit provides sufficient headroom for the full system.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the i5-14400F has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A). A discrete GPU is required for display output, which makes the RX 6750 XT a mandatory component.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The Radeon RX 6750 XT uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, meaning the GPU has backward-compatible bandwidth headroom for future upgrades.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark profile shows a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. Geekbench scores of 2058 single-core and 11268 multi-core place it firmly in the upper tier of desktop processors. Cinebench R23 results of 3055 single-core and 21645 multi-core confirm this assessment. The PassMark single-thread score of 3701 and multithread score of 25470 reinforce the balanced performance profile. These results place the CPU at the 83rd percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 32279.

The GPU's benchmark suite demonstrates strong rasterization performance with solid compute capabilities. The PassMark G3D score of 20700 is the headline figure, placing the RX 6750 XT at the 71st percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 reflects modern DirectX 12 gaming performance. Geekbench scores of 98089 for Vulkan and 137249 for Metal show strong cross-API compatibility. The OpenCL score of 16360 indicates compute workloads are handled competently. The GPU's average benchmark score is 26011.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative terms. The CPU's 83rd percentile versus the GPU's 71st percentile suggests the processor has more headroom than the graphics card. In gaming scenarios, this means the GPU will typically be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU can push higher frame rates at lower resolutions. The average FPS across games of 128.7, combined with the 77th combined percentile, indicates this is a well-matched pairing for mainstream gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

At 1080p resolution, the CPU and GPU are generally well-balanced for high-refresh gaming. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3055 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures it can feed the GPU in most titles. Measured data shows esports games reach very high frame rates: Valorant at 444.9 FPS and CS:GO at 428.9 FPS at 1080p, which suggests the CPU is not holding back in these CPU-bound titles. The pair's average FPS of 128.7 across all games at all resolutions indicates the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases.

At 1440p, the GPU begins to limit performance more noticeably. Call of Duty: Warzone drops from 144 FPS at 1080p to 128 FPS at 1440p, while Cyberpunk 2077 falls from 58.2 to 45.7 FPS. The GPU's 71st percentile ranking versus the CPU's 83rd percentile means the RX 6750 XT is the weaker component. This is not necessarily a problem—it means the CPU has upgrade headroom without creating a bottleneck.

At 4K resolution, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. Most titles fall below 60 FPS, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 29.1 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS. The CPU's performance headroom is irrelevant at this resolution because the GPU cannot render frames fast enough. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows the expected pattern of diminishing returns as resolution increases, confirming the GPU is the bottleneck at higher resolutions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10nm process node, built by Intel with a die size of 215 mm². It has 10 cores and 16 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores in a hybrid configuration. Base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support as a notable feature.

Benchmark results show a processor that performs slightly above its direct competition. The average benchmark score of 32279 places it 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12800H, with a 0.2% deficit to the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS. The 83rd percentile ranking means it outperforms 83% of all tracked CPUs. The PassMark data compression score of 315521 and integer math score of 81524 indicate strong compute throughput for productivity tasks.

The 65W TDP is notably modest for the performance level. This makes the CPU suitable for compact builds with smaller coolers, as power draw is low enough that a capable air cooler suffices. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the CPU uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The launch MSRP is $196. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported, but the high boost clock of 4.70 GHz provides performance without manual tuning.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: This is the sweet spot. Measured FPS shows most titles at 1080p exceed 60 FPS, and many exceed 100 FPS. Esports titles like Valorant (444.9 FPS) and CS:GO (428.9 FPS) are well beyond 144Hz display capabilities. AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (58.2 FPS) require some settings adjustment for smooth 60+ FPS, but are playable.

Gamers at 1440p: The experience remains good, but with compromises. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 128 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 129 FPS, which suits high-refresh 1440p monitors. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (45.7 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (39 FPS) require medium settings or upscaling for smooth gameplay.

Content creators: The CPU's multi-threaded performance (21645 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) handles video editing and 3D rendering workflows. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and compute scores support GPU-accelerated effects. This is a solid entry-level creator system.

Software developers: The 10-core, 16-thread configuration accelerates compilation, while the strong single-thread performance keeps IDEs responsive. The 20 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory support benefit code build processes.

Students and small business users: This system is heavily overqualified for typical office work, but the headroom ensures longevity. The 65W CPU TDP keeps electricity costs low, and the system will handle any productivity software without slowdown.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, confirmed as actual measurements (dataIsMeasured is true), provides a comprehensive picture of gaming capability. At 1920x1080, the pair delivers excellent performance across most titles. Esports and competitive games perform exceptionally well: Valorant at 444.9 FPS, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 232 FPS, CS:GO at 428.9 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 195 FPS. Popular multiplayer titles also perform strongly: Minecraft: Java Edition at 193.1 FPS, Roblox at 252 FPS, and Fortnite at 95.8 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong for competitive gaming but becomes more demanding for AAA titles. Valorant still hits 378.5 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege reaches 152 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone manages 128 FPS, and Assetto Corsa runs at 81.9 FPS. Heavier titles show the GPU's limits: Cyberpunk 2077 at 45.7 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 39 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 17.7 FPS are below ideal smoothness thresholds.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly overmatched for modern AAA titles. Most games fall below 60 FPS, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 29.1 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 109 FPS being the notable exception. Competitive games remain playable at 4K: Valorant at 303.8 FPS, CS:GO at 172.4 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 84 FPS. For 4K gaming, this system requires reduced settings or upscaling for modern titles.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass confirms desktop) pairing Intel's Core i5-14400F with AMD's Radeon RX 6750 XT. The CPU is from Intel's Core 14th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture, released on 2024-01-07. The GPU is from AMD's Radeon RX 6000 series, based on RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 22 chip, released on 2022-03-02. The GPU is end-of-life in production status, while the CPU remains active.

The system sits at the 77th combined percentile, meaning it outperforms 77% of all tracked CPU+GPU combinations. The pair ranks 1657th out of 3732 tracked pairs by average FPS, with an average of 128.7 FPS across all tested games. This places it in the upper-midrange tier of desktop configurations. The CPU's 83rd percentile and GPU's 71st percentile show a system where the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card.

This is a mainstream desktop configuration designed for 1080p high-refresh gaming and 1440p competitive gaming. It also handles productivity workloads competently. The GPU's launch MSRP was $549 USD, and the CPU's launch MSRP was $196. The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, requiring a 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connection.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which limits upgrade options to 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen Intel Core processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, meaning builders can choose their memory platform. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes from the CPU provides bandwidth headroom for future GPUs. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots.

The suggested PSU rating of 600W provides headroom for this configuration. The CPU's 65W TDP and GPU's 250W TDP draw a combined maximum of 315W under full load, leaving ample power budget for the rest of the system. A future GPU upgrade that consumes more power would require a PSU upgrade beyond the 600W recommendation.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has performance headroom above the current graphics card. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 71st percentile indicates the processor can support a faster GPU without becoming a bottleneck. The 12 GB VRAM on the current GPU is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but 4K gaming would benefit from a GPU with more memory and compute power.

The CPU's locked multiplier prevents overclocking, but the 4.70 GHz boost clock already provides high performance. The 65W TDP means the stock cooler is likely sufficient, though aftermarket cooling could maintain boost clocks more consistently. The GPU's dual-slot design and standard power connectors are compatible with most cases and power supplies. The display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a) support multi-monitor setups and high refresh rates.