SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

24,442 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines Intel’s Core i5-14400F with AMD’s Radeon RX 6600 XT, creating a desktop build that sits at the 77th percentile overall among all CPU-GPU combinations. The data shows a strong 1080p gaming focus with respectable 1440p capabilities, but with clear limitations at 4K. This analysis covers platform fit, benchmark standings, workload balance, and what you can realistically expect from this system.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the same socket used across Intel’s 12th, 13th, and 14th generation desktop processors. This means the motherboard you choose for this CPU can also support a wide range of other Intel chips, from lower-end i3 models to higher-core-count i7 and i9 parts within the same socket generation. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel memory bus, giving you flexibility in choosing between older, more common DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits depending on your motherboard’s memory slots. This dual-memory support is a practical advantage, as it allows a builder to reuse existing DDR4 RAM from a previous build or invest in DDR5 for future-proofing.

For storage and expansion, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself. This means the primary PCIe x16 slot for a graphics card is wired for Gen 5, though the RX 6600 XT in this build uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so it will run at Gen 4 speeds regardless. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes also apply to the first M.2 slot on most 1700 motherboards, enabling very fast NVMe SSDs if you choose to install one. The system’s power requirements are modest: the CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 160 W TDP, and the GPU’s suggested PSU is 450 W. This means a typical 500-550 W power supply from a reputable brand will have sufficient headroom for this build, and you won’t need to invest in an expensive high-wattage PSU.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to move to a higher-tier 14th Gen i7 or i9 processor, as they use the same Socket 1700 and will drop into the same motherboard with a BIOS update. That path lets you keep your existing board and RAM while gaining more cores and higher boost clocks for CPU-heavy tasks. However, note that this CPU has a locked multiplier, so overclocking is not an option; you are limited to Intel’s stock boost behavior. The platform itself is mature, and the upgrade path is clear if you need more CPU performance later, but the GPU will likely be the first component you replace for higher resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

Looking at the combined picture, this build’s CPU and GPU scores place it in the 77th percentile among all paired configurations. The CPU alone ranks in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, indicating a system where the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32279, which puts it within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (score 32233) and 0.2% of the Intel Core i9-11900 (score 32226). It is also 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12800H (score 32121) and 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (score 32354). These deltas are tiny, meaning the 14400F trades blows with those four rivals within a rounding error of performance.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 24442. It sits 0.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (score 24277), 0.8% ahead of the GTX 780 Ti (score 24236), and 1.1% ahead of the RTX 2080 SUPER (score 24170). It is 0.8% behind the Intel Arc A350M (score 24647). Again, these are near-identical scores, so the RX 6600 XT performs essentially on par with those four cards in aggregate benchmarks. In real-world gaming, the measured FPS data across 53 games at ultra settings gives an average of 103.4 FPS, which ranks this pair at 2563 out of 3732 pairs. That rank suggests that while the average frame rate is high, many other combinations deliver more consistent high-refresh-rate performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. Its base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and it has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The chip is built on Intel’s 10 nm process node, with a die size of 215 mm². This is a desktop-class CPU with no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory. It supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer chip and could appeal to small business or workstation users who want error-correcting RAM.

Benchmark scores show strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 21645 multi-core and 3055 single-core. For context, the multi-core score is about 7 times the single-core score, reflecting the 10-core/16-thread design. In Geekbench, it scores 11268 multi-core and 2058 single-core. The PassMark suite shows 25470 for multithread and 3701 for single-thread. The data compression score of 315521 and encryption score of 16949 indicate solid capability for file archiving and encrypted workloads. Integer math scores 81524 and floating point math scores 61319, which are typical for a mid-range desktop chip. The extended instructions score of 19937 suggests reasonable AVX/AVX2 throughput.

For a real-world workload interpretation, the 83rd percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. The near-identical scores to the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Core i9-11900 mean you would not notice a difference between this and those chips in everyday use. The 10 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for modern gaming, video editing, and software compilation. The 20 MB of L3 cache helps with gaming and productivity tasks that benefit from larger cache pools. The lack of a performance-per-watt advantage here is notable, but the 65 W TDP makes it easy to cool with a basic air cooler.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark percentile data reveals an imbalance: the CPU is in the 83rd percentile, while the GPU is in the 70th percentile. This suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the processor has headroom to drive more powerful graphics cards, but in GPU-bound scenarios, the RX 6600 XT will be the limiting factor. The combined percentile of 77 is lower than the CPU-only percentile, confirming that the GPU drags the overall performance down. For gaming at 1080p, the measured FPS data shows the CPU can feed the GPU well in many titles, but at higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck.

Looking at FPS scaling across resolutions, the pattern is typical: games like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive run at 343 FPS at 1080p, dropping to 236 FPS at 1440p and 139 FPS at 4K. This is a massive drop, indicating the GPU is struggling at higher pixel counts. In contrast, a CPU-heavy game like Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 57.9 FPS at 1080p, 43.6 FPS at 1440p, and 33.5 FPS at 4K. The smaller drop from 1440p to 4K (about 23%) compared to the 1080p to 1440p drop (about 25%) suggests the CPU is also a factor in that title. This mixed behavior means neither component is the universal bottleneck; it depends on the game.

For productivity workloads, the CPU will dominate most tasks, and the GPU’s relative weakness is less relevant. For gaming, the data shows that at 1080p, the average FPS of 103.4 across all games is respectable, but the pair rank of 2563 out of 3732 indicates that many other builds do much better. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality at 1440p and 4K in demanding titles, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077’s 46 FPS at 1080p and 23 FPS at 4K. If you plan to play at 1440p or higher, the CPU will sit idle more often while waiting on the GPU.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data for this build is based on actual testing, not estimates. At 1080p ultra settings, the system delivers high frame rates in esports titles: Valorant runs at 352.5 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 343 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 184 FPS. These are well above 144 Hz refresh rates, making this an excellent 1080p competitive gaming setup. Slightly older or lighter titles also perform well: Minecraft runs at 153 FPS, Roblox at 200.1 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 145.9 FPS.

At 1440p ultra, the numbers drop but remain playable for many games. Valorant still runs at 303.9 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 101.4 FPS, and Warzone at 129.6 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 34 FPS, which is borderline for smooth play. Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 31 FPS at 1440p, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 13.4 FPS, making it essentially unplayable at this resolution. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 43.6 FPS at 1440p, which is acceptable for a flight sim. For most single-player titles, 1440p ultra will require turning down settings to maintain 60 FPS.

At 4K ultra, the GPU is clearly overwhelmed. Valorant manages 239.1 FPS, but most games fall below 60 FPS. Warzone runs at 111.7 FPS, which is an outlier, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 23 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 21 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 5.4 FPS. The average FPS across all games at 4K is not listed, but the individual scores suggest that 4K gaming is only viable for esports or older titles. If you plan to play at 4K, this GPU will be the limiting factor, and you would need to lower settings significantly.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i5-14400F use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports Intel’s 12th, 13th, and 14th generation desktop processors.

Q: Does this CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is listed as "N/A," so a discrete GPU is required for any display output.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, using a dual-channel memory bus. Your choice depends on the motherboard.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 160 W TDP. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 450 W.

Q: Can I overclock this CPU?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false), so overclocking is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity?

A: The RX 6600 XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s L3 cache size?

A: The CPU has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, with 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core.

Who Should Build It

This build is clearly targeted at 1080p gamers who want high refresh rates in competitive titles. The measured FPS data shows that games like Valorant, CS:GO, and Rainbow Six Siege run at 300+ FPS at 1080p, which is ideal for 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors. For single-player games at 1080p ultra, the system delivers 60+ FPS in most titles, though the most demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2 will run in the 40s, requiring some settings adjustments for a locked 60 FPS. If you primarily play esports or older games, this is a strong match.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and PassMark multithread score of 25470 indicate solid productivity throughput. Students and small business users who need a reliable desktop for office work, web development, or light data analysis will find the CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking more than sufficient. The ECC memory support is a niche feature that could appeal to workstation users who need data integrity. However, for 1440p or 4K gaming, this build is not ideal; the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM will hold back performance. If you plan to move to higher resolutions, consider a stronger GPU later.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a mid-range 14th Gen Intel CPU with a mid-range AMD RDNA 2 GPU. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is a Navi 23-based card with 8 GB of VRAM and a 160 W TDP. The combined percentile of 77 places this system in the upper quarter of all CPU-GPU pairings, but the CPU’s 83rd percentile versus the GPU’s 70th percentile shows an asymmetry. The system’s measured average FPS across 53 games is 103.4, but the pair rank of 2563 out of 3732 indicates that while the average is good, many other builds achieve higher frame rates.

Overall, this is a balanced 1080p gaming system with strong CPU headroom for future GPU upgrades. The platform supports DDR4 or DDR5, PCIe Gen 5, and a clear upgrade path to higher-tier 14th Gen CPUs. The GPU is end-of-life, so it will be the first component to replace if you want to move beyond 1080p. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $196 and the GPU is 379 USD, but those are historical figures and not current pricing considerations. This build makes sense for someone who wants a capable 1080p machine today with an upgrade path for the future.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is based on the Navi 23 chip using the RDNA 2.0 architecture, built on TSMC’s 7 nm process. It has 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die, with a transistor density of 46.7 million per mm². The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It includes 32 ray tracing cores, which support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The base clock is 1968 MHz, with a boost clock of 2589 MHz and a game clock of 2359 MHz. Memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) on an 8 GB GDDR6 bus with a 128-bit width, yielding a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 165.7 GPixel/s, texture rate is 331.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 10.60 TFLOPS.

In benchmark scores, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score is 16461, and its PassMark GPU compute score is 7520. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1804, and Geekbench scores are 88720 for Metal, 80503 for OpenCL, and 72417 for Vulkan. The 70th percentile ranking means it outperforms 70% of all GPUs in the database. The nearest rivals include the GTX 1630 (0.7% slower), Arc A350M (0.8% faster), GTX 780 Ti (0.8% slower), and RTX 2080 SUPER (1.1% slower). These are all within 1.1% of the RX 6600 XT’s average score, so the performance differences are negligible.

For rendering and compute workloads, the FP32 throughput of 10.60 TFLOPS is respectable for a mid-range card, but the 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit large texture sets or heavy compute tasks. The ray tracing cores are present but limited in number (32), so ray-traced games will struggle at higher settings. The dual-slot cooler with a single 8-pin power connector fits most cases, and the card is 190 mm long, making it compatible with smaller mid-tower cases. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting modern monitors. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer in production, but its benchmark scores indicate it remains competitive with newer entry-level cards.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400F

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds